# BruceFief

Notes:
geld for Burton Agnes and its 6 jurisdictions recorded under Burton


Notes:
geld shared between Kirkburn & Tibthorpe. Part of land is Robert Fossard's Holding


Notes:
geld shared between Kirkburn & Tibthorpe


Notes:
geld shared between the Brantingham, North Cave and Hotham


Notes:
12.25 in Eskdaleside, that is Danby, Crunkly Gill, the 2 Hangtons & Lealholm


Notes:
Not in DB. Geld shared between the 2 Hangtons


# ByPlace

Vill:
[Allhallows, St Mary and St Werbergh] Hoo


Vill:
Cranbourne [Grange] and [Upper] Cranbourne


Vill:
Ogbourne [Maizey, St Andrew and St George]

stdVill:
Ogbourne Maizey, St Andrew and St George


Vill:
Stanton [St Quintin] and [Lower] Stanton [St Quintin]

stdVill:
Stanton St Quintin and Lower Stanton St Quintin


Vill:
[Broad] Blunsdon and Blunsdon [St Andrew]


Vill:
Easton [Piercy] and [Lower] Easton [Piercy]


Vill:
Blandford [St Mary] and [Lower] Blandford [St Mary]

stdVill:
Blandford St Mary and Lower Blandford St Mary


Vill:
Seavington [Abbots, St Mary and St Michael]

stdVill:
Seavington Abbots, St Mary and St Michael


Vill:
Callestick, [Higher] Callestick and Callestick [Vean]

stdVill:
Callestick, Higher Callestick and Callestick Vean


stdVill:
Crackington Haven and Higher and Middle Crackington


Vill:
[Temple] Laugherne and [Lower Temple] Laugherne

stdVill:
Temple Laugherne and Lower Temple Laugherne


Vill:
Ellastone and [Lower and Upper] Ellastone


Vill:
[Upper] Millichope and Millichope [Park]


Vill:
Saltfleetby [All Saints, St Clement and St Peter]

stdVill:
Saltfleetby All Saints, St Clement and St Peter


Vill:
[Aythorpe, Berners, High, Leaden, Margaret and White] Roding

stdVill:
Aythorpe, Berners, High, Leaden, Margaret and White Roding


Vill:
Burnham [Norton, Sutton, Ulph and Westgate]

stdVill:
Burnham Norton, Sutton, Ulph and Westgate


Vill:
Pulham [St Mary Magdalene and St Mary the Virgin]

stdVill:
Pulham St Mary Magdalene and St Mary the Virgin


Vill:
Wiggenhall [St Germans, St Mary Magdalen, St Mary the Virgin and St Peter]

stdVill:
Wiggenhall St Germans, St Mary Magdalen, St Mary the Virgin and St Peter


Vill:
Bradfield [Combust, St Clare and St George]

stdVill:
Bradfield Combust, St Clare and St George


Vill:
Creeting [All Saints, St Mary and St Olave]

stdVill:
Creeting All Saints, St Mary and St Olave


Vill:
[South] Elmham [All Saints, St Cross, St James, St Margaret, St Michael, St Nicholas and St Peter]

stdVill:
South Elmham All Saints, St Cross, St James, St Margaret, St Michael, St Nicholas and St Peter


Vill:
Ilketshall [St Andrew, St John, St Lawrence and St Margaret]

stdVill:
Ilketshall St Andrew, St John, St Lawrence and St Margaret


# Claims

Notes:
Burgred and Thorkil re-state their claim in B12; on the fief of Eustace the sheriff (19,9) they are represented as tenants.

Text:
The men who have sworn in Huntingdon say that the Church of St Mary in the Borough and the land that belongs to it was the Church of Thorney's; but the Abbot gave it in pledge to the burgesses. However, King Edward gave it to Vitalis and Bernard, his priests; they sold it to Hugh, King Edward's chamberlain. But Hugh sold it to two priests of Huntingdon, for which they have King Edward's seal. Eustace ^[the sheriff]^ now has it without deliverer, without writ and without installer.


Notes:
Leofeva may be the widow of Aelfric the sheriff, whose wife and children were deprived of their residence by Eustace despite confirmation by royal grant (B10). Oger is not recorded elsewhere in Huntingdonshire.

Text:
Eustace [* the sheriff *] took Leofeva's house by force and gave it to Oger of London.


Notes:
The title of Countess Judith had apparently been challenged, perhaps by Eustace who claimed the manor (20,3) to which these houses were probably attached.

Text:
They testify that the land of Hunef <of Stukeley> and Gos was in King Edward's hands on the day of his death, and that they held from him, not from the Earl [* Waltheof *]. But they say that they heard that King William should have given it to [* Earl *] Waltheof.


Notes:
Eustace claimed 5 hides in 6,3, probably these 5. This entry sets out the grounds on which Ramsey held the disputed 5 hides, without mentioning Eustace.

Text:
Concerning the 5 hides at Broughton, they say that it was Freemen's land in King Edward's time, but that the same king gave the land and the jurisdiction over them to St Benedict's of Ramsey, because of a service which Abbot Alwin did for him in Saxony; and that since then [the Abbey] has always had it.


Notes:
Brictmer does not occur elsewhere in DB Huntingdonshire. The entry is apparently concerned to establish that the reeveland should contribute to the farm of the borough paid to the king and earl.

Text:
The County testifies that the land of Brictmer Balehorn was reeveland before 1066 and belonged to the [Borough] revenue.


Notes:
Alwin the priest does not occur elsewhere in DB Huntingdonshire, and no Alwin occurs on the land of any abbey. The entry is apparently concerned to establish the status of the land Alwin had held. The reeve's land may refer back to D5.

Text:
They testify that the land of Alwin the priest was the Abbot's; and that each was the priest's and the reeve's land respectively.


Notes:
The abbey held in both vills (6,15-16). Boxted in Essex was held by an Aelfric (20,37), presumably the same man, although there is no mention of the abbey's claim there. There are no other traceable connections between Aubrey, Aelfric or the abbey.

Text:
They testify that the lands of Aelfric <of Yelling> in Yelling and Hemingford [Grey] were St Benedict's ^[of Ramsey]^; and that they were granted to Aelfric for his lifetime on this condition that after his death they should have returned to the church, and Boxted with them. However Aelfric himself was killed in the battle at Hastings, and the Abbot recovered his lands, until Aubrey de Vere dispossessed him.


Notes:
Godric's hide, and the abbey's title and claim, is recorded in 6,17; the other, waste, hide constituted Ralph's fief, entered at 27,1 without comment. Ralph held in Hemingford Grey & Yelling (22,1-2), also claimed by the abbey: see D7.

Text:
Concerning the 2 hides which Ralph son of Osmund holds in Hemingford [Abbots], they say that one of them was [part] of the lordship of the Church of Ramsey in King Edward's day and that he holds it against the Abbot's will. Concerning the other hide, they say that Godric held it from the Abbot, but when the Abbot was in Denmark, Ralph's father, Osmund, seized it from Saewin the falconer, to whom the Abbot had given it out of [his] love for the King.


Notes:
Sumarlithi was the predecessor of Eustace but the jurors deny that this conferred title. Neither Thorulf or Sumarlithi appear elsewhere in Huntingdonshire so it is not apparent on whose behalf this statement was made, unless it be the king.

Text:
Concerning Sumarlithi <of Waresley>, they say that he held his land ^[in Waresley]^ from Thorulf, who gave it to him, and afterwards from his sons, and that they had full jurisdiction over him.


Notes:
The jurors presumably mean that this holding should not descend with Kimbolton, held by William of Warenne in 1086 (13,1), implicitly supporting Robert's title: see also D17-18.

Text:
They say that the land of Young Wulfwin in [Hail] Weston was a manor in its own right, and did not belong to Kimbolton; but that nevertheless he was Earl Harold's man.


Notes:
Judith's claim is re-stated in the entry for Eustace's fief (19,27). The jurors imply that the sheriff's predecessor did not confer title, supporting the claim of Countess Judith as heir to her husband, Earl Waltheof, Algeat's lord.

Text:
Concerning the 1 1/2 hides of land ^[in [Hail] Weston]^ which were Algeat <of Weston>'s, the men who have sworn say that Alfgeat held them himself from Earl Tosti, with full jurisdiction, and afterwards from [* Earl *] Waltheof.


Notes:
Judith's claim is not re-stated in the entry for Eustace's fief (19,31). The jurors imply that the sheriff's predecessor did not confer title, supporting the claim of Countess Judith as heir to her husband, Earl Waltheof, Godric's lord.

Text:
Godric the priest likewise held 1 hide of land ^[in Boughton]^ from Earl Waltheof before 1066. Now Eustace ^[the sheriff]^ holds it.


Notes:
The jurors implicitly support the tenure of Eustace against a possible but unrecorded claim by Robert, who acquired another holding in Weston from Saxi (25,1).

Text:
They say that the land of Godwin in [Hail] Weston in no way belonged to Saxi, the predecessor of ^[Robert son of]^ Fafiton.


Notes:
By emphasising Earl Harold's tenure of this dependency of Kimbolton, the jurors may be supporting Warenne's title against an unrecorded claim by Eustace the sheriff, his tenant.

Text:
The men of the County testify that King Edward gave Swineshead to Earl Siward [and] full jurisdiction, and so Earl Harold had it in the same way except that [its men] paid tax in the Hundred, and went with them against the enemy.


Notes:
The implication is that Fursa's land was not held with full jurisdiction, as stated in 19,11, and that Eustace's title was not well-founded.

Text:
Concerning Fursa's land, it was a jurisdiction of the King [* in Swineshead *].


Notes:
In 2,9 the  royal officers claim the virgate for the king's use; Pertenhall was possibly part of Kimbolton.

Text:
Concerning Alwin Devil's 1 virgate of land in Pertenhall, King Edward had the jurisdiction.


Notes:
In emphasising King Edward's jurisdiction and denying Harold's tenure, the jurors appear to impugn Warenne's title, possibly supporting an unrecorded claim by Eustace (the sheriff), his tenant: see also D10;18.

Text:
They say that the hide of land which Young Wulfwin had in Catworth was in the King's jurisdiction and that Earl Harold did not have it.


Notes:
The jurors appear to be supporting a claim based upon jurisdiction buttressed by royal grant, against Warenne's rights to the dependencies of Kimbolton: see also D10;17.

Text:
In Little Catworth the same ^[Young]^ Wulfwin had 1 hide over which King Edward always had full jurisdiction; but he could give and sell the land to whom he would. But the Countess' ^[Judith]^ men say that the King gave the land to Earl Waltheof.


Notes:
The sheriff's depredation is not mentioned in the entry which records the abbey's holding in Easton (4,4)

Text:
The County testifies that the third part of 1/2 hide which lies in Easton and pays tax in Bedfordshire belongs to the Abbot of Ely's manor of Spaldwick. The Abbot had it in the same way before 1066 and for 5 years after the arrival of King William. Eustace [* the sheriff *] seized this [land] by force from the church and kept it.


Notes:
The sheriff's depredation is not mentioned in the entry which records the King's holding (1,7), where Ranulf son of Ilger is stated to be 'in charge'.

Text:
They say that Keyston was and is [part] of King Edward's revenue; and although Aelfric the sheriff resided in that village, yet he always paid the King's revenue from it, and his sons after him, until Eustace ^[the sheriff]^ received the sheriffdom; they have never seen or heard of the sealed [writ] of ?r? King Edward's which had put it outside his revenue.


Notes:
The claim is repeated in 19,15 where William the artificer also claimed part of the land; he held elsewhere in the vill (26,1).

Text:
Alwold and his brothers claim that Eustace ^[the sheriff]^ unjustly took away from them their land ^[in [Great] Gidding]^. The County denies that they have seen the seal, or an installer who had put him in possession of it.


Notes:
The statement is repeated in 1,6. None of the holdings in Gidding are identified as outliers so the purpose of this pronouncement is unclear.

Text:
In 1066 [Great] Gidding was an outlier of Alconbury, in the King's revenue.


Notes:
Buckworth is recorded as a manor in 1086 (10,1). Paxton was held by Countess Judith (20,8) so the statement may imply a claim on her behalf, though none is recorded. Tosti held both Buckworth and Paxton before 1066

Text:
The County testifies that Buckworth was an outlier of [Great] Paxton before 1066.


Notes:
Richard's holding is not recorded but was probably part of the royal manor of 15 hides (36  is an error). He was presumably trying to avoid paying dues on the grounds that his was exempt Forest land.

Text:
They say that the 36 hides of land in Brampton, which Richard the artificer claims belong to the Forest, were [part] of the King's lordship revenue, and did not belong to the Forest.


Notes:
Eustace held 1/2 hide (possibly a duplicate of part of 1,9) in Grafham (19,22) which this statement could allude to and so also to the royal manor at 1,9.

Text:
They say that Grafham was and is a jurisdiction of the King's and that they have seen neither writ nor installer who had delivered it to Eustace [* the sheriff *].


Notes:
The bare facts are repeated in the entry in Countess Judith's fief, implicitly supporting the title of the abbey to 6 of the 9 hides of that entry.

Text:
Concerning the 6 hides in Conington, they said that they had heard that they formerly lay in [the lands] of the Church of Thorney and that they had been granted to Thorkil [* the Dane *] on this condition that after his death they should return to the church with the other 3 hides of the same village. They said that they had heard but had not seen this, nor had they been involved in it.


Notes:
This land was held by Eustace (19,1), where there is no reference to this claim. The jurors support the title of the abbey against the tenure of Eustace and his tenant.

Text:
Concerning the land of Tosti <of Sawtry> in Sawtry, they say that his brother Erik <of Tealby> bequeathed it by name to the Church of Ramsey after the death of himself, his brother and his sister.


Notes:
The abbey held the only holding in Fletton at both dates so it is unclear what prompted this affirmation of its title.

Text:
Concerning [Old] Fletton, they say that in King Edward's day it all lay in [the lands of] the Church of Peterborough, and ought to lie there.


Notes:
The Bishopric of Lincoln was established in 1072 so this detail is anachronistic.

Text:
Concerning Leofric's land ^[in Orton [Waterville]]^, they say that it was in the King's jurisdiction, but Bishop Remigius has shown the writ of King Edward by which he gave Leofric, with all [his] land, to the Bishopric of Lincoln, with full jurisdiction.


Notes:
William of Percy held a carucate in Fyling on his own fief and another ar part of the manor of Whitby, held from Earl Hugh; the claim evidently relates to the former. YS accords a carucate each to Hugh and William

Text:
For copyright reasons, the text for Yorkshire cannot be displayed.


Notes:
The 6 bovates are recorded as a gift by Ulf to the Canons (2N15); Ralph held the remainder of the 6-carucate vill as a jurisdiction of his manor of Nunnington (16N1), acquired from Merleswein. YS agrees with DB about both Stonegrave holdings.


Notes:
Apart from the royal lands (1N22-24;118;120-22. SN,L29-30. SN,A3-4) - all without tenants - Havarthr's only other holding was the manor of Stokesley (29N8) and its dependencies (29N9) held by Uhtred in DB but by the king in YS. See also CE34.


Notes:
These 7 carucates were held by Hugh son of Baldric in DB; they do not appear to be recorded in YS. See also CE34.


Notes:
This holding is recorded as royal land, without tenants in DB & YS. Nigel held elsewhere from the Count of Mortain in [Sheriff] Hutton (5N54 & SN,B3).


Notes:
These 2 carucates are recorded in YS and may be the one carucate each attributed to the king (1Y6) and to Northmann (29E5) in DB; but see SE,C5 note to the printed text.


Notes:
The holding of Barn and Ulf is not separately recorded in DB. YS attributed 2 carucates in Ellerton to both the King and the Count of Mortain but DB records only the Mortain holding (5E24).


Notes:
YS attributes 12 carucates and 1 1/3 bovates to the Count of Mortain, of which 4 carucates and 2 bovates do not appear in DB; this holding is one of them though it might be included in 5E21; see also CE4-7.


Notes:
YS attributes 12 carucates and 1 1/3 bovates to the Count of Mortain, of which 4 carucates and 2 bovates do not appear in DB; this holding, however, is described in 5E22; see also CE3;5-7.


Notes:
YS attributes 12 carucates and 1 1/3 bovates to the Count of Mortain, of which 4 carucates and 2 bovates do not appear in DB; this holding is one of them though it might be included in 5E21; see also CE3-4;6-7.


Notes:
YS attributes 12 carucates and 1 1/3 bovates to the Count of Mortain, of which 4 carucates and 2 bovates do not appear in DB; this holding, however, is described in 5E27 where title is also denied; see also CE3-5;7.


Notes:
This holding is described in 5E28 which states that Richard 'has the land, but the King does not have the jurisdiction', meaning that it had been withheld, or 'not returned', by Richard.


Notes:
Nigel had 8 carucates in Dalton (acquired from Northmann and others) according to DB, 6 in YS, where the King is accorded 3.625 carucates not described in DB; Northmann's share may have been included in this though the totals still do not match exactly.


Notes:
The 2 carucates are recorded as held by the king in both DB and YS.


Notes:
The same facts are recorded in the entry on the fief of the Count of Mortain (5E73). YS attributed 4 carucates in Croom to the king, this holding (1E58) and another of 2 carucates (1E59).


Notes:
The DB entry agrees with these statements. DB attributes a manor of 12.75 carucates to the Canons; YS 14.25 (SE,Sn7), which may therefore include this carucate though the totals still do not match. Earl Morcar had held Welton (3Y1).


Notes:
These 4 bovates are attributed to the king in both DB and YS.


Notes:
Ulf had held part of North Cave (5E1) but Brantingham is recorded as Ulfkil's (5E9). Both Nigel and Malet had predecessors named Ulf and Northmann; several other Malet claims relate to land held by a Northmann: see also CE23;34.


Notes:
DB attributes to Ralph and Gilbert holdings in both vills from the named predecessors, of 2 1/2 carucates and 1 1/2 carucates respectively; YS agrees.


Notes:
The recorded holdings of Asa were held by William of Percy and Gamal in DB, the Percy holdings being also recorded in YS where Gamal's is subsumed in that of the king; see also CE26;31;34.


Notes:
The bishop's holding in Burland is recorded in YS but not in DB proper though the account of Howden includes its jurisdictions (3Y4).


Notes:
The bishop's holding is recorded in DB and subsumed with another of his holdings (3Y4) is YS. Muli, Orm and Basing are recorded as predecessors of Robert Malet (11E2;5).


Notes:
Aughton is recorded as held by Nigel in both DB and YS; Ernwin had held it before 1066.


Notes:
Both DB & YS record Nigel's holding, though give its size as 7 carucates and 2 bovates. See also CE34.


Notes:
DB and YS record a Mortain holding of 7 carucates and 5 bovates; DB additionally records 14 bovates in both Daltons, half of which would make this 8 carucates. Neither source records a connection with the royal manor of Pocklington (1Y10). See also CE34.


Notes:
DB and YS attribute both holdings to the Mortain fief though DB is 1/2 bovate short in Osgodby. Both holdings had some dependency on Howden, the bishop of Durham's manor, but no apparent Malet connection unless it be through Northmann. See also CE34.


Notes:
Both DB & YS attribute 15 carucates in Sancton to Gilbert, held by Northmann, a predecessor of Robert Malet elsewhere (11E3). Robert also held a jurisdiction in the vill (11E8). See also CE34.


Notes:
Malet was named in several of the 14 claims relating to a Northmann. In the East Riding, the Count of Mortain and William of Percy succeeded to the bulk of the lands held by a Northmann but several other tenants-in-chief had an interest. See also CE34.


Notes:
DB & YS attribute Welton & Gardham to the bishop and do not mention the Canons' claim. The carucate in Gardham is recorded in DB and YS, and the 5 carucates and 2 bovates presumably subsumed in the total given for Welton in both.


Notes:
The holding is attributed to William of Percy in both DB and YS; the archbishop and Canons had a manor in Clifton (C30).


Vill:
Scoreby [Manor] & {Ianulfestorp} & Dunnington

Notes:
These holdings are attributed to William of Percy in both DB and YS; see also CE15;31. Several other Malet claims relate to land held by a Northmann: see CE23;34.


Notes:
Both DB and YS attribute the 2 carucates to the Mortain fief; William of Percy held a carucate in the same vill (13E8. SE,Sn10).


Notes:
Both DB & YS attribute these 6 bovates to Gilbert Tison; the basis of the archbishop's claim is not apparent.


Notes:
Both DB & YS attribute these 6 carucates to William of Percy. See also CE34.


Notes:
Neither DB nor YS mention the jurisdiction in Clifton; both attribute the whole vill of 6 carucates and 6 bovates to William of Percy. Several other Malet claims relate to land held by a Northmann: see CE23;34.


Notes:
In DB Gamal held the 4 carucates claimed by Richard; but in YS it was aggregated with another royal holding in Lowthorpe (1E31) as royal land; see also CE15;26.


Notes:
DB & YS both attribute the holdings to Odo the bowman; DB names his predecessors and Orm and Forni.


Notes:
Gamal is not mentioned in the DB entries; but a Gamal, presumably the same man, held a carucate in Walkington in 1086 (29E24).


Jurors:
[[West Riding ] Barkston & `Skyrack' Wapentakes

Notes:
No Wulfbert is recorded on Osbern's fief, or indeed in the West Riding. If this is not a scribal error (see CW4), he may therefore have been the overlord of some, if not most, of the pre-Conquest landowners named in Osbern's fief; see also CW36.


Vill:
Yeadon & Oglethorpe & Hazelwood [Castle]

TenInChief:
King William & Count of Mortain & William of Percy

Lord66:
Gamal & Grim & Esger <of Oglethorpe> & Gamal son of Asmund & Arnketil

Defendant:
King William & Count of Mortain & William of Percy

Notes:
TRE owners not named in some entries. See also CE34.


Vill:
Stutton & Tadcaster & [North] Milford [Hall] & {Neuhuse} & Toulston & Ryther & {Saxehale} & Lead & Newton [Kyme]

Holding:
20 carucates & 2 bovates & 1 mill & 1 arable holding

Lord66:
Thorkil & Wulfstan & Ketil & Ligulf & Thorn


Notes:
Aelfric named as TRE holder in 9W26 so Ulf was presumably his overlord. A scribal error is possible; but there are too many such discrepancies between DB and the Claims to attribute them all to errors.


Notes:
Perhaps implying that Malet was rightful owner (cf CW3)


Notes:
Ligulf still held in 29W24 in 1086 (and possibly in 28W30 where the holder is unnamed), Gospatric sharing half these holdings (SW,Sk3). A Ligulf was a predecessor of Richard. Since Compton is not recorded in DB or YS the implication of all this is unclear


Notes:
Not in YS; Siward not named in DB entries


Notes:
Not apparently in YS, nor on royal fief; Brune not named in DB entries;


Notes:
No holding in Barnborough attributed to Warenne in YS but 6 carucates in Barnborough and Bilham House are accorded to Roger of Bully there (SW,Sf9; also 10W15).


Notes:
Not separately noticed in YS but possibly included in SW,Sf9 (see CW9 note)


Notes:
Mortain and Warenne held in Sandal but other details (including Alwin's and Sotakollr's names) of these holdings are not individually recorded in either DB or YS; they are probably subsumed 12W1 as the Mortain holding is only 1/2 carucate.


Notes:
Warenne held in Bramwith but other details (including Ulfkil's name) of this holding are not individually recorded in either DB or YS; they are probably subsumed in 12W1 & SW,Sf1.


Vill:
Tudworth [Green] & Stainforth & Fishlake

Notes:
Warenne held in all 3 vills but other details (including Ulfkil's & Northmann's names) of these holdings are not individually recorded in either DB or YS; they are probably subsumed in 12W1 & SW,Sf1.


Notes:
Warenne and Mortain held in these vills but other details (including Wulfmer & Swein's names) are not individually recorded in either DB or YS. Fulco was a tenant of Roger of Bully elsewhere in DB but Roger had no holdings in the vills.


Notes:
The only holding in Cantley was the 1 carucate held by Geoffrey Alselin. This Delphic statement presumably hides a claim by Roger of Bully who acquired 6 other holdings from an Alsi in Strafforth, presumably the same individual.


Notes:
Only Mortain is recorded as holding in Loversall so this statement presumably implies a claim by him. Other details (including Toki's name) of the holding are not individually recorded in either DB or YS


Notes:
The implication of this statement is not apparent; but Roger of Bully acquired 1 holding from a Northmann in Strafforth Wapentake & William of Percy several others, but no one else, so a claim involving these two men is possible.


Notes:
Roger of Bully held the 12 carucate vill of Wadworth, acquired from Siward and Toki. This claim and that in CW19 amount to 12.25 carucates. Stancil is not recorded in DB or YS (?an error for Stainton, also acquired by Bully from Siward: 10W3;5 & SW,Sf3-4)


Notes:
This and the previous claim (CW18) amount to 12.25 carucates; Wadworth is 12 carucates in DB and YS. Toki was the predecessor of Geoffrey Alselin for all but a handful of his holdings; this is one of the few holdings of Toki not acquired by Geoffrey.


Notes:
The Count of Mortain is recorded as holding this and other parts of Houghton in both DB and YS; it does not occur on the royal fief.


Notes:
Nigel Fossard held Hexthorpe from the Count of Mortain (5W8 & SW,Sf21) so his claim may refer to the 9 bovates in Marr held by Fulco of Lisors of the jurisdiction of Hexthorpe.


Notes:
If this statement relates to land held by Swein in Adwick, then it refers to Roger of Bully's holding in the vill. The 7 carucates and 3 bovates in Adwick and its dependency are probably those in YS under Osgodcross though the total there is 1 bovate less


Notes:
Ilbert held the manor of Morley and the king the manor of Wakefield, which may account for this pronouncement.


Notes:
The individual details of Arnketil's holdings in these vills are not given, being subsumed among those for other pre-Conquest lords; but these are evidently the entries referred to. See also CE34.


Notes:
The DB entry states that the jurisdiction of all 3 carucates lay in Healaugh; but CW40 tends to confirm the statement made here. See also CE34.


Notes:
A Northmann held 3 carucates in 25W21;26 but these lay in 'Burghshire' Wapentake; none of Osbern's holdings in Ainsty (25W1-19) clearly match this statement


Notes:
The individual details of Godwin's holdings in these vills are not given, being subsumed among those for other pre-Conquest lords; but these are evidently the entries referred to. See also CE34.


Notes:
The DB entry names Aldred & Svartkollr as the pre-Conquest holders. If this is not a scribal error (see CW4), Ulf was either their overlord or an intermediate holder. See also CE34.


Notes:
The individual details of Wulfstan's holding in this vill is not given, being subsumed among those for other pre-Conquest lords; but this is evidently the entry referred to. See also CE34.


Notes:
Neither Landric or Northmann held in these vills, neither of which has holdings of the stated size. The 1/2 carucate might be that held by Landric in Bishopthorpe (29W27); Acaster is the only other holding of his in Ainsty (29W28). See also CE34.


Notes:
Healfdene is named in the DB entry but not Oddi or Alwin; the individual details of holdings in the vill are not given; but this is evidently the entry referred to. See also CE34.


Notes:
Despite the reference to the Poppleton of 25W13 only, since the DB total with Scagglethorpe is 6 1/2 carucates. See also CE34.


Notes:
Ligulf's share of the 8 carucates of the DB entry is not given; but this is evidently the entry referred to. Geoffrey's manor of Healaugh is recorded in 18W3. Neither entry refers to this jurisdiction.


Notes:
Godwin's land in Walton is not separately recorded in DB or YS but was presumably included in the 9 carucates held by 6 thanes, the only recorded holding in Walton. Neither this entry nor Geoffrey's (18W3) mentions the jurisdiction.


Notes:
Both DB and YS attribute Bolton to William of Percy. See also CE34.


Notes:
No Wulfbert is recorded on Osbern's fief, or indeed in the West Riding. This, and the reference to 'all the other lands', raises the possibility that Wulbert was the overlord of some, if not most, of the pre-Conquest landholders named; see also CW1;4


Vill:
Steeton [Hall] & Hornington [Manor] & Oxton & [Palla]thorpe & Colton

Notes:
Ulfkil is not named in DB or YS. If not a scribal error (see CW4), he may have been the overlord of those who are named. [Palla]thorpe is the only holding attributed to the Count. The others probably lay in 25W1, 13W17, 25W5, & 25W3 respectively


Notes:
The only holding in Monkton was of 8 carucates, held by 5 thanes. Merleswein is not named so if not a scribal error (see CW4), he was presumably overlord of one or more of them; he was Ralph's predecessor on almost all of his manors.


Notes:
Drogo's depredations are recorded in only one entry in DB.


Notes:
None of the lands held by William Malet in YKS were acquired by his son though the jurors evidently thought he was the rightful heir: see ANS XXII (2000), 261-77.


Notes:
This must refer to Drogo's 12.5 carucates in Brandesburton which names Ulf and Ulfkil but not Aldwif. If not a scribal error (see CW4) Aldwif was perhaps overlord of one of the 7 named pre-Conquest lords. See also CE34.


Notes:
This holding does not appear in DB or YS See also CE34.


Notes:
Not included in DB and YS though the discrepancy between the 5 1/2 carucates of Rise in DB & YS and 7 1/2 in the Claims (CE39) may possibly conceal this holding. See also CE34.


Notes:
Both holdings of a Cnut - presumably the same individual - in Holderness were claimed for the Malets but he was not their predecessor elsewhere. See also CE34.


Notes:
The assessment of Rise is given as 5 1/2 carucates in DB & YS. The half carucate of the Archbishop of York (2E37) would make Rise a 6-carucate unit so 7 1/2 is probably a scribal error (cf CE37). See also CE34.


Notes:
This holding is probably included in the 5 carucates held by Swein & Murdac. If not a scribal error (see CW4), Aldwif was presumably the overlord or one or other of these two men. See also CE34.


Notes:
Frani was one of 5 pre-Conquest landowners named in the DB entry; he may have therefore been the overlord of the other four men. See also CE34.


Notes:
Thor is named as the pre-Conquest holder of Langthorpe. If not a scribal error (see CW4), Ecgfrith was probably his overlord. See also CE34.


TenInChief:
Drogo of la Beuvrière & Archbishop of York

Lord86:
Drogo of la Beuvrière & Archbishop of York

Defendant:
Drogo of la Beuvrière & Archbishop of York

Notes:
6 carucates were divided between 4 holdings, none of which name Thorsten; if not a scribal error, Thorsten was presumably the overlord of those named. DB does not detail the Archbishop's bovate, possibly subsumed under Swine (2A2). See also CE34.


Notes:
Thorfridh's 8 carucates was the only holding in Keyingham so this is certainly the entry referred to. See also CE34.


Notes:
DB & YS list one holding of 11 bovates and another of either 12 carucates & 1 bovate (YS) or 10 carucates & 2 bovates (DB), the latter held by 8 named individuals of whom Frani was one and presumably the overlord of the others. See also CE34.


Notes:
{Andrebi} was a jurisdiction of Withernsea whose holders are not named; but as this was the only holding in the vill there is no doubt that this is the entry referred to. See also CE34.


Notes:
The 5 carucates were divided between 3 holdings, none of which name Brandulfr; if not a scribal error, he was presumably the overlord of the two men who held 14E17 but the other holdings were dependencies of manors held by other lords. See also CE34.


Notes:
Ravenkel & Karli held 1 1/2 carucates in Redmere, of which Ravenkel's share was presumably 1 carucate. See also CE34.


Notes:
DB names 3 other pre-Conquest holders of the 8-carucate manor of Holmpton, the only holding in that vill. See also CE34.


Notes:
DB names Thorgot, confirming that this is the entry referred to. See also CE34.


Notes:
DB names the pre-Conquest holder as Thorgot. Grimkel was presumably his overlord, or a scribal error is involved (see CW4). See also CE34.


Notes:
Oddi & Ravenkel hold 13 bovates in Southcoates & Drypool in DB, of which YS specifies that 1 carucate lay in Southcoates. Drogo is presumably named by the jurors to distinguish this holding from the 1 carucate of the archbishop (2E35). See also CE34.


Vill:
Bolton [Percy] & `Haggenby' & Acaster [Selby] & Ouston [Farm]

Notes:
Bolton (CW33), 'Haggenby' (CW25) and Ouston (13W14) were dependencies of Geoffrey Alselin's manor of Helaugh. Percy is not recorded as holding in Acaster. A Malet interest in  'Haggenby is recorded in CW25


Notes:
Dependency on Healaugh seems to be implied by the layout of the text but is not mentioned in DB in relation to any part of the Osbern's holdings 9 & 4 carucates respectively. There is little doubt, however, that these are the holdings referred to.


Notes:
Dependency on Healaugh seems to be implied by the layout of the text but is not mentioned in DB in relation to any part of the Count's holding of 8 carucates.  There is little doubt, however, that this is the holding referred to.


Notes:
Robert and Odo both had a predecessor named Siward which may have caused confusion.

Text:
In Tathwell hundred the Bishop of Bayeux's men claim 1 carucate of land against Robert the bursar, and the men of the Wapentake say that the Bishop himself ought rightly to have it.


Notes:
The earl's manor was assessed at 5 carucates, with dependencies of 9 carucates and 2 bovates, any part of which may have included the 3 bovates.

Text:
In the same hundred ^[Tathwell]^ the same Bishop ^[of Bayeux]^'s men claim 3 bovates of land against Earl Hugh, and the Wapentake says that the Bishop himself ought to have them.


Notes:
Jocelyn did not hold in Tathwell so this statement presumably refers to one of the two mills recorded as held by Robert.

Text:
In the same hundred ^[Tathwell]^ the mill which was Aghmund's and [which] after him Lambert and Jocelyn his son had, the Wapentake says that Robert the bursar ought to have with his land.


Notes:
Count Alan is not recorded as holding in Louth so the disputed mill is presumably one of the 13 recorded on the bishop's manor of Louth

Text:
In Louth hundred the Bishop of Lincoln claims 1 mill against Count Alan, and the Wapentake testifies it ought to be the same Bishop's.


Notes:
Hill, Medieval Lincoln, suggested the lands were those in 7,56, a suggestion supported by the fact that this is the only holding  attributed to the Church of Lincoln before 1066. William of Percy has a predecessor named Alsi who held in the Wapentake.

Text:
Those lands which Alsi and Ulfgrim had in Lindsey they place [among the lands of] the Church of St Mary, Lincoln, and at Bishop Wulfwige's discretion, and so Bishop Remigius claims them because they had £160 for the lands themselves before 1066.


Notes:
Godric and Edric held in both Haugham (with Aelfeva) & Maidenwell (with Aleifr).

Text:
In Burwell hundred the King's officers claim against Earl Hugh in Haugham and Maidenwell the lands of the two brothers Godric and Edric, and the men of the Wapentake have adjudged them for the King's use.


Notes:
Kolsveinn did not hold in Carlton so this refers to part of the 3 carucates held by Percy in Reston and Carlton

Text:
In [Little] Carlton hundred William of Percy claims 1/2 carucate of land against Kolsveinn [* of Lincoln *], and the Wapentake testifies in favour of the same William.


Notes:
The king had 2 1/2 carucates and 1 1/3 bovates in Yarburgh; the jurors allow a fraction of Alfred's claim

Text:
In Somercotes hundred Alfred of Lincoln claims 1/2 carucate of land against the King in Yarburgh, but the Riding says that he has nothing there except 9 1/2 acres and 1 plot, the jurisdiction of which lies in the King's manor of Gayton[-le-Wold].


Text:
In the same hundred ^[Somercotes]^ Siward Buss claims 1 mill against Alfred [* of Lincoln *], and the men of the Riding [say] that Alfred [* of Lincoln *] has half in Rainer of Brimeux's [manor] of Keddington and [that] the Bishop of Durham has the other half as a jurisdiction of Keddington.


Notes:
Alfred held 13 bovates in Stewton; his claim perhaps refers to the remaining 3 bovates in the vill, held by the bishop of Bayeux

Text:
In `Skidbrooke' hundred Alfred [* of Lincoln *] claims 3 bovates of land in Stewton against Ilbert. The men of the Riding say that Alfred [* of Lincoln *] ought to have them himself.


Notes:
40,26 Rainer held 1/3 of the church and claimed the other 2/3rds; these are not recorded on Ilbert's fief.

Text:
In Withcall hundred Rainer claims the whole minster [church], and the ?rq? men of the Riding say that it was his predecessor's, and [so was] the third part of the jurisdiction, and that Ilbert of Lacy [has] 2 parts of the jurisdiction over the church and the land which is an adjunct of it.


Notes:
Earl Hugh held 12 carucates in Claythorpe and 3 other places, jurisdictions of Greetham (13,1), Robert's claim evidently referring to part of this holding; Vigleikr is not named there but he was Robert's predecessor elsewhere (38,8;10-11. CS,36).

Text:
In Swaby hundred Robert the bursar claims against Earl Hugh 1 carucate of land in Claythorpe. The men of the Riding say that the jurisdiction lies in Greetham and was Vigleikr's and he himself left the land and forfeited it and they say that Robert the bursar has nothing there.


Notes:
Thorulf was the predecessor of Bishop Odo, whose tenant was the claimant, Losoard; Gilbert succeeded Tonni.

Text:
In Rigsby hundred Losoard claims against Gilbert of Ghent 1 carucate of land in Well. The men of the Riding say that before 1066 Thorulf had it with full jurisdiction and afterwards Tonni <of Lusby> had it, and [that] this land was delivered to Bishop Odo by charter, but they have not seen the King's writ for it, and he had it himself on the day he was taken, and later he was dispossessed.


Notes:
Recorded on Rainer's fief but not Earl Hugh's.

Text:
In the same hundred ^[Rigsby]^ Rainer of Brimeux claims against Earl Hugh 2 bovates of land in Ulceby, and the men of the Riding say that he ought to have nothing except the jurisdiction in Cumberworth, and the Earl [ought to have] the land.


Lord66:
Bergthorr & Sumarlithi & Godric & Siward

Notes:
Earl Hugh's holding in Mablethorpe is subsumed in a larger complex; neither Blunt nor the pre-Conquest landowners are named there. Blunt also acquired 49,2 from Godric & Siward, presumably the same individuals.

Text:
In Theddlethorpe hundred the Bishop of Durham claims against Earl Hugh 2 bovates in Mablethorpe. The men of the Riding say that he has nothing except 1 bovate which was Bergthorr's and that the jurisdiction is Earl Hugh's in Greetham. There also William Blunt [has] 3 bovates which were Sumarlithi's, Godric's and Siward's, and the jurisdiction is in Greetham, by witness of the whole Riding.


Notes:
The holdings are recorded on Alfred's fief; Earl Hugh's jurisdiction in Huttoft (13,8) is aggregated with that for several other places.

Text:
In Huttoft hundred Alfred [* of Lincoln *] claims 2 bovates of land, and the men of the Riding say that he ought to have one with full jurisdiction, and the other likewise is his, but Earl Hugh has the jurisdiction in Greetham.


Notes:
The bovate was a jurisdiction of Huttoft, presumably Alfred's manor there (27,60). The Siwards of Huttoft and Sutton were probably the same individual.

Text:
In the same hundred ^[Huttoft]^ the Riding says that the same Alfred [* of Lincoln *] ought to have the jurisdiction of 1 bovate which Alfred [* of Lincoln *] claims against Ketilbiorn <of Nettleton> in Sutton[-on-Sea].


Notes:
Gilbert's predecessor here is Tonni <of Lusby>. The bulk of Gilbert's lands came from Ulf Fenman but Tonni ranked second among his predecessors.

Text:
In Mumby hundred Count Alan claims 2 bovates of land against Gilbert of Ghent, but the Riding says that Gilbert's predecessor had full jurisdiction over it before 1066 and it ought to be his.


Notes:
Tonni <of Lusby> held the manor of Willoughby in 1066 (24,54) but this claim may refer to the outlier in Willoughby (24,59); an Alnoth was the Bishop's predecessor at 3,21;25

Text:
In Willoughby hundred the Bishop of Durham claims the land of Alnoth the priest against Gilbert of Ghent, and the men of the Riding say that they never saw the Bishop's predecessor put in possession of it, either by writ or officer, and they testify [it is] for Gilbert's use.


Claimant:
Ivo Tallboys & Ketilbiorn <of Nettleton>

Notes:
Not recorded elsewhere. Ivo Tallboys had an interest in Hanby (14,86;101) but Ketilbiorn is not recorded as holding anywhere in `Calcewath' wapentake. The woodland is presumably subsumed in one of the entries for Willoughby manor (24,54-60).

Text:
In the same hundred ^[Willoughby]^ the men of the Riding testify that Ketilbiorn <of Nettleton> ought to have 20 acres of woodland in Hanby, and Ivo Tallboys the jurisdiction.


Lord66:
Harold (brother of Aelfric and Guthfrithr)

Notes:
Eudo claimed Thorpe, a jurisdiction of Kirkby-on-Bain (3,13) held by Harold. Another of his claims against the bishop, to Spilsby (3,22), appears to be unrelated and concerns the North Riding.

Text:
Concerning the claim [disputed] between the Bishop of Durham and Eudo son of Spirewic, the men of Horncastle Wapentake have borne witness, with the agreement of the whole Riding, that the three brothers, Harold, Guthfrithr and Aelfric, divided their father's lordship land equally and jointly, and that only Harold and Guthfrithr divided their father's jurisdiction, without the third brother, and they held it equally and jointly before 1066.


Notes:
Eudo held the manor of Little Sturton (29,1) of which the 6 bovates of Langton was a jurisdiction. Guthfrithr's son are identified in 29,1 as Godwin & Gunnhvati.

Text:
Concerning the jurisdiction of 6 bovates about which there is a claim [disputed] between the Bishop ^[of Durham]^ and Eudo [* son of Spirewic *] in Langton[-by-Wragby] and in {Torp}, the men of `Wraggoe' Wapentake say that the said two brothers had the jurisdiction equally and jointly before 1066, but in 1066 Guthfrithr's sons had the whole jurisdiction, but they do not know how they had it, whether by force or by their uncle's gift.


Notes:
Gilbert held Baumber (24,20) whose predecessor was Ulf Fenman, Tonni holding one of its dependencies (22,23), acquired by William of Percy (22,23); Ulf & Tonni were Gilbert main predecessors. Robert the bursar held in the same vill (38,11).

Text:
Concerning the claim which Robert the bursar makes against Gilbert of Ghent about the woodland which is in Langton[-by-Wragby], `Wraggoe' Wapentake says, with the agreement of the whole Riding, that Tonni <of Lusby> had it before 1066 with full jurisdiction in Baumber, and therefore Gilbert of Ghent rightly has it.


Notes:
Erneis held in Wragby but the other claims cannot be traced.

Text:
Concerning the underwood which Robert the bursar claims against the King in Hainton and against Erneis of Buron in Wragby, by the witness of the Wapentake he has nothing there. But over Earl Hugh's 12 acres and the Bishop of Bayeux's 8 acres he has jurisdiction according to the witness of the men of the Wapentake and Riding.


Notes:
Alfred of Lincoln's 3 1/2 bovates lay in Torrington, a jurisdiction of Hainton (16,14), both held by Klakkr in 1066. Rainer held 3 1/2 bovates as a manor in Hainton itself (40,9).

Text:
[In] the claim which Rainer of Brimeux made against Alfred of Lincoln concerning the jurisdiction of 3 1/2 bovates of land, he ought to have nothing there, as the men of the Wapentake and Riding testify; but Roger of Poitou ought to have it [as belonging] to the house of his predecessor Klakkr in Hainton.


Notes:
The jurors pronouncement is explained by the DB entry which states that the jurisdiction of the 4 bovates lay in Wragby, a manor of Erneis (34,12).

Text:
Concerning the claim which Erneis of Buron makes against William of Percy in Legsby about the jurisdiction of 4 bovates, the Wapentake says that the same Erneis ought rightly to have it.


Notes:
This claim probably refers to land in Benniworth where both Ivo and the archbishop (2,16) held land, acquired from Siward and Godwin respectively. Siward was also the predecessor of Ivo at 14,9-10;15;30-31;34-36 but these holdings were in the North Riding

Text:
Concerning the claim which Archbishop Thomas made - that is, that he ought to have jurisdiction over the land of Siward, the predecessor of Ivo Tallboys - the Wapentake says, and the Riding, that Siward held his land with as full jurisdiction as Godwin, the Archbishop's predecessor, held his, and therefore he does not claim it justly.


Notes:
The archbishop's manor in South Willingham is described in 2,1.

Text:
Archbishop Thomas ought to have jurisdiction over Eskil's land which the Bishop of Bayeux has in [South] Willingham because, as the whole County testifies, the Archbishop's predecessor had full jurisdiction over the same land, and the Bishop's men wrongfully took the same jurisdiction away from the same Archbishop.


Notes:
Rainer's entry notes a claim, by a marginal 'k'. Willingham is described there as a jurisdiction of Bramwith, held by Koddi (40,7); it had evidently been a jurisdiction of the archbishop's manor of [South] Willingham (2,1), held by Almer, before 1066.

Text:
Before 1066 Almer, Archbishop Thomas's predecessor, was in possession of the jurisdiction of 10 bovates in [South] Willingham. This land was Koddi's and is now Rainer of Brimeux's; it was pledged for £3 before 1066. Now the men of the Riding affirm that the Archbishop ought rightly to have this jurisdiction until £3 are paid to him.


Notes:
Norman of Arcy's interest is not apparent; but Tonni was an important predecessor of Gilbert. The jurors statement seems also to imply that he had a manor of Barlings, unrecorded in the main text. A royal grant trumped everything.

Text:
Gilbert of Ghent and Norman of Arcy claim against William of Percy the jurisdiction of 12 bovates in Stainfield, which belongs to Barlings and was Tonni <of Lusby>'s. But the Wapentake, and the County, says that Gilbert ought to have it, not Norman. But William of Percy holds it by the King's gift as Robert son of Stigand held it.


Notes:
This statement seems also (see CS30) to imply that Tonni had a manor of Barlings, unrecorded in the main text; the claimant was presumably Gilbert of Ghent.

Text:
They put forward the same argument concerning the jurisdiction of 7 bovates in Apley because it lies in Barlings and Tonni <of Lusby> held it before 1066.


Notes:
The 2 bovates were a jurisdiction of Bullington, a manor of the Bishop of Durham (3,8); both had been held by an Aelfric in 1066. Percy's holding is annotated with a marginal 'k', for a claim.

Text:
Also in Apley the Bishop of Durham claims the jurisdiction of 2 bovates against William of Percy, and the Wapentake says that the same Bishop's predecessor had it and he ought to have it himself in Bullington.


Notes:
These two 1/2 carucates must be subsumed in Gilbert's manors of Baumber & Edlington (24,20;22). Ulf Fenman, not Tonni, is Gilbert's predecessor there; but Tonni may have been his 'man' for the subholdings, as he was on another fragment of Baumber (22,23).

Text:
The Wapentake of Horncastle says that Robert the bursar wrongfully makes a claim against Gilbert of Ghent about 1/2 carucate of land in Baumber and about another 1/2 carucate in Edlington. Before 1066 Tonni <of Lusby> had this land. Robert had several holdings in Horncastle but the specific basis of his claim is not apparent.


Notes:
Aki was Robert's main predecessor (38,1-2;13).

Text:
Robert the bursar ought to have jurisdiction over the fishery and over the plot which Ketilbiorn <of Nettleton> holds in Coningsby because Aki, Robert's predecessor, had it before 1066.


Notes:
Earl Hugh's holding in Ashby does not mention a mill; it was a jurisdiction of his manor of Greetham (13,1). Ivo did not hold in the vill so the nature of his claim is unclear.

Text:
`Candleshoe' Wapentake says that Ivo Tallboys ought to have in Ashby[-by-Partney] what he claims against Earl Hugh, that is, 1 mill and 1 bovate of land, but the jurisdiction belongs to Greetham.


Notes:
Vigleikr was Robert's predecessor at 38,8;10-11 (also CS12); Scremby was a jurisdiction of Gilbert's manor of Bardney (24,17). Robert's claim, based upon a predecessor who had forfeited his land to the lord of the jurisdiction, is similar to CS37.

Text:
Concerning 2 carucates of land which Robert the bursar claims against Gilbert of Ghent in Scremby through Vigleikr, his predecessor, the Wapentake says that he had only 1 carucate and the jurisdiction of that was in Bardney; Vigleikr, however, forfeited that land to [the loss of] his lord, Gilbert, and therefore Robert has nothing there, by the witness of the Riding.


Notes:
This case is similar to CS36: a claim based upon a predecessor who had forfeited his land to the lord of the jurisdiction. Godric is not recorded as holding in Scremby nor as a predecessor of Ketilbiorn in Lincolnshire.

Text:
Also in Scremby Ketilbiorn <of Nettleton> claims 1 carucate against Gilbert of Ghent through Godric, but they say that he had only 1/2 carucate and its jurisdiction was in Bardney; and Ketilbiorn wrongfully claims it as the Wapentake says, because his predecessor forfeited it.


Jurors:
South Riding `Candleshoe' & Bolingbroke Wapentakes

Notes:
Eudo acquired the lands of Sighvatr (29,10), and the bishop of Durham those of his brothers (3,21-26;43-47). Their father was probably the Godwin who held 29,11-13;16-17;30-32. See also CN30.

Text:
The men of `Candleshoe' Wapentake testify, with the consent of the whole Riding, that Sighvatr, Alnoth, Fenkell and Eskil equally and jointly divided their father's land between themselves before 1066 and held it in such a way that if a royal expedition was necessary and Sighvatr could go, the other brothers helped him. After him, the next one went and Sighvatr, with the rest, helped him; and so on with them all. However, Sighvatr was the King's man. [The men] of Bolingbroke [Wapentake] testify to the same with the above men, and the South Riding also agrees.


Lord86:
Ansger of `Skidbrooke' & Rainald & Humphrey & Geoffrey

Notes:
Neither the toll, the places named, or the individuals with bynames are recorded elsewhere in the text; and only a Geoffrey among the 1086 landowners held in `Louthesk' Wapentake; see also CS40.

Text:
In Saltfleet, `Mare' and `Swine' a new toll has come into use and Ansger of `Skidbrooke' has been receiving it, also Rainald, Humphrey and Geoffrey; `Louthesk' Wapentake, and the whole South Riding, says that this toll did not exist before 1066. Godric paid a toll of 1d according to the testimony of Ulfkil of Asterby who saw it. Arnketil of Withern testifies that he himself saw Ansger receive the toll from 24 ships from Hastings.


Notes:
Neither Saltfleet, the customary dues, or Hugh the servant is recorded elsewhere in the text, and no Hugh held in `Louthesk' Wapentake; see also CS39

Text:
In Saltfleet Hugh the servant receives the customary dues of the ships which come there willingly and unwillingly. These [dues] did not exist there before 1066; they originated this new practice and the men of the Riding say that they saw a claim made for it.


Notes:
Ferries are recorded at both Barton and Ferriby, and a market at Barton; but there is no mention of tolls. The road from Lincoln (and ultimately London) probably terminated at Barton, from where the ferries gave passage across the Humber to the north.

Text:
In Barton[-upon-Humber] and in [South] Ferriby Gilbert of Ghent's men receive a different toll to the one they received before 1066, from bread, fishes, skins and very many other things, for which nothing was ever given.


Notes:
The meaning is unclear. Caistor was more than 10 miles from the nearest point on the coast and almost 20 from Barton; if Barton were not intended, then the ferry was presumably that at Grimsby (4,70. 36,1).


Notes:
This statement presumably refers to part of the king's 4 1/2 carucates in [Great] Limber since he held only 3 bovates in [Little] Limber where Ivo held 9 bovates (14,32).

Text:
In Limber Ivo Tallboys claims 6 bovates of land against the King. The men of the County say that he ought to have the land himself and the King the jurisdiction.


Notes:
Of the 4 holdings in Ulceby, this claim probably refers to 7,22 (though no meadow is mentioned there) as both Alfred and the bishop had a predecessor named Healfdene who may have been the source of a dispute.

Text:
Instead of 30 acres of meadow which Alfred [* of Lincoln *] claims in Ulceby he ought to have in the same village 1 strip of ploughland.


Claimant:
Drogo of la Beuvrière & Alfred of Lincoln

Notes:
Drogo acquired Morcar's manor of Barrow[-upon-Humber] (30,1), of which Goxhill had presumably been a jurisdiction like Drogo's own holding there (30,2), alienated by Morcar. Alfred held in the same vill (27,1) but the basis of his claim is not apparent.

Text:
Yarborough Wapentake testifies that in Goxhill [* Earl *] Morcar gave Hugh 4 bovates of land with full jurisdiction, which Drogo of la Beuvrière claims. Alfred [* of Lincoln *] claims 1 bovate of this land. The Wapentake says that the land is Hugh's, and the jurisdiction is Alfred's.


Notes:
The bishop's claim to the church is restated in 1,65.

Text:
The Wapentake testifies that King William gave the church of Caistor to St Mary's of Lincoln in alms; to which church belong 2 bovates of land in lordship, 2 villagers and 1 mill, and in Hundon the jurisdiction of 1 carucate.


Notes:
The 3 bovates of Searby were an outlier of Count Alan's manor of Kelsey (12,9), acquired from Grimbald. Jocelyn had no predecessor of that name nor did he hold in either vill, so the basis of his claim is not apparent.

Text:
Jocelyn claims 3 bovates of land in Searby against Count Alan. The County says that Jocelyn ought to have it, not Alan.


Notes:
Norman's 1 1/2 bovates in Brocklesby were a jurisdiction of his manor of Stallingborough (32,1). Hugh also had a manor there (25,7) but no dependent jurisdictions are named.

Text:
Hugh son of Baldric claims 1/2 bovate of land in Brocklesby. The men of the Riding say that the land ought to be his, and the jurisdiction Norman's, through their predecessors.


Notes:
Rainer was an intermediate holder, the predecessor from whom title derived, here and at 2,8; Eilafr's other holdings devolved upon Waldin the artificer (47,4-7): see also CN1113;18;23.

Text:
In Stallingborough the Wapentake says that Rainer the deacon held Eilafr's 2 manors on the day he left this country.


Notes:
Rainer held a manor in Limber (40,1) and the archbishop had two holdings dependent upon Limber: 3 bovates in jurisdiction (2,24) and 1/2 bovate of {inland} (2,25); the claim presumably refers to part of 2,24.

Text:
Rainer of Brimeux ought to have the jurisdiction in Limber of 1/2 bovate of land which Archbishop Thomas has in Stallingborough.


Notes:
Rainer was an intermediate holder, the predecessor from whom title derived, here and at 2,6-7; Eilafr's other holdings devolved upon Waldin the artificer (47,4-7). See also CN9;13;18;23.

Text:
Concerning one manor of Eilafr's which Archbishop Thomas now has in Keelby, Rainer the deacon was in possession of it on the day he left this land.


Notes:
Both Alfred and Durand held in Great Coates, neither holding being precisely 2 bovates so it is unclear who was claiming against whom.

Text:
In [Great] Coates Alfred [* of Lincoln *] ought to have the land of the 2 bovates and Durand Malet the jurisdiction [of them] with 3 villagers who belong to it.


TenInChief:
Archbishop of York & Bishop Odo of Bayeux

Lord86:
Archbishop of York & Bishop Odo of Bayeux

Notes:
The 1 carucate was probably the archbishop's since Rainer held Cuxwold, of which Swallow (2,9) was a dependency; Odo also had a carucate there. Rainer was an intermediate holder, the predecessor from whom title derived. See also CN9;11;18;23

Text:
Rainer the deacon was in possession of 1 carucate of land in Swallow when he left this land. Likewise the same Rainer the deacon was in possession of Erik <of Tealby>'s land which is in Grimsby hundred; now the Bishop of Bayeux has it.


TenInChief:
Ralph of Mortimer & Bishop Odo of Bayeux

Lord86:
Ralph of Mortimer & Bishop Odo of Bayeux

Lord66:
Erik <of Tealby> & Tosti <of Sawtry> & Edeva

Defendant:
Ralph of Mortimer & Bishop Odo of Bayeux & Losoard

Notes:
Ferries are recorded in Grimsby on the fief of Ralph of Mortimer and of the Bishop of Bayeux, whose man Losoard was (4,8;41;61-64); tolls are not mentioned there.

Text:
Ralph of Mortimer's men and Losoard's men receive a new toll in Grimsby, which did not exist before 1066, but Losoard denies that his men did it on his authority.


TenInChief:
Bishop Odo of Bayeux & Bishop of Lincoln

Lord86:
Bishop Odo of Bayeux & Bishop of Lincoln

Claimant:
Bishop Odo of Bayeux & Bishop of Lincoln

Notes:
The lands of Winghal church lay in Owersby, where both bishops held land (4,74. 7,28)

Text:
The Bishop of Bayeux and the Bishop of Lincoln ought to have jurisdiction over 2 1/2 bovates of land which lies in [the lands of] the church of Winghale.


Notes:
The jurisdiction is not recorded on either Siward's or the bishop's (4,74) holdings.

Text:
In Owersby hundred the Bishop of Bayeux has jurisdiction over 1/2 carucate of land which was Ernwin the priest's, and is now Siward the priest's.


Notes:
Perhaps a reference to part of 4 bovates in Keisby whose jurisdiction lay in Osgodby; no 1086 holder is recorded for this land. Jocelyn had two holdings in Osgodby, both jurisdictions of his manor of Tealby (28,20;22;24).

Text:
In Osgodby Jocelyn son of Lambert ought to have jurisdiction ?rq? over 1/2 bovate of land.


Notes:
Rainer was an intermediate holder, the predecessor from whom title derived. See also CN9;11;13;23. Neither Count Alan nor his main predecessor held in the wapentake so the basis of his jurisdiction is not apparent.

Text:
In Tealby hundred Rainer the deacon had Erik <of Tealby>'s land with all that belongs there. Jocelyn holds it and Rainer claims it. The Riding testifies that Count Alan's predecessor had the jurisdiction but they do not know of what type.


Notes:
The details identify the holding as 14,11. Jocelyn had a jurisdiction in Claxby (28,23).

Text:
In Claxby Jocelyn son of Lambert ought to have 1 mill which Geoffrey, Ivo Tallboys' man, seized against his [will].


Notes:
Ivo had 3 mills at Croxby where William Blunt also held land (49,2)

Text:
In Croxby William Blunt ought to have 1 garden in Ivo Tallboys' land, but he is prevented [from doing so] on account of a mill which was not there before 1066.


Notes:
The holdings of bishop and count were in 3,6 and 12,19 respectively; it is unclear who was claiming against whom.

Text:
In Fulstow the Bishop of Durham ought to have 40 acres of land - of meadow - and 4 plots, and Count Alan jurisdiction over them, as the Wapentake says.


Notes:
Count Alan also held in Fulstow but the interest of Drogo - presumably Drogo of la Beuvrière -  is not apparent.

Text:
In the same village ^[Fulstow]^ they judge that Count Alan has jurisdiction over 1 carucate of land in Robert the bursar's land, and Drogo ought to have 1 salt-house there which he claims, and Count Alan jurisdiction over it.


Notes:
Rainer was an intermediate holder, the predecessor from whom title derived. See also CN9;11;13;18. The archbishop held Swallow, a jurisdiction of Cuxwold (2,10); Rainer did not hold in the vill or the wapentake or succeed Fulcric elsewhere.

Text:
Rainer the deacon was in possession of Fulcric's land in Cuxwold when he left this land. Now Archbishop Thomas holds it; Rainer of Brimeux claims it.


Notes:
Hugh's holding was of 3 bovates Both Hugh (25,9) and William Percy (22,9-10) had holdings in Cuxwold which were outliers of Cabourne held by Grimkel, a possible source of confusion

Text:
Also in Cuxwold William of Percy ought to have 2 bovates of land, which he claims, in Hugh son of Baldric's land. The Wapentake testifies in favour of him.


Notes:
The bishop's holding in Wold Newton records 'a hall with a plot and full jurisdiction'.

Text:
The Wapentake says that Count Alan ought to have jurisdiction over Grimkel's Hall, whose land the Bishop of Durham has in [Wold] Newton.


Notes:
The brothers were probably One, Edric and Ecgwulf (12,29).

Text:
Kolsveinn [* of Lincoln *] did not deliver the land of Ingimundr and his brothers to Count Alan, but the same Ingimundr made it subject to this Count on account of other land which he held from him.


Notes:
The bishop held 13 bovates in Ormsby but these were a jurisdiction of Wyham, held by Rothulfr; the claim probably refers to the 4 carucates and 7 bovates held by Ulf and Skemundr which do not mention Stow or the bishop: see Whitelock, Wills, no. 39.

Text:
The North Riding, and all the County, testifies that the land of Ulf in [North] Ormsby, that is 4 1/2 carucates of land, was sold to St Mary's of Stow before 1066 and it lay in its [lands] in 1066, and later on Bishop Remigius was in possession of it.


Notes:
The printed notes identify {Schemin} as Skemundr and the holding as that at 30,20; but Ivo's holding(14,65)  is the one specified.

Text:
In {Schemin} [* [North] Ormsby *] in Ivo Tallboys' land Drogo [* of la Beuvrière *] claims 3 dwellings which he ought to have, by witness of the Wapentake, with full jurisdiction.


Notes:
Berengar's 4 carucates and 5 bovates at Fotherby was a jurisdiction of Binbrook (18,7); it was presumably these 5 bovates which the bishop claimed, in addition to his 7 bovates in the vill (3,20), Berengar retaining the jurisdiction.

Text:
In Fotherby, the land of Berengar of Tosny, the Bishop of Durham ought to have 5 bovates of land and Berengar [* of Tosny *] jurisdiction over it.


Notes:
Eudo acquired the lands of Sighvatr (29,10), and the bishop of Durham those of his brothers (3,21-26;43-47). Their father was probably the Godwin who held 29,11-13;16-17;30-32.  See also CS38

Text:
The Wapentake, and the whole County, testifies that the Bishop of Durham ought to have the land of 3 brothers with full jurisdiction, and Eudo son of Spirewic the land of the fourth brother, likewise with full jurisdiction: their names are Sighvatr - or Godwin - Alnoth, Fenkell and Eskil.


Notes:
Four other tenants-in-chief held in Burton, their holdings all being dependencies of other manors (7,9. 18,5. 24,3. 60,1); the full jurisdiction claimed for Swartbrand would give title against possible claims from those four.

Text:
`Lawress' Wapentake testifies that Alnoth had full jurisdiction over his land, 3 carucates in Burton. Now Swartbrand [* son of Ulf *] has it after him.


Notes:
Kolsveinn held as a tenant of the abbey (8,13). The circumstances in which the abbey acquired the church of All Saints and its land are detailed in C16, where Ernwin's claim is explained.

Text:
The Abbot of Peterborough claims 4 bovates of land in Riseholme, Kolsveinn [* of Lincoln *]'s land, and the Wapentake testifies that before 1066 they lay in [the lands of] the church of All Saints in Lincoln.


Notes:
Aghmund was Jocelyn's main predecessor (28,4;10-11;14-18;25-32;36;42-43), and Norman had succeeded Guthroth in C3 so the dispute concerned the terms of the pledge.

Text:
Three burgesses of Lincoln, Guthroth, Leofwin and Sigewine, before 1066 held in pledge from Aghmund the land which Jocelyn son of Lambert claims in `[Middle] Carlton' against Norman the fat.


Notes:
As neither Norman or Ivo Tallboys held in Scampton, Norman presumably acted as an official of the sheriff in extorting this money. Gilbert of Ghent held the only substantial holding in Scampton (24,1-4;6-7;9).

Text:
In Scampton Norman the fat added £3 and 1 gold mark, and he pledged this to Ivo the sheriff.


Notes:
Norman succeeded Godric elsewhere in Scothern (32,29); Kolsveinn presumably held the 4 1/2 bovates as a dependency of his manor of Scothern (26,4).

Text:
In Scothern hundred before 1066 Godric, Norman ^[of Arcy]^'s predecessor, had 4 1/2 bovates of land, as the Wapentake testifies.


Notes:
The abbey held jurisdictions of 5 1/2 carucates in Scothern and 2 other vills; although Gilbert had a substantial manor in `Lawress' wapentake, the basis of his claim is not apparent.

Text:
In the same hundred ^[Scothern]^ Gilbert of Ghent claims 1 carucate of land against the Abbot of Peterborough. But the Wapentake testifies that St Peter's had this land with its jurisdiction in 1066.


Notes:
Not recorded in the text; but the bishop held the royal manor of Nettleham (1,35-36) in the Lindsey survey: Keats-Rohan, Domesday People, p. 79.

Text:
In Nettleham hundred Bishop Remigius claims 2 bovates of land and the Wapentake testifies he ought to have them himself.


Claimant:
Ranulf of St Valery & Kolsveinn (of Lincoln)

Notes:
All three parties (and no others) held land in Reepham: 8,3. 26,9. 43,5.

Text:
The Wapentake says that St Peter's of Peterborough ought to have the fourth part of the woodland which Ranulf and Kolsveinn [* of Lincoln *] claim in Reepham.


Notes:
This may imply a claim by the bishop of Lincoln (who acquired the lands of St Mary's of Stow) since the land in Sturton had presumably been forfeited. There was no earl in 1086, his rights devolving on the Crown.

Text:
The Wapentake testifies that Ulfkil, Asfrith, Restelf and Wulfmer had full jurisdiction over their lands and over their men in Sturton[-by-Stow] hundred. St Mary's [* of Stow *] has 2 parts of the jurisdiction over the forfeiture in the Wapentake, and the Earl the third. Now the King [has it]. Likewise concerning heriot. If they had forfeited their land, St Mary's would have had 2 parts and the Earl the third.


Notes:
This may imply a claim by the bishop of Lincoln (who acquired the lands of St Mary's of Stow). {Broctone} does not occur in the text. There was no earl in 1086, his rights devolving on the Crown.

Text:
The Shire testifies that Gunnhvati's land - 1 manor of 1 carucate in lordship - was forfeited, 2 parts [going] to St Mary's [* of Stow *] and the third part for the Earl's use. Likewise concerning all the jurisdiction which belongs to [Gate] Burton or {Broctone}. Likewise also concerning Steingrimr's land, 18 bovates of land.


Notes:
This may imply a claim by the bishop of Lincoln (who acquired the lands of St Mary's of Stow). Several tenants-in-chief held land in `Well': 8 tenants-in-chief other than the bishop held in `Well' wapentake; but not apparently Ralph of Mortimer.

Text:
Concerning all the thanes who have land in `Well' Wapentake, St Mary's has 2 parts of the forfeiture, the Earl the third; likewise concerning heriot. Likewise if they had forfeited their land, two parts [would have been] in St Mary's [* of Stow *] and the third part in the Earl's hands. Now the King has it. In this custom Gilbert of Ghent does not partake nor Robert of Tosny nor Ralph of Mortimer because of their predecessors.


Notes:
The Claims here appear to concern `Aslacoe, in which case Grimkel's estate was Willoughton (47,1), which does not mention Merleswein. Possibly Broughton in `Lawress', where Grimkel held and Ralph Payenel succeeded Merleswein (35,1-2), is intended.

Text:
Before 1066 Grimkel had full jurisdiction over his land, but in 1066 he forfeited it and gave it to Merleswein the sheriff, because he stood accused before the King, and made him heir to it.


Notes:
The bishop's claim to jurisdiction is acknowledged in both entries; the jurisdiction presumably lay in Stow (7,1)

Text:
In Owmby[-by-Spital] Jocelyn has 9 bovates of Aghmund's land and Ivo 1 bovate. Bishop Remigius ought to have the jurisdiction of these.


Notes:
Eskil, not Siward Rufus, is named as the pre-Conquest landowner in 8,16; Siward was possibly his overlord. The 1086 tenant is named, not Ralph, possibly a scribal error: Foster & Langley, p. 56.

Text:
In Northorpe hundred Siward Rufus had 1 carucate of land with full jurisdiction before 1066, and more recently Ralph of Neville held it from Abbot Turold, but he did not have a deliverer for it. Now it is adjudged for the King's use.


Notes:
Swein's 1 1/2 carucates in Laughton is described as a manor not a jurisdiction but marked as subject to a claim by a marginal 'k'; Guy's holding in the same vill is recorded in 57,7.

Text:
In the same hundred ^[Northorpe]^ in Laughton village Guy of Craon claims jurisdiction over Swein's land through his predecessor Ulfgrim, and the Wapentake testifies that Ulfgrim himself had full jurisdiction over the same Swein before 1066.


Notes:
The abbey derived its title from Eskil, who subsequently bequeathed these and other manors to the abbey. Manton is attributed to Rothulfr in the text (8,20), and Muskham to the abbey (NTT 8,2). Rothulfr held other manors bequethed by Eskil (8,14;22).

Text:
The Shire testifies that in 1066 and later Eskil ^[brother of Brand]^ had from King Edward these three manors, Scotton, Scotter and Raventhorpe, under his free authority. Likewise he had Muskham in Nottinghamshire. He held 1 manor, Manton, on lease from his brother [* Abbot *] Brand, the monk.


Claimant:
Norman the fat & & Gilbert of Ghent & Henry of Ferrers

Notes:
Ulf Fenman was the principal predecessor of Gilbert of Ghent, and Siward Barn (not named in 63,17) of Henry. Norman the fat did not hold in the wapentake so the basis of his claim is not apparent.

Text:
The West Riding testifies that the claims which have been [made] in Epworth Wapentake have been rightly made. [a] Norman the fat claims 7 bovates of land against Geoffrey of la Guerche in Haxey. [b] Gilbert of Ghent claims 4 carucates of land and 6 bovates against Geoffrey himself. This is Ulf Fenman's land in Belton. [c] Henry of Ferrers claims 3 bovates of land against Geoffrey himself. This is Siward Barn's land in Amcotts. [d] Again, Gilbert of Ghent claims 1/2 carucate of the jurisdiction in Belton against the same Geoffrey which was Ulf Fenman's.


Notes:
Gilbert also held in Walcot (24,93), a jurisdiction of his manor of Folkingham (24,82-105), acquired from his principal predecessor, Ulf Fenman.

Text:
The Wapentake testifies that in Winteringham hundred Erneis of Buron ought to have Veggi's land, that is 6 bovates of land and 1 plot in Gilbert of Ghent's jurisdiction and another plot with full jurisdiction.


Notes:
Ralph had several holdings in `Manley' wapentake but none in Thealby; the king's jurisdiction in Kirton is recorded in 1,64.

Text:
In Thealby hundred Ralph Payenel claims 1 plot. The Wapentake says that he ought to have it himself and the King the jurisdiction in Kirton[-in-Lindsey].


Notes:
Norman had several holdings in `Manley' wapentake but none in Normanby; Drogo held 5 carucates in the vill.

Text:
Norman of Arcy claims 3 bovates of land in Normanby against Drogo [* of la Beuvrière *]. The Wapentake says that the land ought to be his and the jurisdiction Drogo's.


Vill:
Uffington & Tallington & Casewick & Deeping [St James]

Notes:
This statement may have been made to clarify the Alfred's title since Robert of Tosny and Godfrey of Cambrai had predecessors named Arnbiorn in 3 of the 4 named vills: 18,11-12. 51,2.

Text:
`Ness' Wapentake and the whole Riding have testified that the land of Wulfgeat and his mother Wulffled was not Arnbiorn's, his sister's relative, and he only had it in charge until Wulfgeat could hold the land: that is, 7 carucates in Uffington, 6 1/2 carucates in Tallington, 6 bovates in Casewick and 4 bovates - 1/2 carucate - in East Deeping [* Deeping [St James] *].


Notes:
The essential facts are repeated in the entry in the fief of the countess (56,4); Alfred's holding is recorded in 27,34-35.

Text:
The Wapentake says that before 1066 St Peter's of Peterborough had 60 acres of land which Countess Judith has and cultivates with ploughs from Belmesthorpe. The {warnode} of these 60 acres of land and of 48 acres of meadow lies in Uffington [the land] of Alfred of Lincoln, but it has been kept back by force


Notes:
The 1/2 carucate was held by Gilbert of Ghent as a jurisdiction of Gunfrid's manor of Casewick (52,1); the jurors state that Gunfrid should have the land as well as the jurisdiction.

Text:
The Wapentake says that Azur's 1/2 carucate of land in Barholm ought to be Gunfrid of Chocques'.


Notes:
This is presumably stated to clarify the title of the abbey, since the land of an outlaw would be forfeit to the Crown. This Hereward is the famous outlaw, commonly known as Hereward 'the Wake'.

Text:
The Wapentake says that Hereward <of Witham> did not have Asfrith's land in Barholm hundred on the day he fled.


Notes:
Merleswein was Ralph's principal predecessor so the statement impugns Ralph's title, though to whose benefit is unclear: possibly the king, or perhaps Oger who had acquired his main holding from Earl Morcar (42,1-7).

Text:
Ralph Payenel has 6 bovates of land of [* Earl *] Morcar's land in Burton[-le-Coggles] hundred, but Merleswein did not have it before 1066.


Claimant:
Gilbert of Ghent & Abbey of Peterborough

Notes:
Both claims are repeated in the entry on Drogo's fief (30,32). Gilbert's manor of Edenham is recorded in 24,25, and the abbey's manor of Witham in 8,34.

Text:
The Abbot of Peterborough claims 1 bovate of land against Drogo [* of la Beuvrière *] in Witham[-on-the-Hill] hundred. The Wapentake says that the land ought to be St Peter's and the jurisdiction Gilbert of Ghent's in Edenham.


Notes:
Radbod is not named in the text. Both the abbey and Drogo of la Beuvrière (30,31) had holdings of a carucate or more in [Little] Bytham.

Text:
In [Little] Bytham hundred Radbod ought to have 1 carucate of land which he claims, but the jurisdiction is St Peter's of Peterborough.


Notes:
The archbishop's manor of Skillington (2,37) records 'pasturable woodland' of 60 acres in the {warnode} of Bishop Remigius. Neither archbishop or bishop held in Little Bytham so the implication of this statement is not apparent.

Text:
They say that the {warnode} of 4d from 60 acres of woodland which lies in Skillington belongs in [Little?] Bytham.


Holding:
13 acres of woodland & 25 acres of arable

Notes:
Neither of the holdings in Irnham (27,41. 35,14) mention Arnbiorn so the implication of this statement is unclear.

Text:
They say that Arnbiorn had 13 acres of woodland and 25 acres of arable land in Irnham and that it belongs to Aslackby which Robert of Tosny has.


Notes:
The archbishop held in Lenton and Skillington but not Hardwick, only Lenton being recorded as acquired from Ulf. Skillington (2,37) had been held by Earl Morcar and Hardwick by Queen Edith (T2-4): see Whitelock, Wills, no. 39. Ilbold is not named in DB.

Text:
Archbishop Aldred acquired Lenton and Skillington, with the outlier Hardwick, from Ulf son of Topi with his own money which he gave him in the sight of the Wapentake; later they saw the King's seal through which he was possessed of these lands because Ilbold had dispossessed him of them.


Notes:
This section appears to refer to `Flaxwell' Wapentake, where Eskil held in Ashby. Ralph acquired another holding in the vill from Merleswein (35,15), his predecessor, so denial of Merleswein's superiority may imply rejection of a claim made by Ralph.

Text:
The Wapentake says that Eskil was the King's thane and never had his land under Merleswein.


Notes:
Arnketil is not named as holding land in Rauceby, but both Robert of Vessey (37,4) and Geoffrey Alselin (64,8-9) held jurisdictions there whose holders are unnamed; Robert of Stafford had several holdings in the vill (59,12-15).

Text:
Robert of Stafford wrongfully held 6 bovates, a jurisdiction, of Arnketil's land in Rauceby hundred, as the Wapentake says.


Notes:
DB describes the bishop of Durham's holding in Rauceby (3,37) as a jurisdiction of [Silk]_Willoughby, Arnketil's manor held by the bishop of Lincoln; but this statement implies that Remigius had exchanged the jurisdiction for 10 bovates of land.

Text:
They say that Bishop Remigius's claim which he makes concerning Arnketil's jurisdiction in Rauceby hundred is wrongful because he only had 10 bovates himself from the lordship of the same Arnketil's land in exchange, and the whole of the other land was delivered to the Bishop of Durham.


Notes:
Walter manor of Branston (31,11) had no named jurisdiction held by an Alsi; if the entry is in DB, the most likely holding is Kolsveinn's at Marston, acquired from Alsi and held by a Walter, conceivably Aincourt; but this was in Loveden Wapentake.

Text:
The Wapentake says that the 9 bovates of land which Walter of Aincourt claims are a jurisdiction of Branston, the land of Alsi the deacon which Walter has now: therefore he is claiming rightfully.


TenInChief:
Walter of Aincourt & Norman of Arcy & Heppo the bowman

Lord86:
Walter of Aincourt & Norman of Arcy & Heppo the bowman

Overlord66:
Walter of Aincourt & Norman of Arcy & Heppo the bowman

Claimant:
Walter of Aincourt & Norman of Arcy & Heppo

Notes:
Navenby (44,16) and Scopwick are still separated by Scopwick Heath, which was presumably the source of the dispute

Text:
The men of Navenby hold back by force 16s from the customary dues of pasturage which are in Scopwick and Kirkby [Green] and they did not give them before 1066.


Notes:
Robert acquired Metheringham (59,19) from Leofsi, and the archbishop 3 bovates in Hackthorn (in `Aslacoe') from Auti, claiming that 3 bovates - presumably Auti's - lay in the jurisdiction of his manor.

Text:
Robert of Stafford claims that the land of Auti, Archbishop Thomas's man, ought to lie in the jurisdiction of his predecessor, Leofsi, but the Wapentake says that they never saw Auti give the jurisdiction to Leofsi.


Notes:
Othin only holding was at Hainton (16,12), acquired by Roger of Poitou; Potterhanworth (31,17) was held by Walter of Aincourt. There is no indication of the nature of Earl Hugh's claim.

Text:
Concerning Earl Hugh's claim, they say that Othin had the land before 1066 and the jurisdiction lay in Potterhanworth.


Notes:
6 tenants-in-chief held in Canwick any one of whom could have been the subject of the claim; Swartbrand held in nearby vill of Metheringham (68,4).

Text:
In Canwick Swartbrand claims 140 acres. The Wapentake bears witness in favour of him because his father, Ulf, gave 1 gold mark in pledge for this land.


Notes:
Countess Judith did not hold in Marston; the holding referred to was probably that held by Osbern the priest (54,1), acquired from Thorfridh, probably Almer's brother of 56,7.

Text:
In Ponton Countess Judith holds 2 manors which were Almer's and his brothers'. Robert of Tosny claims them, and the Wapentake bears witness for him that they were delivered to him in exchange for Marston.


Notes:
Robert of Tosny held the vill of Woolsthorpe[-by-Belvoir] (18,27-28); Robert of Stafford's manor of Casthorpe is recorded in 59,2.

Text:
In Casthorpe Robert of Tosny claims 2 bovates and 2 plots against Robert Malet and the Wapentake says they ought to lie in Woolsthorpe[-by-Belvoir]. Concerning 1 garden in the same village they say that it ought to lie in Robert of Stafford's [manor of] Casthorpe.


Notes:
Northmann's holding is not recorded in the text but was probably the 7 'plots' claimed by the bishop in the royal manor of Grantham (1,9) and 2 bovates of its jurisdiction in Gonerby (1,10). The Bishop of Durham had a manor in Gonerby (3,31).

Text:
They say that Northmann son of Merewin had 7 gardens in ?rq? Grantham and their jurisdiction belongs there, but the gardens themselves belong to Gonerby. They say likewise concerning 2 bovates of land which belong to Gonerby and the jurisdiction lies in Grantham.


Notes:
Neither Ivo Tallboys or Robert of Tosny are recorded as holding in Stenwith, the single holding in the vill being held by Robert Malet (58,5). The comment on the division of land may have wide-ranging implications for the administration of the settlement.

Text:
Ivo Tallboys claims 2 carucates of land, less 30 acres, in Stenwith against Robert of Tosny for which he pays the tax himself. Concerning this, they say that it is right that they themselves should go over this land and divide it rightly in proportion to the tax they pay.


Notes:
Both tenants-in-chief had a predecessor named Karli (12,52;55. 59,4-6) though he is not recorded as holding in Stoke [Rochford] or `Winnibriggs' wapentake.

Text:
In Stoke [Rochford] half hundred Robert of Stafford claims Karli's land, 3 carucates of land. The Wapentake says that this land was Ralph the constable's and the said Robert has nothing there.


Notes:
The holdings of St Wulfram's of Grantham in the 2 wapentakes constitute the fief of the bishop of Salisbury.

Text:
They say that the tithes and customary church dues from `Winnibriggs' Wapentake and `Threo' Wapentake, from all the jurisdictions and {inlands} which the King has there, belong to the church of Grantham; see also CK62.


Notes:
Judith held 7 1/2 carucates in Thurlby, as a jurisdiction of her manor of Eagle (56,14); Osbern had no recorded holding in Thurlby.

Text:
Osbern, the King's officer, claims 1 carucate of land in Thurlby which by the Wapentake's witness he ought to have and to render the jurisdiction in Eagle, Countess Judith's manor.


Notes:
Neither tenant-in-chief is recorded as holding in the vill and only Drogo held land in the wapentake (30,27) so the nature of the dispute is not apparent.

Text:
Drogo of la Beuvrière claims 10 bovates of land, a jurisdiction, in Thurlby against Osbern of Arques, but the Wapentake says that he is claiming them wrongfully.


Vill:
Haddington & Hykeham & Skellingthorpe & Whisby

Notes:
The claim is repeated in the account of Baldwin's fief, which adds 8 carucates in North Hykeham (65,5); Aelfric's grant is rehearsed in a writ of the Conqueror; see also 9,1.

Text:
Concerning the claim which the Abbot of Westminster makes against Baldwin [* of Flanders *] about the land and jurisdiction of Aelric son of Mergeat, they say that they heard that the same Aelric gave it to St Peter's, but they do not know whether [it was] the whole or the half. However, they say that in Haddington there are 8 1/2 carucates of land, a jurisdiction and {inland} of Doddington, in [South] Hykeham 4 carucates of land, a jurisdiction of Doddington, in Skellingthorpe 12 carucates, a jurisdiction of Doddington, and in Whisby 6 carucates of land, {inland} and a jurisdiction of Doddington. The Abbot of Westminster claims the whole of this because the head manor was given to St Peter's. All the County bears witness in favour of St Peter's.


Notes:
The abbey held 6 carucates and 2 bovates in Thorpe, part of which was a jurisdiction of Doddington; Kofsi was the predecessor of Ralph of Mortimer so statement this may imply a claim on his behalf.

Text:
The Wapentake says that Kofsi had 10 bovates of land and 1 ?rq? church in the jurisdiction of Thorpe[-on-the-Hill].


Notes:
Neither Ulf or Swartbrand held in Hykeham or in Graffoe Wapentake so the basis of Swartbrand's claim is not apparent; the claim is repeated in the entry for North Hykeham (12,92).

Text:
The Wapentake says that Siward, not Ulf - Swartbrand's father -, had the manor of 4 carucates of land in North Hykeham, and therefore his claim is not right.


Notes:
The one manor in Ewerby was Kolgrim's (67,1) so this statement appears to imply a claim on his behalf.

Text:
They say that the 6 bovates of land in Austhorpe which were Godric's and now are Martin's, ought to be {inland} of Ewerby.


Notes:
Merleswein was Ralph's principal predecessor so the statement amounts to a denial of Ralph's claim. Thorkil and Algar held 1 carucate and 6 bovates in Heckington as 2 manors, the carucate presumably being Thorkil's.

Text:
Ralph Payenel claims against Kolsveinn [* of Lincoln *] in Heckington 6 bovates, land which was Algar the deacon's. The Wapentake says that Merleswein, Ralph's predecessor, did not have it.


Notes:
Waldin did not hold in Quarrington, nor did he succeed elsewhere to anyone who had held in the vill, so the basis of his claim is not apparent.

Text:
In Quarrington Waldin the Breton claims 14 bovates of land against the Abbot of Ramsey, but the Wapentake says that he does not claim it rightly.


Notes:
The Bishop of Lincoln's holding in Quarrington mentions neither Arnketil nor a pledge, and Arnketil himself is not recorded as holding in the vill, though he had 3 other properties in the wapentake (67,5-6 and 68,26).

Text:
Also in Quarrington Bishop Remigius claims that he held Arnketil's land in pledge, but [Arnketil] denies this and holds from the King.


Notes:
Thorkil is not named in the entry for Kirkby, his holding presumably being subsumed in the 5 carucates of the manor.

Text:
Kolsveinn [* of Lincoln *] claims 2 bovates of land and 1 garden against the King in Kirkby[-la-Thorpe] from Earl Morcar's land which Thorkil held. The Wapentake says both that the jurisdiction was Earl Morcar's and that this land does not lie in another manor.


Notes:
Both Robert (58,3) and Gilbert (24,29) held in Ingoldsby and both had predecessors named Azur, possibly the source of this dispute. Azur is not named in either entry. See also the note to the printed volume.

Text:
In Ingoldsby Robert Malet claims jurisdiction over 4 bovates of land which Gilbert of Ghent has. The Wapentake says that Robert himself ought to have it through Azur, his predecessor.


Notes:
Robert of Vessey acquired his entire fief from Aelric; his holding in Caythorpe was the only one in the vill.

Text:
In Caythorpe hundred Gilbert of Ghent claims against Robert of Vessey the meadow which was Aelric [* son of Mergeat *]'s, his predecessor, but the Wapentake says that the same Aelric had the whole meadow, and Gilbert's predecessor did not have anything of it except by renting it for money.


Notes:
This may imply a claim by Count Alan, who held in the same vill (12,46), or by the tenant, or the priest of the vill.

Text:
The Wapentake testifies that the tithe and the other customary dues of Carlton [Scroop] lie in the church of the same village.


Notes:
Like William of Warenne, Count Alan held in both vills (12,46;49) which may have been the source of the dispute.

Text:
In [Long] Bennington Count Alan claims 10 bovates of land, but the Wapentake says that they belong to Carlton [Scroop], William of Warenne's manor, and that Earl Harold, his predecessor, had them thus.


Notes:
Thorfridh's land in Loveden Wapentake was held by Osbern the priest; neither the bishop's nor Northmann's interest is recorded in the main text.

Text:
The Bishop of Durham claims 2 bovates of land in Marston from Thorfridh's land. Concerning this, they say that Northmann gave Thorfridh himself 3 gold marks for this land before 1066, and after 1066 he gave a fourth mark.


Notes:
Drogo acquired Earl Morcar's manors in 4 wapentakes; but all those in Aveland went to Oger (42,1;3-5;7-8).

Text:
The men of Aveland Wapentake testify that the manor [of] Bourne was Earl Morcar's before 1066. Now Oger [* the Breton *] has it from the King. Drogo claims it, but wrongfully.


Notes:
Heppo held a jurisdiction of 3 bovates in Dyke (61,2), possibly a duplicate (but see CK42); he also held the manor of Haconby (61,1). Oger had another jurisdiction in Dyke (42,5) which may have been the source of confusion.

Text:
The Wapentake says that the 3 1/2 bovates which Oger [* the Breton *] has in Dyke lie in Haconby and are by rights Heppo the bowman's.


Notes:
Heppo, who held Haconby (61,1), had a holding of the same size (61,3), perhaps resulting from a division. The implication is unclear: either the land or the superiority was Heppo's, perhaps the land since the superiority is ackowledged in Oger's entries.

Text:
They say that 1 carucate of land in Morton, {inland}, and 1 1/2 bovates in Hanthorpe, a jurisdiction, belong to Haconby, and were there before 1066 and [that] Leofric had them.


Notes:
Morton was a jurisdiction of Quarrington, a manor of the Abbey of Ramsey (10,1).

Text:
They say that also in Morton St Benedict's of Ramsey ought to have 1/2 carucate of land with full jurisdiction. Oger [* the Breton *] holds it wrongfully.


Notes:
Haconby was a jurisdiction of Edenham, a manor of Gilbert of Ghent acquired from Ulf Fenman (24,25).

Text:
They say that in Haconby Oger [* the Breton *] holds wrongfully 9 bovates of land because Gilbert of Ghent ought to have them through Ulf Fenman, his predecessor, who had them before 1066.


Notes:
The chronicle of Hugh Candidus (ed. Mellows, p. 69) claims that Healfdene's land was granted King William to the Bishop of Lincoln but that Dunsby had been held from the abbey at a rent and so was rightfully the abbey's: see also Whitelock, Wills, no 39.

Text:
The Wapentake says that Healfdene [* son of Topi *]'s land in Dunsby, which Bishop Remigius holds and the Abbot of Peterborough claims, was not St Peter's before 1066.


Notes:
Rippingale is associated with Ringstone where Robert of Tosny's predecessors were Aslak and Dene (18,15-16), possibly the men of one of Robert's principal predecessors, Thorgot and Arnbiorn, probably the latter: see CK47.

Text:
In Rippingale Oger [* the Breton *] holds 1 carucate of land which the Wapentake says was Robert of Tosny's predecessor's.


Notes:
Robert of Tosny held in Kirkby [Underwood] (18,16) and Arnbiorn was one of his principal predecessors so this may imply a claim on his behalf; see also CK46.

Text:
They say that Osfram's land in Kirkby [Underwood] was not in Arnbiorn's jurisdiction.


Notes:
DB records Crowland as holding Rippingale 'for the monks' supplies'; Hereward appears to have had an interest in part of the vill elsewhere (42,11).

Text:
They say that St Guthlac's [* of Crowland *] land which Oger [* the Breton *] holds in Rippingale was lordship revenue of the monks, and that Abbot Ulfkil assigned it to Hereward <of Witham> at a revenue as might be agreed between them each year, but the Abbot repossessed it before Hereward fled from the country because he had not held to the agreement.


Notes:
Both the abbey (42,13) and Guy (57,10) had manors in Rippingale, a possible source of confusion; Dowsby is entered as a manor, not a jurisdiction, on Guy's fief,

Text:
They say that the jurisdiction of 3 carucates of land in Dowsby, which Osfram had in pledge and was later redeemed, ought to lie in Rippingale, St Guthlac's [* of Crowland *] manor. They say it was thus before 1066 and later until Guy of Craon took possession of it.


Notes:
Possibly a reference to Earl Morcar's lands retained by the king though 7 other tenants-in-chief also held in the same area.

Text:
The claims which Drogo of la Beuvrière makes on the lands of [* Earl *] Morcar they leave to the King's judgement.


Notes:
Ralph the constable, Count Alan's principal predecessor, is not named in the Billingborough entry; both the count (12,52;55) and Robert (59,4-6) had a predecessor named Karli, presumably the source of the conflict.

Text:
They say that Robert of Stafford wrongfully claims Karli's land in Billingborough because the same Karli held it from Ralph the constable.


Notes:
The facts are re-stated in the Bishop's entry (3,32) for the whole holding at Newton, Wulfgeat's share being duplicated in 67,10.

Text:
They say that Wulfric Wilde's land in Walcot hundred ought to be half the Bishop of Durham's, and half that of a certain man Wulfgeat who has it in alms from the King.


Notes:
Ralph is not recorded as having land or jurisdiction in Osbournby or a predecessor named Aelfric so the basis of his claim is not apparent.

Text:
Ralph Payenel claims full jurisdiction over Aelfric [* son of Godram *]'s land which Guy of Craon has in Osbournby. The Wapentake says that the same Ralph ought to have 1 horse from this land whenever he goes on a [military] expedition


Notes:
The facts concerning the 2 carucates are restated in the entry (26,53). The statement of immunity might have been made to pre-empt similar claims in Pickworth or for Auti's other lands.

Text:
In Pickworth there are 2 carucates of land which were Auti's and now are Kolsveinn [* of Lincoln *]'s. They are not in the count of any hundred and do not have their like in Lincolnshire.


Notes:
The entry on Walter's fief does not mention a pledge, and neither statement is unambiguous about the date, so the implication is unclear. Robert of Tosny had a predecessor named Thori who held in this wapentake.

Text:
Concerning Thori's land in [Old] Somerby which Walter of Aincourt has, they say that before 1066 they saw the same Thori have it, but in 1066 Northmann held it in pledge. The men of the Wapentake do not know on what basis because they have not seen him perform any service for it.


Notes:
Neither Peterborough or Westminster had interests in the Wapentake so St Peter's is perhaps the manorial church, the statement 'defining parochial obligation tenurially': Blair, Church in Anglo-Saxon Society, p. 499.

Text:
They say that the tithe and other customs [due] to the church from Thori's land in Ropsley hundred belong to St Peter's church [* of Ropsley *].


Notes:
Walter held in the adjacent vill of Belton (31,1), perhaps the source of his claim.

Text:
Walter of Aincourt claims the service of Guy of Raimbeaucourt's men in the manor of Syston, but he does not have a just claim.


Notes:
Drogo did not hold land in the wapentake but he had a predecessor named Aethelstan (30,33-35;37), perhaps the source of his claim

Text:
In Welby hundred Drogo claims 4 carucates of land against Guy of Craon, but the Wapentake bears witness in favour of Guy that they are rightly his.


Notes:
The king had no holding in Belton; Walter held 4 carucates there.

Text:
They say that Walter of Aincourt ought not to have 1/2 carucate of land which he claims against the King in Belton, but the King [ought to have it].


Notes:
Guy held 1/2 carucate in Belton (57,25). Kolgrim held in the same vill, but acquired his holding from a different predecessor, Roald (67,13). Both holdings were connected to 'Towthorpe', providing several possible sources of conflict.

Text:
Also in Belton Kolgrim ought to have 1 bovate of land of Algar's land which Guy of Craon has, but the jurisdiction belongs to Guy in `Towthorpe'.


Notes:
Guy & Ingelrann of Raimbeaucourt held this meadow, its manorial status undefined; Kolgrim had a manor in Belton (67,13).

Text:
They say that before 1066 Young Leofric withheld the {warnode} of 10 acres of meadow also in Belton. Kolgrim claims the jurisdiction of these 10 acres.


Notes:
This claim had earlier been made for `Winnibriggs' & `Threo' Wapentakes (CK24); it is not apparent why `Westhorpe' was singled out for separate treatment.

Text:
They say that the whole of the customs [due] to the church and the tithe from `Westhorpe' belong to the church of Grantham, as Bishop Osmund claims.


Notes:
Both tenants-in-chief had jurisdictions in Honington, dependant upon manors held by Ulf Fenman (14,89) and Godwin <of Teigh> (24,84) respectively; Azur is unnamed but presumably held 2 1/2 of Ulf's 3 carucates from him.

Text:
In Honington hundred Gilbert claims the jurisdiction of 2 1/2 carucates of land through his predecessor Ulf, but the Wapentake says that Ivo ought to have the jurisdiction as Azur, his predecessor, had it from Ulf.


Claimant:
Kolsveinn of Lincoln & Robert of Stafford

Notes:
Kolsveinn held land in Barkston (26,33) but Robert did not hold in either vill or wapentake; his claim may have been based upon his predecessor, Thorfridh (59,13-14).

Text:
Robert of Stafford claims 2 mills which are in Barkston, and Kolsveinn [* of Lincoln *] likewise claims them. The Wapentake says that they lie in Marston and their jurisdiction in Grantham.


Notes:
The entry for Count Alan's fief repeats the claims of the Abbey of Ramsey and of Bishop Remigius (through his predecessor) but state that they do not know on what basis Bishop Wulfwige held from the abbey.

Text:
In Drayton hundred Count Alan has 1 carucate of land from St Benedict's of Ramsey. Bishop Remigius claims it and the Wapentake bears witness in favour of him that ^[Bishop]^ Wulfwige, his predecessor, held it from St Benedict's before 1066.


Notes:
Count Alan had holdings in Drayton and Bicker (a jurisdiction) acquired from Earl Ralph the constable (12,60;75); Guy's holding in Drayton emphasised its manorial status, perhaps the  source of the conflicting claims. Algar is not named.

Text:
Guy of Craon holds 4 bovates of land in Drayton and 10 bovates in Bicker hundred from the land of Aethelstan son of Godram. Count Alan claims these, and Algar, his man, has given a pledge to the King's barons to establish by court-judgement or by combat that Aethelstan ^[son of Godram]^ himself was not in possession of these 14 bovates before 1066. Against this Guy's man, Alstan of Frampton, has given his pledge to prove that he was in possession of them with full jurisdiction, and that Guy was in possession of them from the time of Ralph the constable until now, and he holds them now.


Notes:
Several of the Bishop of Lincoln's manors (7,16;18;20;22;27;30-33) had been acquired from Healfdene (son of Topi), possibly this Healfdene of Steyning.

Text:
The men of Holland testify that Healfdene [* son of Topi *], Bishop Remigius's predecessor, had in Steyning 3 carucates of land without interference which Count Alan now has and [has] wrongfully because the Bishop was in possession of them.


Notes:
A Thorkil was Alfred's predecessor on several manors (27,15-18;40;51-53) but not of the Count elsewhere.

Text:
Alfred of Lincoln claims 1 carucate of land in Quadring against Count Alan. The men of Holland agree with the same Alfred both that it was his predecessor's, and [that] he himself was in possession of it in the time of Earl Ralph.


Notes:
Earl Ralph the constable, Count's Alan's principal predecessor, is named as overlord of the 6 bovates in the entry for Gosberton.

Text:
Gyrthr, Count Alan's man, gave a pledge to affirm that Count Alan's predecessor had 6 bovates of land with full jurisdiction in Gosberton and therefore Guy of Craon does not claim them rightly.


Notes:
Neither a monastery or church of Sutton, or a Ketil of Sutton, appears to be to be recorded in Sutton or in the royal manor of Tydd [St Mary] (1,28). (Ivo Tallboys had a church there, in an outlier of Spalding: 14,98).

Text:
The men of Holland testify that the jurisdiction of Ketil of Sutton's minster [church] of [Long] Sutton lies in the King's manor of Tydd [St Mary].


Notes:
12,84 records that Count Alan held 5 carucates of the jurisdiction of Gedney adjudged for the king's use; 1,33 (a duplicate?) states they are in the king's hands. The sixth carucate is probably included in 12,83 & 1,32. None mention a royal gift.

Text:
The 6 carucates of land which the King's officers claim in Holbeach lay in the King's manor of Gedney. Now Count Alan has them as one manor by the King's gift.


# Manors

Notes:
Shared statistics: P1-P5; value and woodland recorded in P5. Geld: 1 sulung and 16 acres but total liability of Canons was 24 sulungs (M1 and P16) so this assessment is recorded elsewhere and adjusted accordingly. Payments: villagers, 22s.


Notes:
Shared statistics: P1-P5; value is recorded in P5. Duplicates: geld duplicated in M1. Payments: villagers, 16s 8d.


Notes:
Shared statistics: P1-P5, value and woodland recorded in P5. Duplicates: geld duplicated in M1. Payments: meadow, 16s 8d.


Notes:
Shared statistics: P1-P5: value and woodland recorded in P5. Duplicates: geld duplicated in M1. Payments: villagers, 20s less 2d.


Notes:
Shared statistics: P1-P5; value and woodland recorded here. Geld: a small piece of land. Payments: villagers, 50d.


Notes:
Payments: Dover tolls, £8 before 1066, now £22.


Notes:
Values: from mills, £7. Values: payments recorded as valuation. Duplicates: 4 mills possibly duplicated in P19.


Notes:
Values: from this community the archbishop has 55s annually, recorded as a payment though an outgoing sum.


Notes:
Geld: 450 acres, which make 2.5 sulungs; but total liability of Canons was 24 sulungs (M1 and P16) so this assessment is recorded elsewhere and adjusted accordingly.


Notes:
Geld: 100 acres which meet their tax where they did before 1066; but total liability of Canons was 24 sulungs (M1 and P16) so this assessment is recorded elsewhere and adjusted accordingly.


Notes:
Geld: 150 acres; but these are additional to 24 total (M1 and P16), assumed to be recorded elsewhere. Values: 'all these' assumed to refer to P6-20; £60 assumed to be both 1066 and intermediate dates.


Notes:
Duplicates: 4 mills possibly duplicated in P13. Payments: meadow, mills, fishery and salt-house taken away but not apparently recorded elsewhere.


Notes:
Duplicates: Hawley, duplicated in 5,1, not included here. Values: £90 according to the reeve who pays in a mixture of bullion, ora and coin.


Notes:
Values: values of tenant holdings (£10.867) assumed to be additional and to account for difference between value and Render.


Notes:
Values: £18, King Edward had two parts, Earl Godwin the third and Canons the other half.


Notes:
Values: town burnt in 1066 so its value (1066 and later) could not be reckoned; division between king and bishop only given for Render.


Notes:
Duplicates: mill probably duplicated in 5,188.


Notes:
Geld: on the equations employed here, M2-24 total 20.833 hides, 0.167 being the balance of 21 hides; the 3 sulungs in Lympne are recorded in P2-4. Values: £61 before 1066 but details in M2-24 total £89. Duplicates: details duplicated in entries.


Notes:
Duplicates: geld duplicated in M1. Payments: monastery, 11s.


Notes:
Duplicates: geld duplicated in M1. Geld: 1 yoke, 25 acres.


Notes:
Duplicates: geld duplicated in M1. Values: Excerpta, 60s.


Notes:
Duplicates: geld duplicated in M1. Landowners: Sigar named in Excerpta which implies Turbat and Trublet are the same individual.


Notes:
Geld: 1/2 sulung and 25 acres. Duplicates: geld duplicated in M1.


Notes:
Geld: 85 acres; Excerpta, 80. Duplicates: geld duplicated in M1. Values: Excerpta provides the intermediate valuation: value then £12; now 60s.


Notes:
Geld: 1 sulung and 100 acres. Duplicates: geld duplicated in M1. Values: Excerpta adds that archbishop has 1 sulung, value £6.5, not included here.


Notes:
Geld: 3 virgates; Excerpta, 3 yokes. Duplicates: geld duplicated in M1. Values: Excerpta, value £4.


Notes:
Duplicates: geld duplicated in M1. Values: Excerpta provides the intermediate valuation, value was 30s; now 25s.


Notes:
Geld: 1.5 yokes; Excerpta, 1 yoke. Duplicates: geld duplicated in M1. Values: Excerpta, 20s before 1066.


Notes:
Duplicates: geld duplicated in M1. Landowners: Excerpta names Oswy as 1066 holder.


Notes:
Population: 21 houses assumed by Darby to imply burgesses. Waste: houses destroyed. Payments: toll, 68s; meadow, 15s; unproductive woodland, 24s. Values: renders £30 weighed, £24 at face value, 110s to sheriff.


Notes:
Churches: church possibly recorded elsewhere.


Notes:
Geld: additional sulungs, assumed to be new land. Payments: fisheries, 22s 8d; salt-houses, 27s; toll, 40s; pasture, 13s 4d; escorts, 50s. Values: £140 of Render weighed. Churches: Excerpta, 1.


Notes:
Payments: woodland, 31s 2d; market, £4; salt-houses, 3s 2d; 3 sites in Canterbury, 20d. Values: Farley records £9 for £60.


Notes:
Payments: 32 messuages which clergy of town hold in their guild, 35s.


Notes:
Payments: 40000 herrings for the supplies of the monks.


Notes:
Payments: burgesses in Rochester, 6s 8d. Values: Richard's 10s assumed to be additional.


Notes:
Values: Richard's £10 assumed to be additional; 1066 and intermediate valuations missing; subholding values of thanes from Domesday Monachorum.


Notes:
Values: pays £23 and a man-at-arms for the Archbishop's service. Landowners: Domesday Monachorum records (Earl) Godwin as the pre-Conquest landholder; Domesday is silent.


Notes:
Values: £1.50 assumed to be additional to valuation and Render.


Notes:
Geld: 1 1/2 yokes; Excerpta, 1 1/2 sulungs. Values: Richard's £15 assumed to be additional; values of subholdings from Domesday Monachorum.


Notes:
Payments: salt-houses, none recorded; fisheries, 450 eels. Details of subholdings from Domesday Monachorum, assumed to be additional. Values: Cola and Wulfric pay 20s to monks.


Notes:
Values: subholdings assumed to be additional. Domesday Monachorum values differ slightly. Landowners: DM names two subtenants instead of 1 Frenchman.


Notes:
Values: Domesday Monachorum assessed value differs slightly from the Render; additional £7 7s assumed to be part of Render. Payments: salt-houses, 64d; fishery, none recorded.


Notes:
Values: subholdings assumed to be additional; figures in Domesday Monachorum differ slightly. Landowners: details of dependencies supplied by Domesday Monachorum.


Notes:
Values: subholdings assumed to be additional; details from Domesday Monachorum.


Notes:
Duplicates: 1 sulung possibly duplicated in 2,24. Landowners: Domesday Monachorum supplies details of subholdings, assumed to be additional. Values: details in satellite total £11, not £9. DM records burgesses who pay 10s.


Notes:
Geld: Domesday Monachorum, 5.5 sulungs. Values: DM values differ significantly. Payments: salt-house, 16d; fishery, 10d.


Notes:
Geld: 1086 reduction given by Domesday Monachorum which states the archbishop has the other sulung for his plough. Values: Domesday Monachorum values differ significantly.


Notes:
Payments: salt-house and fishery, 30d. Values: details exceed stated total (£123: £123.25); Domesday Monachorum gives £6 for William of Arques.


Notes:
Geld: Farley, 7 sulungs but manuscript correction to 6 probably contemporary; Domesday Monachorum adds that the assessment was 5.5 sulungs when the archbishop received it.


Notes:
Geld: Domesday Monachorum, 20 sulungs for current assessment. Values: now it pays £101 recorded as 1086 valuation and Render, though possibly only latter meant.


Notes:
Geld: Domesday Monachorum, 1 not 1.5 sulungs, as also implied in valuation. Duplicates: sulung possibly a duplicate of part of 2,16. Values: value for 1066 only for 1/2 sulung.


Notes:
Payments: 85 burgesses, £6; 7 priests, £7 5s. Landowners: Domesday Monachorum names William of Arques as tenant and Alfhere as his predecessor.


Notes:
Values: subholdings assumed to be additional. Payments: 40 eels. Landowners: Domesday Monachorum supplies details of subholdings.


Notes:
Values: Domesday Monachorum, now it is valued at £8 1s in gifts. Payments: market, 39s 7d.


Notes:
Values: £4 of £11 to monks for clothing.


Notes:
Values: £3 (Domesday Monachorum), woodland, mill, fishery held by Richard of Tonbridge, assumed to be additional.


Notes:
Geld: 3 yokes before 1066, one now outside Orpington, recorded as an exemption.


Notes:
Landowners: Domesday Monachorum records Young Wulfnoth as the pre-Conquest holder. Payments: grazing, 9s 6d.


Notes:
Values: Domesday Monachorum, now valued at £11.


Notes:
Geld: lies in 6 sulungs of Hollingbourne (3,3). Landowners: pre-Conquest holder recorded in Domesday Monachorum. Duplicates: 1/2 sulung duplicated in 3,3.


Notes:
Landowners: 1066 holder recorded in Domesday Monachorum.


Notes:
Values: Domesday Monachorum gives 1066 value as £2.5.


Notes:
Geld: Domesday Monachorum records then 7 sulungs, now 5 but answers for 3. Landowners: DM also records Earl Godwin as the pre-Conquest landholder; Domesday is silent. Values: between the borough and manor.


Notes:
Landowners: Deormann's holding recorded in Domesday Monachorum.


Notes:
Values: Richard's £4 assumed to be additional; he also has half the woodland.


Notes:
Geld: 1/2 sulung has never paid levy. Duplicates: 1/2 sulung duplicated in 2,33.


Notes:
Values: Richard's £0.925 assumed to be additional.


Notes:
Values: subholdings assumed to be additional. Payments: 1200 eels.


Notes:
Geld: 2.5 sulungs before 1066 according to Domesday Monachorum.


Notes:
Payments: no payment recorded for new fishery.


Notes:
Values: £7 of tenant holding assumed to be additional.


Notes:
Population: Excerpta, burgesses 100 less 19. Payments: satellites record different figures, £8 0s 6d (DM) and £9 0s 6d (Excerpta).


Notes:
Payments: 8 fisheries with [payment of] tribute, 25s. Ploughlands: recorded in Domesday Monachorum.


Notes:
Geld: 2 1/2 hides in 1086, a scribal error (Domesday Monachorum has 2.5 sulungs); 1/2 sulung at Pett according to DM. Values: subholding assumed to be additional.


Notes:
Geld: 1/2 sulung, 1 yoke and 5 acres in Giddinge assumed to be additional. Values: Domesday Monachorum, £37 10s 3d.


Notes:
Landowners: details of subholdings and tenants from Domesday Monachorum. Values: £46 16s 4d; DM, it pays £16 16s 4d; subholdings assumed to be additional.


Notes:
Landowners: details of tenant holding from Domesday Monachorum, assumed to be additional.


Notes:
Values: £1 of Richard of Tonbridge assumed to be additional; ounce of gold assumed to be approximately £4 (after Baring).


Notes:
Values: it pays £20 and an ounce of gold (assumed to be approximately £4, after Baring); 15s of Richard of Tonbridge assumed to be additional. Payments: a porpoise.


Notes:
Values: Render from Domesday Monachorum.


Notes:
Values: from 80 messuages which belong to Frindsbury and Borstal.


Notes:
Duplicates: duplicate of part of 1,1. Values: Wilfred's 5s assumed to be additional.


Notes:
Payments: 5 fisheries, 30d, the sixth serves the hall; landing-place, 5s 4d. Values: 4s from woodland assumed to be additional.


Notes:
Values: 1066 value is a little more than £4.


Notes:
Geld: 1/2 sulung held by men assumed to be additional. Population: 8 male and female slaves, divided equally. Values: subholdings assumed to be additional and £1 of 2 men assumed to be unchanged.


Notes:
Values: royal holding assumed to be additional.


Notes:
Values: 3s assumed to be additional. Payments: 150 eels.


Notes:
Values: mill at 5 sulungs, interpreted as a scribal error for 5s.


Notes:
Values: king's 10d assumed to be additional.


Notes:
Payments: 90 eels. Values: Richard's £6 assumed to be additional.


Notes:
Values: subholdings assumed to be additional.


Notes:
Payments: enclosure, 20s. Values: what Richard of Tonbridge has in his territory in a wood, 5s, assumed to be additional.


Notes:
Payments: 4 houses in Rochester, 9s 10d. Values: what Richard of Tonbridge has in his territory, 20d, assumed to be additional.


Notes:
Payments: 1 house in Rochester, 30d. Values: holding of Richard of Tonbridge, 11s, assumed to be additional.


Notes:
Payments: mill, 330 eels; fishery, 60 eels.


Notes:
Values: the houses from this manor of the Bishop of Rochester, 7s, assumed to be additional.


Notes:
Values: the 3 pig pastures where 4 villagers live of King William, £2, assumed to be additional.


Notes:
Ploughteams: blank in manuscript for demesne ploughteams.


Notes:
Geld: 1/2 sulung assumed to be included in manorial total; 1086 reduction recorded in Excerpta.


Notes:
Payments: 3 measures of land in Rochester, 5s.


Notes:
Payments: 2 measures of land in Canterbury, 12d.


Notes:
Payments: 1 house in Canterbury which pays 25d belonged to this manor before 1066, assumed to be lost by 1086.


Notes:
Payments: 3 houses in Canterbury which pay 40d belonged to this manor before 1066, assumed to be lost.


Notes:
Geld: to this manor belongs free land for 3 oxen. Values: 5s assumed to be additional.


Notes:
Values: Adam's holding assumed to be always 30s, and subholdings to be additional to Render. Payments: 9 houses in Rochester which paid 6s taken away.


Notes:
Payments: fisheries, 2s; 2 sites held by Bishop Odo, 30s.


Notes:
Payments: fishery, 30 eels; 3 sites (in Rochester), 3s.


Notes:
Values: subholding assumed to be additional.


Notes:
Values: royal holding and that of Richard in his territory, assumed to be additional.


Notes:
Geld: 1 hide in Essex assumed to be the equivalent of a sulung for geld. Values: King's 7s assumed to be additional. Payments: 3 sites in Rochester, 50d.


Notes:
Values: what Richard has in his territory, 7s, assumed to be additional.


Notes:
Geld: additional 30 acres, assumed to be new land.


Notes:
Values: before 1066 and later assumed to refer to three dates.


Notes:
Ploughteams: land for 2 ploughs; it is in lordship, recorded as 1 ploughteam, 2 possibly meant.


Notes:
Payments: 1/2 fishery, 4d; salt-house, 30d; pasture, 40d. Values: royal holding assumed to be additional.


Notes:
Geld: additional 1/2 sulung, assumed to be new land. Payments: 3 fisheries, 4s; 2 salt-houses, 32d; a priest who gives 40s annually; 3 messuages in Canterbury, 6s 8d. Pasture: for 300 sheep and 31 cattle.


Notes:
Payments: 4 houses in Canterbury and 2 outside, 8s.


Notes:
Geld: yokes and acres in subholdings; villagers' land held by tenants. Values: subholdings assumed to be additional. Payments: churches, 55s; salt-house, 30d; pig pasture and farmed land, £3.


Notes:
Geld: none stated for outlier. Payments: 25 fisheries, 34s 8d; cartage, 60s; grazing, 26s. Values: £40 when acquired but paid £100, recorded as Render.


Notes:
Payments: 1 salt-house, 28d; 2 fisheries without dues.


Notes:
Payments: 2 fisheries, 17d; pasture, 18s 7d; 13 messuages in Canterbury, 15s.


Notes:
Geld: Herbert has 1/2 sulung and 3 virgates, Turstin 1 yoke. Payments: a fishery, 10d; a salt-house, 4d; 1 messuage in Canterbury, 30d. Values: Turstin's 5s assumed to be additional.


Notes:
Geld: acres. Values: 42d of tenant holding assumed to be additional. Payments: 1 messuage in Canterbury, 21d.


Notes:
Values: payment by villagers assumed to be additional to the valuation.


Notes:
Payments: 1 messuage in Canterbury, 16d.


Notes:
Geld: 4 yokes, fourth assumed to be additional.


Notes:
Population: 3 villagers hold it from Adam (son of Hubert) at a revenue; recorded as landowners, not rural population.


Notes:
Geld: 5 sulungs before 1066, now answers for 2 and did so after the Bishop gave the manor. Values: now £4, but the Bishop had £8, recorded as the Render. Population: manuscript correction of 30 to 29 may not be contemporary.


Notes:
Payments: 1/2 fishery, 300 herrings; 5 sites in Canterbury, 7s 10d. Values: £10 before 1066; the Bishop put it at a revenue for £10; when acquired and now £6; £10 recorded as Render.


Notes:
Values: Hugh de Montfort holds what is valued at £1; tenant holding assumed to be included in £4 manorial total.


Notes:
Values: £4 and the service of 1 man-at-arms.


Notes:
Values: only subholding value (woodland and pasture) supplied.


Notes:
Geld: 1 yoke and 1 virgate. Duplicates: valuation duplicated in 9,16.


Notes:
Geld: 12 acres. Values: 4s a year assumed to imply always.


Notes:
Payments: 10 salt-houses, 100d; 2 fisheries, 5d.


Notes:
Geld: recorded in 9,22. Duplicates: 1/2 pig pasture and value (15s) duplicated in 9,22.


Notes:
Values: tenant holding assumed to be additional.


Notes:
Payments: villagers and smallholder, 4s 7d.


Notes:
Payments: mill, 48 measures of corn; does not belong to any manor. Duplicates: mill probably duplicated in D10.


Notes:
Values: subholdings assumed to be additional to valuation. Duplicates: possibly (though not probably) partially duplicated in 9,36.


Notes:
Geld: 2 sulungs, possibly more (manuscript damaged); Aethelwold has 1 yoke. Payments: 32 messuages in Sandwich, 42s 8d.


Notes:
Geld: 1 1/2 yokes and 1 sulung and 1/2 yoke.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 5,211-212, valuation recorded in 5,212.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 5,211-212, valuation recorded here.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 5,213-214, valuation recorded in 5,214. Geld: 1 yoke and 10 acres.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 5,213-214, valuation recorded here. Geld: 15 acres.


Notes:
Ploughteams: villagers have 1/2 plough and 1 1/2 ploughs.


Notes:
Payments: 4 messuages in Canterbury, 6s less 1d.


Notes:
Values: 30d paid by village, recorded as valuation.


Notes:
Geld: 40 acres. Values: 6s paid by villager assumed to be additional to villager's rent.


Notes:
Values: villager's 30d assumed to be additional.


Notes:
Geld: now 3 yokes because Hugh de Montfort holds the other part in his territory (9,52).


Notes:
Values: when received at 20 pence to the ora; if abbot had full jurisdictions, value would be another £20. Payments: dues, 6d; Adelulf, 12d; Hugh de Montfort, 300 eels and 2s.


Notes:
Geld: Excerpta records the yoke at Bromfeld as 1/2 yoke. Values: tenant holding assumed to be additional.


Notes:
Geld: 1 sulung and 1 yoke; second yoke assumed to be recorded elsewhere. Values: Excerpta, £35, adding tribute of £13.033 (possibly additional), not included here. Population: 70 burgesses were in Canterbury, assumed to be there in 1086. 4 mills: Excerpta


Notes:
Values: £3 in Bishop's park assumed to be lost value excluded from £32.


Notes:
Population: 39 with 32 smallholders interpreted as 39 villagers with 32 smallholders; but there is no gap in the manuscript. Values: Excerpta records £56 as the assessment.


Notes:
Values: subholding assumed to be additional and £9 when there is peace in the land assumed to be current. Payments: salt-house, not recorded; fisheries, 3d; priest 20s.


Notes:
Values: subholding of 4 French men-at-arms assumed to be additional. Payments: salt, 50 packloads; church, 12s.


Notes:
Geld: 1 yoke; 24 acres assumed to be ingeldable (Excerpta records the 33 acres). Payments: 73 messuages, 13s; burgesses, 22s.


Notes:
Geld: 4 acres assumed to be ingeldable. Payments: from nuns, 1 packload of flour. Values: tenant holding assumed to be additional; Excerpta includes 2s and flour in valuation.


Notes:
Values: Excerpta adds that it is now held by a villager and valued at 40s.


Notes:
Geld: 3 yokes, 2 from the abbot's lordship; Excerpta and Domesday Monachorum record first yoke as a sulung. Values: Excerpta, £4 5s.


Notes:
Geld: yokes and acres in subholdings; Excerpta equates yoke with 25 acres. Values: Excerpta records Oidelard's holding as £5, not £4; subholdings assumed to be additional. Payments: Wadard, 30s; Osbern, 15s; Ranulf, 50d.


Notes:
Geld: Monks' land never paid tax; Wadard's - villagers' according to Excerpta - did in 1066. Values: 'is and was' here interpreted as 'always'.


Notes:
Values: valued at £2 because it is at a revenue.


Notes:
Geld: 1/2 sulung and 1/2 yoke; Excerpta records an additional 1/2 yoke and 20 acres before 1066. Values: value of 1/2 sulung assumed to be included in manorial total. Payments: Ansfrid pays monks 100d; Godesa previously paid 25d.


Notes:
Geld: 3 virgates; Excerpta, 3 yokes. Values: Excerpta records value in 1086 as 9s.


Notes:
Geld: additional exempt yoke, assumed to be new land. Payments: as much woodland as produces an income from pasturage of 40 pigs or 54 1/2d.


Notes:
Payments: mills with countrymen's tribute, £8 12s; port, 40s.


Notes:
Geld: 1 sulung, 3 yokes inside Hugh's territory, the fourth outside, of the Bishop of Bayeux's Holding (possibly 5,163).


Notes:
Population: 4 villagers recorded as landowners, not rural population.


Notes:
Values: valued in Tinton (9,22) because it is ploughed with the lordship ploughs from there.


Notes:
Payments: salt-houses, 20s; half-fishery, 8d.


Notes:
Geld: 1/2 yoke and 1/2 virgate. Waste possibly implied: no current value or resources.


Notes:
Values: Ralph's 3 pig pastures and their value recorded in 5,169; omitted here. Duplicates: 3 pig pastures duplicated in 5,169.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 9,17-18, valuation recorded in 9,18. Ploughteams: 1 villager with 3 smallholders lives there; no ploughs.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 9,17-18, valuation recorded here.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 9,20-21, valuation recorded in part here and in total in 9,21; intermediate valuation deduced from there.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 9,20-21, valuation for both recorded here.


Notes:
Geld: exemption due to loss of pig pasture recorded in 5,182. Duplicates: 1/2 pig pasture and value (15s) duplicated in 5,182.


Notes:
Waste: no significant resources; nothing there.


Notes:
Ploughteams: there was and is nothing there.


Notes:
Duplicates: possibly (though not probably) a partial duplicate of 5,192.


Notes:
Geld: exemption due to 1 sulung outside the territory (5,204).


Notes:
Values: mill only; the value of the mill is the value of the holding.


Notes:
Geld: now 5 1/2 sulungs and 1/2 yoke because the other part is outside Hugh's territory, held by Bishop Odo (5,171).


Notes:
Geld: 1 virgate. Payments: 1 smallholder, 12d.


Notes:
Payments: fisheries, 1700 eels. Values: now £20 because the land has been despoiled of livestock.


Notes:
Values: tenant holding assumed to be additional. Payments: mill, 60 eels.


Notes:
Geld: 63 acres. Payments: 11 smallholders, 41d.


Notes:
Payments: fishery serves hall; urban sites, 64d; dues from Milton (1,3), £13.4; cheeses, 56.5 weys; cartage. Values: 60s and tenant holding assumed to be additional.


Notes:
Geld: paid tax on 38 hides before and after 1066. Payments: 2 fisheries and 11 sites in Chichester. Values: pays £50 assayed and weighed, valued at £65, recorded as Render.


Notes:
Geld: 5 hides outside Hundred, 12.583 in 2,1b-g. Values: previously held at a revenue (£90). Payments: grazing, 38s 6d; mill, 2000 eels.


Notes:
Geld: 6 hides before, now 4 1/2; 1 1/2 hides outside Rape (10,99) assumed to be recorded there. Values: formerly it paid £6, but it could not maintain it.


Notes:
Values: it pays £80, but it is too heavy. Payments: church in Chichester, 64d.


Notes:
Values: previously it was at £20, but it could not bear it.


Notes:
Payments: woodland, 10d and £1 from pasturage.


Notes:
Values: value of subholding 100s and 10s; 10s possibly an error for 10d.


Notes:
Mills: disputed mill and fishery, not apparently recorded elsewhere (but see 13,23 for possible mill), entered here. Values: it was at a revenue for £18. Payments: 3 burgesses, 21d.


Notes:
Payments: 16 sites in Chichester, 7s 6d.


Notes:
Values: £2 assumed to be value of subholding, not mill; formerly it was at £25 revenue, but it could not pay. Payments: 3 sites in Lewes, 18d.


Notes:
Geld: hides held in common and never paid tax.


Notes:
Payments: 5 churches, 64s; 100 salt-houses, £8 15s; 64 burgesses, £7 18s; 4 burgesses and 14 smallholders in new borough of Rye, 63s.


Notes:
Payments: mill, 68 pigs; 123 sites in Steyning whose holders worked at court like villagers before 1066, 100s 100d. Geld: 18 hides never paid tax outside the Rape, probably 13,10. 81 hides in other Rapes but held by abbot so recorded here.


Notes:
Geld: 47 hides outside Rape (in 12,33;42 and 11,45) assumed to be recorded there; hidage adjusted from 112 to 65. Payments: 2 sites in Chichester, 16d; a salt-house, 2s.


Notes:
Payments: 10 burgesses, 52d; 38,500 herrings from villagers; for porpoises, £4; fines, £9; 3 packloads of peas. Values: valued as much [£20]; however, it pays £28.


Notes:
Geld: 50 hides, 5.5 outside the Rape assumed to be recorded there (see VCH p. 394 note 1).


Notes:
Geld: of the said 5 hides presumably a misreading for 50 hides.


Notes:
Geld: the Abbey Chronicle gives the assessment (8,3-16) as 6 hides and 1/2 virgate, 8 virgates making 1 hide, the equation used here. 1 virgate of the 1/2 hide was in the Rape of the Count of Eu (see 8,16).


Notes:
Geld: paid tax in another Rape (see 8,16). Virgates interpreted as 0.125 of a hide. Osbern's holding at Beech is recorded in 9,25.


Notes:
Geld: paid tax in another Rape (see 8,16). Virgates interpreted as 0.125 of a hide. Abbey Chronicle says assessment was 1/2 virgate.


Notes:
Geld: paid tax in another Rape (see 8,16 and 9,24). Virgates interpreted as 0.125 of a hide. The Abbey Chronicle says assessment was 5 virgates not 6. This holding was included in 9,24 according to VCH p. 394 note 10.


Notes:
Geld: paid tax in another Rape (see 8,16). Virgates interpreted as 0.125 of a hide. The Count of Eu's holding at Netherfield is recorded in 9,23.


Notes:
Geld: paid tax in another Rape (see 8,16), perhaps included in Bexhill (9,11): VCH p. 394 note 11.


Notes:
Geld: paid tax in another Rape (see 8,16). The Count of Eu's holding at Hooe is recorded in 9,1.


Notes:
Geld: paid tax in another Rape (see 8,16). Virgates interpreted as 0.125 of a hide. The Count of Eu's holding at Filsham is recorded in 9,14.


Notes:
Geld: paid tax in another Rape (see 8,16). Virgates interpreted as 0.125 of a hide. Warin's holding at Catsfield is recorded in 9,2.


Notes:
Geld: paid tax in another Rape (see 8,16). Virgates interpreted as 0.125 of a hide. The Count of Eu's holding at Bullington is recorded in 9,13.


Notes:
Geld: paid tax in another Rape (see 8,16). Virgates interpreted as 0.125 of a hide. The Walter's holding at Crowhurst is recorded in 9,18.


Notes:
Geld: paid tax in another Rape (see 8,16). Virgates interpreted as 0.125 of a hide. Ingelrann's holding at Wilting is recorded in 9,19.


Notes:
Geld: paid tax in another Rape (see 8,16). Virgates interpreted as 0.125 of a hide. The Count of Eu's holding at Hollington is recorded in 9,15.


Notes:
Geld: these hides [8,4-16] did not pay tax in the Rape. Virgates interpreted as 0.125 of a hide.


Notes:
Payments: 1 fishery, 5s; 6 burgesses in Chichester, 7s.


Notes:
Geld: virgates interpreted as 0.125 of a hide in details (see also 8,9 and 10,27).


Notes:
Geld: virgates interpreted as 0.125 of a hide in details. Hidage perhaps reduced though loss of 8,11.


Notes:
Geld: virgates interpreted as 0.125 of a hide; assessment 3 virgates.


Notes:
Geld: virgates interpreted as 0.125 of a hide. 19 virgates plus unspecified number held by villagers equal 3 hides if villagers held 5 virgates and virgates are 0.125 of a hide.


Notes:
Geld: virgates interpreted as 0.125 of a hide.


Notes:
Geld: virgates interpreted as 0.125 of a hide; details agree with total if this equation holds good.


Notes:
Geld: virgates interpreted as 0.125 of a hide; assessment 1 virgate.


Notes:
Geld: virgates interpreted as 0.125 of a hide (see also 8,8). Values: was waste, assumed to have no intermediate valuation.


Notes:
Geld: virgates interpreted as 0.125 of a hide; assessment 2 virgates.


Notes:
Geld: virgates interpreted as 0.125 of a hide; total of 5 hides includes Count's holding of 1.875 (in 8,12), recorded here.


Notes:
Geld: '15 hides there which do not and did not pay tax' (excluding Wulfward's virgate). Particulars total 14.875 (with 8,10), if virgate assumed to be 0.125 of a hide (as here). Values: was waste, assumed to have no intermediate value.


Notes:
Geld: virgates interpreted as 0.125 of a hide; pays on 3 hides and 2 virgates (see also 8,15).


Notes:
Geld: virgates interpreted as 0.125 of a hide; assessment 1 hide and 2 virgates.


Notes:
Geld: virgates interpreted as 0.125 of a hide; see also 8,13. Values: was waste, assumed to have no intermediate valuation.


Notes:
Geld: virgates interpreted as 0.125 of a hide; total hidage equals details if this equation holds good and 8,14 included (as here). Values: was waste, assumed to have no intermediate valuation.


Notes:
Geld: it never paid tax on 3 virgates; assumed to be recorded elsewhere. Virgates interpreted as 0.125 of a hide.


Notes:
Values: was waste, assumed to have no intermediate valuation.


Notes:
Landowners: 'God' is probably 'Goda', and possibly the countess, Mountfield being surrounded by other Godwinson holdings.


Notes:
Values: was waste, assumed to have no intermediate valuation. Geld: see also 8,7.


Notes:
Geld: see also 8,6 and 10,39 (VCH p. 399 note 1).


Notes:
Geld: virgates interpreted as 0.125 of a hide; assessment 1 virgate (see also 8,4). Values: waste, value nothing.


Notes:
Geld: it never paid tax on 1 virgate; assumed to be recorded elsewhere. Virgates interpreted as 0.125 of a hide.


Notes:
Geld: the count has half of the hide in the Forest. Values: value of William's holding possibly included in 9,33.


Notes:
Geld: it never paid tax on 1.5 virgates; assumed to be recorded elsewhere. Virgates interpreted as 0.125 of a hide. Values: value possibly included William's holding in 9,32.


Notes:
Geld: it never paid tax on 1 hide; assumed to be recorded elsewhere (perhaps 10,3).


Notes:
Geld: it never paid tax on 1/2 hide; assumed to be recorded elsewhere (perhaps 10,3).


Notes:
Geld: it never paid tax on 4 hides less 1/2 virgate; assumed to be recorded elsewhere. Virgates interpreted as 0.125 of a hide.


Notes:
Geld: it never paid tax on 1.5 hides and 1 virgate; assumed to be recorded elsewhere (perhaps 10,22). Virgates interpreted as 0.125 of a hide.


Notes:
Geld: it never paid tax on 1.5 virgates; assumed to be recorded elsewhere (perhaps 10,37: see VCH p. 400 note 6); virgates interpreted as 0.125 of a hide.


Notes:
Geld: it never paid tax on 1.5 virgates; assumed to be recorded elsewhere (perhaps 10,93). Virgates interpreted as 0.125 of a hide.


Notes:
Geld: it never paid tax on 1 virgate; assumed to be recorded elsewhere (probably 10,89). Virgates interpreted as 0.125 of a hide.


Notes:
Geld: it never paid tax on 1/2 hide and 1/2 virgate; assumed to be recorded elsewhere (perhaps 10,86). Virgates interpreted as 0.125 of a hide.


Notes:
Geld: it never paid tax on 1 virgate; assumed to be recorded elsewhere (perhaps 10,18). Virgates interpreted as 0.125 of a hide.


Notes:
Geld: it never paid tax on 1.5 virgates; assumed to be recorded elsewhere. Virgates interpreted as 0.125 of a hide.


Notes:
Geld: it never paid tax on 1.5 virgates; assumed to be recorded elsewhere (perhaps 10,27). Virgates interpreted as 0.125 of a hide.


Notes:
Geld: it never paid tax on 1 virgate; assumed to be recorded elsewhere (perhaps 10,95: see VCH p. 400 note 8). Virgates interpreted as 0.125 of a hide.


Notes:
Geld: it never paid tax on 1 virgate and 1 furlong; assumed to be recorded elsewhere (perhaps 10,56). Virgates interpreted as 0.125 of a hide.


Notes:
Geld: it never paid tax on 1/2 hide; assumed to be recorded elsewhere (perhaps 10,36).


Notes:
Geld: it never paid tax on 1 hide; assumed to be recorded elsewhere (perhaps 10,35).


Notes:
Geld: it never paid tax on 1 hide; assumed to be recorded elsewhere (perhaps 10,93).


Notes:
Geld: it never paid tax on 1/2 hide; assumed to be recorded elsewhere (perhaps 10,32).


Notes:
Geld: it never paid tax on 5 hides; assumed to be recorded elsewhere (perhaps partially in 10,93).


Notes:
Geld: it never paid tax on 1/2 hide; assumed to be recorded elsewhere (perhaps 10,94). Payments: cottager, 12d.


Notes:
Geld: it never paid tax on 1/2 hide; assumed to be recorded elsewhere (see 10,51).


Notes:
Geld: it never paid tax on 1 hide; assumed to be recorded elsewhere (perhaps 10,89).


Notes:
Geld: it never paid tax on 1 virgate; assumed to be recorded elsewhere (perhaps 10,22). Virgates interpreted as 0.125 of a hide.


Notes:
Geld: it never paid tax on 1/2 hide; assumed to be recorded elsewhere (perhaps 10,12).


Notes:
Geld: it never paid tax on 1/2 virgate; assumed to be recorded elsewhere (perhaps 10,92). Virgates interpreted as 0.125 of a hide.


Notes:
Geld: it never paid tax on 1 virgate; assumed to be recorded elsewhere (perhaps 10,86). Virgates interpreted as 0.125 of a hide.


Notes:
Geld: the Hundred never paid tax but assessments for both dates recorded. Values: was waste, assumed to have no intermediate valuation.


Notes:
Geld: it never paid tax on 1 virgate; assumed to be recorded elsewhere (perhaps 10,91). Virgates interpreted as 0.125 of a hide.


Notes:
Geld: it never paid tax on 1 virgate; assumed to be recorded elsewhere (see 10,18). Virgates interpreted as 0.125 of a hide.


Notes:
Geld: it never paid tax on 1 virgate; assumed to be recorded elsewhere (see VCH p. 394 note 1). Virgates interpreted as 0.125 of a hide.


Notes:
Geld: it never paid tax on 1 virgate; assumed to be recorded elsewhere (see 10,31). Virgates interpreted as 0.125 of a hide. Payments: 3 cottagers pay 2s.


Notes:
Geld: it never paid tax on 1 virgate; assumed to be recorded elsewhere (perhaps 10,3). Virgates interpreted as 0.125 of a hide. Values: was waste, assumed to have no intermediate valuation.


Notes:
Geld: it never paid tax on 1/2 virgate; assumed to be recorded elsewhere (perhaps 10,27). Virgates interpreted as 0.125 of a hide. Values: was waste, assumed to have no intermediate valuation. Payments: a cottager, 12d.


Notes:
Geld: it never paid tax on 1 virgate; assumed to be recorded elsewhere (perhaps 10,31). Virgates interpreted as 0.125 of a hide.


Notes:
Geld: it never paid tax on 1/2 hide; assumed to be recorded elsewhere (perhaps 10,27).


Notes:
Geld: it never paid tax on 1 virgate; assumed to be recorded elsewhere (perhaps 10,31: see VCH p. 411 note 10). Virgates interpreted as 0.125 of a hide.


Notes:
Geld: it never paid tax on 1 virgate; assumed to be recorded elsewhere (perhaps 10,26). Virgates interpreted as 0.125 of a hide.


Notes:
Geld: it never paid tax on 1 hide; assumed to be recorded elsewhere (perhaps 10,86).


Notes:
Geld: it never paid tax on 1 hide and 1/2 virgates; assumed to be recorded elsewhere (perhaps 10,22). Virgates interpreted as 0.125 of a hide.


Notes:
Geld: it never paid tax on 1/2 hide and 1 virgate; assumed to be recorded elsewhere (perhaps 10,89). Virgates interpreted as 0.125 of a hide.


Notes:
Geld: it never paid tax on 1/2 hide; assumed to be recorded elsewhere (perhaps 10,18).


Notes:
Geld: it never paid tax on 1 virgate; assumed to be recorded elsewhere (perhaps 10,93). Virgates interpreted as 0.125 of a hide. Values: Walter has nothing but 2s.


Notes:
Geld: it never paid tax on 1/2 hide; assumed to be recorded elsewhere (perhaps 10,31: see VCH p. 411 note 10).


Notes:
Geld: virgates interpreted as 0.125 of a hide; assessment 3.5 hides and 1 virgate. Values: was waste, assumed no value intermediate valuation.


Notes:
Geld: it did not pay tax on 1 hide; assumed to be recorded elsewhere. Values: was waste, assumed to have no intermediate valuation.


Notes:
Geld: it never paid tax on 1/2 hide; assumed to be recorded elsewhere.


Notes:
Geld: it never paid tax on 1 hide; assumed to be recorded elsewhere (perhaps 10,2).


Notes:
Geld: it never paid tax on 1/2 hide; assumed to be recorded elsewhere (perhaps 10,2: see VCH p. 403 note 7).


Notes:
Geld: it never paid tax on 1/2 hide; assumed to be recorded elsewhere (perhaps 10,2).


Notes:
Geld: it never paid tax on 1/2 hide and 1 1/2 virgates; assumed to be recorded elsewhere (perhaps 10,27). Virgates interpreted as 0.125 of a hide.


Notes:
Geld: it never paid tax on 1/2 hide; assumed to be recorded elsewhere (perhaps 10,53).


Notes:
Geld: it never paid tax on 1/2 hide; assumed to be recorded elsewhere (perhaps 10,87).


Notes:
Geld: it never paid tax on 1 virgate; assumed to be recorded elsewhere (perhaps 10,89). Virgates interpreted as 0.125 of a hide.


Notes:
Geld: it never paid tax on 2 1/2 virgates; assumed to be recorded elsewhere (see VCH p. 394 note 1). Virgates interpreted as 0.125 of a hide.


Notes:
Geld: it never paid tax on 1/2 virgate; assumed to be recorded elsewhere (see VCH p. 394 note 1). Virgates interpreted as 0.125 of a hide.


Notes:
Geld: it never paid tax on 1 1/2 virgates; assumed to be recorded elsewhere (perhaps 10,27). Virgates interpreted as 0.125 of a hide.


Notes:
Geld: it never paid tax on 1/2 virgate; assumed to be recorded elsewhere (perhaps 10,22); virgates interpreted as 0.125 of a hide.


Notes:
Geld: it never paid tax on 1 hide; assumed to be recorded elsewhere. Values: was waste, assumed to have no intermediate valuation.


Notes:
Geld: virgates interpreted as 0.125 hide. Total 1 virgate short, perhaps held by the count, credited with it here. Ploughteams: 1 lordship plough repeated, possibly in error.


Notes:
Geld: it never paid tax on 2 virgates; assumed to be recorded elsewhere (perhaps 10,88). Virgates interpreted as 0.125 of a hide.


Notes:
Geld: it never paid tax on 2 virgates; assumed to be recorded elsewhere (perhaps 10,91). Virgates interpreted as 0.125 of a hide.


Notes:
Geld: it never paid tax on 2 virgates; assumed to be recorded elsewhere (perhaps 10,49). Virgates interpreted as 0.125 of a hide.


Notes:
Geld: it never paid tax on 1 virgate; assumed to be recorded elsewhere (perhaps 10,49). Virgates interpreted as 0.125 of a hide.


Notes:
Geld: it never paid tax on 1 virgate; assumed to be recorded elsewhere (perhaps 10,80). Virgates interpreted as 0.125 of a hide.


Notes:
Geld: answered for 6 hides, now 4.375. 1 hide in Mortain Rape assumed to be recorded there. Virgates interpreted as 0.125 of a hide; although hides appear to equal 4 virgates, Baring (EHR 1904, pp. 95-96) suggests an explanation.


Notes:
Geld: reduction before 1066. Values: was waste, assumed to have no intermediate valuation.


Notes:
Geld: It answered for 1 hide and 3 virgates outside the Rape: 3 virgates assumed to be recorded there. Virgates interpreted as 0.125 of a hide.


Notes:
Geld: it never paid tax on 1 virgate, it was always outside the Rape; assumed to be recorded there. Virgates interpreted as 0.125 of a hide.


Notes:
Geld: 1 virgate outside the Rape, assumed to be recorded there.


Notes:
Geld: 1/2 hide answers for 2 virgates, each virgate interpreted as 0.125 of a hide; exemption assumed.


Notes:
Geld: 1/2 hide answers for 2 virgates in 1066 and 1086, each virgate interpreted as 0.125 of a hide; exemption assumed.


Notes:
Geld: virgates interpreted as 0.125 of a hide. Details of hidage total 13 virgates (1.625 hides), though assessment of holding 1 hide at both dates; probably a scribal error. There was nothing there but a hall.


Notes:
Waste: intermediate waste implied: no significant resources; 52 burgesses before 1066, later 27. Payments: Count's 60 burgesses, 39s in tribute; toll, £4; mint, 20s; tenants 50 burgesses, 24s 238d; land, 3s; grazing, 15s 4d. 1066 payments total £3 16s 9d.


Notes:
Values: 1066 valuation is the farm of one night, estimated at £100 (EHR 2002 pp. 258-61). Geld: were and are 46 hides so 2 hides 1 virgate in Hastings Rape assumed to be taxed here. Payments: 16 salt-houses at £4 40d; pasture, £6.


Notes:
Values: 1066 valuation farm of one night estimated at £100 (see 13,1 and EHR 2002 pp. 258-61). Geld: answered for 52.5 hides, now 50; 1 1/2 hides 1/2 virgate in Hastings Rape (perhaps 9,35-36). Payments: grazing, 35s; salt-houses, 40d.


Notes:
Geld: assessed elsewhere; assumed also in 1066.


Notes:
Geld: 1/2 hide in Rape of Hastings assumed to be recorded there (see 9,43;77). Values: they deduct 20s for the 1/2 hide which is not there assumed to explain the difference between the 1066 and 1086 valuations.


Notes:
Geld: 1/2 hide in Rape of Hastings assumed to be recorded there.


Notes:
Geld: 7 hides in Rape of Hastings assumed to be recorded there. Gilbert has 60 acres of waste land, assumed to be geld acres.


Notes:
Geld: 7 1/2 hides, then and now it answered for 7 hides.


Notes:
Geld: 14 1/2 hides in Hastings Rape assumed to be recorded there (see 9,1;45;67;70;91;96;101).


Notes:
Geld: 2 1/2 hides in Hastings Rape assumed to be recorded there.


Notes:
Geld: answered for 6 hides, now for 4; 2 hides less 1 virgate in Hastings Rape assumed to be recorded there (see 9,64;68;72;79: VCH p. 411 note 10).


Notes:
Geld: 1/2 hide in Hastings Rape assumed to be recorded there (see 9,51).


Notes:
Geld: 1 hide in Hastings Rape assumed to be recorded there (see 9,49).


Notes:
Geld: 1/2 hide in Hastings Rape assumed to be recorded there (see 9,80).


Notes:
Geld: 1/2 hide in Hastings Rape assumed to be recorded there.


Notes:
Geld: Then and now it answered for 8 hides; 1 hide in Hastings Rape assumed to be taxed here (see 8,6 and 9,24).


Notes:
Shared statistics: 10,40-41; manorial statistics possibly included in 10,41.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 10,40-41; manorial statistics of 10,40 possibly included here.


Notes:
Ploughteams: figure probably omitted before 'and a half' for men's ploughs; 1 added.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 10,44-45; manorial statistics possibly included in 10,45. Geld: see 12,3 and VCH p. 435 note 6.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 10,44-45; manorial statistics of 10,44 possibly included here.


Notes:
Geld: [another] 1/2 hide which does not belong to them is outside the Rape, assumed to be taxed there (see 9,116-118).


Notes:
Geld: 1/2 hide in Hastings Rape assumed to be recorded there (see 9,54 and VCH p. 401 note 5).


Notes:
Geld: 1/2 hide in Hastings Rape assumed to be recorded there (see 9,47). Payments: mill, 10s and 500 eels.


Notes:
Ploughteams: villagers plough the half of the lordship land but no men's ploughs recorded.


Notes:
Geld: outside the Rape, never paid tax; in Rodmell (12,4).


Notes:
Geld: 1 hide outside the Rape; never paid tax.


Notes:
Geld: 1/2 hide outside the Rape; never paid tax (see 12,3 and VCH p. 435 note 6).


Notes:
Geld: 1 virgate outside the Rape; never paid tax.


Notes:
Geld: 2.375 hides in other Rapes answer here and so recorded here (see 10,31).


Notes:
Payments: pasturage 20s; 5 salt-houses, 41s and 8s. 8s assumed to be error for 8d.


Notes:
Payments: 2 salt-houses, 7s; 11 salt-houses, 24s 6d.


Notes:
Geld: 1086 assessment recorded in 10,73. Values: perhaps included in 10,73.


Notes:
Geld: assumed to be taxed here at both dates.


Notes:
Geld: no 'return' from 1.125 hides held by Count. Duplicates: Ansgot's 1/2 hide, which lay in Eastbourne before 1066, duplicated in 10,84.


Notes:
Duplicates: 1/2 hide duplicated in 10,82.


Notes:
Values: claimed amount treated as valuation.


Notes:
Geld: then and now answered for 22 hides so 8 hides in Hastings Rape assumed to be taxed here (but see VCH p. 417 note 5).


Notes:
Geld: then and now answered for 4 hides so 1/2 hide in Hastings Rape assumed to be taxed here (see 9,93).


Notes:
Geld: 2 hides lie in Hastings Rape assumed to be recorded there (see 9,41;55;76;97).


Notes:
Geld: 4 hides answers for as much so 1/2 hide in Hastings Rape assumed to be taxed here; Humphrey's hide assumed to be included in the 4 hides, not additional to them (see 9,61;115).


Notes:
Geld: 4 hides in Hastings Rape assumed to be recorded there (see 9,40;50;52;78).


Notes:
Geld: additional virgate in Hastings Rape (see 9,46) assumed to be recorded there.


Notes:
Geld: 1 hide outside the Rape (lay in Lewes Rape); does not pay tax.


Notes:
Geld: 1 1/2 hides outside the Rape; never paid tax; assessed in the manor (unclear which, perhaps 12,7).


Notes:
Geld: 1 1/2 hides outside the Rape; did not paid tax.


Notes:
Geld: 2 hides outside the Rape; never paid tax.


Notes:
Geld: 2 hides less 1 virgate outside the Rape; never paid tax.


Notes:
Geld: 1/2 hide outside the Rape; never paid tax.


Notes:
Geld: 1 1/12 virgates outside the Rape in Bevendean in 1066 (12,18), now accounted and assessed in Tarring (10,43); never paid tax.


Notes:
Geld: 1 virgate outside the Rape (in Lewes) in Ditchling before 1066 (12,6); never paid tax.


Notes:
Geld: 4 hides outside the Rape in Hamsey before 1066 (12,49); never paid tax.


Notes:
Geld: 1 virgate outside the Rape in Balmer before 1066 (12,16); never paid tax.


Notes:
Geld: 1 virgate outside the Rape; never paid tax (see VCH p. 420 note 3).


Notes:
Geld: 1 virgate outside the Rape never paid tax.


Notes:
Values: they paid £15, £10 to the king £5 to the earl. Payments: Humphrey's site, 10s.


Notes:
Values: 1066 valuation from miscellaneous payments; 1086 valuation includes extraordinary value of mill, 14 measures of wheat and 10 of rough corn valued at £14. Payments: fishery, 5s; sites, 11s.


Notes:
Values: assumed that the values of clergy and men-at-arms are additional to £93 and 1 gold mark (£6); the clergy hold £8 and have (equals Render) £10. Payments: 9 sites in Chichester, 9s 4d; grazing, 15s.


Notes:
Geld: Guy's hide assumed to be included in 10 hides. Payments: 1 site in Chichester 5d.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 11,6-7, Render recorded in 11,7, allocated between them in proportion to their valuation. Payments: grazing, 18s; 11 sites in Chichester, 15s.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 11,6-7, Render recorded here, allocated between them in proportion to their valuation.


Notes:
Geld: assumed 2 hides included in 11. Values: 8s (pays 15s) assumed to be additional to £5.


Notes:
Payments: mill, 8s and 100 eels; site in Chichester, 6d.


Notes:
Payments: quarry, 6s 8d; 1 site in Chichester, 6d.


Notes:
Payments: 100 eels; 1 site in Chichester, 7d.


Notes:
Geld: 1 of 4 Frenchmen omitted, assumed to be responsible for missing 1.5 hides.


Notes:
Payments: mill, 20s and 120 eels; 1 site in Chichester, 8d.


Notes:
Payments: 1 site in Chichester, 2s; fisheries, 360 eels.


Notes:
Mills: blank in manuscript for mill value.


Notes:
Payments: fisheries (none); 1 site in Chichester, 3d.


Notes:
Ploughlands: blank in manuscript. Geld: Westbourne assessed at 36 hides but paid on 12 before 1066. Payments: fishery, 16d; 7 sites in Chichester, 42d. Values: Payne's value assumed to be additional.


Notes:
Duplicates: 1 hide duplicated in SUR 18,1. Payments: 2 sites in Chichester, 2s.


Notes:
Geld: 36 hides there but then and now it answered for 15. 16 hides put in Westbourne but now restored. 1 hide in Lewes Rape. Values: £4 assumed to be included in £40. Payments: 15 sites in Chichester, 7s 8d.


Notes:
Geld: 1/2 hide assumed to be additional at both dates.


Notes:
Geld: 1 hide in Rape of William of Braose assumed to be recorded there.


Notes:
Geld: 3 hides in Rape of William of Braose (13,48) assumed to be recorded there.


Notes:
Geld: 2 hides in Rape of William of Braose assumed to be taxed there (see 13,38).


Notes:
Geld: 1.5 hides in Rape of William of Braose assumed to be taxed there (see 13,38).


Notes:
Geld: 2 1/2 hides in Rape of William of Braose assumed to be taxed there (see 13,38).


Notes:
Values: £1 assumed to be additional and the combined value of the 2 subholdings.


Notes:
Geld: 8 hides less 1 virgate which the earl has which does not pay tax.


Notes:
Geld: then and now it answered for 1 virgate; 2 virgates there.


Notes:
Values: include £4.5 in payments from 2 mills, pasture, and woodland which are given a valuation in the standard format.


Notes:
Geld: 3 hides there but then and now it answered for 2 hides.


Notes:
Geld: 1/2 hides there but then and now answered for 1.75 hides.


Notes:
Geld: 1/2 hide and 2 virgates assumed to equal 1 hide.


Notes:
Payments: 3 burgesses in Chichester, 5s.


Notes:
Payments: 1 fishery, 6d; 2 sites in Chichester, 18d.


Notes:
Payments: grazing, 2s; 1 site in Chichester, 16d.


Notes:
Geld: 1 hide in earl's park exempt. Payments: grazing, 2s; 1 site in Chichester, 7d.


Notes:
Payments: messuages, 26s 6d; mint (included in valuation), 112s; customary dues.


Notes:
Geld: 19.5 hides in the Rape of the Count of Mortain assumed to be recorded there and to include the 6.5 hides of the abbey (see 10,44;63 and VCH p. 435 note 6). Payments: 26 burgesses, 13s; pasture, 15s 8d; 16000 herrings.


Notes:
Geld: 15 hides lost to other Rapes assumed to be recorded there (e.g., 10,61 and 13,2). Payments: 11 salt-houses, 26s; 44 sites in Lewes, 22s; 4000 herrings.


Notes:
Geld: 46 hides, of which 42 received, 4 others in the Rape of the Count of Mortain assumed to be recorded there; answers for 33; it never paid tax (see 10,102;108). Payments: 11 messuages, 12s; 6 burgesses in Lewes, 43d.


Notes:
Geld: 21 hides before 1066, now 18, the others in the Rape of the Count of Mortain assumed to be recorded there; they do not pay tax (see 10,22;98).


Notes:
Geld: then answered for 10.5 hides now 6 but 1/2 hide is in the Count of Mortain's Rape assumed to be recorded there. Payments: 4 sites in Lewes at 20d.


Notes:
Geld: then and now answers for 2 hides; it lay in Frog Firle, in the Rape of the Count of Mortain, assumed to be taxed here.


Notes:
Geld: 8 hides now pay tax on 6; 1 1/2 hides in the Rape of the Count of Mortain assumed to be recorded there. With these hides William holds 2 others which never paid tax (see 8,1). Payments: 10 sites in Lewes, 5s.


Notes:
Geld: answers for 4 hides; in addition 1 virgate which does not pay tax because it is outside the Rape, assumed to be recorded there. Payments: 2 sites in Lewes, 18d.


Notes:
Geld: 7 1/2 hides; it lay in Beeding in 1066 (13,1), now in the Rape of William of Braose; it did not pay tax but assumed to be taxed here.


Notes:
Geld: lay in Broadwater, Rape of William of Braose in 1066 (13,30); assumed to be taxed here.


Notes:
Geld: lay in the lands of Kingston (13,28), in the Rape of William of Braose in 1066; assumed to be taxed here.


Notes:
Geld: answered for 4 hides, now 1 1/2 because others are in the Rape of William of Braose; 2 1/2 assumed to be taxed there. Payments: 3 sites in Lewes, 18d.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 12,28-29, valuation recorded in 12,29. Geld: it lay in Truleigh (13,6), in the Rape of William of Braose; assumed to be taxed here. Pay Values: value included in 12,29.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 12,28-29, valuation recorded here. Geld: it lay in Shipley (not recorded perhaps included in 13,49), in the Rape of William of Braose; assumed to be taxed here. Payments: 1/2 site in Lewes, 2d.


Notes:
Geld: answers for 8 hides before 1066 and now but it never paid tax; recorded as an exemption.


Notes:
Geld: lay in Bosham in 1066 (6,1), assumed to be taxed here. Payments: from salt, 15d; 1 site in Lewes.


Notes:
Geld: answered for 41 hides but 18.5 hides when acquired, 22.5 in other Rapes, assumed to be taxed there; now for nothing because it never paid tax (see 13,3;46).


Notes:
Geld: there was no hall there nor did it pay tax, as they state, assumed to be an exemption. Payments: 1 site in Lewes, nothing.


Notes:
Payments: 9 sites in Lewes, 4s 5d; tribute, 17 pigs.


Notes:
Geld: then 7 hides, now 5.25, 1.75 in the Rape of the Count of Mortain assumed to be recorded there. Payments: 2.5 sites in Lewes, 20d.


Notes:
Geld: then 2 hides, now 1.5 because 1/2 hide in the Rape of the Count of Mortain; assumed to be recorded there. Payments: 1 burgess in Lewes at 6d.


Notes:
Geld: never paid tax; no one lives there.


Notes:
Geld: then 3.5 hides, now 3 because 1/2 hide in the Rape of the Count of Mortain; assumed to be recorded there. Payments: 3 sites in Lewes at 21d.


Notes:
Geld: Beeding (13,1), now in Rape of William of Braose; it did not pay tax but assumed to be taxed here.


Notes:
Geld: then 13 hides, now 10.5, others in the Rape of the Count of Mortain and assumed to be recorded there (see VCH p. 420 note 3). Payments: 18 sites in Lewes at 8s 7d.


Notes:
Geld: then 25, now 14 because others in the Rapes of the Count of Mortain and Earl Roger; assumed to be recorded there (see 10,109 and 11,69). Now pays tax for 13 hides. Ploughteams: 2 hides assumed to be error for 2 ploughteams.


Notes:
Geld: lay in Ovingdean in 1066; never paid tax.


Notes:
Geld: then 32 hides; it did not pay tax. Warenne has 10 hides in his Rape, assumed to be taxed there (12,20;47); Braose the others. Payments: 2 sesters of honey; hearth-tax; woodland 70 pigs, 20 from tribute.


Notes:
Geld: 8 hides lay in Rodmell, in the Rape of Warenne (12,4) now answer for 5 1/2 hides; remaining 2 1/2 assumed to be recorded there.


Notes:
Geld: 7 hides lay in Berth, in the Rape of Lewes, an outlier; now answers for 1 1/2 hides, 5 1/2 assumed to be recorded in Lewes Rape (see 12,36).


Notes:
Values: no resources to account for the valuation.


Notes:
Values: was at a revenue for £50 but could not bear it.


Notes:
Geld: Leofwin gave tax to his lord and his lord gave nothing. Payments: 5 salt-houses, 110 ambers of salt or 9s 2d. Values: was at a revenue for £100.


Notes:
Geld: then 18.75; it never paid tax; 12 hides here, others recorded in Goring (11,71-73), in Earl Roger's Rape; unclear whether 12 hides are exempt in 1086.


Notes:
Geld: then 30.5 hides, 10 now in Earl Roger's Rape, remainder only paid tax on 3 hides (assumed to be current exemption).


Notes:
Geld: then 9 hides, now 4; 3 virgates in Arundel Rape assumed to be recorded there.


Notes:
Payments: woodland, 5d; salt, 20d; 1 sester of honey.


Notes:
Geld: then 8 hides but 2 are in Earl Roger's Rape; they lay in Lyminster (11,59) in 1066; Gilbert pays tax on 3 hides, so 3 more are exempt.


Notes:
Geld: lay in Goring, in Earl Roger's Rape in 1066; it is outside the Rape and not in the numeration of hides and it never paid tax; no assessment is recorded though it should probably be 2.5 hides (see 11,73).


Notes:
Geld: it did not pay tax, assumed to be an exemption.


Notes:
Ploughteams: nothing there except 10 acres of meadow.


Notes:
Ploughteams: nothing there except 2 cattle.


Notes:
Geld: then 21 hides, 6 hides in Lewes Rape assumed to be recorded there (see 12,23); now pays tax on 6 hides. Payments: 6 salt-houses at 20s and 10 ambers of salt.


Notes:
Payments: salt-houses, 22d; pasturage, 16s.


Notes:
Geld: then 29 hides, 9 in Lewes Rape (12,21) and William of Braose has 2 in lordship (also exempt?); Robert pays tax on 6.


Notes:
Geld: then 11 hides, now Robert has 9 hides; they (7 freeholders?) paid tax for 2 hides: perhaps implying this is the current assessment.


Notes:
Geld: it paid tax for 1/2 hide, assumed to be the current assessment.


Notes:
Geld: then 17 hides, now 11.5 of which 2.75 pay tax. Of 17 hides, 2 in Goring, in Earl Roger's Rape, 3.5 'elsewhere'; these assumed to be recorded elsewhere (11,71-73).


Notes:
Geld: 2 hides are additional to the numeration of the above (13,38) hides.


Notes:
Geld: 1 hide is additional to the numeration of the above (13,38) hides.


Notes:
Geld: answered for 16.25, 4.375 (in 13,44); Robert has 11.875 though stated to be 12.25.


Notes:
Geld: in Earl Roger's Rape (11,57); it did not pay tax [here].


Notes:
Payments: a quarry, 9s 4d; 1 site in Chichester, 20d; church dues, 40d. Churches: dues taken to imply existence of a church.


Notes:
Values: assessed value recorded as valuation for 1086.


Notes:
Population: 6 men assumed to be included in previous total of 175 (1,1a).


Notes:
Duplicates: Count of Mortain's 1 hide duplicates part of 17,2 and may be the difference between the 1066 and 1086 hidages.


Notes:
Geld: 2 hides in another Hundred included in manor but said to be exempt in 1086 though hidage unchanged; 2 sulungs assumed to be included in manorial total (as Baring). Values: submanor valuation assumed to be additional.


Notes:
Duplicates: 2 hides possibly duplicated in 23,1. Payments: woodland, 10s, to the sheriff.


Notes:
Duplicates: 3.5 of 37.5 hides possibly duplicated in 13.5 of 16,1.


Notes:
Payments: 2 fisheries, 10s; a third fishery, excellent, but without dues. Duplicates: 2 hides possibly duplicated in 22,4.


Notes:
Duplicates: 2.25 hides possibly duplicated in 5,16-17. Geld: 7 hides additional to official 1066 hidage; 1/3 church hide assumed to be included in manorial total. Values: 1086 includes £1 for church.


Notes:
Duplicates: 1/2 hide possibly duplicated in 5,1g; 1 hide in Wotton Hundred.


Notes:
Geld: answered for 9 hides but 16 hides there.


Notes:
Values: sheriff has £7 from Queen Edith's 3 manors in Surrey for aid 'when they have work'; assumed that the value of subholdings are included in manorial total of £18.


Notes:
Geld: 24 hides; they never paid tax; 1086 hidage not specified, assumed to be zero. Render £30 weighed and assayed, plus £4 from subholding. Payments: 1 church, 12s.


Notes:
Geld: 1 hide in 1066 and 1086 but it did not pay tax; coded as exemption but recorded as 1 hide also (as Baring).


Notes:
Duplicates: 2 hides possibly duplicated in 5,19. Payments: £7.4 in tribute to men.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 2,3 and 13,1, geld reduction for both recorded here. Duplicates: 8 of these 80 hides duplicated in 13,1. Payments: fishery without dues; fishery built by force; 55 pigs from pasturage; 17 messuages in London, 52d; 4 in Southwark, 27d.


Notes:
Geld: church hide assumed to be included in manorial assessment. Values: £6 assumed to be included in valuation.


Notes:
Geld: 1086 geld unpaid and unstated; assumed to equal 1066 figure (though Baring does not). Ploughlands: land for 2 ploughs, assumed to be new land.


Notes:
Geld: not paid since the Bishop acquired it (5,1h).


Notes:
Duplicates: 2 hides probably duplicated in 8,29, not paid since the Bishop acquired it (5,1h).


Notes:
Duplicates: 2 1/2 hides possibly duplicated in 5,29; but Corbett disagrees; not paid since the Bishop acquired it (5,1h).


Notes:
Geld: not paid since the Bishop acquired it (5,1h); no hidage recorded for either date. Duplicates: 1/2 hide possibly duplicated in 1,11.


Notes:
Geld: not paid since the Bishop acquired it.


Notes:
Geld: 1 hide leased for 1/2 gold mark (£3). Values: Osbert's and Ansgot's shares assumed to be 'always', as other elements.


Notes:
Duplicates: possibly duplicates the 5 hides of 5,24. Values: value of the whole manor £8; value of subtenancies £6.5, presumably not included in £8 despite the whole manor phrasing.


Notes:
Mills: 2 half-mills, recorded as 1 mill.


Notes:
Duplicates: possibly part of 2.25 hides detached from 1,9 and duplicated there.


Notes:
Geld: Baring (p. 16) & Corbett disagree on geld. Ralph (4), Wulfwin (1.75) and Restold (2) assumed to be included in Ilbert's 22 hides; Wulfwin's 0.75 held from King. Duplicates: 2 hides possibly duplicated in 2,1. Values: £9.6 assumed to be Ilbert's.


Notes:
Mills: sixth part of one and third part of another, recorded as 0.5.


Notes:
Duplicates: 5 hides possibly duplicated in the 29 hides of 5,8.


Notes:
Duplicates: 1 hide probably duplicated elsewhere: see Baring, p.16.


Notes:
Values: whoever holds from Wadard pays him 50s and the service of 1 man-at-arms.


Notes:
Duplicates: possible duplicated in 5,1d (Corbett disagrees).


Notes:
Duplicates: 2 hides possibly duplicated in 5,13. Baring argues another 5.5 hides are duplicated elsewhere (8,15, 17,1;4?); Corbett disagrees. Payments: 1 smallholder, 12d; tolls, £6; 1 pig.


Notes:
Duplicates: 2 hides possibly duplicated in 19,40.


Notes:
Geld: the king has 3 hides in the Forest.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 8,7-8, geld reduction recorded in 8,8; 1 virgate reduction allocated here.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 8,7-8, geld reduction recorded here; 4 virgate reduction allocated here.


Notes:
Payments: fishery, 1000 eels and 1000 lampreys.


Notes:
Duplicates: possibly duplicated in 6,1 (Baring) though Corbett disagrees.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 8,23-24, geld reduction recorded in 8,24; reduction allocated to this entry.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 8,23-24, geld reduction recorded here, allocated to 8,23.


Notes:
Values: when William went away it was at a revenue of 40s; unclear whether land is still his.


Notes:
Duplicates: 2 hides duplicated in part of 5,1c. Geld: 2 hides assumed to be included in the stated total of 10.


Notes:
Geld: since the abbot acquired it, it is not answerable. Payments: quarries, 2s; 3 hawk's nests.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 2,3 and 13,1; geld reduction for both recorded in 2,3, allocated to that entry. Duplicates: 8 hides duplicated in 2,3.


Notes:
Population: burgesses are London burgesses, counted in Middlesex by Darby.


Notes:
Payments: 15 messuages in Southwark and London, 16s and 2000 herrings. Render: £28 by weight.


Notes:
Duplicates: 3.5 of 13.5 hides possibly duplicated in 37.5 of 1,7.


Notes:
Duplicates: 1 hide duplicated in 1,4: 1 hide where the Count's house stands, which may be the hide deducted there.


Notes:
Duplicates: possibly duplicated in 6,1 (Baring) though Corbett disagrees. Values: 1066 value assumed to be the total of the three manors, here divided equally.


Notes:
Population and ploughteams: none recorded; possibly included in the Sussex return for Compton (11,36). Duplicates: 1 hide duplicated in SUS 11,36.


Notes:
Values: £10 in all, presumably the total of the shares of Thorold and the men-at-arms, here divided proportionately between them.


Notes:
Ploughlands: 1 ox where woodland expected.


Notes:
Payments: grazing, 1 pig in 10; a chapel, 8s.


Notes:
Geld: then and now it answered for 15 hides, but it never paid tax.


Notes:
Geld: It has never paid tax since Richard had it.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 19,20-21, geld reduction recorded in 19,21, divided between entries.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 19,20-21, geld reduction recorded here, divided between entries. Payments: messuage in Southwark, 500 herrings.


Notes:
Duplicates: 1 hide duplicated in 19,23 (included in 8 hides there), recording a claim.


Notes:
Duplicates: 1 hide possibly duplicated in 19,27: see Baring p. 16.


Notes:
Duplicates: 1 hide possibly duplicated in 19,28: see Baring p. 16.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 19,34-35, geld reduction recorded in 19,35, here divided between them. Ploughlands: possibly shared between holdings also. Duplicates: 1 1/2 hides possibly duplicated in 19,35.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 19,34-35, geld reduction recorded here, divided between them; now 3 hides pay tax for 1.5 hides; ploughlands may also be for both entries. Duplicates: 1 1/2 hides possibly duplicated in 19,34.


Notes:
Duplicates: 6 hides of Bletchworth duplicated in 19,47. Values: Coleman's hide assumed to be 'always', as others.


Notes:
Duplicates: possibly duplicated in 12 hides of 6,2.


Notes:
Duplicates: 2 hides probably duplicated in 21,4, where there is partial geld exemption.


Notes:
Geld: 1/2 hide assessed in Ockley (not recorded).


Notes:
Duplicates: 6 hides duplicated in 19,39.


Notes:
Geld: same in 1066 and 1086 but Heldred's reduced to nothing and Wulfward and Walter 'did not pay tax'.


Notes:
Duplicates: 2 hides duplicated in 19,43; these 2 hides (value £1) assumed to be additional to the 6, are in Copthorne Hundred.


Notes:
Duplicates: 2 hides possibly duplicated in 39 hides of 1,8. Payments: 125 eels.


Notes:
Duplicates: 2 hides possibly duplicated in 11 hides of 1,6 where there is no geld reduction. Ploughteams and population: none recorded.


Notes:
Values: 20s given by Geoffrey in alms; Baring includes in 1086 valuation as given away.


Notes:
Geld: details of 1066 holdings total 26.5 hides not 27.


Notes:
Landowners: Durand recorded as de facto tenant as this is not a copy of his holding recorded elsewhere.


Notes:
Values: he has served Oswald and paid him 20d since 1066. Waste implied: no recorded resources.


Notes:
Geld: 78.5 hides but answered for 38 before 1066.


Notes:
Geld: hidage unknown, assumed unassessed. Payments: market, £8. Values: valued at £76 16s 8d but pays £118 12s 9d.


Notes:
Geld: never paid tax but includes at least 1/2 hide, assumed to be ancient assessment.


Notes:
Payments: grazing, 6s 9d. Values: the holder pays £32, so presumably farmed.


Notes:
Geld: belonged to manor, which was not assessed. Population: in 1066 there were 8 boors, also called freedmen, with 4 ploughs. Values: none recorded for 1086.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 1,13-14, Render recorded in 1,14.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 1,13-14, Render recorded here.


Notes:
Geld: then 72 hides; paid tax on 35.25, assumed to be current in 1086. Duplicates: 6.5 hides duplicated in 2,13; total adjusted here. Values: it pays £100 by weight in revenue but it cannot bear it.


Notes:
Geld: never assessed except for 6 hides held by freedmen in the outlier (assumed to be current in 1086); they did not state the number of hides. Values: 1/2 day's revenue before 1066, value £38 8s 4d.


Notes:
Values: Render, £31.25; value of church added to Render. Payments: 2 sites in Winchester, 65d; tithes and church tax, 46d.


Notes:
Values: Render, £27.58 at 20d to the ora.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 1,21-23, assumed inclusive. Geld: they did not give an account of the hides, assumed to be never assessed.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 1,21-23 assumed to be inclusive.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 1,21-23, assumed to be inclusive. Population: freedmen or boors pay the customary due of the others[?] as above: assumed to be included in 1,21. Payments: honey, 10s and pasture, 10s, in the Forest.


Notes:
Geld: 2 hides, now 1 because the other is in the Forest; this land lies in the revenue which he has from the Isle of Wight.


Notes:
Geld: number of hides unknown, assumed to be unassessed. Values: 1/2 night's revenue before 1066; pays £52.30 with the things which fall within the Forest. Population: there were 16 villagers and 3 smallholders (not recorded).


Notes:
Other population: 3 freedmen, 4 riding men; there were 5 villagers and 3 ploughteams. Values: before 1066 £19 at face value; now £10 at 20d to ora; pays £12.5; in the Forest valued at £12.5. Payments: 31 messuages in Tynham, 16d.


Notes:
Geld: 7 hides on IoW, 3.5 in the Forest. Population: there were 13 villagers, 3 smallholders, 8 ploughs. Values: £24 at face value; pays £25 at 20d to the ora; what is in the Forest valued £12.5. Woodland for 129 swine lost.


Notes:
Geld: 18 hides in IoW,4 in the Forest. Values: pays £12.50 at 20d to the ora; £7.5 at face value assumed to be lost to the Forest. Population: there were villagers, smallholders, ploughs, a mill and woodland for 189 swine in the Forest.


Notes:
Population: there were 3 villagers with 1 ploughteam, assumed to be no longer there. Values: no recorded 1086 value, assumed to be nothing (in the Forest).


Notes:
Values: in the Forest, assumed to be valueless.


Notes:
Geld: 1086 assessment unstated, assumed exempt. Values: in the Forest, assumed to be valueless.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 1,36-38. Geld: never assessed in hides.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 1,36-38. Duplicates: adjusted for Gerwy's hide (probably duplicated in IoW9,18); others lost portions recorded. Values: apparently losses; normal valuations unrecorded or perhaps included in 1,21. £13.5 lost to Forest from 1,21;36-38.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 1,36-38. Payments: 1000 eels; woodland and pasture which paid 40 pigs and 10s (not recorded) in the Forest.


Notes:
Geld: they did not state the number of hides; assumed to be unassessed.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 1,42-44, valuation of night's revenue recorded in 1,44. Geld: never gave tax nor has the hide been apportioned there. Payments: market, 30s; 4 men, 12s 11d. Other population: 12 freedmen, 4 men.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 1,42-44, valuation of night's revenue recorded in 1,44. Geld: they did not know the number of hides, assumed unassessed. Payments: tolls, 15s; woodland, 20s; freedmen, 13s.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 1,42-44, valuation of night's revenue recorded here, estimated at £100 (see EHR 2002 pp. 258-61). Geld: they do not have the number of hides, assumed to be unassessed. Payments: grazing, 20s; church tax, 14s.


Notes:
Geld: 2 hides but they did not pay tax. Values: no 1086 value given; outlier of Meonstoke (1,15) which itself has no values; included in 1,16? Duplicates: 1 mill possibly duplicated in error. Payments: toll 40s; pasture, 51d.


Notes:
Geld: never apportioned in hides. Payments: pasture, 17s; grazing, 10d.


Notes:
Geld: manorial total and particulars for 1066 disagree. Payments: mill, each thane had part of mill, each valued 22d; assumed to be there is 1086. Values: valuation of thanes holdings assumed to refer to 1066.


Notes:
Duplicates: church duplicated in IoW4,1.


Notes:
Geld: not assessed in hides, assumed to be exempt.


Notes:
Duplicates: 6 ploughshares probably duplicated in IoW7,16 and IoW8,2.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 1,W19-20, Render of £18.00 at 20d to the ora between them recorded and entered in 1,W20.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 1,W19-20, Render of £18.00 at 20d to the ora between them recorded and entered here.


Notes:
Payments: grazing, 50d; churches, £4; they paid £6 but could not bear it.


Notes:
Geld: before 1066 and now answered for 20 hides although there are 30 hides in number.


Notes:
Values: subholding assumed additional to Render.


Notes:
Values: Render £40.00, but cannot bear it for long. Payments: church, 50s; 8 sites in Winchester, 6s.


Notes:
Geld: 6.25 paid tax; now 3.25; the others did not pay tax. Duplicates: 6 hides and 1 virgate duplicated in 1,16 but not the reduction recorded there (entered here).


Notes:
Geld: there are 30 hides, but answered for 20 before 1066 and now, because of the Vikings. Values: at a revenue of £20.00 but it cannot bear it.


Notes:
Geld: Peverel will not pay geld on hide he holds. Payments: fishery, 3d; 3 burgesses, 30d. Values: subholdings assumed to be additional.


Notes:
Values: freemen's £1 assumed to be additional.


Notes:
Values: assumed that valuation of the subholding was also then and now.


Notes:
Geld: known to have been 100 hides. Duplicates: 6 hides duplicated in 29,1;3;9. Ploughlands: tenants ploughlands assumed to be carucates. Payments: grazing, 23s 5d.


Notes:
Geld: Sturmy holds 4.25 hides previously held by reeve, two of them as a villager. Duplicates: 3.75 hides duplicated in 41,1; balance recorded here.


Notes:
Geld: 50 hides before 1066; then it answered for 38 hides, now 33. Ploughlands of tenancies (12) assumed to be additional.


Notes:
Values: value of church before 1066 assigned to the bishop.


Notes:
Geld: Mortimer holds 1/2 hide by force though monks pay the geld. Payments: church, 20s; profit of land, 12s; pasturage, 10d.


Notes:
Values: ought to pay £30.00 but it can not bear it, recorded as the Render.


Notes:
Geld: 16 hides before 1066, reduced to 10 (as now) by King Edward.


Notes:
Geld: there are 8 hides; before 1066 and now paid tax for 5. Payments: a church at 40s; however, it pays 50s.


Notes:
Geld: adjusted for the other 7 virgates in the Forest. Duplicates: 7 virgates duplicated in NF2,1.


Notes:
Churches: 1 church and 6 chapels in named places. Values: missing hide was and is worth 10s. Payments: 1 site in Winchester, 30d.


Notes:
Geld: Harding holds and does not pay tax on 5 hides in King's revenue; abbot has not paid tax on 5 hides in lordship; unclear whether exemptions are involved (assumed not).


Notes:
Geld: King named as warrantor of geld reduction. Payments: from grazing, 8d.


Notes:
Geld: it did not pay tax. Values: it is waste; however, the value is and always was 10s.


Notes:
Geld: Hugh's holding equals the geld reduction. Payments: 4 villagers, 7s.


Notes:
Geld: 7 hides but they never paid tax. Ploughteams: 2 villagers and 9 smallholders without a plough.


Notes:
Geld: then 5 hides; now 1: the others are in lordship.


Notes:
Payments: woodland, 30s; 1 site in Winchester, 7d.


Notes:
Ploughlands: blank in manuscript where ploughlands expected; formulae also missing.


Notes:
Payments: 2 fisheries, 20d; salt-house, 6s 8d.


Notes:
Geld: 12 acres; never paid tax. Fisheries: was one but not there now.


Notes:
Geld: answered for 1.5 hides but now for nothing because it is for the supplies of the nuns.


Notes:
Payments: 14 burgesses in Winchester, 25s. Values: subholding assumed to be always £1.


Notes:
Geld: answered for 1 hide, now 3 virgates; 1 virgate is in the Forest.


Notes:
Geld: always held for 10 hides; it never paid tax.


Notes:
Geld: 31 messuages exempt from all customary dues, except for the King's tax. The Abbess's own house is exempt from even this tax.


Notes:
Geld: 1 hide in the Isle of Wight. Payments: 6 messuages in Twynham, 13s 4d.


Notes:
Payments: 2 messuages in Twynham without recorded payment.


Notes:
Payments: a fishery with 2 salt-houses, 100d.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 20,1-2. Geld: 25 hides there but answers for 10 and did so before 1066. Values: pays £80.00 at face value.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 20,1-2. Values: accounted in [Bishops] Sutton (20,1). Geld: 5 hides which answered for 3 before 1066; exemption assumed to be current in 1086.


Notes:
Values: £1 of man-at-arms assumed to be additional.


Notes:
Waste possibly implied: the whole wood of this manor is in the King's Forest.


Notes:
Churches: number not specified; 2 recorded.


Notes:
Payments: 1 house in Winchester, 5s. Values: the intermediate valuation may be an error for £5, perhaps reading 5s from the line above.


Notes:
Values: the Render seems improbably high.


Notes:
Geld: 10 hides but King Edward put it for service and tax at 4.25 hides.


Notes:
Duplicates: 5 hides duplicated in 29,15.


Notes:
Geld: the King has 1.63 hides of this land is in the Forest with half the woodland, for 45 pigs.


Notes:
Waste possibly implied: woodland in the Forest; its value was 30s.


Notes:
Geld: 2 hides of this manor are in the Forest (value £1.00), assumed to be lost to manor. Payments: mill, 700 eels.


Notes:
Geld: 1086 assessment unstated for the 1/2 virgate, assumed to be unchanged.


Notes:
Waste possibly implied: 3 virgates of this manor and the whole wood, value 20s, are in the King's Forest. Values: 20s assumed to be an additional sum, lost to the manor.


Notes:
Duplicates: 4 hides duplicated in 3,1. Payments: fishery, 2s; pasturage, 10s.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 29,3-4, population and ploughteams possibly recorded in 29,3. Duplicates: 1 hide duplicated in 3,1. Payments: grazing, 40s; 8 sites in Winchester, 65s 4d.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 29,3-4, population and ploughteams possibly recorded here.


Notes:
Payments: 4 messuages in Southampton, 40d; fishery, 6s.


Notes:
Geld: because it was in the Monastery, that it did not give tax neither does it now; they do not know what it has defaulted: an illegality rather than an exemption assumed. Duplicates: hide duplicated in 3,1.


Notes:
Duplicates: 5 hides duplicated in 23,44.


Notes:
Values: value reduced due to lost 1/2 hide.


Notes:
Values: later and now £8; however, it was at £9, assumed to be the Render.


Notes:
Payments: 9 burgesses' messuages, 12s 2d.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 32,2-3, valuation and other statistics recorded in 32,2.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 32,2-3, valuation and other statistics recorded here.


Notes:
Geld: no warrant for geld reduction from 6 to 3 hides seen by County; now 2 hides.


Notes:
Payments: 1 messuage in Winchester, nothing.


Notes:
Values: value reduced though loss of woodland. Payments: 3 sites in Southampton, 18d.


Notes:
Values: was 10s; now it is waste, assumed to be without value.


Notes:
Duplicates: 3.75 hides duplicated in 3,3.


Notes:
Values: Hugh holds from Gilbert and pays 15s, assumed to be the valuation.


Notes:
Payments: 1 site in Winchester without recorded payment.


Notes:
Geld: the King has 1.125 hides and all the woodland of this manor in his Forest; he gave another 0.125 hide to a priest. Values: 110s in the Forest, assumed to be lost to manor. Mills: 2 for the hall. Payments: 450 eels.


Notes:
Geld: the King has 4 hides and the whole wood of this manor in his Forest; value of all this 110s, presumably lost to manor. Payments: mill, 875 eels.


Notes:
Geld: it did not pay tax, exemption assumed to be current.


Notes:
Geld: exemption due to 1/2 hide in Earl Roger's park (see also SUS 11,81;85;112-113). Values: decline because it is diminished, presumably by the park.


Notes:
Geld: exemption partially due to 1 virgate in Earl Roger's park (see also SUS 11,81;85;112-113).


Notes:
Geld: then and now answered for 1 hide but there is 1 virgate of land more, assumed to be new land.


Notes:
Geld: half of this hide is in the Forest, though no geld reduction is recorded. Values: Forest hide was worth 7s, accounting for the bulk of the lost value.


Notes:
Payments: grazing, 12d; 5 sites in Winchester, 10s.


Notes:
Geld: geld reduction assumed to be due to loss of 1/2 hide; ancient assessment therefore unaffected.


Notes:
Geld: Waleran put 1.5 virgates of this manor in Wiltshire and 3 virgates are in the King's Forest; ancient assessment assumed to include Forest hides but not 1.5, assumed to be recorded elsewhere (perhaps in 45,2).


Notes:
Values: 1 smallholder pays 7d; the value is as much.


Notes:
Geld: claimed exemption assumed to be current.


Notes:
Geld: 1 hide is in the King's Forest with woodland for 20 pigs. Values: £7 in the Forest assumed to be lost to the manor.


Notes:
Geld: 3 hides and the whole woodland of the manor are in the King's Forest. Values: 100s in the Forest assumed to be lost to manor.


Notes:
Entries: blank is manuscript, perhaps where place-name was erased.


Notes:
Geld: 2 hides but answered for 1 virgate then and now.


Notes:
Geld: 5 hides used to be recorded there; but then and now it answered for 3 hides.


Notes:
Values: valuation increased, despite being in the Forest.


Notes:
Values: in the Forest, assumed to be valueless; it is in the revenue of the Isle of Wight. Now it is in the Forest; the King put it there.


Notes:
Values: in the Forest, assumed to be valueless. Duplicates: 7 virgates in the Forest, duplicated in 3,19.


Notes:
Geld: 1086 assessment unstated, assumed to be zero because of the Forest. Values: in the Forest, assumed to be valueless.


Notes:
Geld: 1086 assessment unstated, assumed to be zero because of the Forest. Values: in the Forest except for meadow; assumed to be valueless.


Notes:
Geld: now it is in the Forest, except for 1/4 virgate.


Notes:
Geld: 1 virgate is in the Forest. Values: 2s which the King has assumed to be an additional sum, lost to the manor.


Notes:
Geld: 3 virgates are in the Forest. Values: 15s which the King has assumed to be an additional sum, lost to the manor.


Notes:
Geld: in the Forest, assumed to be exempt. Values: in the Forest, assumed to be valueless.


Notes:
Values: woodland, 4s, in the Forest assumed to be an additional sum, lost to the manor.


Notes:
Geld: 1/2 hide exempt because the woodland is in the Forest.


Notes:
Geld: 1/2 virgate exempt because it is in the Forest. Values: 3s which the King has assumed to be an additional sum, lost to the manor.


Notes:
Geld: 1 virgate is exempt, in the Forest. Values: 6s which the King has assumed to be an additional sum, lost to the manor.


Notes:
Geld: 2 virgates are exempt, because they are in the Forest. Values: 6s which the King has assumed to be an additional sum, lost to the manor.


Notes:
Geld: 1/2 hide is exempt, in the Forest. Values: 6s which the King has assumed to be an additional sum, lost to the manor.


Notes:
Geld: 1 virgate is exempt, in the Forest. Values: 3s which the King has assumed to be an additional sum, lost to the manor.


Notes:
Geld: 1 virgate is exempt, in the Forest. Values: 5s which the King has assumed to be an additional sum, lost to the manor.


Notes:
Geld: 1/3 of a hide which answered for 3 virgates; 2 virgates are now exempt, in the Forest. Values: 3s which the King has assumed to be an additional sum, lost to the manor.


Notes:
Geld: the King has 1 virgate with the woodland. Values: 5s which the King has assumed to be an additional sum, lost to the manor.


Notes:
Geld: 1 hide is exempt, in the Forest. Values: woodland which the King has where 6 men used to live, value £3, assumed to be an additional sum, lost to the manor.


Notes:
Geld: 1 1/2 virgates are exempt, because they are in the Forest. Values: in the Forest, assumed to be valueless.


Notes:
Geld: exempt, because all in the Forest. Values: in the Forest, assumed to be valueless.


Notes:
Geld: answered for 5 hides, now 2. It does not pay tax except for 1 because 3 hides are in the Forest.


Notes:
Values: woodland in the Forest, 12d, assumed to be lost to the manor. Ploughteams: there is nothing there; however, the value is 3s.


Notes:
Population: 3 slaves; 1 slave and 2 smallholders with 1/2 plough; 3 slaves assumed to be error for 3 villagers. Values: woodland in the Forest for 8 pigs, value 5s, assumed to be an additional sum, lost to the manor.


Notes:
Geld: then 3.5 hides; now 1/2 hide which paid tax for 1 virgate; the other land is in the Forest.


Notes:
Geld: then 3 hides, now 2; it paid tax on 1.5; the third hide is in the Forest.


Notes:
Geld: exemption due to the church part (0.5 hide) being in the Forest. Values: the King's part, 10s, assumed to be an additional sum, lost to the manor.


Notes:
Values: what is in the Forest, 4s, assumed to be an additional sum, lost to the manor.


Notes:
Geld: 1 hide; then and now answered for 1 virgate.


Notes:
Values: 20s for the Forest woodland assumed to be an additional sum, lost to the manor.


Notes:
Geld: 1/4 virgate in the Forest. Values: to the King, 16s, assumed to be an additional sum, lost to the manor.


Notes:
Population: 76 men probably a scribal error for 79 (recorded here), the sum of the details.


Notes:
Geld: exempt land from the King himself. Other population: 65 Frenchmen and 31 Englishmen since 1066. Geld: 34 acres assumed to be field, not geld, acres. Payments: 6 houses, 3 exempt.


Notes:
Values: no current valuation recorded, only the Render, recorded as both 1086 valuation and Render.


Notes:
Values: Reginald's virgate was worth 5s (1066 assumed), now waste, assumed to be valueless.


Notes:
Shared statistics: IoW1,7-11, Render recorded in IoW1,11. Geld: 1 virgate did not paid tax. Payments: salt-house without dues; toll, 40s; 8 men, 5s; 20 messuages, 14s; tithes. Values: £4 assumed to be additional. Duplicates: church duplicated in IoW4,1.


Notes:
Shared statistics: IoW1,7-11, Render recorded in IoW1,11. Geld: 2 virgates less a quarter assumed to mean 0.04375 of a hide.


Notes:
Shared statistics: IoW1,7-11, Render recorded in IoW1,11.


Notes:
Shared statistics: IoW1,7-11, Render recorded here; from the four manors named above, William son of Stur pays £60.00, however much less their value (which totals £32).


Notes:
Geld: then 2.5 hides, now 2 because a castle stands on 1 virgate.


Notes:
Geld: 32 hides but paid tax on 17 before 1066 and now. Values at a revenue for £40, but it cannot bear nor pay. Valuations of church and men assumed to be additional to that of manor.


Notes:
Geld: villagers have 1.4375 hides; entry summarises the data from several unidentified holdings. Duplicates: 2 churches duplicated in 1,W4 and IoW1,7.


Notes:
Payments: a salt-house without dues. Geld: 3 hides before 1066, now 2.5 because half is in the King's park. Values: 5s assumed to be an additional sum, lost to the manor.


Notes:
Values: 16d but villager pays 10s a year.


Notes:
Geld: it was of King Edward's revenue and did not pay tax.


Notes:
Ploughteams: 2 cows recorded as 0.25 of a ploughteam.


Notes:
Duplicates: ploughshares probably duplicated in 1,W6.


Notes:
Values: £15 between them all, allocated proportionately to the geld.


Notes:
Duplicates: 1 hide and £7 (or £9) probably duplicated in 1,37.


Notes:
Geld: hides may record area rather than assessment. Values: tribute, assumed to apply to both dates. Population: 22 Frenchmen's houses assumed to imply 22 Frenchmen. Waste: houses waste for castle.


Notes:
Values: values of subholdings assumed to be additional.


Notes:
Payments: fishery, 6s 8d; town sites, 30s.


Notes:
Geld: 3 hides assumed to be additional. Values: assumed to be £3 additional.


Notes:
Payments: 2 fisheries, 13s 4d; a new market, 20s.


Notes:
Values: pays £15 by weight, recorded as Render.


Notes:
Geld: 23 hides answered for 22; king's 11 hides (of 22?) do not pay tax; particulars do not match stated total, King's 11 adjusted to 9.5; details assumed to be additional. See Baring, Tables, p. 63.


Notes:
Geld: Edred's hide assumed (with Baring) to be included in 16 hides but value is assumed to be additional and £1 at both dates.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 1,17;46, valuation recorded here. Geld: no hidage recorded; Baring supplies an estimated 6 hides. See also HAM 43,4.


Notes:
Payments: mill, 150 eels; 5 fisheries, 550 eels.


Notes:
Geld: does not pay tax but pays revenue in Reading.


Notes:
Payments: Reading, 1 site; 2 fisheries, 7s 6d.


Notes:
Geld: Ferrers 1 virgate assumed to be included in 10 hides of manor.


Notes:
Payments: from 9 sites in this village, 40s; mill with a fishery, 35s.


Notes:
Geld: 1/2 hide of church assumed to be included in manorial total.


Notes:
Waste: 1 site in Wallingford wasted (see B4).


Notes:
Payments: 3 fisheries, 14s 6d; pasture, 16s 6d.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 1,44-45. Values: included with Aldermaston.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 1,17;46, valuation recorded in 1,17, the head of the manor. Ploughteams and population: assumed to be additional to main entry (1,17).


Notes:
Values: Roger's £3 assumed to be additional.


Notes:
Payments: pleas of the land belonging to Wallingford, 25s.


Notes:
Payments: 4 fisheries, 20s 6d; a dairy, 10 weys of cheese, 32s 4d, possibly an error for 33s 4d.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 7,1-5, geld total (50 hides) recorded here.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 7,1-5, geld total (50 hides) recorded in 7,1.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 7,1-5, geld total (50 hides) recorded in 7,1; thane's hide exempt but no thane recorded.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 7,6-11, geld total (60 hides) recorded here; valuation for 7,6-7 also. Payments: from 10 merchants dwelling in front of the church gate, fisheries and pasture. Other population: 24 freedmen, 10 merchants.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 7,6-11, geld total (60 hides) recorded in 7,6; valuation in 7,6 also.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 7,6-11, geld total (60 hides) recorded in 7,6.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 7,13-14, geld total (50 hides) recorded here.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 7,13-14, geld total (50 hides) recorded in 7,13.


Notes:
Geld: original assessment was 15 hides but King Edward remitted it for 11.


Notes:
Waste possibly implied: nothing else but meadow.


Notes:
Values: £2 assumed to be additional to the manorial total (as Baring).


Notes:
Population: 6 smallholders assumed to be additional to 10 (compare Baring).


Notes:
Payments: fishery, 10s; profit of the lordship land, 21s.


Notes:
Payments: mill, 250 eels; fishery, 300 eels.


Notes:
Geld: 2 virgates possibly an error for 2 hides.


Notes:
Payments: other meadows, 12s 6d; customary dues on cheeses, £4 16s 8d.


Notes:
Payments: 8 sites in Wallingford, 14s 4d.


Notes:
Geld: under Harold reduced to 10 hides. Payments: Wallingford, 5 sites.


Notes:
Payments: 29 messuages in Reading, 28s 8d; 2.5 fisheries, 5s; the church, £3.


Notes:
Payments: 8 sites in Wallingford, 4s; grazing, 5s.


Notes:
Ploughteams: villagers' ploughs probably omitted.


Notes:
Geld: reduced by King Edward, as Hundred testifies.


Notes:
Geld: reduced first by King Edward from 40 to 30 hides, then to 6. Payments: from pasture.


Notes:
Geld: Godric received another virgate, without warrant, assumed to be recorded elsewhere.


Notes:
Geld: 1/2 hide assumed to be additional to 10.


Notes:
Ploughteams: villagers' ploughs possibly omitted.


Notes:
Geld: in the Forest and has never paid tax as the Shire states.


Notes:
Geld: then and now 10 hides there, but it answers for 6.5.


Notes:
Geld: 6.25 hides did not pay tax before 1066 and now only for 5 hides.


Notes:
Geld: assessed in Gratentun (Oxford) - not otherwise recorded - but pays the levy in Berkshire.


Notes:
Values: pays £6 and 1 ounce of gold (assumed to be approximately £4, after Baring).


Notes:
Payments: fisheries, 11s; 1 site in Oxford, 10d.


Notes:
Geld: placed in Harwell where it never lay, nor has it ever paid tax.


Notes:
Geld: then for 3 hides; it answered for 1 hide; now the same.


Notes:
Geld: 15 hides; but then and now it answered for 11.75.


Notes:
Geld: 10 hides; but it answered for 6.5 then and now.


Notes:
Geld: 7.5 hides but then and now it pays tax for 5.5 hides.


Notes:
Other population: 5 freeholders with 2 ploughs recorded as manorial peasantry.


Notes:
Geld: Aldeva's hide assumed to be additional.


Notes:
Payments: messuages, 43s 6d. Values: payments recorded as valuation.


Notes:
Values: paid £22 when Hervey (of Wilton) acquired it in charge.


Notes:
Payments: a hawk, £10; a packhorse, 20s; hay, 100s and 5 ora.


Notes:
Values: from third pennies of boroughs; and £60 from the increase, by weight.


Notes:
Values: pays £8 and 100s. Payments: mint, 100s; food for boatmen, boatmen, 20s.


Notes:
Geld: never assessed; did not pay tax. Values: pays one night's revenue, with all customary dues (estimated at £100 in EHR 2002 pp. 258-61), assumed to apply to 1066 also. Payments: burgesses, 20s. Duplicates: 5 hides possibly duplicated in 54,1.


Notes:
Values: pays one night's revenue, with all customary dues (estimated at £100 in EHR 2002 pp. 258-61), assumed to apply to 1066 also. Geld: never assessed; did not pay tax.


Notes:
Values: with its dependencies, one night's revenue (estimated at £100 in EHR 2002 pp. 258-61), assumed to apply to 1066 also. Geld: never assessed; did not pay tax.


Notes:
Values: pays one night's revenue, with all customary dues (estimated at £100 in EHR 2002 pp. 258-61), assumed to apply to 1066 also. Geld: Never assessed; did not pay tax. Other population: 13 pigmen, 14 freedmen.


Notes:
Values: pays one night's revenue, with all customary dues (estimated at £110 at face value), assumed to apply to 1066 also. Geld: never assessed; did not pay tax; but subholdings recorded in hides.


Notes:
Values: pays one night's revenue, with all customary dues (estimated at £100 at face value), assumed to apply to 1066 also. Geld: never assessed; did not pay tax. Payments: burgesses, 50s.


Notes:
Values: pays £70 by weight (recorded as Render), but valued by the English at only £60; subholding value of £2 assumed to be additional.


Notes:
Values: with its dependencies pays £30 by weight, but valued by the English at £31 at face value. Geld: only 18 hides pay tax.


Notes:
Values: pays £111 11s by weight; the English assess it the same at face value.


Notes:
Values: pays £24 by weight: the same at face value before 1066.


Notes:
Values: pays £100 at face value. Other population: 9 beekeepers, 16 freedmen, 29 pigmen, unspecified number of potters, recorded as 2. Payments: potters, 20s.


Notes:
Payments: burgesses, 6s. Churches: 1, now unoccupied with damaged roof.


Notes:
Geld: 2 of the hides were taken away with the other 3 (100 less 3) in King Knut's time, perhaps implying that the ancient assessment was 100 hides; 4 hides are in the Forest.


Notes:
Population: [...] villagers entered as 2.


Notes:
Duplicates: meadow possibly duplicated in 7,5.


Notes:
Geld: acres. Values: pays £61, but valued at £45 by the men because of the confusion of the land and because of the revenue which is too high.


Notes:
Duplicates: meadow possibly duplicated in 5,6 and 48,4.


Notes:
Geld: 1 hide lies in Hampshire. Values: intermediate valuation for lordship only.


Notes:
Values: intermediate valuation for lordship only.


Woodland:
2 leagues * 2 furlongs & 1 * 1 furlong & 4 acres


Notes:
Values: £9 from the church, many burgesses and third penny of Cricklade.


Notes:
Values: intermediate valuation (100s less than that of 1086) assumed to include the value of the subholding.


Notes:
Duplicates: 2 hides duplicated in 25,6 but deleted there.


Notes:
Ploughteams: Edward has 3 ploughs on the villagers' land, interpreted here as men's ploughs.


Notes:
Other population: 18 freedmen, 22 pigmen, a servant. Payments: 7 sesters of honey; burgesses, 35s 9d; market, 45s.


Notes:
Duplicates: 7 1/2 hides duplicated in 58,2.


Notes:
Payments: 80 cartloads of timer and fodder for 80 pigs and what may be needed for repairing houses and fences.


Notes:
Payments: 80 cartloads of timber and whatever is needed for [repairing] houses and fences.


Notes:
Waste: 1/4 of the land is in the King's Forest.


Notes:
Payments: borough, £10 17s 6d. Values: payments recorded as valuation.


Notes:
Geld: 1 hide attached to the church has never paid tax.


Notes:
Geld: paid tax for 20 hides and 7 before 1066.


Notes:
Payments: 130 pigs; bacon-pigs, 32; wheat, 2 pecks and 8 sesters; malt, as much; oats, 5 pecks and 4 sesters; honey, 16 sesters or 16s; chickens, 480; eggs, 1600; cheeses, 100; lambs, 52; fleeces, 240; 1 standing corn, 162 acres.


Notes:
Mills: 1 part of a mill, recorded as 1/2.


Notes:
Values: when acquired £20, apart from the revenue of 2 thanes which was in the place.


Notes:
Duplicates: 2 hides deleted in manuscript; recorded as part of record 10,3.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 'as much as above' interpreted to mean exactly the same statistics as the previous entry.


Notes:
Values: now 40d which he pays to Arnulf in revenue.


Notes:
Geld: 1/2 hide has not paid tax since 1066. Duplicates: 1/2 hide duplicated in 32,17.


Notes:
Values: £18, but valued by the English at £12.


Notes:
Mills: the third part of 2 mills, recorded as 0.667.


Notes:
Geld: the king has 1 hide; nothing is there.


Notes:
Waste: half this land is in the King's Forest.


Notes:
Population: unspecified number of Cottagers recorded as 2.


Notes:
Geld: it did not pay tax for 1/2 hide after 1066. Duplicates: 1/2 hide duplicated in 25,23.


Notes:
Geld: Exon records men have 2 hides less 1 virgate.


Notes:
Values: all parts valued £4, assumed to mean equal shares in the valuation.


Notes:
Duplicates: 5 hides possibly duplicated in 1,1.


Notes:
Geld: possible lordship carucates in error for hides in manuscript. Payments: burgesses, 20d.


Notes:
Duplicates: 7 1/2 hides duplicated in 13,9.


Notes:
Ploughteams: stepsons have 5 ploughs with their men, here shared equally between demesne and men.


Notes:
Geld: 5 hides; before 1066 paid tax for 0.5 hides. Payments: burgesses, 21d.


Notes:
Population: unspecified number of villagers recorded as 2.


Notes:
Values: 8s probably a scribal error for £8.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 56,56-57, valuation recorded in 67,56.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 56,56-57, valuation recorded here.


Notes:
Waste: half of this land is in the Forest.


Notes:
Geld: 10 hides, that is, 1 silver mark (13s 4d) for the use of the guards apart from customary dues for nights' revenue. Values: 2 moneyers paid 1 silver mark and 20s each when coinage changed. Waste: 100 houses destroyed by fire.


Notes:
Geld: 5 hides, that is, 1/2 silver mark (6s 8d) for the use of the guards apart from customary dues for nights' revenue.


Notes:
Geld: 10 hides, that is, 1 silver mark (13s 4d) for the use of the guards apart from customary dues for nights' revenue. Values: 2 moneyers paid 1 silver mark and 20s each when coinage changed. Waste: 133 houses destroyed, 17 unoccupied.


Notes:
Geld: 20 hides, that is, 2 silver marks (£1 6s 8d) for the use of the guards apart from customary dues for nights' revenue. Values: 3 moneyers paid 1 silver mark and 20s each when coinage changed. Waste: 80 houses destroyed.


Notes:
Geld: never assessed; did not pay tax. Values: farm of one night, estimated at £100 (EHR 2002 pp. 258-61).


Notes:
Values: half of the farm of one night, estimated at £50 (EHR 2002 pp. 258-61).


Notes:
Satellite: intermediate valuation and woodland.


Notes:
Satellite: discrepancy, lord's ploughs equals 1.5.


Notes:
Satellite: values discrepancy, was/now £34 (not including smaller holdings), probably an error by the Domesday scribe.


Notes:
Satellite: additional population, 8 cottagers.


Notes:
Payments: 3 thanes pay £3 apart from service. Satellite: discrepancy in woodland.


Notes:
Satellite: population discrepancy, 2 villagers, although the Exon. manuscript is unclear.


Notes:
Geld: never paid tax on 1/2 of a hide; does not belong to the revenue.


Notes:
Ploughteams: lord's ploughs blank in manuscript.


Notes:
Satellite: demesne hides 2.5 less 8 acres held by Cottagers; additional ploughs, 1 in lordship.


Notes:
Geld: 10 hides taken away by Harold; 3 1/2 virgates in Buckland added.


Pasture:
6 * 5 furlongs  & 0.5 league * 4 furlongs


Notes:
Geld: as much land as 2 ploughs can plough, assumed to be new land; it has never paid tax.


Notes:
Ploughlands: land for 2 ploughs, assumed to be new land; never paid tax.


Notes:
Geld: land for 6 ploughs has never paid tax, assumed to be new land; 6 subholding hides assumed to be included in manorial total.


Notes:
Payments: 1 house, 6d. Values: they pay 15s to the monks for fish, recorded as valuation. Geld: never paid tax. Ploughlands: land for 1 plough, assumed to be new land.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 2,6 and 3,1. Geld: 16 carucates never assessed and did not pay tax, assumed to be new land.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 2,6 and 3,1. Ploughlands: 9.5 carucates, assumed to be new land.


Notes:
Geld: 2 carucates which have never been divided into hides, assumed to be new land.


Pasture:
1 * 0.5 leagues & 4 * 2 furlongs & 32 acres

Notes:
Geld: 2 carucates which have never paid tax, assumed to be new land.


Pasture:
1.5 leagues & 2 furlongs * 1 league & 1 furlong

Woodland:
1 league & 2 furlongs * 1 league & 1 furlong


Notes:
Ploughlands: land for 14 ploughs, assumed to be new land.


Notes:
Ploughlands: land for 8 ploughs, assumed to be new land; never paid tax.


Notes:
Satellite: Britctwin pays 30s a year to the church apart from service.


Notes:
Satellite: demesne hides and discrepancy; lord's ploughs equals 1.5.


Notes:
Values: worth £5 more then because the manor has been plundered. Satellite: additional population, 5 cottagers; additional values, intermediate and now.


Pasture:
8 furlongs & 26 rods * 3 furlongs & 14 perches

Notes:
Ploughteams: ploughteams there assumed to be as additional. Landowners: Roger Bushell holds from Hugh's wife in Exon.


Notes:
Satellite: additional ploughs; 2 in lordship belonging to man-at-arms, discrepancy; men's ploughs equals 2.5; value discrepancy, intermediate valuation equals 11.75, woodland 'bears no fruit'.


Notes:
Satellite: discrepancy, men's ploughs equals 3.


Notes:
Satellite: additional ploughs; 2 ploughs between the villagers.


Notes:
Payments: salt-workers pay £1, recorded as valuation.


Notes:
Satellite: population discrepancy, 7 smallholders; mill value discrepancy, worth 25s, possibly a scribal error.


Notes:
Satellite: lord's plough, 1086 tenant and tenure.


Notes:
Geld: the king holds 2 better hides of these 7 in the Forest of Wimborne. Payments: church in Wimbourne with land for 2 houses; 1 church and 5 houses in Wareham, 65d; 1 house in Dorchester.


Notes:
Satellite: provides 1066 holders and their tenure.


Notes:
Satellite: intermediate valuation. Payments: 2 tributaries pay 15s.


Notes:
Satellite: additional ploughs; 1 plough between the villagers.


Notes:
Satellite: additional ploughlands: land for 1 plough.


Notes:
Values: missing. Duplicates: 1 hide duplicated between between 49,17 and 55,21.


Notes:
Churches: church in the singular but 2 places named, includes tithes. Geld: acres.


Notes:
Churches: church in the singular but 3 places named.


Notes:
Mills: half of 2 mills, recorded as 1 mill.


Notes:
Geld: acres; total (1 1/2 hides) disagrees with the particulars for 1086 (4 virgates and 9 acres).


Notes:
Values: main holding only has a 1086 value; intermediate and 1086 values are given for the subholding.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 31,1-2, valuation recorded in 31,2.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 31,1-2, valuation recorded here.


Notes:
Duplicates: 1 virgate duplicated in 36,3. Satellite: demesne hides.


Notes:
Satellite: demesne hides, acres. Payments: a garden in Wareham, 3d.


Notes:
Satellite: additional population, 2 cottagers. Mills: assumed to be shared between the 2 men.


Notes:
Satellite: demesne hides, acres; additional ploughs; 1 plough between the villagers.


Notes:
Geld: 1 hide did not pay tax. Satellite: demesne hides and woodland.


Notes:
Satellite: demesne hides and intermediate valuation.


Notes:
Geld: wife of Hugh son of Grip holds a part of this land, amount unspecified.


Notes:
Duplicates: 1/2 hide duplicated in 19,11.


Notes:
Satellite: provides details of 1086 holdings.


Notes:
Mills: 1 part of a mill, recorded as 0.5.


Notes:
Satellite: population discrepancy, 1 smallholder.


Notes:
Satellite: demesne hides, discrepancy; lord's ploughs equals 1.5.


Notes:
Duplicates: 1/2 hide duplicated in 19,11. Satellite: lord's plough and intermediate valuation.


Notes:
Satellite: demesne hides; population discrepancy, 1 countryman for 1 villager.


Notes:
Satellite: demesne hides and intermediate valuation; additional ploughs, 1/2 plough between the villagers; population discrepancy, 2 villagers instead of 1.


Notes:
Satellite: demesne hides and intermediate valuation; additional ploughs, 1/2 plough between the villagers.


Notes:
Satellite: King William has never had his tax from 0.25 hides; value discrepancy; intermediate valuation equals 1, 1086 value equals 1.25; 1066 landholder.


Notes:
Satellite: demesne hides and additional intermediate valuation; in Hugh son of Grip's lifetime it paid £11.


Notes:
Satellite: demesne hides, acres; additional ploughs; 1/2 plough between the villagers.


Notes:
Satellite: demesne hides, discrepancy; geld for the whole entry given as 1.75.


Notes:
Satellite: has been completely laid waste: now has a value but no recorded resources.


Notes:
Satellite: demesne hides; additional ploughs, 2 oxen between the villagers.


Notes:
Satellite: Walter Thunder holds the whole in lordship.


Notes:
Values: 1086 value of 40s probably a scribal error for 40d.


Notes:
Duplicates: entry duplicated in 56,65. Entries: blank in manuscript; entry incomplete.


Notes:
Entries: blank in manuscript 1.5 lines missing.


Notes:
Values: 2 smallholders pay 20d, recorded as the valuation.


Notes:
Payments: in the village mill 22.5 [...]; blank in manuscript could be shillings or pence.


Notes:
Values: 4 men pay 12s 4d, recorded as the valuation.


Notes:
Values: 30s in 1086 possibly an error for 30d.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 1,1-2, valuation for 1066 recorded in 1,2; one night's revenue (estimated at £100 in EHR 2002 pp. 258-61). Payments: 2 fisheries, 10s; burgesses in Langport, 15s.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 1,1-2, valuation for 1066 recorded here; one night's revenue (estimated at £100 in EHR 2002 pp. 258-61). Payments: 3 fisheries, 10s; 7 people, 17s; 32 burgesses in Axbridge, 20s.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 1,3-5, valuation for 1066 recorded in 1,5; one night's revenue (estimated at £100 in EHR 2002 pp. 258-61), allocated equally between the three.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 1,3-5, valuation for 1066 recorded in 1,5; one night's revenue (estimated at £100 in EHR 2002 pp. 258-61), allocated equally between the three. Payments: 6 sheep, 6 lambs and 1 bloom of iron.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 1,3-5, valuation for 1066 recorded here; one night's revenue (estimated at £100 in EHR 2002 pp. 258-61), allocated equally between the three. Duplicates: 1 virgate duplicated in 19,15 at Swell.


Notes:
Values: paid one night's revenue before 1066 (estimated at £100 in EHR 2002 pp. 258-61). Satellite: 1 virgate in Ledforda added, value 2s.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 1,8-9, valuation for 1066 recorded in 1,9; one night's revenue (estimated at £100 in EHR 2002 pp. 258-61). Payments: market, 46s 8d.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 1,8-9, valuation for 1066 recorded here; one night's revenue (estimated at £100 in EHR 2002 pp. 258-61); intermediate valuation for subholding only.


Notes:
Values: paid 1/2 and 0.25 night's revenue before 1066; valuation for 1086 includes market and dependencies. Payments: 56 burgesses and market, 60s; 107 burgesses, 20s. Satellite: additional ploughs, another 1/2 plough between the villagers.


Notes:
Duplicates: 1 hide possibly duplicated in 19,35 but there are differences. Satellite: subholding demesne hides, 3 virgates; tenant of 1 hide in Preston; other population, 15 pigmen; payments from pigmen, 32s.


Pasture:
1 * 0.5 leagues & 0.5 leagues * 4 furlongs


Notes:
Values: may be more, £s as blank in manuscript but estimated in Domesday Geography p. 169 to be £4.6. Satellite: intermediate valuation.


Notes:
Payments: a fishery but does not belong to the revenue. Satellite: intermediate valuation.


Notes:
Payments: burgesses, 38d; a fishery but it does not belong to the revenue. Satellite: intermediate valuation.


Notes:
Payments: market, £4. Satellite: subholding intermediate valuation only. Duplicates: 50s duplicated in 19,33.


Notes:
Satellite: intermediate valuation for main manor and subholdings of Giso, Serlo and Gilbert.


Notes:
Geld: paid tax for 8.5 hides. Satellite: intermediate valuation.


Notes:
Geld: paid tax for 7 hides. Satellite: intermediate valuation; 1 pigman who renders 10 pigs.


Notes:
Geld: land for 8 ploughs which has never paid tax, assumed to be new land. Satellite: intermediate valuation.


Notes:
Geld: paid tax for 13 hides before 1066. Values: worth £5 more if Bishop Walkelin has testified. Satellite: intermediate valuation. Payments: £4 10s in Martock; 1 fishery, 5s.


Woodland:
1 * 1 leagues & 3 * 4 furlongs & 4 acres

Notes:
Duplicates: 4 hide submanor duplicated in 17,6. Payments: burgesses, 5s. Satellite: subholding demesne hides, 8.625 hides; intermediate valuation; plough details for Wulfward's wife; 19 additional ploughlands.


Notes:
Geld: paid tax for 14 hides before 1066. Satellite: subholding demesne hides; ploughs details; 3 additional ploughlands. Payments: burgesses, 40d.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 1,30-31, valuation recorded in 1,31. Satellite: demesne hides. Paid tax for 1 hide. Part of the lordship revenue of the Borough of Bath (1,31).


Notes:
Shared statistics: 1,30-31, valuation recorded here. Payments: Edward, £11 of the third penny; burgesses, £7; mint, 100s; William of Mohun, £6 at 20d/ora of Ilchester; of Milborne, 20s; of Bruton, 20s; of Langport, 10s; of Axbridge, 10s; of Frome, 5s.


Notes:
Values: subholding value assumed to be included in manorial total.


Notes:
Satellite: additional ploughs; 3 ploughs between the villagers; additional population.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 2,1;6-9, geld total (54.625 hides) recorded here. Payments: pigmen, £7 10s; burgesses, 32s; market, 50s; from mint, 50s.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 2,1;6-9, geld total recorded in 2,1. Values: assumed to be additional to 2,1 (as Exon.).


Notes:
Shared statistics: 2,1;6-9, geld total recorded in 2,1. Geld: assumed to be included in manorial total. Values: assumed to be additional to 2,1 (as Exon.). Satellite: population discrepancy, 7 slaves.


Notes:
Satellite: subholding intermediate valuation; additional population 4 slaves and 1 pigman.


Notes:
Payments: 1066 customary due of 12 sheep with their lambs and 1 bloom of iron from every free man. Satellite: demesne hides and ploughs.


Notes:
Satellite: ploughs for main manor; intermediate valuation for main manor only.


Notes:
Satellite: demesne hides; intermediate valuation; plough discrepancy, 1 lord's plough.


Notes:
Mills: third part of 1 mill and two-thirds of another, recorded as 1. Satellite: demesne hides and ploughs including details for 2 added hides not in printed text.


Notes:
Satellite: demesne hides; intermediate valuation.


Notes:
Payments: 2 houses in Bath, 10d; 10 houses in Bristol.


Notes:
Satellite: demesne hides; additional ploughs; 12 ploughs between the villagers.


Notes:
Satellite: demesne hides and subholding intermediate valuation.


Notes:
Satellite: demesne hides; additional ploughs; 1/2 plough between the villagers.


Notes:
Duplicates: 1 hide duplicated in 20,1. Satellite: demesne hides.


Notes:
Satellite: demesne hides; additional population 3 cottagers.


Notes:
Satellite: demesne hides and intermediate valuation for main manor.


Notes:
Satellite: demesne hides and subholding plough details.


Notes:
Geld: did not pay tax before 1066 except for 1 hide. Satellite: demesne hides.


Notes:
Payments: a burgess, 15d. Satellite: demesne hides.


Notes:
Geld: particulars (52 hides) exceed the stated 50 hides. Duplicates: 2 hides possibly duplicated in 46,24. Satellite: subholding demesne hides; 6 hides.


Notes:
Payments: 2 mills, 10s; 1 pays 40d. Satellite: 8 additional ploughlands.


Notes:
Geld: paid tax for 10 hides but 11 hides there.


Notes:
Duplicates: 3 hides and 1 virgate duplicated in 22,20.


Notes:
Geld: acres. Satellite: intermediate valuation. Other population: 8 smiths, 10 fishermen.


Notes:
Ploughlands: land for 20 ploughs, assumed to be new land; never paid tax. Satellite: demesne hides on subholding.


Notes:
Satellite: demesne hides; intermediate valuation; ploughs.


Notes:
Satellite: demesne hides; additional ploughs; 2 oxen in lordship.


Notes:
Geld: some hides in dependent tables must be among 20 untaxed ploughlands. Ploughlands: land for 20 ploughs, assumed to be new land; never paid tax. Satellite: additional population; 11 cottagers.


Notes:
Geld: paid tax for 10 hides before 1066 but there are 20 hides there. Satellite: intermediate valuation.


Notes:
Satellite: subholding demesne hides; 5.25 hides; intermediate valuation.


Woodland:
1.5 leagues * 2 furlongs & 9 * 1.5 furlongs


Notes:
Duplicates: 3 hides duplicated in 15,1. Satellite: values.


Notes:
Values: lands lost to Church (eg, 5,43) valued at £5 and more.


Notes:
Geld: 4 carucates which never paid tax in 3 islands. Payments: 6000 eels.


Notes:
Geld: acres; another 'one' in lordship assumed to be 1 hide, see Phillimore notes. Satellite: intermediate valuation 'when the Abbot died'.


Notes:
Duplicates: 1 hide and 1/2 virgate duplicated in 21,55.


Notes:
Satellite: subholding demesne hides; 0.25 hides.


Notes:
Satellite: demesne hides: acres; intermediate valuation 'when the Abbot died'.


Notes:
Duplicates: 2 hides probably duplicated in 10,6 and 21,98, although there are differences in the details.


Notes:
Geld: did not pay tax before 1066. Satellite: demesne hides.


Notes:
Duplicates: 5 hides duplicated in 10,2. 19,18. 21,98 and 32,5.


Notes:
Satellite: subholding demesne hides; 1.5 hides and intermediate valuation.


Notes:
Duplicates: 3 hides duplicated in 8,37. Satellite: demesne hides.


Notes:
Values: £3 and 4 cows. Satellite: demesne hides and intermediate valuation.


Notes:
Satellite: demesne hides; intermediate valuation when the Bishop died; additional ploughs; 1 1/2 ploughs between the villagers.


Notes:
Satellite: church recorded in satellite text.


Notes:
Payments: 2 blooms of iron. Satellite: demesne hides.


Notes:
Duplicates: entry duplicated in 1,28. Satellite: demesne hides.


Notes:
Satellite: demesne hides and additional ploughs; 1 in lordship.


Notes:
Geld: paid tax for 5 hides before 1066. Satellite: demesne hides and intermediate valuation.


Notes:
Geld: 1 virgate did not pay tax before 1066. Satellite: demesne hides.


Notes:
Duplicates: 1 virgate duplicated in 1,5. Satellite: demesne hides and intermediate valuation.


Notes:
Payments: 1 sheep and 1 lamb in customary dues to the king's manor of Curry [Rivel] withheld. Satellite: intermediate valuation.


Notes:
Payments: 30d to the King's manor of Curry Rivel before 1066 now withheld. Satellite: demesne hides; intermediate valuation. Duplicates: 2 hides duplicated in 10,6.


Notes:
Duplicates: 1 virgate possibly duplicated in 46,4. Satellite: demesne hides and intermediate valuation.


Notes:
Payments: 1 sheep and 1 lamb in customary dues to the King's manor of Curry [Rivel] withheld. Satellite: intermediate valuation.


Notes:
Payments: 5 sheep and 5 lambs in customary dues to the King's manor of Curry [Rivel] withheld. Satellite: demesne hides.


Notes:
Payments: 2 sheep and 2 lambs in customary dues to the King's manor of Curry Rivel withheld. Satellite: demesne hides.


Notes:
Payments: a garden in Langport; 50 eels.


Notes:
Payments: 5 sheep and 5 lambs in customary dues and 1 bloom of iron per free man to the King's manor of Curry [Rivel] withheld. Satellite: demesne hides.


Notes:
Payments: 1 sheep and 1 lamb in customary dues to the King's manor of Curry [Rivel] withheld. Satellite: demesne hides.


Notes:
Duplicates: 1 hide of this manor may be duplicated in 46,21. Satellite: demesne hides: acres; intermediate valuation.


Notes:
Satellite: 1 additional ploughland; 1 plough can plough it.


Notes:
Satellite: demesne hides; additional population 4 cottagers.


Notes:
Payments: 8 blooms of iron. Satellite: demesne hides.


Notes:
Satellite: additional population; 2 slaves.


Notes:
Payments: burgesses, 3s. Satellite: intermediate valuation.


Notes:
Satellite: demesne hides: acres and intermediate valuation.


Notes:
Satellite: demesne hides; intermediate valuation; additional ploughs; 1/2 plough between the villagers.


Notes:
Duplicates: 1 hide is in the common pasture in the Bishop of Coutances' manor of Hardington, duplicated from 5,48.


Notes:
Satellite: demesne hides; intermediate valuation; additional ploughs.


Notes:
Satellite: demesne hides; additional ploughs.


Notes:
Ploughlands: 2 oxen. Satellite: demesne hides and intermediate valuation.


Notes:
Satellite: intermediate valuation; additional ploughs; 2 oxen in lordship.


Notes:
Satellite: demesne hides; additional ploughs; 1/2 plough in lordship.


Notes:
Satellite: intermediate valuation; additional ploughs; 1/2 ploughs in lordship.


Notes:
Satellite: demesne hides and additional ploughs; 1 plough in lordship, 2 oxen between the villagers.


Notes:
Duplicates: part of the 20 hides of Drayton, duplicated in 9,6; thaneland. Satellite: demesne hides.


Notes:
Satellite: demesne hides and intermediate valuation; intermediate waste.


Notes:
Satellite: intermediate valuation; intermediate waste.


Notes:
Duplicates: 2 hides duplicated in 25,55 with some differences. Satellite: demesne hides.


Notes:
Duplicates: 2 hides probably duplicated in 10,2 and 10,6, but differences in the details.


Notes:
Mills: a mill which grinds for the hall. Satellite: demesne hides.


Notes:
Geld: paid tax for 1 hide less 1 furlong.


Notes:
Duplicates: 3 hides and 1 virgate duplicated in 6,19. Satellite: demesne hides and intermediate valuation.


Notes:
Satellite: demesne hides and additional ploughs; 1 plough between the villagers.


Notes:
Satellite: demesne hides and additional ploughs; 1/2 plough between the villagers.


Notes:
Duplicates: 1/2 hide duplicated in 46,5. Satellite: demesne hides.


Notes:
Geld: paid tax for 5 hides but there are 6 hides there.


Notes:
Satellite: demesne hides; additional population 8 smallholders.


Notes:
Satellite: additional population; payments; 8 pigmen, 50 pigs.


Notes:
Satellite: demesne hides; additional population 6 cottagers.


Notes:
Satellite: demesne hides, intermediate valuation and additional ploughs; 1 plough in lordship.


Notes:
Satellite: demesne hides; intermediate valuation for Rademar's holding; additional population, 3 cottagers.


Notes:
Satellite: demesne hides and ploughs include figures for an added hide.


Notes:
Geld: acres. Satellite: demesne hides and intermediate valuation.


Notes:
Satellite: demesne hides; additional ploughs; 4 oxen in lordship.


Pasture:
2 * 1 leagues & 0.5 leagues * 5 furlongs


Notes:
Satellite: demesne hides; 1/2 additional ploughlands.


Notes:
Ploughlands: land for 1/2 plough, but it lies in pasture. Satellite: intermediate valuation.


Notes:
Values: error in formulae for 1086 valuation. Satellite: demesne hides.


Notes:
Satellite: demesne hides; additional ploughs; 1 plough between the villagers and 1 in lordship; additional population, 6 villagers and 3 smallholders.


Notes:
Geld: King's virgate is part of the manor of Williton. Satellite: demesne hides.


Notes:
Satellite: demesne hides; additional population 1 villager.


Notes:
Satellite: intermediate valuation for main manor.


Notes:
Geld: paid tax for 1/2 hide but 1 hide there. Satellite: demesne hides.


Notes:
Duplicates: 3 hides - probably a scribal error for 2 - duplicated in 21,90. Satellite: demesne hides; additional 25 cottagers on main manor.


Notes:
Payments: 22 plots of land, 12s. Satellite: demesne hides.


Notes:
Values: subholding always 5s. Satellite: demesne hides.


Notes:
Payments: 12 sheep to the King's manor of Carhampton before 1066 now withheld. Satellite: demesne hides and intermediate valuation.


Notes:
Payments: 12 sheep to the King's manor of Carhampton before 1066 now withheld. Satellite: demesne hides.


Notes:
Duplicates: 1 hide duplicated in 10,6. Satellite: demesne hides.


Notes:
Values: 1086 valuation supplied by satellite; now pays 100 cheeses and 10 bacon-pigs. Satellite: demesne hides; 1086 valuation.


Notes:
Values: subholding always 5s. Satellite: demesne hides and intermediate valuation.


Notes:
Satellite: demesne hides and subholding additional ploughs; 2 ploughs between the villagers.


Notes:
Geld: paid tax for 1/2 hide less 1 furlong. Satellite: additional ploughs; 1 plough between the villagers; demesne hides.


Notes:
Payments: a burgesses, 23s. Satellite: demesne hides.


Notes:
Satellite: demesne hides; additional population 3 villagers.


Notes:
Satellite: demesne hides including 3 virgates; 1 additional ploughland and plough details for Lambert's hide.


Notes:
Satellite: demesne hides; intermediate valuation for subholding; ploughs for Chilliyhill; additional population, 1 villager for Stoke.


Notes:
Geld: paid tax for 1 hide, but 5 hides there. Satellite: demesne hides.


Notes:
Satellite: demesne hides: acres, includes demesne hides and plough details for Lambert's hide.


Notes:
Satellite: demesne hides and subholding additional ploughs; 1/2 ploughs in lordship.


Notes:
Payments: houses 7.5d. Satellite: demesne hides.


Notes:
Payments: houses, 27d. Satellite: demesne hides: acres.


Notes:
Duplicates: 1 virgate possibly duplicated in 19,21 or 19,22. Satellite: demesne hides.


Notes:
Duplicates: 1/2 hide duplicated in 24,8. Satellite: subholding values.


Notes:
Geld: paid tax for 0.625 hides and 1/2 furlong. Satellite: demesne hides and ploughs, 1086 lord.


Notes:
Satellite: demesne hides and additional ploughs; 2 oxen in a plough between the villagers.


Notes:
Satellite: demesne hides and ploughteams.


Notes:
Satellite: demesne hides and ploughs, discrepancy of 1 plough.


Notes:
Satellite: demesne hides and ploughs; discrepancy of 1/2 plough.


Notes:
Duplicates: 1 hide possibly duplicated in Keinton Mandeville, 19,59. Satellite: demesne hides.


Notes:
Duplicates: 2 hides possibly duplicated in 6,1.


Notes:
Payments: 10s in revenue before 1066 now withheld.


Notes:
Satellite: tenant holding intermediate valuation; intermediate waste.


Notes:
Population: unspecified number of villagers, recorded as 2.


Notes:
Geld: paid tax for 1 virgate and 1.25 furlongs.


Notes:
Satellite: additional ploughs; 2 oxen in lordship.


Notes:
Payments: burgesses, 40s by weight and 20s at face value. Values: payments recorded as the valuation. Waste possibly implied: 23 houses unoccupied since 1066.


Notes:
Payments: burgesses, 60s by weight. Values: payments recorded as the valuation. Waste possibly implied: 40 houses unoccupied since 1066.


Notes:
Duplicates: 1/2 virgate duplicated in 22,1. Satellite: additional 0.5 ploughlands.


Notes:
Duplicates: 1 virgate duplicated in 16,74, another in 16,80. Satellite: intermediate valuation for tenant holding.


Notes:
Geld: added 1/2 virgate not apparently recorded elsewhere so included here.


Notes:
Values: pays £14 by weight and 10s at face value. Satellite: demesne hides.


Notes:
Geld: never assessed; did not pay tax. Satellite: intermediate valuation.


Notes:
Satellite: intermediate valuation and demesne hides.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 1,19-21; 1066 valuation recorded in 1,21; 1 night's revenue (estimated at £100 in EHR 2002 pp. 258-61). Satellite: intermediate valuation and demesne hides.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 1,19-21; 1066 valuation recorded here; 1 night's revenue (estimated at £100 in EHR 2002 pp. 258-61). Satellite: intermediate valuation and demesne hides.


Notes:
Payments: 4 pigmen, 20s; 8 salt-workers, 20s. Satellite: intermediate valuation and demesne hides.


Notes:
Values: before Baldwin's time it paid £23. Satellite: demesne hides.


Notes:
Satellite: intermediate valuation and demesne hides; additional ploughs, 1 in lordship in Sherford.


Notes:
Payments: 3 pigmen, 10 pigs. Satellite: demesne hides.


Notes:
Payments: [West] Putford, 30d. Satellite: intermediate valuation and demesne hides.


Notes:
Duplicates: 1.5 virgates in Langley partially duplicated in 1,67; hidage and 1086 valuation recorded here. Payments: pigmen pay 35 pigs; 5 houses in Exeter. Satellite: intermediate valuation and demesne hides.


Notes:
Satellite: demesne hides; population: 116 villagers from the satellite text; Domesday's 16 assumed to be a scribal error.


Notes:
Duplicates: 0.375 and £4 duplicated in 1,40 but assumed to be charged here. Satellite: demesne hides; payments: pigmen, 16 pigs.


Notes:
Satellite: demesne hides; payments, 5 pigmen, 30 pigs.


Notes:
Geld: acres. Values: church pays 1 silver mark interpreted as value. Payments: 47 houses pay 10s 10d. 2.5 acres of land belong to the church.


Notes:
Payments: 10 pigmen, 35 pigs; salt-houses, 10s; 9 houses, 3s. Satellite: demesne hides.


Notes:
Geld: 3 hides have never paid tax. Payments: 22 pigmen, 100 pigs. Satellite: demesne hides.


Notes:
Payments: 5 pigmen, 50 pigs; salt-house, 10d. Satellite: demesne hides.


Notes:
Payments: 17 pigmen, 90 pigs. Satellite: demesne hides.


Notes:
Waste possibly implied: 3 houses, 1 unoccupied.


Notes:
Payments: 6 houses, 4 exempt, 2 paid 16d, withheld. Values: payments recorded as valuation.


Notes:
Payments: 10 burgesses, 45d; 7 unoccupied houses, 1/2 virgate, a mill, 20s; dues from burgesses, 20s. Values: payments recorded as the valuation.


Notes:
Payments: 9 pigmen, 25 pigs. Satellite: demesne hides.


Notes:
Payments: 13 pigmen, 21 pigs; 1 burgess in Barnstaple, 15d. Satellite: demesne hides.


Notes:
Satellite: demesne hides; payments, 3 pigmen, 11 pigs.


Notes:
Payments: 3 pigmen, 15 pigs. Satellite: demesne hides.


Notes:
Payments: 3 pigmen, 50 pigs. Satellite: demesne hides.


Notes:
Ploughteams: men have 6 oxen in a plough. Satellite: demesne hides.


Notes:
Satellite: demesne hides; additional ploughteams, 2 oxen in a plough between the villagers.


Notes:
Payments: a garden, 4d. Satellite: demesne hides.


Notes:
Satellite: intermediate valuation, demesne hides and ploughs.


Notes:
Satellite: additional ploughs, 2 oxen between the villagers.


Notes:
Satellite: additional ploughlands for subholdings.


Notes:
Satellite: demesne hides; additional ploughs, 1 plough between the villagers.


Notes:
Satellite: additional ploughs, 1 ox between the villagers.


Notes:
Satellite: demesne hides; intermediate valuation less than £3.


Notes:
Geld: 2 manors at 1/2 hide have been added. Payments: 4 pigmen, 40 pigs. Satellite: demesne hides.


Notes:
Payments: 1 house, 8d, withheld. Values: payments recorded as valuation.


Notes:
Satellite: additional ploughs, 1 in lordship.


Notes:
Payments: 7 houses, 4s 8d, 1 exempt. Values: payments recorded as valuation.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 10,1-2, valuation recorded in 10,2. Payments: 5 pigmen, 30s 15d, 1 salt-house, 30d; a garden. Satellite: demesne hides.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 10,1-2, valuation recorded here. Satellite: demesne hides.


Notes:
Payments: a pigman, 10 pigs. Satellite: demesne hides.


Notes:
Payments: salt-house, 10s; fishery, 30d. Satellite: demesne hides and 1 pigman.


Notes:
Payments: 3 pigmen, 30 pigs. Satellite: demesne hides.


Notes:
Satellite: demesne hides; additional ploughs, 1 ox between the villagers.


Notes:
Satellite: demesne hides and ploughs; Domesday Book has 5 ploughteams there and 3 men's ploughs, the satellite text treats the 3 as inclusive.


Notes:
Satellite: demesne hides and ploughs; 4 oxen in a plough.


Notes:
Satellite: demesne hides and ploughs; 2 additional oxen.


Notes:
Satellite: demesne hides; additional ploughs, 1 in lordship.


Notes:
Payments: 3 pigmen, 15 pigs; salt-houses, 10s. Satellite: demesne hides.


Notes:
Payments: salt-houses, 40d and 2 packloads of salt. Satellite: demesne hides.


Notes:
Payments: 7 burgesses, 7s 6d. Values: payments recorded as valuation.


Notes:
Payments: market, 4s. Satellite: demesne hides and pigmen.


Notes:
Duplicates: 1 virgate duplicated in 52,33. Satellite: demesne hides.


Notes:
Satellite: demesne hides; payments: 3 pigmen, 15 pigs.


Notes:
Satellite: demesne hides and mill; payments, 2 pigmen, 10 pigs.


Notes:
Satellite: demesne hides and ploughs; payments: 2 pigmen, 15 pigs.


Notes:
Satellite: demesne hides and ploughs; additional oxen in lordship.


Notes:
Population: 42 villagers and smallholders divided equally. Payments: 5 pigmen, 44 pigs; burgesses in Exeter, 53d. Satellite: demesne hides and ploughs.


Notes:
Population: unspecified number of villagers entered as 2. Satellite: demesne hides.


Notes:
Geld: settled its tax with manor of Charles before 1066 for 0.25 hides; now both are accounted for as a total of 0.5 hides. Satellite: demesne hides and ploughs.


Notes:
Duplicates: 1 virgate duplicated in 1,5. Satellite: demesne hides and ploughs.


Notes:
Satellite: demesne hides; payments, 1 pigman, 6 pigs.


Notes:
Duplicates: 1 virgate and 2s duplicated in 1,5. Satellite: demesne hides; additional population, 4 villagers; payments: 3 pigmen, 15 pigs.


Notes:
Satellite: demesne hides and ploughs; oxen.


Notes:
Duplicates: 1/2 hide duplicated in 39,10 with valuation. Satellite: demesne hides.


Notes:
Satellite: demesne hides; unspecified number of villagers entered as 2.


Notes:
Payments: 1 house, 8d. Values: payments recorded as valuation.


Notes:
Satellite: demesne hides and ploughs; deficit of 1 ox.


Notes:
Satellite: demesne hides; payments, 1 pigman, 10 pigs.


Notes:
Satellite: demesne hides and additional ploughs, 2 cattle in a plough between the villagers.


Notes:
Satellite: demesne hides; Exon. records 1 lordship plough and 6 cattle in a plough between the villagers, presumably rounded up by the Domesday scribe.


Notes:
Payments: a fishery, 30 salmon. Satellite: demesne hides.


Notes:
Satellite: demesne hides and ploughs; waste, laid waste by Irishmen.


Notes:
Satellite: demesne hides; waste, laid waste by Irishmen.


Notes:
Satellite: demesne hides and additional ploughs; waste, laid waste by Irishmen.


Notes:
Satellite: demesne hides and ploughs; villagers '6 cattle in a plough' interpreted as 6 oxen leaving a deficit of 2; waste, laid waste by Irishmen.


Notes:
Satellite: demesne hides; additional ploughs, less 2 oxen between the villagers.


Notes:
Payments: a fishery, 30 salmon. Satellite: demesne hides and ploughs.


Notes:
Satellite: demesne hides and ploughs; 2 additional cattle interpreted as oxen.


Notes:
Satellite: demesne hides and ploughs; 6 additional oxen.


Notes:
Satellite: demesne hides and ploughs; additional oxen.


Notes:
Satellite: demesne hides and additional ploughs, 1/2 in lordship.


Notes:
Satellite: demesne hides and additional ploughs; men have 1 animal in a plough.


Notes:
Satellite: demesne hides and ploughs; deficit of 1/2 plough in lordship.


Notes:
Satellite: demesne hides and additional ploughs; villager has 1 ox in a plough.


Notes:
Payments: 2 pigmen, 20 pigs. Satellite: demesne hides.


Notes:
Payments: 1 pigman, 10 pigs. Satellite: demesne hides.


Notes:
Geld: Badgeworthy (19,18), assessed at 1/2 virgate, has been added to Lyn (19,17). Satellite: demesne hides; payments, 2 pigmen, 20 pigs.


Notes:
Satellite: demesne hides, intermediate valuation and ploughs.


Notes:
Satellite: demesne hides and ploughs; no villagers ploughs.


Notes:
Values: Englishman holds as much land as pays 10s a year to William, recorded as valuation. Satellite: demesne hides; 1066 holder of subholding.


Notes:
Payments: 2 pigmen, 8 pigs. Satellite: demesne hides.


Notes:
Payments: 2 pigmen, 21 pigs. Satellite: demesne hides; 1 lordship and 1.5 villagers ploughs in Luscombe; payments, 2 fishermen, 80 salmon.


Notes:
Ploughteams: men have 2 oxen in a plough. Satellite: demesne and men's hides.


Notes:
Satellite: demesne hides and additional ploughs, 2 oxen between men.


Notes:
Payments: a fishery, 10s; a salt-house, no payments recorded. Satellite: demesne hides.


Notes:
Duplicates: 1/2 virgate duplicated in1,4.


Notes:
Payments: 15 pigmen, 106.5 pigs. Satellite: 4 additional ploughteams.


Notes:
Payments: 2 pigmen, 15 pigs. Satellite: demesne hides.


Notes:
Payments: 2 pigmen, 15 pigs; 5 beekeepers, 7 sesters of honey. Satellite: demesne hides.


Notes:
Duplicates: 1 hide in Shapcombe duplicated in 42,16 but discrepancies in ploughlands, population, values and appurtenances. Satellite: demesne hides.


Notes:
Satellite: demesne hides and intermediate geld for subholding.


Notes:
Payments: customs due from the house in mortgage.


Notes:
Satellite: demesne hides and ploughs; additional ploughs, 1/2 between the villagers.


Notes:
Satellite: additional ploughs and population.


Notes:
Satellite: demesne hides; unspecified number of slaves.


Notes:
Satellite: demesne hides and additional ploughs.


Notes:
Payments: 2 pigmen, 16 pigs. Satellite: demesne hides.


Notes:
Payments: a villager, 30d. Values: payments recorded as valuation.


Notes:
Payments: 2 unoccupied houses, 4d. Values: payments recorded as valuation.


Notes:
Payments: a villager pays 30d. Values: payments recorded as valuation.


Notes:
Payments: a villager, 5s. Values: payments recorded as valuation.


Notes:
Payments: 8d due from the customs of the house.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 33,1-2, valuation recorded in 33,1. Satellite: demesne hides.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 33,1-2, valuation recorded here. Satellite: demesne hides.


Notes:
Payments: salt workers, 6s 5d. Values: payments recorded as valuation.


Notes:
Payments: 1 villager, 3s. Satellite: demesne hides.


Notes:
Satellite: demesne hides and additional ploughs, 7 oxen in a plough.


Notes:
Satellite: demesne hides and additional ploughs, 4 in lordship.


Notes:
Satellite: demesne hides and intermediate valuation for subholding.


Notes:
Payments: from houses withheld. Values: payments recorded as valuation.


Notes:
Satellite: demesne hides and additional ploughs, 3 oxen between the villagers.


Notes:
Satellite: demesne hides and additional ploughs, 1 in lordship.


Notes:
Payments: from salt-workers, 5 packloads of salt and 1 packload of fish. Values: payment by salt-workers recorded as valuation.


Notes:
Satellite: demesne hides, meadow, pasture and ploughs.


Notes:
Satellite: demesne hides and ploughs, 3 oxen in lordship.


Notes:
Duplicates: 1/2 hide in Whimple has been added, entry duplicated in 16,94, but assessment has been recorded here.


Notes:
Satellite: demesne hides and additional ploughs, 2 between the villagers.


Notes:
Payments: 25 pigmen, 110 pigs. Satellite: demesne hides.


Notes:
Duplicates: 1 hide in Shapcombe possibly duplicates of part of 23,20, though with discrepancies. Payments: 2 pigmen pay 10 pigs. Satellite: demesne hides.


Notes:
Geld: the land of 9 thanes and 2 virgates have been added. Satellite: demesne hides and additional ploughs involving a deficit of 1/2 plough.


Notes:
Satellite: demesne hides; payments, 1 pigman, 5 pigs.


Notes:
Satellite: demesne hides. Payments: owes customary dues of 1 ox or 30d to the King's manor of [South] Tawton.


Notes:
Satellite: demesne hides, waste and ploughs.


Notes:
Satellite: additional ploughs, 1 attributed to lordship since population comprises only slaves.


Notes:
Satellite: demesne hides; intermediate valuation and ploughs, deficit of 1 plough.


Notes:
Satellite: demesne hides and ploughs; satellite has 3 ploughs between the villagers, Domesday Book 4; 3 entered but total includes 4.


Notes:
Payments: customary dues of 30d or 1 ox to the King's manor of [South] Tawton withheld. Satellite: demesne hides.


Notes:
Payments: 22 pigmen, 64 pigs. Satellite: demesne hides 5 carucates.


Notes:
Duplicates: 1 virgate in Sedborough duplicated in 16,33.


Notes:
Satellite: other 1066 lords held at £21/20.


Notes:
Entries: memorandum on 1066 ownership: no statistical data.


Notes:
Entries: memorandum on 1086 ownership: no statistical data.


Notes:
Satellite: 1 furlong in lordship, 1 ploughteam; the villagers, the rest and 2 ploughteams.


Notes:
Satellite: 1 furlong in lordship, 1 ploughteam.


Notes:
Geld: never paid tax. Payments: 68 houses and a market. Population: Exon. describes the 68 houses of Domesday as 68 burgesses, recorded here.


Notes:
Satellite: 1 ploughteam in lordship; the villagers, 2 oxen.


Notes:
Satellite: 1 hide in lordship, 1/2 ploughteam; the villagers, 1 hide, 3.5 ploughteams.


Notes:
Satellite: 1 virgate in lordship, 1 ploughteams; the villagers, 3 virgates, 3 ploughteams.


Notes:
Satellite: woodland, 300 acres (Domesday Book 400). Payments: market, 4s.


Notes:
Ploughteams: 6 villagers' ploughteams (Exon.), corrected from 20, probably miscopied by the scribe from the line above.


Notes:
Satellite: 1/2 ploughteam in lordship; the villagers, 1/2 ploughteam.


Notes:
Satellite: 1/2 virgate and 1 ploughteam in lordship; the villagers, the rest and 1 ploughteam.


Notes:
Satellite: 1/2 acre and 2 oxen in lordship; the villagers, the rest.


Notes:
Satellite: 1/2 furlong in lordship; the villagers, the rest.


Notes:
Satellite: 1/2 furlong and 1 ploughteam in lordship; the villagers, the rest.


Notes:
Satellite: 1 virgate in lordship; the villagers, 3 virgates and 3 ploughteams.


Notes:
Satellite: 2 furlongs and 1 ploughteam in lordship; the villagers, 2 furlongs.


Notes:
Satellite: 2 furlongs and 1 ploughteam in lordship; the villagers, 1 ploughteam.


Notes:
Satellite: 1 virgate and 1 ploughteam in lordship; the villagers, 3 virgates and 3 ploughteams.


Notes:
Satellite: 1 virgate and 1 ploughteam in lordship; the villagers, 1 virgate and 2 ploughteams.


Notes:
Satellite: 2 furlongs and 4 oxen in lordship; the villagers, 2 oxen (Domesday Book 1 ploughteam there).


Notes:
Satellite: 1 ploughteam in lordship; the villagers, 2 ploughteams.


Notes:
Satellite: 2 furlongs and 1/2 ploughteam in lordship; the villagers, 2 furlongs and 2 ploughteams.


Notes:
Satellite: 1 virgate and 1 ploughteam in lordship; the villagers, 1 ploughteam.


Notes:
Satellite: 1 ploughteam in lordship; the villagers, 1 ploughteam.


Notes:
Satellite: 1/2 ploughteam in lordship; the villagers, the rest and 1/2 ploughteam.


Notes:
Satellite: 1 virgate in lordship; the villagers, 3 virgates.


Notes:
Satellite: 1/2 furlong and 1/2 ploughteam in lordship; the villagers, the rest.


Notes:
Satellite: 1/2 virgate and 2 ploughteams in lordship; the villagers, the rest and 2 ploughs.


Notes:
Satellite: 2 ploughteams in lordship; the villagers, 1 plough.


Notes:
Satellite: 1 ploughteam in lordship; the villagers, 1 plough.


Notes:
Satellite: 1 virgate in lordship; the villagers, the rest.


Notes:
Satellite: 1 virgate and 2 ploughteams in lordship; the villagers, 3 virgates and 5 ploughs.


Notes:
Satellite: 1 virgate and 2 ploughteams in lordship; the villagers, the rest and 1 ploughs.


Notes:
Satellite: 1 furlong and 2 ploughteams in lordship; the villagers, 3 furlongs and 1 ploughs.


Notes:
Satellite: 1 virgate and 2 ploughteams in lordship; the villagers, the rest and 3 ploughs.


Notes:
Satellite: 1 virgate and 1 ploughteam in lordship; the villagers, 3 virgates and 4 ploughs.


Notes:
Satellite: 1 furlong and 1 ploughteam in lordship; the villagers, the rest and 3 oxen (Domesday Book 1.5 ploughteams there).


Notes:
Satellite: 1 furlong and 1/2 ploughteam in lordship; the villagers, the rest and 1 plough.


Notes:
Satellite: 1 furlong and 1 ploughteam in lordship; the villagers, 1 furlong and 4 oxen.


Notes:
Satellite: 1/2 furlong and 1 ploughteam in lordship; the villagers have the other part and 6 oxen (Domesday Book 2 ploughteams there).


Notes:
Satellite: 1 virgate and 1.5 ploughteams in lordship; the villagers, the rest and 1.5 ploughs.


Notes:
Satellite: 1 virgate and 2 ploughteams in lordship; the villagers, the rest and 4 ploughs.


Notes:
Satellite: 1 virgate and 3 ploughteams in lordship; the villagers, the rest and 7 ploughs.


Notes:
Satellite: 1 virgate and 1 ploughteam in lordship; the villagers, the rest and 3 ploughs.


Notes:
Satellite: 1 virgate and 2 ploughteams in lordship; the villagers, the rest and 2 ploughs.


Notes:
Satellite: 1 virgate and 2 ploughteams in lordship; the villagers, the rest and 1 plough.


Notes:
Satellite: 1 virgate and 3 ploughteams in lordship; the villagers, the rest and 1 plough.


Notes:
Satellite: 1/2 virgate and 6 oxen in lordship; the villagers, the rest and 1/2 plough.


Notes:
Ploughteams: land for 15 or 30 ploughs. Repetition 3 hides there. 3 hides. Satellite: 1 virgate and 3 ploughteams in lordship; the villagers, the rest and 9 ploughs.


Notes:
Satellite: 1 virgate and 1 ploughteam in lordship; the villagers, the rest and 4 ploughs.


Notes:
Satellite: 1/3 hide and 1.5 ploughteams in lordship; the villagers, the rest and 4 ploughs.


Notes:
Satellite: 1/2 furlong and 1/2 ploughteam in lordship; the villagers, the rest and 1/2 plough.


Notes:
Satellite: 1/2 furlong and 2 oxen in lordship; the villagers, the rest and 2 oxen.


Notes:
Satellite: 1 furlong and 1 ploughteam in lordship; the villagers, the rest and 1 plough.


Notes:
Satellite: 1 furlong and 1 ploughteam in lordship; the villagers, the rest.


Notes:
Satellite: 1/2 furlong and 3 [oxen] in lordship; the villagers, the rest and 3 oxen.


Notes:
Satellite: 1 virgate and 3 oxen in lordship; the villagers, 1 virgate (Domesday Book 1/2 ploughteam there).


Notes:
Satellite: 1 virgate in lordship; the villagers, the rest and 4 ploughs.


Notes:
Satellite: 1/2 virgate and 1 ploughteam in lordship; the villagers, the rest and 1 plough.


Notes:
Satellite: 1/2 virgate in lordship; the villagers, the rest and 1 plough.


Notes:
Satellite: 1 furlong in lordship; the villagers, the rest and 1/2 plough.


Notes:
Satellite: 1 acre and 1 ploughteam in lordship.


Notes:
Satellite: 1/2 furlong and 1/2 ploughteam in lordship; the villagers, the rest and 3 ploughs.


Notes:
Satellite: 1/3 furlong and 7 oxen in lordship; the villagers, the rest and 6 oxen (2 ploughteams there in GDB).


Notes:
Satellite: 1/2 hide and 3 ploughteams in lordship; the villagers, 4 1/2 hides and 5 ploughs.


Notes:
Satellite: 1/2 hide and 2 ploughteams in lordship; the villagers, the rest and 4 ploughs.


Notes:
Satellite: 1/2 virgate and 2 ploughteams in lordship; the villagers, the rest and 1 plough.


Notes:
Satellite: 1 furlong in lordship; the villagers, the rest and 2 oxen; (Domesday Book omits ploughs).


Notes:
Satellite: 1 virgate and 1.5 ploughteams in lordship; the villagers, the rest and 4 ploughs.


Notes:
Satellite: 1/2 acre and 1/2 ploughteam in lordship; the villagers, 1/2 acre and 2 oxen (Domesday Book 1 ploughteam there).


Notes:
Satellite: 1/2 acre and 1 ploughteam in lordship; the villagers, the rest.


Notes:
Satellite: 1/2 hide there (Domesday Book only gives It paid tax for 1 virgate) 1/2 virgate and 1 ploughteam in lordship; the villagers, the rest and 3 oxen (Domesday Book 1.5 ploughteams there).


Notes:
Satellite: 1/2 virgate and 1 ploughteam in lordship; the villagers, the rest.


Notes:
Satellite: 1/2 virgate and 1 ploughteam in lordship; the villagers, the rest and 1/2 plough.


Notes:
Satellite: 2 furlongs and 3 ploughteams in lordship; the villagers, the rest.


Notes:
Satellite: 1 virgate and 1.5 ploughteams in lordship; the villagers, the rest and 3 ploughs.


Notes:
Satellite: 1/2 virgate and 2.5 ploughteams in lordship; the villagers, the rest and 4 ploughs.


Notes:
Satellite: 1/2 virgate and 1.5 ploughteams in lordship; the villagers, the rest and 1.5 ploughs.


Notes:
Satellite: 1 virgate and 1 ploughteam in lordship; the villagers, the rest and 1/2 ploughs; value when acquired 20s.


Notes:
Satellite: 1 virgate and 1 ploughteam in lordship; the villagers, the rest and 1 plough.


Notes:
Satellite: 1 ploughteam in lordship; the villagers, 7 oxen.


Notes:
Satellite: 1 virgate and 3 ploughteams in lordship; the villagers, the rest and 3 ploughs.


Notes:
Satellite: 1 furlong and 1.5 ploughteams in lordship; the villagers, the rest and 3 ploughs.


Notes:
Satellite: 1 furlong and 1.5 ploughteam in lordship; the villagers, the rest and 2 ploughs.


Notes:
Satellite: 1/2 furlong and 1 ploughteam in lordship; the villagers, the rest and 1 plough.


Notes:
Satellite: 1/2 furlong in lordship; the villagers, the rest and 1/2 plough.


Notes:
Satellite: 1 furlong and 1 ploughteam in lordship; the villagers, the rest and 3 oxen.


Notes:
Satellite: 1/2 virgate and 1 ploughteam in lordship; the villagers, the rest and 2 ploughs.


Notes:
Satellite: 1 furlong and 1 ploughteam in lordship; the villagers, the rest and 3 oxen; (Domesday Book 1.5 ploughteams there).


Notes:
Satellite: 2 villagers have 2 oxen in a plough (none in GDB).


Notes:
Satellite: 1 acre and 1/2 ploughteam in lordship; the villagers, the rest and 1/2 plough.


Notes:
Satellite: 1/2 virgate and 1 ploughteam in lordship; the villagers, the rest and 3 oxen (Domesday Book 1.5 ploughteams there).


Notes:
Satellite: 1 acre and 1 ploughteam in lordship; the villagers, the rest and 1.5 plough.


Notes:
Satellite: 1.5 acres and 1 ploughteam in lordship; the villagers, the rest and 11 plough.


Notes:
Satellite: 1/2 furlong and 7 oxen in lordship (Domesday Book 1 ploughteam there); the villagers, the rest.


Notes:
Satellite: 1 virgate and 3 ploughteams in lordship; the villagers, the rest and 2 ploughs.


Notes:
Satellite: 2 furlongs and 2 ploughteams in lordship; the villagers, the rest.


Notes:
Satellite: 1/2 virgate and 2 ploughteams in lordship; the villagers, the rest and 1.5 ploughs.


Notes:
Satellite: 1/4 furlong and 1 ploughteam in lordship; the villagers, the rest and 1 plough.


Notes:
Satellite: 1/2 ploughteam in lordship; the villagers, 2 oxen.


Notes:
Satellite: 1/2 virgate and 3 oxen in lordship; the villagers, the rest and 3 oxen.


Notes:
Satellite: 1 ploughteam in lordship; the villagers, 1/2 plough.


Notes:
Satellite: 1 virgate and 6 oxen in lordship; the villagers, the rest and 2 ploughs.


Notes:
Satellite: Osfrith has the third part of a virgate and 1/2 ploughteam in lordship; the villagers, the rest of the land and 1 plough (corrected to 2 by Domesday scribe, giving 2.5 in total).


Notes:
Satellite: 1/2 furlong in lordship; the villagers, the rest and 2 oxen.


Notes:
Satellite: 1 virgate and 2 oxen in lordship; the villagers, the rest and 2 ploughs.


Notes:
Satellite: third part of a virgate (corrected from three parts in printed edition) and 1.5 ploughteams in lordship; the villagers, the rest of the land and 1 ploughteam (corrected to 2 by Domesday scribe).


Notes:
Geld: never paid tax. Satellite: 1 virgate and 1/2 ploughteam in lordship; the villagers, 3 virgates and 1/2 plough.


Notes:
Satellite: 1/2 furlong and 1/2 ploughteam in lordship; the villagers, the rest and 3 oxen.


Notes:
Satellite: 1/2 furlong and 6 oxen in lordship; the villagers, the rest and 2 oxen.


Notes:
Satellite: 1/3 hide and 7 oxen in lordship; the villagers, the rest and 1 plough.


Notes:
Satellite: 1/3 hide and 1/2 ploughteam in lordship; the villagers, the rest and 1 ploughteam and 2 oxen.


Notes:
Satellite: 1 virgate and 1.5 ploughteams in lordship; the villagers, the rest and 2 ploughs.


Notes:
Satellite: 1 furlong and 1/2 ploughteam in lordship; the villagers, the rest and 1 ploughteam and 2 oxen.


Notes:
Satellite: 1/3 virgate in lordship; the villagers, the rest.


Notes:
Satellite: 1/2 acre and 1/2 ploughteam in lordship; the villagers, the rest and 1 ox.


Notes:
Satellite: 2 villagers and 4 smallholders and the rest of the land.


Notes:
Satellite: 1 furlong and 1/2 ploughteam in lordship; the villagers, the rest and 1/2 plough.


Notes:
Satellite: 1 ox in lordship; the villagers, 4 oxen.


Notes:
Satellite: 1/2 ploughteam in lordship; the villagers, 3 oxen.


Notes:
Satellite: 1/2 acre and 1/2 ploughteam in lordship; the villagers, the rest.


Notes:
Satellite: 1 virgate and 5 oxen in lordship; the villagers, 1 plough.


Notes:
Satellite: 1 hide and 1 ploughteam in lordship; the villagers, 3 hides and 4 ploughs.


Notes:
Satellite: 1 furlong and 2 oxen in lordship; the villagers, the rest.


Notes:
Satellite: 1 acre and 1 ploughteam in lordship; the villagers, the rest and 1/2 plough.


Notes:
Satellite: 1/2 furlong in lordship; the villagers, 1/2 furlong.


Notes:
Satellite: 1/4 furlong and 1 ploughteam in lordship; the villagers, the rest.


Notes:
Satellite: 1/2 virgate in lordship; the villagers, the rest.


Notes:
Satellite: 1 acre in lordship; the villagers, the rest and 1 plough.


Notes:
Satellite: the villagers have the whole of that land and 1/2 plough.


Notes:
Satellite: 1/2 furlong and 1.5 ploughteams in lordship; the villagers, the rest and 1/2 plough.


Notes:
Satellite: 1.5 acres and 1 ploughteam in lordship; the villagers, the rest and 1 plough.


Notes:
Satellite: 1 virgate and 1 ploughteam in lordship; the villagers, the rest and 2 oxen.


Notes:
Satellite: 1 furlong and 1.5 ploughteams in lordship; the villagers, the rest.


Notes:
Satellite: Blohin has all the land in lordship.


Notes:
Satellite: 1.5 acres (half of 3 acres) and 1 ploughteam in lordship; the villagers, the rest.


Notes:
Population: between the Frenchmen and some London burgesses, 23 hides of villagers land; under them dwell 31 of the villagers and smallholders. Payments: 1/2 weir, 10s; woodland, 17d.


Notes:
Landowners: 1066 owners named in 3,16 assumed to hold 3,15 also.


Notes:
Geld: 9 acres assumed to be field acres. Payments: 10 cottagers, 18s 6d. Values: payments recorded as valuation.


Notes:
Landowners: 1066 owners named in 4,4 assumed to hold 4,3 also.


Notes:
Other population: 2 Frenchmen, 3 men. Payments: from 1 weir, 5s.


Notes:
Geld: manorial total and 1066 particulars disagree.


Notes:
Payments: 25s over and above meadow; woodland and pasture, 12s.


Notes:
Payments: fishponds, 8s; meadow, 25s; woodland and pasture, 43s.


Notes:
Payments: 4 mills, 70s and 375 eels; 3 weirs, 1000.


Notes:
Payments: 1.5 weirs, 12s 8d; grazing, 12d.


Notes:
Payments: meadow for 3 ploughs, and 10s too; from fishing-nets and drag-nets in the river Thames, 3s.


Notes:
Ploughteams: 6 possible men's ploughs probably a scribal error for 6th, i.e. 1 more plough. Landowners: fief of Aubrey de Vere but this manor said to be held from the Bishop of Coutances.


Notes:
Geld: 2 carucates in lordship in addition to hides. Values: 3 ounces of gold (assumed to be approximately £12, after Baring). Payments: 20s over and above for meadow; 1 weir, 3s.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 1,1-19, valuation recorded in 1,19.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 1,1-19, valuation recorded in 1,19. Values: here for church submanor only.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 1,1-19, valuation recorded in 1,19. Geld: defence obligations in Bedfordshire; since 1066 has not paid tax.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 1,1-19, valuation recorded here.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 9,5-6, valuation recorded here.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 9,5-6, valuation recorded in 9,5.


Notes:
Payments: town and tolls, £11 14s; woodland 7s.


Notes:
Geld: 1 hide claimed possibly additional to 5.5.


Notes:
Values: blank in manuscript for intermediate valuation.


Notes:
Payments: burgesses tolls, £4; woodland, 5s.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 16,9-10, valuation recorded in 16,10. Ploughlands: given as 33, probably an error since ploughs and possible ploughs total 23, the figure recorded here. Payments: merchants, 10s; weir, 16d; woodland, 40d.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 16,9-10, valuation recorded here. Payments: 100 eels from weir.


Notes:
Geld: 14 hides always but tax reduced. Values: includes 1 oz gold (approximately £4, after Baring).


Notes:
Geld: manorial total and 1066 particulars disagree. Other population: 4 Frenchmen, 1 reeve. Payments: 1 village reeve and 4 Frenchmen, burgesses pay 23s, but Alwin's men paid 12d in 1066.


Notes:
Other population: 1 village reeve, 3 Frenchmen, 2 Englishmen, 32 men. Payments: 375 eels.


Notes:
Other population: 1 man-at-arms, 2 Frenchmen.


Notes:
Other population: 2 men-at-arms, 2 countrymen.


Notes:
Duplicates: 4 hides and 1/2 virgate duplicated in 31,7.


Notes:
Duplicates: 4 hides and 1/2 virgate duplicated in 31,4.


Notes:
Payments: villagers, 17s 4d; Freeman, 5s 4d; woodland, 4s.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 36,6-7, valuation recorded in 36,7; lies and assessed in Benington and cultivated with own ploughs.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 36,6-7, valuation recorded here.


Notes:
Geld: exempt (but forfeited for non-payment). Values: 1086 valuation not recorded.


Notes:
Geld: the 3rd and 4th freemen interpreted as holding 0.5 hide less 6 acres each.


Notes:
Shared statistics: shared with BDF 48,1 assessed in Meppershall. Duplicates: 3 hides 1 virgate duplicated in BDF 48,1.


Notes:
Values: 1066 valuation probably erroneous; £10 possibly intended.


Notes:
Payments: 20s meadow, from the remainder, 20s; tolls at face value, £10. Values: £10 from tolls could be included in valuation.


Notes:
Payments: burgess, 2s; unspecified number of packloads of salt.


Notes:
Payments: Freemen with 1 hide in 8 surrounding hundreds pays 1 load of corn; 1 acre of corn and 4d due to the church from each freeman but not paid since William arrived; 18 smallholders, 20s.


Notes:
Geld: manorial total and 1066 particulars disagree; 0.375 hides short.


Notes:
Payments: 24 loads of malt from mill; from the returns of the woodland, enough ploughshares.


Notes:
Payments: vavassors, 32s 6d; customary due, 28d.


Notes:
Geld: 1066 hidage less than 1086 figure.


Notes:
Geld: demesne hides mentioned but no figure given. Payments: 75 eels.


Notes:
Payments: 2 shares for ploughs from wood.


Notes:
Geld: lordship carucates, assumed to be new land. Ploughs include 6.5 of other men who work outside the 5 hides held by unspecified number of burgesses. Payments: meadow, 10s; woodland, 2s; men in woodland, 4s; other payments, 116s 4d.


Notes:
Geld: manorial total and 1066 particulars disagree. Payments: from minor customary dues.


Notes:
Geld: lordship carucates, assumed to be new land.


Notes:
Values: 1066 valuation before 1066, 2 or [...].


Notes:
Payments: 4 fisheries, 1500 eels and fish every Friday for the village reeve's work.


Notes:
Geld: these 5 hides and 3 virgates are 8 hides; recorded as 5.75 hides, balance possibly field hides or a tax reduction.


Notes:
Payments: 4 fisheries in the Thames 27s less 4d; hay for the cattle of the court.


Notes:
Ploughteams: villagers have 7 ploughs, a ninth possible interpreted as an error for eight ploughs there.


Notes:
Duplicates: deleted in the manuscript; entry duplicated in 14,18.


Notes:
Waste: no significant resources; modest value.


Notes:
Ploughlands: lordship carucates, assumed to be new land.


Notes:
Payments: 1 fishery, 1000 eels. Values: in all its payments, £35 a year at face value.


Notes:
Payments: 6 sesters of honey for tolls, tribute and all other customary dues.


Notes:
Values: Oxford pays £60 at face value, at 20 [pence] to the {ora}.


Notes:
Waste possibly implied: 9 messuages, 3 unoccupied.


Notes:
Waste possibly implied: 84 messuages, 43 unoccupied.


Notes:
Waste possibly implied: 81 messuages, 27 unoccupied.


Notes:
Waste possibly implied: 55 messuages, 18 unoccupied.


Notes:
Payments: meadows, pastures and fisheries, £18 15s 5d; church-tax, 11s; year's corn, £30.


Notes:
Payments: 5 fisheries, 20s; meadow and pasture, £4; year's corn £8; 'half-week', 30s; Church tax, 10s 6d; other, 100s 25d.


Notes:
Payments: meadow and pasture, £8; year's corn, £20.


Notes:
Payments: year's corn, 40s; customary dues, 50s; 10s from woodland in King's Enclosure before 1066 not included.


Notes:
Payments: meadow, pasture and tribute, £12 17s; year's corn, £15; 50s from woodland in King's Enclosure before 1066 not included.


Notes:
Payments: fisheries, 20s; meadows, 65s; market, 50s; pig pasture, salt houses, customary dues, £9 13s; year's corn £15.


Notes:
Payments: wool and cheeses, 40s; pig-pasture, 24s 7d; year's corn, £28 10s.


Notes:
Values: county and borough payments total £226.2625.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 6,1a-c;9, geld. Geld: of 90 hides, 59.75 are the bishop's, disaggregated in 6,1b-c; remaining 30.25 in 6,9. Other population: 1 fisherman, 1 man. Payments: 30 sticks of eels.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 6,1a-c;9, geld. Geld: of 90 hides, 59.75 are the bishop's, disaggregated in 6,1b-c; remaining 30.25 in 6,9. Duplicates: 2.5 of 20.5 hides posiibly duplicated in 6,17 (VCH Oxford, vol. 7 p.1 ). Payments: meadow and fisheries, 22s 8d.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 6,1a-c;9, geld. Geld: of 90 hides, 59.75 are the bishop's, disaggregated in 6,1b-c; remaining 30.25 in 6,9. Payments: 12 sticks of eels.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 6,2;10, geld. Geld: total (60) and particulars (50) disagree; bishop's 27 hides perhaps a scribal error for 37.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 6,3;11, geld. Geld: Bishop holds 31 of 40 hides; 9.75 disaggregated in 6,11, possibly in error or scribe has rounded the total.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 6,4;12, geld. Geld: of 50 hides, 3 are the bishop's besides inland, and 33.5 belong to the men of the village. However, 17 are disaggregated in 6,12. Ploughlands: land for 10 ploughs, assumed to be new land.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 6,5;13, geld. Geld: total (50) and particulars (55) disagree. Ploughlands: land for 10 ploughs, assumed to be new land.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 6,1a-c;9, geld. Geld: of 90 hides, 59.75 are the bishop's, disaggregated in 6,1b-c; remaining 30.25 recorded here.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 6,2;10, geld. Geld: total (60) and particulars (50) disagree; bishop's demesne of 27 (6,2), possibly a scribal error for 37.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 6,3;11, geld. Geld: mismatch of 0.75 between the two entries for the men at arms' land.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 6,4;12, geld. Geld: total (50) and particulars (53.5) disagree.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 6,5;13, geld. Geld: total (50) and particulars (55) disagree. Values: 10s allocated to Ansgered.


Notes:
Duplicates: 2.5 hides at Marsh Baldon possibly duplicated in 20.5 held by Bricteva in Dorchester (6,1b).


Notes:
Geld: 11.5 hides in lordship, besides the inland.


Notes:
Geld: now in lordship 1 hide and 1 virgate of this land, besides the inland. Payments: 2 fisheries, 30s; woodland, 25s, when stocked.


Notes:
Duplicates: entry duplicated in 7,37. Payments: mill and fishery, 15s 6d and 175 eels.


Notes:
Duplicates: entry duplicated in 7,32. Payments: mill and fishery, 175 eels.


Notes:
Geld: 1 hide of inland which never paid tax, assumed to be new land.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 11,1-2, valuation given in 11,2 entered here.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 11,1-2, valuation recorded here entered at 11,1. Duplicates: 1 hide duplicated in 24,7.


Notes:
Payments: eels, 62s 6d; quarries, meadows and pasture, 24s 7d.


Notes:
Payments: mill and 1 virgate of land, 35s.


Notes:
Waste possibly implied: no significant resources; pays nothing.


Notes:
Other population: : 6 others, possibly 6 other smallholders.


Notes:
Payments: part of 2 mills, 11s 6d, recorded as one mill.


Notes:
Geld: besides the inland he has 2 hides and 1 virgate of villagers' land.


Notes:
Payments: part of a mill, 16d, recorded as 0.5 mill.


Notes:
Geld: from the fifth hide of this land Amalric has not paid tax or anything else.


Notes:
Ploughteams: none there now, though the value has increased. Geld: never paid tax.


Notes:
Payments: 2 mills with fishery and meadows, 20s.


Notes:
Payments: 3 packloads of salt at Droitwich.


Notes:
Geld: 1 hide of warland in lordship. Payments: 2 fisheries, 8s.


Notes:
Values: manorial valuation is that of mills, the only data.


Notes:
Values: £7 assumed to be an error for 7s.


Notes:
Values: £20 from mint assumed to be additional to £60.


Notes:
Values: payments assumed to be the valuation. Payments: from Caerleon, 7 fisheries and 1 plough.


Notes:
Shared statistics: W1-8, valuation recorded in W8. Values: 3 dairy farms from which Roger of Ivry wanted to have £5. Population: 11 half-villagers, recorded as 5.5.


Notes:
Shared statistics: W1-8, valuation recorded in W8. Waste: 54 villages, 4 destroyed by King Caradoc. Payments: 47 sesters of honey; 40 pigs; 41 cows; hawks, 28s.


Notes:
Shared statistics: W1-8, valuation recorded in W8. Payments: 1 sester of honey and 1 pig for 1 waste land.


Notes:
Shared statistics: W1-8, valuation recorded in W8. Values: 9 villages pay nothing.


Notes:
Shared statistics: W1-8, valuation recorded in W8. Payments: 2 pigs, 100 loaves with ale to pray for king's soul.


Notes:
Shared statistics: W1-8, valuation recorded in W8.


Notes:
Shared statistics: W1-8, valuation recorded here.


Notes:
Population: 15 half-villagers, recorded as 7.5.


Notes:
Geld: was 50 carucates now only 32, remainder recorded in W18 (1 missing). Payments: fisheries, 70s. Population: men have 16 ploughs but no population specified; recorded as 2 men.


Notes:
Population: Roger holds as much populated land with a mill as is worth 36s; but no population specified.


Notes:
Ploughteams: 17 ploughs assumed to be a scribal error for 17 carucates, 4 ploughs also; see W18 for explanation. Payments: 1/2 fishery, 10s.


Notes:
Payments: 7 villages pay 6 sesters of honey, 6 pigs and 10s.


Notes:
Values: Earl Harold had the third penny, that is 40s. £6 in 1066; later £20 with the whole Hundred of the town; Durand added 100s, Roger of Ivry 60s; now with 3 adjoining Hundreds, £28.


Notes:
Ploughteams: there were 3, assumed to be no longer there in 1086; indeterminate number of priests recorded as 2. Geld: 1.5 Church hides assumed to be additional. Payments: 20 cows; 20 pigs; bread, 16s.


Notes:
Geld: dependencies assumed to be included in manorial total. Duplicates: 3 virgates duplicated in 64,1. Payments: 20 cows; 20 pigs, bread, 16s.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 1,3-5. Ploughteams: there were 8, assumed to be no longer there in 1086.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 1,3-5. Ploughteams: there were 2, assumed to be no longer there in 1086.


Notes:
Payments: woods, 5s; 20 cows, 20 pigs; bread, 16s; new market, 20s, from which St Mary's of Cirencester has third penny.


Notes:
Ploughteams: there were 5, assumed to be no longer there in 1086.. Geld: breakdown from later sources. Values: farm of one night, estimated elsewhere as £100 (see EHR 2002 pp. 258-61), though this may be high for GLS.


Notes:
Values: sheriff paid what he wished in 1066. Payments: meadow, 10s; 1 hide, 10s; dogs, 5s. Population and ploughteams: added smallholders and ploughteams assumed to be additional to 11 and 8 respectively.


Notes:
Values: farm of one night, estimated elsewhere as £100 (see EHR 2002 pp. 258-61), though this may be high for GLS. Duplicates: 25 of 30 hides duplicated in 16,1 and HEF 3,1. WOR 3,2. 6,1. 19,3-9;11. Ploughteams: 5 were there, assumed no longer so.


Notes:
Values: includes the 2 Hundreds of Chelthorn and Witley. Geld: '8 hides in each' assumed to mean between them.


Notes:
Geld: 3 outliers put outside the manor. Values: farm of 1/2 night, estimated as £50 (EHR 2002 pp. 258-61); 0.5 hide waste so manor pays only £12 but sheriff pays the whole. Payments: 30 packloads of salt. Duplicates: part of 7 hides duplicated in 1,54.


Notes:
Population and ploughteams: added numbers assumed to be additional.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 1,15-16; value recorded here. Ploughteams: there were 49.5, assumed to be no longer there in 1086. Other population: 17 men, 22 freedmen, 19 riders. Geld: 15 hides in woodland and open land and meadow; 7 hides assumed to be additional.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 1,15-16. Values: value of Berkeley recorded in 1,15 though inscribed here. Geld: 5 hides assumed to be additional to total for 1,15.


Notes:
Geld: 5 hides assumed to be additional to total for Berkeley; Farley omits 1 hide.


Notes:
Geld: breakdown supplied by later sources; 5 hides assumed to be additional to total for Berkeley.


Notes:
Geld: 5 hides assumed to be additional to total for Berkeley.


Notes:
Values: Bishop of Coutances has 33 marks of silver and 1 of gold in addition to valuation; total possibly represents commuted farm of a night. Population and ploughteams: intermediate statistics not recorded.


Notes:
Geld: 45 hides assumed to include 9.5 at Tewkesbury. Ploughteams: there were 26, assumed to be no longer there in 1086. Payments: a salt-house. Population: villagers and riders who were there not recorded; 22 male and female slaves, divided equally.


Notes:
Population: 12 slaves, male and female, divided equally. Payments: burgesses, 40d. Geld: these 5 hides do not appear to be included in the 95 hides of Tewkesbury: see notes to 1,24;38.


Notes:
Geld: see note to 1,24;38. Population: 5 slaves, male and female, divided 3:2.


Notes:
Geld: see notes to 1,24;38. Ploughteams: 2 men's ploughs possibly a scribal error for 7 (but 2 recorded here).


Notes:
Geld: see notes to 1,24;38; 1 hide was exempt land.


Notes:
Geld: was exempt; Church land (1,27-32) paid tax on 20 hides, 2 other exempt hides (1,31-32) presumably being exempted after 1066. These 4.5 hides not apparently included in the 95 hides of Tewkesbury: see notes to 1,24;38.


Notes:
Geld: see notes to 1,24;38. Duplicates: 4 hides duplicated in HEF 1,42. Ploughteams: there were 2, assumed to be no longer there in 1086. Population: 40 villagers and smallholders and 8 slaves, male and female, divided equally between the groups.


Notes:
Geld: see note to 1,24;38; paid tax with Tewkesbury. Duplicates: 9 hides duplicated in HEF 1,43. Population: 20 villagers and smallholders and 6 slaves, male and female, divided equally between the groups.


Notes:
Geld: see note to 1,24;38; reduction in hidage was due to the separation of Wincot (1,42). Population: there were 13 slaves, male and female, assumed to be no longer there.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 1,27-32;34-37;42. Geld: 50 exempt hides part of 95 hides (1,24). Waste: destroyed and dismembered. Values: £100 in 1066 (particulars £97.5); intermediate £12 and £50 Render (total of demesne farmed lands) recorded here.


Notes:
Duplicates: 11 hides duplicated in 19,2.


Notes:
Payments: at Droitwich, 40 sesters of salt or 20d; a fishery in Gloucester, 58d; meadow, 40s; market, 20s. Other population: 18 riding men, 4 freedmen, 1 reeve.


Notes:
Payments: paid 25 sesters of salt but oppressed men can no longer pay. Geld: virgate assumed to be additional.


Notes:
Other population: 11 freedmen, 4 riding men.


Notes:
Duplicates: part of 7 hides duplicated in 1,13.


Notes:
Population and ploughteams: there were 6 villagers with 4 teams, assumed to be no longer there.


Notes:
Population and ploughteams which were there assumed to be no longer there; villagers assumed to equal to the number of their fisheries. Values: monks' supplies only 1066; now £25.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 1,57-58, value recorded in 1,58. Values: reeves paid what they wished in 1066; nothing recorded. Payments: from toll on salt. Ploughteams: there were 7, assumed to be no longer there in 1086..


Notes:
Shared statistics: 1,57-58, value recorded here. Values: reeves paid what they wished in 1066; nothing recorded. Population: 16 slaves, male and female, divided equally.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 1,59-60; value recorded in 1,60. Population and ploughteams: Earl William gave 12 villagers with 5 ploughs to Ansfrid, assumed to be no longer there. Church recorded in following entry.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 1,59-60; value recorded here. Churches: 1 allocated to this and previous entry.


Notes:
Values: did not pay revenue in 1066 but its owner lived off it.


Notes:
Geld: no account given to the commissioners so no geld, ploughteams or population recorded.


Notes:
Geld: 5 hides exempted from tax by King Edward.


Notes:
Geld: 3 hides assumed to be included in 9 hides.


Notes:
Geld: assessments of subholdings assumed to be included in the 50 hides.


Notes:
Population: 11 slaves, male and female, divided 6:5; unspecified number of men recorded as 2.


Notes:
Payments: burgesses, 3 s 7 1/2d. Values: now £33 between them.


Notes:
Geld: service withheld. Ploughteams: 4 draught animals not included in total. Values: now £26 between them.


Notes:
Population: unspecified number of men recorded as 2; 1 riding man; 11 slaves, male and female, divided 5:4. Payments: burgess, 18d.


Notes:
Ploughteams: villagers' ploughs possibly omitted accidentally.


Notes:
Geld: when it is ploughed there are only 64 acres of land in that hide.


Notes:
Ploughteams: villagers' ploughs possibly accidentally accident but none recorded here.


Notes:
Other population: 1 riding man, 1 freedman.


Notes:
Other population: 6 men, 2 freedmen, 3 Frenchmen. Payments: 90 lumps of iron; burgess, 5s; freedmen, 34d.


Notes:
Geld: always exempt from tax and all royal service.


Notes:
Geld: exempt from tax and all outside service except to the church.


Notes:
Geld: 5 hides in both woodland and open land.


Notes:
Geld: 10 hides are free; they belong to the court.


Notes:
Geld: was free and exempt from all tax and royal service.


Notes:
Geld: 2 hides in lordship; 8 liable for service.


Notes:
Geld: before 1066 this church answered for 60 hides in Gloucestershire. Total of 11,1-12 (11,14 added later) is 57.5; 11,5 would bring the total to 60 but was not described as exempt.


Notes:
Duplicates: entry duplicated in 78,1 where 1066 valuation is £3 and there is no mention of Bolle's grant.


Notes:
Geld: free hide assumed to be additional to 3 taxed hides.


Notes:
Other population: 4 wives of dead villagers.


Notes:
Geld: in the Quarter of Winchcombe Evesham had 56 hides before 1066. The total here is 57, the extra hide being in 12,6 (1 outside county) or 12,7 (where total could be 3).


Notes:
Duplicates: 6 hides duplicated in 1,11. Values: Durand's 12s assumed to be additional to £5. Population: 9 plus 1.5 villagers.


Notes:
Payments: 24 measures of salt from Droitwich.


Notes:
Geld: 59 hides is the total of 1,41 and 19,1-2. Duplicates: 11 hides duplicated in 1,41 (see next note).


Notes:
Duplicates: Gerard the chamberlain's 8 hides in Kemerton and 3 in Boddington are recorded in 1,41 and duplicated (but not recorded) here. Values: £40, of which £26 to lord and £14 to men; 1066 divided similarly.


Woodland:
2.5 leagues * 1 league + 2 furlongs & 0.5 leagues * 2 furlongs


Notes:
Geld: only 7 hides paid tax (see Regesta i, 411).


Notes:
Geld: 8 hides which pay tax besides the lordship land.


Notes:
Other population: 8 riding men, 23 men. Payments: 23 men, 44s and 2 sesters of honey; burgesses, 66d; woodland, 20s.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 28,5-7, value recorded in 28,7. Duplicates: 3 hides probably duplicated in 28,7.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 28,5-7, value recorded in 28,7. Duplicates: 1 hide probably duplicated in 28,7.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 28,5-7, value recorded here. Duplicates: 4 hides probably duplicated in 28,5-6.


Notes:
Waste implied: now only a fishery there.


Notes:
Geld: tax on 3 hides withheld. Population: unspecified number of men recorded as 2.


Notes:
Values: 3 villagers and 3 smallholders pay 20s.


Notes:
Waste possibly implied: no recorded resources; in the Forest and no 1086 value.


Notes:
Population: 8 slaves, male and female, divided equally.


Notes:
Population: 13 slaves, male and female, divided 7:6.


Notes:
Payments: 20 packloads of salt; burgesses, 11s 4d. Population: 11 slaves, male and female, divided 6:5. Other population: 3 Frenchmen, 2 riding men.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 35,1-2 (possibly). Population: 8 slaves, male and female, divided equally. Geld: 7 hides assumed to be total for 35,1-2.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 35,1-2 (possibly). Geld: 7 hides assumed to be total for 35,1-2.


Notes:
Ploughteams: there was 1, assumed to be no longer there in 1086.


Notes:
Geld: King Edward assigned these lands exempt from tax in return for guarding the forest (37,3).


Notes:
Geld: land is free; 1 virgate lies in the Forest and pays 12d.


Notes:
Population: there were 12 slaves whom William Leofric freed, assumed to be no longer there.


Notes:
Geld: 10 hides besides the lordship land which does not pay tax. Payments: a salt-house, 20s; 12 packloads of salt; burgesses, 42d; woodland and pasture, 40 hens. Population: 18 slaves, male and female, divided equally.


Notes:
Values: 10s assumed to be additional to £24.


Notes:
Other population: 2 riding men, 1 reeve, 1 smith. Payments: burgess, 4 ploughshares; smith, 2s.


Notes:
Geld: 5 hides besides the lordship land.


Notes:
Geld: 1 of these 3 hides paid tax each year at 10s for the King's use.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 42,2-3, value recorded here.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 42,2-3, value recorded in 41,2.


Notes:
Population: 7 half-villagers, recorded as 3.5.


Notes:
Waste possibly implied: no recorded resources and land abandoned.


Notes:
Population: 9 slaves, male and female, divided 5:4.


Notes:
Waste possibly implied: no recorded resources.


Notes:
Population: 8 slaves, male and female, divided equally. Payments: burgess, 3d.


Notes:
Payments: a salt-house at Droitwich, 4 packloads of salt.


Notes:
Other population: 4 men-at-arms and unspecified number of men, recorded as 2.


Notes:
Population: 6 slaves, male and female, divided equally.


Notes:
Mills: there were 3 mills at 30s, assumed to be no longer there.


Notes:
Geld: 6 hides exempt. Payments: 175 eels; £7 7s from meadows besides hay for the oxen; burgesses, 16d.


Notes:
Payments: meadows, £9 besides pasture for the oxen; sheepfold, 120 weys of cheese; burgesses, 2s.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 61,1-2, values recorded in 61,2. Population: 14 slaves, male and female, divided equally.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 61,1-2, values recorded here. Population: 10 slaves, male and female, divided equally. Payments: 50 measures of salt.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 62,1-3, values recorded in 62,3 assumed to be for 3 holdings.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 62,1-3, values recorded in 62,3 assumed to be for 3 holdings; this entry incomplete.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 62,1-3, values recorded here assumed to be for 3 holdings.


Notes:
Population: 11 slaves, male and female, divided 6:5.


Notes:
Duplicates: 3 virgates duplicated in 1,2.


Notes:
Population: 10 slaves, male and female, divided equally.


Notes:
Geld: 10 hides which pay tax besides the lordship land.


Notes:
Population: 5 half-villagers, recorded as 2.5.


Notes:
Ploughteams: there were 42, assumed to be no longer there in 1086.


Notes:
Ploughteams: there were 3, assumed to be no longer there in 1086.


Notes:
Ploughteams and population: 2 ploughs, smallholder and 6 slaves were there assumed to be no longer there in view of the low valuation (12d for the meadows).


Notes:
Ploughteams and population: 9 smallholders assumed to be an error for 9 men's ploughs.


Notes:
Landowners: there was no one to make a return for this land; the scribe appears to have been unsure where this entry belonged; perhaps not part of Chapter 75.


Notes:
Entries: the scribe appears to have been unsure where this entry belonged; perhaps not part of Chapter 75.


Notes:
Geld: 5 of the 9 hides do not pay tax. Ploughteams: 7 villagers with 5 ploughs; now 1 plough is recorded, assumed to be instead of, not additional to 5. Population: 13 slaves, male and female, divided 7:6.


Notes:
Payments: mill, corn in so far as it can be sold.


Notes:
Values: £23 5s from City and £17 from County by weight; £10 (or a hawk), 100s (to Queen), and 20s (or packhorse) at face value. The royal manors pay £123 4s which, if accurate, comprised 1,1-3;6, though 1,6 said to be paid in Staffordshire.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 1,1a-b, valuation recorded in 1b. Other population: 1 reeve, 1 beadle, 3 salt-workers. Payments: 13 salt-houses in Droitwich; 3 salt-workers who pay 300 measures of salt.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 1,1a-b, valuation recorded here. Geld: these hides removed by sheriff. Duplicates: the 5 hides are duplicated in X3 and in HEF 1,47.


Notes:
Other population: 1 rider and 6 ploughmen. Waste possibly implied: woodland in the Forest. Landowners: four men-at-arms hold from Urso.


Notes:
Duplicates: 3 virgates probably duplicated in 23,4. Landowners: Baldwin holds from William son of Ansculf.


Notes:
Values: if accurate, the stated value (£123.2) of the royal manors (C2) comprised 1,1-3;6, implying that 11s was included in £10.2. Payments: 2 salt-houses at 30s; 1 fishery at 100d. Waste: woodland in the Forest; the whole of this manor was waste.


Notes:
Payments: 8 brine-pits, 2 hocci and 2 parts of 1 hoccus.


Notes:
Payments: 6s 8d and two measures of salt.


Notes:
Geld: assessments recorded in 1,5-6. Values: memorandum on arrangements for paying values of 1,5-6 and STS 1,27, not recorded here. Duplicates: values partially duplicated in STS 1,27.


Notes:
Values: revenue paid by the sheriff in Staffordshire. Payments: 7 salt-houses and 2 lead vats, 20s and 100 measures of salt.


Notes:
Values: if accurate, the stated value (£123.2) of the royal manors (C2) comprised 1,1-3;6, though this £4 is said to be paid in Staffordshire.


Notes:
Values: revenue paid by the sheriff in Staffordshire. Duplicates: 1/2 hide duplicated in 15,14.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 2,2-5, geld total (24 hides) recorded here. Waste: 5 hides are waste.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 2,2-5, geld total recorded in 2,2.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 2,2-5, geld total recorded in 2,2. Landowners: Aiulf holds from Roger of Lacy.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 2,6-14, geld total (15 hides) recorded here.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 2,6-14, geld total (15 hides) recorded in 2,6. Values: valuation blank in manuscript; supplied by Evesham A89 satellite. Payments: a fishery at 5s; 1 salt-house at 13d.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 2,6-14, geld total (15 hides) recorded in 2,6.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 2,6-14, geld total (15 hides) recorded in 2,6. Landowners: Walter holds from Urso.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 2,6-14, geld total (15 hides) recorded in 2,6. Landowners: Godfrey holds from Urso.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 2,15-21, geld total (40 hides) recorded here.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 2,15-21, geld total recorded in 2,15.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 2,15-21, geld total recorded in 2,15. Landowners: Alfred holds from Urso.


Notes:
Shared Statistics: 2,22-30, geld total (35 hides) recorded here.


Notes:
Shared Statistics: 2,22-30, geld total recorded in 2,22. Landowners: 2 Frenchmen hold from Roger of Lacy.


Notes:
Shared Statistics: 2,22-30, geld total recorded in 2,22.


Notes:
Shared Statistics: 2,22-30, geld total recorded in 2,22. Duplicates: 1 hide duplicated in HEF 1,44.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 2,31-37, geld total (25 hides) recorded here. Payments: honey and hunting, 10s.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 2,31-37, geld total recorded in 2,31.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 2,31-37, geld total recorded in 2,31. Duplicates: 1 hide duplicated in HEF 1,45.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 2,38-43, geld total (38 hides) recorded here.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 2,38-43, geld total recorded in 2,38.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 2,38-43, geld total recorded in 2,38. Mills: there was a mill, assumed to be no longer there.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 2,45-47, geld total (23 hides) recorded here; lordship hides (omitted) assumed to provide the balance.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 2,45-47, geld total recorded in 2,45.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 2,48;52-61, geld total recorded as 25 hides here, valuation recorded in 2,50. Payments: a salt-house which pays 100 measures of salt for 100 cartloads of timber; from the fishery, 4s. Other population: 1 reeve, 1 rider.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 2,48;50, valuation recorded in 2,48. Payments: lead works, 3 measures of salt and 2s.


Notes:
Values: 25 houses paying 100s a year recorded as the valuation.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 2,48;52-61, geld total recorded as 25 hides in 2,48. Waste possibly implied: woodland in the Forest. Landowners: Godfrey holds from Urso.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 2,48;52-61, geld total recorded as 25 hides in 2,48. Waste possibly implied: woodland in the Forest. Landowners: Robert holds from Urso.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 2,48;52-61, geld total recorded as 25 hides in 2,48. Waste possibly implied: woodland in the Forest.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 2,48;52-61, geld total recorded as 25 hides in 2,48.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 2,48;52-61, geld total recorded as 25 hides in 2,48. Values: valuation blank in manuscript; supplied by Evesham A89 satellite. Waste possibly implied: woodland in the Forest.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 2,66-67, geld adjusted here. Payments: 1/2 fishery, [...] sticks of eels.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 2,66-67, geld in 2,66 adjusted.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 2,68-71, geld total (7 hides) recorded here exceeded by particulars (7.5). Payments: a salt-house, 50 measures of salt; a fishery, 20 sticks of eels; 10 houses in Droitwich.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 2,68-71, geld total (exceeded by particulars) recorded in 2,68.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 2,68-71, geld total (exceeded by particulars) recorded in 2,68. Waste: no significant resources.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 2,68-71, geld total (exceeded by particulars) recorded in 2,68. Landowners: Baldwin holds from Hugh of Grandmesnil. Payments: 8d a year to the church of Worcestershire.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 2,72-75, geld total recorded as 50 hides here which exceeds the particulars (40 hides). Waste: 5 hides are waste.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 2,72-75, geld total (which exceeds particulars) recorded in 2,72.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 2,72-75, geld total (which exceeds particulars) recorded in 2,72. Duplicates: 5 hides duplicated in 10,11.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 2,72-75, geld total (which exceeds particulars) recorded in 2,72. Duplicates: 5 hides duplicated in 10,12.


Notes:
Waste possibly implied: woodland in the Forest. Landowners: Odo holds from Roger of Lacy.


Notes:
Payments: 105 measures of salt. Waste: Waste possibly implied: woodland in the Forest; 2 hides waste. Landowners: Ralph holds from Urso.


Notes:
Waste possibly implied: woodland in the Forest.


Notes:
Payments: 5 houses in Droitwich, 5 measures of salt.


Notes:
Payments: 1 free man, 2 sesters of honey.


Notes:
Other population: 1 reeve and 1 rider. Payments: 8 salt-houses in Droitwich, one 50 measures of salt, the other 7, 70 measures of salt.


Notes:
Duplicates: 3,2 and 19, 4-7 6 hides in Kyre duplicated in GLS 1,11.


Notes:
Payments: 15 measures of salt; 100 pigs for pasture dues.


Notes:
Values: burgesses pay 4s 6d recorded as valuation. Duplicates: 1 hide duplicated in 15,14.


Notes:
Duplicates: 6,1 and 19,3;5-6;8-9 10 hides in Clifton duplicated in GLS 1,11.


Notes:
Geld: same customary dues as the king's half hide in Droitwich belonging to Gloucestershire. Duplicates: 1/2 hide duplicated in 15,14.


Notes:
Geld: stated total for the fief (200 hides) exceeds the particulars (198).


Notes:
Ploughteams: tenants' ploughteam assumed to be additional though possibly the stated lordship team.


Notes:
Ploughteams: tenants' ploughteams assumed to be additional though possibly the stated lordship teams.


Notes:
Geld: 10 hides, both wood and open land. Ploughteams: they plough 4 acres and sow it with their own seeds.


Notes:
Geld: Eckington (8,7) said to total 16 hides, but particulars total 15.5 hides. Payments: 6 freedmen pay 11s and 2d a year; they plough and sow 12 acres with their own seed.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 8,9a-g, geld total (30 hides) exceeded by particulars (30.25).


Notes:
Shared statistics: 8,9a-g, 1066 valuation recorded here. Landowners: memorandum on free men recorded in 8,9a;b-g.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 8,9a-g, 1066 valuation recorded in 8,9b. Geld: total (exceeded by particulars) recorded in 8,9a. Duplicates: hidage probably duplicated in HEF 1,44;46.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 8,9a-g, 1066 valuation recorded in 8,9b. Geld: total (exceeded by particulars) recorded in 8,9a.


Notes:
Other population: 3 boors, freedmen, 2 ploughmen. Payments: a payment 30s. Landowners: the 8 riders are named.


Notes:
Values: valuation assumed to refer to both 1066 and 1086 (see 8,28).


Notes:
Ploughteams: tenants' ploughteams assumed to be additional though possibly included among the stated lordship teams. Other population: 4 ploughmen and 2 Frenchmen who serve.


Notes:
Geld: the man who has charge of this land has 1 hide of it. Payments: 100 cartloads of timber a year to the salt-houses of Droitwich.


Notes:
Duplicates: 1 hide duplicated in 15,14. Payments: burgesses, 15s 8d; salt-house, 10s; king's tithe, £8. Landowners: Leofnoth the priest holds the salt-house.


Notes:
Geld: Wulfric's virgates assumed to be held in demesne in 1086. Waste: partial waste on Urso's hide: 'nothing there except 2 acres of meadow'.


Notes:
Landowners: Robert Parler holds from Gilbert son of Turold.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 8,26a-c, valuation recorded in 8,26c; geld total (15 hides) recorded here.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 8,26a-c, valuation recorded in 8,26c; geld total in 8,26a. Payments: riders, 10s.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 8,26a-c, valuation recorded here; geld total recorded in 8,26a.


Notes:
Values: the total 1086 valuation for 8,1-28 (£82.367) is almost £83 as recorded here if 8,10b is assumed to refer to 1066. Payments: 50 sesters of honey.


Notes:
Shared Statistics: 9,1a-1e, geld total (26 hides) recorded here exceeded by particulars (28). Payments: salt-house in Droitwich, 30 measures of salt; mill at Wyre Piddle, 20 sticks of eels.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 9,1a-1e, geld total (exceeded by particulars) recorded in 9,1a.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 9,5a-c, geld total (3 hides) recorded here exceeded by particulars (3.5).


Notes:
Shared statistics: 9,5a-c, geld total (exceeded by particulars) recorded in 9,5a.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 9,6a-c, geld total (5 hides) recorded here. Duplicates: 1 hide lies in Herefordshire, duplicated in HEF 10,39 and 23,6.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 9,6a-c, geld possibly included in 9,6a.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 9,6a-c, geld total recorded in 9,6a. Waste: 1 virgate but the whole of it is waste; value 5s.


Notes:
Payments: dues of the men who live there, 20s.


Notes:
Geld: memorandum on geld in Fishborough Hundred.


Notes:
Ploughteams: oxen for one plough but they draw stone to the church included in men's ploughs. Other population: 2 riders and 2 Frenchmen.


Notes:
Payments: in Droitwich 1 salt-house; 1 1/2 fisheries, 2000 eels. Other population: 2 riders and 10 ploughmen.


Notes:
Other population: 4 ploughmen and 1 Frenchman.


Notes:
Values: 30s from the salt-houses recorded as valuation. Duplicates: 1 hide duplicated in 15,14.


Notes:
Landowners: Urso holds from Nigel the doctor.


Notes:
Payments: salt-house, 4s; 1 house in Worcester, 12d.


Notes:
Population: 7 villagers assumed to be included in 14 but possibly additional to them. Payments: 70s from salt-houses, 20d from houses, 3s from 7 villagers.


Notes:
Payments: salt-house, 2s and 8 measures of salt; a burgess, 10s.


Notes:
Duplicates: 1/2 hide duplicated in 15,14. Payments: 1.5 salt-houses, 32 1/2 measures.


Notes:
Population: 14 villagers and smallholders, divided equally.


Notes:
Duplicates: 3,2 and 19, 4-7 6 hides in Kyre duplicated in GLS 1,11. Payments: mill, 10 packloads of grain.


Notes:
Duplicates: 3,2 and 19, 4-7 6 hides in Kyre duplicated in GLS 1,11. 6,1 and 19,3;5-6;8-9 10 hides in Clifton duplicated in GLS 1,11.


Notes:
Duplicates: 3,2 and 19, 4-7 6 hides in Kyre duplicated in GLS 1,11; 6,1 and 19,3;5-6;8-9; 10 hides in Clifton duplicated in GLS 1,11. Payments: 16 sticks of eels.


Notes:
Duplicates: 6,1 and 19,3;5-6;8-9 10 hides in Clifton duplicated in GLS 1,11. Payments: mill, 16 packloads of corn.


Notes:
Duplicates: 6,1 and 19,3;5-6;8-9 10 hides in Clifton duplicated in GLS 1,11. Payments: mill, 6 packloads of corn.


Notes:
Duplicates: 1 hide duplicated in GLS 1,11.


Notes:
Payments: 2s from burgess, 6s from 2 salt-houses.


Notes:
Other population: 1 miller and 2 ploughmen.


Notes:
Other population: 1 smith and 1 Frenchman.


Notes:
Payments: 2 fisheries, 40 sticks of eels.


Notes:
Payments: 7 salt-houses, 111 measures of salt.


Notes:
Duplicates: virgate duplicated in HEF 1,39. Payments: 1 rider pays 6s.


Notes:
Duplicates: 1 hide duplicated in 15,14. Payments: 7 salt-houses, 50 measures of salt.


Notes:
Duplicates: 3 virgates probably duplicated in 1,1d.


Notes:
Waste: no significant resources; woodland in King's Forest.


Notes:
Duplicates: 2 hides duplicated in 15,14. Payments: 3 salt-houses, 60 measures of salt; part of 1 salt-house, 10 measures of salt; burgess, 2s.


Notes:
Payments: burgess, 16d; 4 measures of salt.


Notes:
Payments: 1 house in Worcester, 16d; 1 salt-house in Droitwich, 12 measures of salt.


Notes:
Waste possibly implied: woodland in King's Forest.


Notes:
Payments: salt-house, 5 {ora}. Population: 4 slaves, male and female, divided equally.


Notes:
Payments: 5 salt-houses, 100 measures of salt.


Notes:
Payments: 3 salt-houses in Droitwich, 40 measures of salt; 1 burgess, 2s.


Notes:
Duplicates: 1/2 hide duplicated in 15,14.


Notes:
Payments: salt-house in Droitwich, 30 measures of salt. Other population: 1 Frenchman and 4 ploughmen.


Notes:
Population: 8 slaves, male and female, divided equally. Payments: mill, 12 packloads of corn; 2 burgesses, 12d; 5 salt-houses in Droitwich, 21s 4d. Geld: 10 hides exempt from geld.


Notes:
Duplicates: memorandum recording that this holding, although in Worcestershire, is described in Herefordshire (HEF 1,40-41), so not recorded here.


Notes:
Duplicates: memorandum recording that this holding, although in Worcestershire, is described in Herefordshire (HEF 1,39;47), so not recorded here; Martley, 13 hides here, is recorded as 10.25 in HEF; the 5 hides at Suckley are also recorded in 1,1b.


Notes:
Values: Borough pays £60; total for City & 18 manors (1,1-10;39-47) stated to be £335.9 besides revenue for pleas of Hundred and County; total here is £336.1, the small discrepancy perhaps due to the value of the ounce of gold. Entries 1,39-47 are in GLS.


Notes:
Values: Rhys of Wales pays King William £40; from the land of {Calcebuef} the King has 10s in addition to the revenue. Landowners: Rhys is probably the Welsh king of that name; Calcebuef may be the name of a cantref.


Notes:
Values: 1/4 nights' revenue in 1066 assumed to equal £25 (see EHR 2002, p. 274); 'it is extremely reduced'. Duplicates: 1 virgate duplicated in 15,3; 2 hides possibly duplicated in 21,3. Payments: honey and sheep.


Notes:
Values: at farm in 1066 so value unknown. £3 is sheriff's share (Bernay?). Payments: tithe. Values: £10 plus 1 ounce of gold (assumed to be approximately £4, after Baring). Sheriff has £3, assumed included in valuation.


Notes:
Other population: 1 reeve, 1 smith. Payments: 1 hawk.


Notes:
Geld: not given; 2 paid tax. Payments: 9 packloads of salt; fishery without dues; salt-houses; 25 sticks of eels. Duplicates: 2 hides duplicated in 16,3-4; 1 virgate probably in 35,1. Other population: 4 freedmen, 8 servants.


Notes:
Duplicates: 2 hides duplicated in 9,1. Payments: 500 eels; customary dues 95s; woodland, mills, villagers, freedmen. Abbey of Cormeilles holds churches, number unspecified, 2 recorded (1,6).


Notes:
Payments: customary dues. Other population: 1 reeve, 1 smith, 6 freedmen, 2 riding men. Payments: customary dues and payments in kind.


Notes:
Other population: 1 reeve, 1 Frenchman, 1 riding man, 3 men. Payments: woodland, salt, ploughshares, iron, salmon. Duplicates: 1/2 hide probably duplicated in 15,4.


Notes:
Waste possibly implied: land taken into Forest. Duplicates: 1.75 hide holding duplicated in 1,57. Population: unspecified number of Welshmen have 8 ploughs. Payments: salt, honey, sheep, lambs, and a fishery which pays nothing.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 1,10a-c. Duplicates: 1.75 hides duplicated in SHR 4,28,5. Payments: dues, £7.735; fish, 17s; salt, 8s; honey, 65s; timber, 5s; 30 measures of salt. Population: 25 male & female slaves. Other population: 7 reeves, 6 riding men, 7 beadles


Notes:
Shared statistics: 1,10a-c. Payments: by 14 named tenants, possibly additional to value, of £23 2s besides the eels. Value £60 besides the supplies of the nuns; could be £120, recorded as Render.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 1,10a-c. Geld: stated total for manor (80 hides) disagrees with particulars (60+18.5); missing 1.5 hides, assumed to be Leofwin's. Values: 25s assumed to be additional.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 1,11-37, geld total recorded in 1,37. Other population: 1 reeve, 2 Frenchmen, 2 riding men, 2 men.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 1,11-37, geld total recorded in 1,37.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 1,11-37, geld total recorded in 1,37. Geld: 1 free hide, assumed to be untaxed. Values: omitted.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 1,11-37, geld total recorded in 1,37. Other population: 1 reeve, 2 riding men.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 1,11-37, geld total recorded in 1,37. Waste possibly implied: no recorded resources.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 1,11-37, geld total recorded in 1,37. Payments: fishery, 600 eels.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 1,11-37, geld total recorded in 1,37. Payments: villager, 10d.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 1,11-37, geld total recorded in 1,37. Waste: no recorded resources.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 1,11-37, geld total recorded in 1,37. Other population: 1 riding man, 1 Frenchman. Values and payments: Frenchman and smallholders pay 25s, assumed to be additional to valuation.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 1,11-37, geld total recorded in 1,37. Payments: fishery, 500 eels.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 1,11-37, geld total recorded Geld: stated total of 32 hides for 1,11-36 differs from particulars, which amount to 34.25 in all, or 30.5 taxed.


Notes:
Duplicates: 10.25 (or 13) hides duplicated in WOR X3. Payments: 2 weirs, 2500 eels and 5 sticks; 3 houses, 12d; villagers, 12s. Other population: 4 riders, 1 beadle, 1 reeve.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 1,40-41, paid to Hereford. Other population: 1 reeve, 1 miller, 1 beadle, 1 smith. Duplicates: 10 hides in duplicated in WOR X2.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 1,40-41, paid to Hereford. Payments: 4 salt-houses, 1 {hoch}. Duplicates: 3 hides duplicated in WOR X2. Population: 6 slaves, male and female, divided equally. Other population: 1 reeve, 1 beadle. Payments: 2 ploughshares.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 1,42-47, value recorded in 1,47, paid to Hereford. Duplicates: 4 hides duplicated in GLS 1,34. Population: 9 slaves, male and female, divided 5:4. Payments: pigmen, 60 pigs; a villager, 20 {ora}. Other population: 1 reeve, 6 pigmen.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 1,42-47. Value recorded in 1,47, paid to Hereford. Duplicates: 9 hides duplicated in GLS 1,35. Villager of Lyre assumed to be additional. Payments: 4 pigmen, 35 pigs.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 1,42-47, value in 1,47. Duplicates: 1.75 hide duplicated in WOR 2,30; 8,9c. Payments: house, 13s 4d. Population: 8 slaves male and female divided equally. Other population: 1 reeve, 1 beadle, 2 foresters, 1 dairymaid, 1 cowman.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 1,42-47. Value recorded in 1,47, paid to Hereford. Duplicates: 1 hide duplicated in WOR 2,36. 2 villagers assumed to be additional. Other population: 1 pigman, 1 dairymaid.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 1,42-47, value recorded in 1,47, paid to Hereford. Duplicates: 5 hides probably duplicated in WOR 1,1b and X3. Population: 5 slaves, male and female, divided 3:2.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 1,42-47. Value recorded here; paid to Hereford. Population: villager assumed to be additional. Other population: 1 beekeeper. Payments: burgess pays nothing. Duplicates: 5 hides probably duplicated in WOR 1,1b and X3.


Notes:
Ploughteams: unspecified number of Welshmen have 24 ploughs, men-at-arms 7; more possible. Population: 15 slaves, male and female. Abbey of Saumur has church and tithes Payments: 33 sesters of honey and 2s; Welshmen, 2s and 33 sesters of honey.


Notes:
Geld: 96 men have 73 ploughs, pay customary dues, do army service, but do not pay tax. Duplicates: ploughteams probably duplicated in 1,50-60. Payments: 41 sesters of honey; sheep, 20s; hearth tax, 10s. Waste: King Gruffydd and Bleddyn laid land waste.


Notes:
Geld: there were 4 carucates. Duplicates: ploughteams probably duplicated in 1,49.


Notes:
Duplicates: ploughteams probably duplicated in 1,49. Payments: 4 sesters of honey and 16d.


Notes:
Duplicates: ploughteams probably duplicated in 1,49. Payments: Forest, 1/2 sester of honey and 6d.


Notes:
Duplicates: ploughteams probably duplicated in 1,49. Payments: 15 sesters of honey and 10s. Geld: they did not pay any other tax nor do service except in the army.


Notes:
Duplicates: ploughteams probably duplicated in 1,49. Payments: 5s in customary dues.


Notes:
Duplicates: ploughteams probably duplicated in 1,49. Other population: 5 Welshmen, 1 Frenchman. Payments: 5 sesters of honey, 5 sheep with lambs and 10d.


Notes:
Duplicates: ploughteams probably duplicated in 1,49. Payments: 3 sheep.


Notes:
Geld: hidage recorded in 1,8. Values: payment assumed to be the valuation. Duplicates: partially duplicated in 1,8; ploughteams in 1,49.


Notes:
Duplicates: ploughteams probably duplicated in 1,49. Payments: 7 sesters of honey and 5s. Values: 5s payment assumed to be value.


Notes:
Duplicates: ploughteams probably duplicated in 1,49. Payments: 6 sesters of honey and 10s. Values: 10s payment assumed to be value.


Notes:
Duplicates: ploughteams probably duplicated in 1,49. Payments: 18 sesters of honey.


Notes:
Other population: 1 Welshman, 1 Frenchman. Geld: 1 hide has Welsh customs, the others English. Payments: 2 sesters of honey.


Notes:
Waste: no recorded resources other than forest. Geld: 9 waste manors total 19 hides, assumed to be additional to other entries. William pays the king £15 from the Forests he holds.


Notes:
Waste: no recorded resources; 'they were waste and are still in the king's wood'.


Notes:
Values: Hugh paid 30s and still does, assumed to be the valuation, though there are no recorded resources.


Notes:
Geld: 40 hides assumed to be an error for 40 messuages, those among the original 98 no longer there or habitable: i,e 98-60 rounded up.


Notes:
Waste: no recorded resources. All these hides have been laid waste and were waste except for 1.


Notes:
Geld: 1 hide waste. Ploughteams: the villagers have more ploughs than ploughable land.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 2,8-10. Values: the valuation may refer to Eaton and its dependencies (2,8-10) or the dependencies alone (2,9-10), as assumed here. Value recorded in 2,10 assigned here. Population: unspecified number of men-at-arms; 2 recorded.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 2,8-10; value recorded here entered in previous record and attributed to the Canons.


Notes:
Other population: 1 reeve, 1 Frenchman, 4 boors. Payments: priest, 2s. Geld: no hidage recorded for exempt land.


Notes:
Payments: man-at-arms pays £0.25 to the Canons of St Albert.


Notes:
Geld: 5 English hides which pay tax plus 3 Welsh hides. Payments: Welsh hides, 6s.


Notes:
Geld: 3 hides pay tax; 3 are waste. Salt-houses: part of a salt-house in Droitwich.


Notes:
Geld: 10 hides of which 4 lie in Plegelgate Hundred.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 2,23-25. Values: recorded in 2,25. Payments: villagers, 10s for waste land, otherwise unrecorded.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 2,23-25. Values: recorded in 2,25. Payments: villagers, 18s in dues.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 2,23-25. Values: recorded here for 2,23-25. Payments: villagers, 20s in dues.


Notes:
Payments: part of a salt-house in Droitwich. Other population: unspecified number of other men, assumed to be at least 2; 1 boor.


Notes:
Payments: part of a salt-house in Droitwich. Population: unspecified number of other men assumed to be at least 2.


Notes:
Payments: part of a salt-house in Droitwich.


Notes:
Geld: 1 hide is waste; the others pay tax.


Notes:
Geld: 0.5 hides waste; the others pay tax. Payments: 3 messuages in WOR, 30d.


Notes:
Payments: man-at-arms holds at a revenue of 4s.


Notes:
Geld: 4 hides are waste; the others pay tax.


Notes:
Geld: hide held by man-at-arms assumed to be included in 5 hides.


Notes:
Geld: 3 hides were and are waste; the others pay tax.


Notes:
Geld: 3 hides waste; the others pay tax.


Notes:
Geld: 1 hide is Welsh; the largest part of the land is in the king's Enclosure. Duplicate: 1 hide duplicated in 25,7.


Notes:
Geld: 300 hides; the total of particulars for the fief is 298.75. The tenants part of the holding is allocated in proportion to the ploughteams. The men of the bishop give no account of 33 hides.


Notes:
Geld: assessed and does service in GLS. Duplicates: 2 hides possibly duplicated in GLS 1,11.


Notes:
Geld: 1 hide pays tax the other free from tax and every customary due.


Notes:
Waste: no recorded resources; but it pays 5s.


Notes:
Payments: 1 Frenchman with a plough, 6s.


Notes:
Population: the men of another village work in this village. Values: payment assumed to be the valuation.


Notes:
Waste: no recorded resources; however they pay 6s, assumed to be the value of the holding.


Notes:
Geld: only 2 of 4 hides pay tax according to the testimony of the county. Other population: 1 reeve, 1 riding man.


Notes:
Geld: 1 hide free from tax and the king's service.


Notes:
Population: 2 smallholders repeated but probably intentionally, 2 being without ploughs.


Notes:
Ploughlands: land for 23 ploughs, assumed to be new land. Duplicates: 4 carucates probably duplicated in 10,3. Payments: mill, 3 measures of corn.


Notes:
Geld: 1 hide did not pay tax because it was in lordship. Payments: mill, 25 sticks of eels; meadow, 5s.


Notes:
Values: in 1066 it was waste and the value was 10s; the value may be intended to refer to the intermediate date.


Notes:
Values: Ralph gave 0.5 hide to 1 man-at-arms therefore the manor pays less.


Notes:
Duplicates: 2 hides duplicated in 1,5. Waste: Earl William built the castle on waste land. Values: borough pays £7, assumed to be the valuation.


Notes:
Other population: 1 riding man, 1 smith.


Notes:
Waste: no recorded resources; in total 9 hides are waste in the Welsh March.


Notes:
Duplicates: woodland duplicated in 31,7.


Notes:
Other population: 1 reeve, 1 smith, 1 rider.


Notes:
Payments: 4 Welshmen, 2 sesters of honey.


Notes:
Payments: 15 sesters of honey and 15 pigs when the men are there and [he administers] justice over them.


Notes:
Waste: no recorded resources. Duplicates: 4 carucates probably duplicatd in 8,1.


Notes:
Other population: 1 reeve, 1 smith. Geld: 2 carucates granted to Hereford assumed to be new land.


Notes:
Values: the fishery is valued at £6, assumed to be the value. Payments: burgesses of Hereford, 20s.


Notes:
Other population: 1 beadle, 1 smith. Payments: 30 sticks of eels.


Notes:
Ploughteams: Edwy held it with 1 plough; none recorded for 1086.


Notes:
Duplicates: 6 hides duplicated in 25,7. Payments: 3 Welshmen, 3 sesters of honey.


Notes:
Duplicates: 1 hide duplicated in 25,7. Waste: was waste; now has a value but no recorded resources.


Notes:
Ploughteams: 4 smallholders with 1 hide, assumed to be an error for 1 ploughteam. Population: 9 slaves, male and female, divided 5:4.


Notes:
Waste: no recorded resources but valued at 4s.


Notes:
Duplicates: 1/2 hide duplicated in WOR 9,6a.


Notes:
Geld: half was in royal lordship and did not pay tax.


Notes:
Population: unspecified number of men. Values: men pay 10s 8d for their right to settle, assumed to be value. Nothing else is there.


Notes:
Payments: settlers, 100d. Population: 5 slaves, male and female, divided 3:2; unspecified number of men.


Notes:
Geld: this land does not pay tax or give customary dues or lie in any Hundred. Payments: Welshman, 3s.


Notes:
Geld: 0.5 hide in Droitwich belongs to Roger, probably to Weobley (WOR 18,6). Other population: 1 reeve, 1 smith. Payments: park, 11s 9d.


Notes:
Payments: land for 1 plough cleared of wood, 54d.


Notes:
Other population: 1 reeve, 1 riding man.


Notes:
Other population: 1 rider, 1 smith. Payments: rider, 2s.


Notes:
Waste: no recorded resources; nothing there.


Notes:
Payments: 4 measures of corn and 15 sticks of eels.


Notes:
Payments: 2 sesters of honey; churches; customary payments.


Notes:
Geld: 8 carucates (not hides). Payments: 3 Welshmen living under Welsh law, 4 sesters of honey.


Notes:
Waste: no recorded resources other than an hedged Enclosure.


Notes:
Waste possibly implied: no recorded resources, nothing there, though the value was and is 3s.


Notes:
Duplicates: 1 virgate possibly duplicated in 1,1. Waste possibly implied: 1 plough there; nothing more but 3s in value.


Notes:
Duplicates: 1 1/2 hides duplicated in 1,4.


Notes:
Duplicates: 10 carucates; 5 probably duplicated in 19,4 as 5 hides. Other population: 9 Welshmen, 1 man. Payments: honey; 25d.


Notes:
Other population: 2 men-at-arms, 1 man. Payments: 25 sticks of eels; woodland, 4s; burgesses, 52d.


Notes:
Population: 15 smallholders could be 16: manuscript unclear.


Notes:
Duplicates: 5 hides possibly duplicated in 19,1 as 5 carucates, and in 25,7. Other population: 3 Frenchmen, 1 rider.


Notes:
Duplicates: 5 hides duplicated in 25,7. Other population: 1 Welshman, 1 man.


Notes:
Geld: king grants exemption for 6 hides. Other population: 1 reeve, 1 smith. Payments: meadow and woodland, nothing.


Notes:
Duplicates: 2 hides possibly duplicated in 1,1. Payments: 8 men, nothing; mill, nothing.


Notes:
Waste: 1 hide laid waste. Payments: woodland, nothing.


Notes:
Waste possibly implied: no recorded resources but entry is incomplete.


Notes:
Duplicates: 1 hide 1 1/2 virgates duplicated in 25,7. Payments: burgess (possibly in Hereford), 4d.


Notes:
Waste: 11 manors, 36 ploughlands, all waste. On these waste lands have grown woods, from which Osbern has what he catches; nothing else. Duplicates: 1/2 hide possibly duplicated in SHR 5,6.


Notes:
Waste possibly implied: missing plough and only 1 villager.


Notes:
Waste: on these waste lands have grown woods in which Osbern hunts; he has what he catches; 'nothing else'.


Notes:
Waste: no recorded resources except a hedged enclosure there in a little wood. Ploughlands: 6, possibly 7, manuscript unclear.


Notes:
Ploughteams and population: there were 10 villagers with 13 ploughs, assumed to be no longer there in 1086.


Notes:
Waste: no recorded resources; the whole of this land has been turned back into woodland. Geld: 'nothing' assumed to include geld exemption. Payments: pays nothing.


Notes:
Duplicates: 56 hides: the details for Golden Valley (2,54-56. 10,16-18. 14,6. 19,4-5. 23,2-4. 25,4-6. 29,6-10) total 59.5, or 55.5 paying tax or excluding 19,4 (possibly included in 19,1); 112 ploughlands duplicate some 40 already recorded.


Notes:
Waste: was waste; worth 5s but no recorded resources.


Notes:
Values: now these 2 manors (28,1-2) are at a revenue of 30s, allocated proportionately between 2 entries.


Notes:
Duplicates: 1 hide possibly duplicated in 31,3. Values: Gruffydd's holding assumed to be additional.


Notes:
Values: 'The lord has 12s 4d from the waste lands'. Payments: 300 eels. Other population: 1 reeve, 1 smith, 1 carpenter, 1 man-at-arms. Ploughteams: man-at-arms' plough assumed to be additional.


Notes:
Population: there were and are 3 riding men with 3 ploughs; they serve the lord.


Notes:
Duplicates: 1/2 hide duplicated in 25,7. Waste: no recorded resources.


Notes:
Duplicates: 2 hides duplicated in 25,7. Waste: no recorded resources.


Notes:
Duplicates: 5 hides duplicated in 25,7. Population: '2 smallholders ... 2 smallholders' assumed to be 4 smallholders but possibly an error. Other population: 1 rider, 1 smith.


Notes:
Duplicates: 3 hides duplicated in 25,7. Population: 2 men assumed to be the 2 Frenchmen. Payments: 8s.


Notes:
Duplicates: 1 hide duplicated in 25,7. Waste: no recorded resources but pays 3s.


Notes:
Ploughteams: 5 lordship ploughs previously: there were more ploughs than there are now. Payments: at Droitwich he has 17 measures of salt for 30d. Other population: 1 reeve, 1 smith, 4 riding men.


Notes:
Waste: no recorded resources except for a large wood and hedged enclosure; the rest of the land is waste.


Notes:
Waste: no significant resources except for 3 acres of land recently ploughed there though no ploughteams are recorded.


Notes:
Duplicates: 1 hide possibly duplicated in 29,1.


Notes:
Duplicates: woodland duplicated in 9,14.


Notes:
Ploughteams: 4 cattle assumed to be a 1/2 plough.


Notes:
Waste: no recorded resources but pays 2s.


Notes:
Duplicates: 1 virgate possibly duplicated in 1,4.


Notes:
Geld: Cambridge answered for a Hundred before 1066. Duplicates: Count Alan's 5 burgesses duplicated in 14,12.


Notes:
Duplicates: Count Alan's 5 burgesses duplicated in 14,12.


Notes:
Values: tenant holdings assumed to be additional.


Notes:
Geld: ICC, 'less 6 acres'. Payments: 3500 eels from fisheries and presentation of fish three times a year from fishermen. Duplicates: 6 hides and 40 acres duplicated in 1,13.


Notes:
Payments: mills feed 2 pigs a year; customary payments for corn honey and malt. Geld: Brunmann's hide assumed (with Hart) to be additional to that of manor.


Notes:
Geld: defence obligation of 1.5 hides of Chesterford. Duplicates: 1.5 hides duplicated in 1,22.


Notes:
Ploughteams: ICC has 11 possible ploughs, likely to be correct because ploughs would then equal ploughlands.


Notes:
Payments: 7000 eels. Satellite: ICC has £52 value.


Notes:
Duplicates: memorandum on 6 hides 40 acres in the king's return, duplicated in 1,1 and not recorded here.


Notes:
Payments: 12 horses and 12 escorts or 12s 8d. (ICC 12s 7d).


Notes:
Duplicates: 1/2 hide and 1/2 virgate duplicated in ESS 1,9.


Notes:
Duplicates: 1/2 hide or 1/2 virgate duplicated in 29,12.


Notes:
Duplicates: 1 1/2 hides duplicated in 1,10 and ESS 1,9; deleted here in manuscript.


Notes:
Satellite: 3 cottagers from ICC. Values: 1066 valuation has been altered in manuscript, possibly from £4.


Notes:
Satellite: ICC has 1.5 hides and 0.5 virgate instead of Domesday Book 1 hide 2.5 virgates, and 3 smallholders each with 5 acres instead of 4.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 3,3-4, geld total (26 1/2 hides) recorded here.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 3,3-4, geld total (26 1/2 hides) recorded in 3,3.


Notes:
Payments: mill, 300 eels and another 2000 eels.


Notes:
Satellite: IE has different lordship hidage (3.625).


Notes:
Duplicates: 1 1/2 virgates duplicated in 26,50.


Notes:
Satellite: ICC states ploughteams are men's; IE Brev. lists a further 2 ploughs in lordship, but they do not appear in any other satellite texts. IE gives 1.75 hides in lordship, ICC includes a further 5 acres.


Notes:
Satellite: IE Brev. gives 3 ploughs in lordship.


Notes:
Duplicates: 3 hides duplicated in 26,51.


Notes:
Satellite: IE Brev., 18 villagers; ICC, payments: pasture 2 orae.


Notes:
Duplicates: 80 acres duplicated in 26,52.


Notes:
Satellite: IE describes 10 smallholders as 10 cottagers.


Notes:
Payments: fishnet toll, 6s; marsh, 6d. Satellite: IE 6d or 3 ploughshares.


Notes:
Duplicates: entry duplicated in 32,2. Satellite: Freemen, named as Aelfric and Brictwin, and lordship hides from IE.


Notes:
Satellite: IE Brev. gives 2 ploughs in lordship.


Notes:
Satellite: ICC 1 hide 8 acres; IE Brev. 2 villagers only.


Notes:
Payments: mill, 1000 eels. Satellite: Domesday Book has 17 for ploughlands, IE 17.5; ICC has 8.5 lords ploughs, 25 villagers; 1086 valuation £16.


Notes:
Satellite: ICC gives total vill assessment as 5 hides and 1086 valuation £5.


Notes:
Duplicates: entry duplicated in 26,54. Satellite: ICC has 1 virgate, held by Durand from Hardwin.


Notes:
Geld: 6.5 hides. Satellite: ICC and IE, 5.5 hides. ICC has 2 ploughshares.


Notes:
Duplicates: 1 1/2 hides duplicated in 32,5. Values: valuation from IE.


Notes:
Payments: mill, 2 pigs. Satellite: ICC has 9 hides and 29 acres and a different 1086 valuation of £7.


Notes:
Values: from IE. Duplicates: 2 1/2 hides and 9 acres duplicated in 26,18.


Notes:
Duplicates: 1 1/2 hides and 6 acres duplicated in 14,22. Satellite: IE 6 Freemen, valuation 40s.


Notes:
Duplicates: entry duplicated in 26,27; valuation recorded there.


Notes:
Duplicates: 1 virgate duplicated in 26,29.


Notes:
Satellite: ICC gives 3 cottagers, 5 men's ploughs instead of 3; likely to be correct because ploughs would then equal ploughlands.


Notes:
Duplicates: 1 1/2 hides duplicated in 26,30.


Notes:
Duplicates: 10 Freemen duplicated in 31,1.


Notes:
Satellite: IE, 1.5 hides in lordship IE Brev. has 2 lordship ploughs and includes cottagers as smallholders. ICC 0.5 mill at 3s 8d.


Notes:
Duplicates: 1/2 virgate duplicated in 26,33.


Notes:
Satellite: IE Brev. 3 ploughs in lordship.


Notes:
Payments: marshes, 6s. Geld: ICC 7.5 hides before 1066, now 5, Ely Abbey now holds 7 of these 7.5.


Notes:
Satellite: IE answered for 10 hides in 1066, now 5; abbot holds 6.5. 2 ploughs possible in lordship. IE Brev. has 2 ploughs in lordship and gives cottagers as smallholders.


Notes:
Satellite: possible plough from IE; IE Brev. gives 2 lordship ploughs. Duplicates: 40 acres possibly duplicated in 32,41.


Notes:
Payments: weir, 2s. Satellite: IE Brev. 2 ploughs in lordship.


Notes:
Payments: 27150 eels; presentations, 24s.


Notes:
Payments: fisheries, 1500 eels. Satellite: IE Brev. 2 ploughs in lordship, includes cottagers as smallholders, slaves from IE and IE Brev.


Notes:
Payments: fisheries, 17000 eels; presentations of fish, 12s 9d.


Notes:
Payments: fisheries, 24000 eels; presentations, 18s. Satellite: IE Brev. 2 ploughs in lordship cottagers counted as smallholders, intermediate valuation £10.


Notes:
Payments: fisheries, 500 eels; presentations, 4 1/2 d. Satellite: lordship hides from IE. IENV, 1 men's plough; cottagers counted as smallholders.


Notes:
Payments: fisheries, 3250 eels; presentations, 7s 7d. Satellite: IE, 3 ploughs in lordship; only 12 villagers.


Notes:
Payments: reeds, 16d. Satellite: IE 4 ploughs in lordship. IE Brev. 10 smallholders.


Notes:
Payments: fisheries, 3333 eels; presentations, 4s. Satellite: IE Brev. 5 men's ploughs; cottagers counted as smallholders.


Notes:
Payments: 3 ploughshares from the port. Satellite: IE Brev. 4 men's ploughs.


Notes:
Payments: fisheries, 1500 eels. Satellite: IE 18 cottagers; IE Brev. 18 smallholders; 12 from presentations of fishery from IE.


Notes:
Payments: 14000 eels; presentations, 13s 4d.


Notes:
Payments: fisheries, 3750 eels; presentations, 2s 3d. Satellite: IE Brev. lists 8 ploughs in lordship.


Notes:
Payments: fisheries, 300 eels and 2s. Satellite: IE Brev. cottagers counted as smallholders.


Notes:
Satellite: IE Brev. 3 ploughs in lordship; cottagers counted as smallholders.


Notes:
Satellite: IE Brev. cottagers counted as smallholders; 3 ploughs in lordship.


Notes:
Satellite: IE Brev. cottagers counted as smallholders; 3 villagers.


Notes:
Payments: fisheries, 44s. IE 2.5 lordship hides. Satellite: IE Brev. 4 ploughs in lordship; cottagers counted as smallholders. IE and IENV 5 men's ploughs.


Notes:
Satellite: ICC adds smallholders and pasture.


Notes:
Payments: fisheries, 3000 eels; presentations, 27d. Satellite: IE 3 ploughlands, 3 ploughs of meadow.


Notes:
Payments: marsh, 500 eels; presentations, 12d. Duplicates: 40 acres possibly duplicated in 32,42.


Notes:
Duplicates: 1/2 mill duplicated in 22,5.


Notes:
Satellite: ICC intermediate valuation 40s.


Notes:
Satellite: ICC answered for 5 hides before 1066; now for 4.


Notes:
Satellite: 1066 names of overlords from ICC.


Notes:
Satellite: 1066 names from ICC; no cottagers in ICC.


Notes:
Satellite: ICC records Aelfric's hidage as 1 hide and 1.333 virgates.


Notes:
Payments: 4 ploughshares; marshes, 25d; carts, 6d. Satellite: Cottagers from ICC; also 21 smallholders; 25s 6d from carts; 1086 valuation £18.


Notes:
Geld: ICC gives total assessment of vill as 5 hides (2.25 geld).


Notes:
Geld: ICC specifies 3 hides 4 virgates, assuming the Freeman's virgate is additional to, not included in, the estate total of 3.75; Hart does likewise and we have followed suit.


Notes:
Duplicates: 10 burgesses duplicated in B1-2.


Notes:
Satellite: 2 1066 men-at-arms named in ICC; also has 2 smallholders instead of 5.


Notes:
Duplicates: 1 1/2 hides and 6 acres duplicated in 5,27.


Notes:
Satellite: ICC 2 Freemen held 1 virgate.


Notes:
Satellite: ICC 1066 valuation 5s, abbey's 1/2 virgate at 40s in error.


Notes:
Geld: Freeman's 1/2 virgate treated as additional to 2.25 (as Hart).


Notes:
Values: mills only; the value of the mills is the value of the holding, but three dates given.


Notes:
Satellite: ICC 1.5 ploughs in lordship; intermediate valuation 12s.


Notes:
Satellite: ICC 2 cottagers instead of smallholders.


Notes:
Satellite: ploughs in lordship and men's ploughs from ICC.


Notes:
Satellite: ICC 53 ploughlands in error, 3 men's ploughs.


Notes:
Satellite: ICC 2 smallholders, 1066 valuation 17s.


Notes:
Satellite: ICC states that the bishop's man held 1 virgate, treated by Hart as additional to the 4.375 but not included here.


Notes:
Payments: marsh, 450 eels. Satellite: 1 virgate (claimed by Ely Abbey), value 5s.


Notes:
Satellite: 2 ploughs; it is there, probably an error for 1, as in ICC.


Notes:
Payments: 1 mill, 6s; the other is in lordship.


Notes:
Payments: 1200 eels. Satellite: ICC 3 men's ploughs.


Notes:
Satellite: ICC intermediate valuation, 70s.


Notes:
Satellite: 1066 tenants named in ICC which supplies their hidages.


Notes:
Payments: 1500 eels, 1 fishing net in Soham Mere. Satellite: ICC 3 men's ploughs and 1 possible.


Notes:
Payments: mill, 4520 eels; 3 fishing nets in Soham Mere. Values: ICC 1086 valuation 38s, 1066 £16.


Notes:
Geld: manorial total and 1066 particulars disagree due to details of 1066 Freemen holdings.


Notes:
Satellite: tenant, Geoffrey, named in ICC.


Notes:
Satellite: 1 Freeman named as Guthlif in ICC.


Notes:
Values: valued with the other land. Satellite: ICC 43 ploughs, in error for acres.


Notes:
Payments: mill, 12s, broken but can be repaired. Satellite: ICC 2.5 villagers, 5 smallholders and 1 slave, Guy holds 1 hide instead of 0.5.


Notes:
Payments: 3 ploughshares (ICC, 4); marsh, 400 eels.


Notes:
Payments: 300 eels. Satellite: mill value 30s less 3d instead of 4d.


Notes:
Satellite: ICC intermediate valuation 5s, 4 oxen instead of smallholders.


Notes:
Satellite: ICC gives 4 hides 22 acres and gives 4 men's ploughs and 13 smallholders.


Notes:
Values: includes 1 oz gold (value 4.083333 according to Baring). Satellite: IE gives 4 ploughs in lordship.


Notes:
Satellite: ICC and IE give 6 ploughlands. ICC adds 2 slaves. 4 ploughshares - IE has 4 Freemen in error.


Notes:
Satellite: ICC 6 villagers, but adds 1 priest, and oats (57 pennies).


Notes:
Satellite: ICC gives total for vill as 5 hides.


Notes:
Geld: manorial total and 1066 particulars disagree; ICC gives total hidage of 8.375. Payments: marsh, 3200 eels.


Notes:
Duplicates: 1/2 mill duplicated in 11,1. Values: for mill only.


Notes:
Payments: 1500 eels; in 1066, 8d or 1 horse in the King's service. Satellite: ICC records 29 villagers, adds 1 mill, supplies no value. Geld: reduced because the farm oppressed it.


Notes:
Satellite: ICC intermediate valuation 23s.


Notes:
Satellite: ICC 2 oxen instead of smallholders.


Notes:
Satellite: ICC provides hidage (Domesday Book equals 0.25) and ploughlands.


Notes:
Payments: 1 ploughshare. Satellite: ICC 3 smallholders.


Notes:
Values: intermediate valuation £7. Duplicates: 2 1/2 hides and 9 acres duplicated in 5,26.


Notes:
Satellite: ICC names 1066 tenant Aelfric.


Notes:
Satellite: ploughteams from ICC, which also adds 2 smallholders.


Notes:
Satellite: ICC 1 smallholder, 2 cottagers.


Notes:
Satellite: IE. value 3s. Duplicates: 1 virgate duplicated in 5,30.


Notes:
Duplicates: 1 1/2 hides duplicated in 5,32.


Notes:
Duplicates: 1/2 virgate duplicated in 5,35.


Notes:
Satellite: 1066 valuations for Stanhard and 2 Freemen from ICC which states total to be £3.


Notes:
Satellite: lordship hides from ICC; 1066 valuation there £4.


Notes:
Duplicates: 1 1/2 virgates duplicated in 5,2.


Notes:
Satellite: 8 men's ploughs supplied by ICC, which records 7 Freemen instead of 6; IE gives cottagers as smallholders.


Notes:
Ploughlands: ICC, 10, villagers holding 7, and 1086 valuation £10.


Notes:
Payments: pasture, 6 ploughshares (ICC 5).


Notes:
Duplicates: 1/2 hide or 1/2 virgate duplicated in 1,16, with differences. Geld: hidage recorded in 1,16 as 1/2 virgate (probably correct).


Notes:
Duplicates: 10 Freemen duplicated in 5,33. Satellite: ICC gives 15 freemen and 4 hides.


Notes:
Geld: manorial total and 1066 particulars disagree due to ICC details. 2.125 lordship hides, 2.125 belonged to Edric in 1066. Population: 18 cottagers, 1 instead of 2 Freemen holding 1.5 virgate.


Notes:
Geld: manorial total and 1066 particulars disagree. Satellite: ICC 6 Freemen.


Notes:
Satellite: ICC 7 villagers; 0.5 mill, 40d; 1 mill, 7s; 1 mill, 10s 8d.


Notes:
Duplicates: 1 1/2 hides held by Picot duplicated in 5,24. Satellite: ICC 3.5 men's ploughs; intermediate valuation £4.1 1/2 hides.


Notes:
Satellite: Freemen named in ICC, gives 2.5 villagers instead of villagers holding 2.5 virgates. Adds 4 slaves, wood for fences, names 1066 Freemen.


Notes:
Geld: manorial total and 1066 particulars disagree. Satellite: Freemen named in ICC.


Notes:
Geld: manorial total and 1066 particulars disagree. Satellite: ICC men are men-at arms.


Notes:
Satellite: ICC ploughlands equals 4 oxen.


Notes:
Satellite: Freeman not in ICC, value 4s there.


Notes:
Population: 14 Freemen specified but 16 given in particulars. Geld: manorial total and 1066 particulars disagree. Satellite: ICC 3 villagers; value £5; Earl Algar's men have 1 hide; value of Ely's man 2s.


Notes:
Satellite: ICC 1 Freeman instead of men.


Notes:
Population: ICC 14 Freemen; Domesday Book has possibly counted Saxi's man twice. Values: 1 1066 hide valued at 20s by ICC.


Notes:
Satellite: ICC values the land of the 4 1066 tenants who could sell at £3, Sugga's at 10s.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 32,32;44, geld; 2 hides of 32,44 assumed to be additional. Geld: manorial total and 1066 particulars disagree.


Notes:
Payments: marsh, 650 eels and 12d. Satellite: IE 4 men's ploughs.


Notes:
Payments: 1000 eels and 12d from marsh. Geld: manorial total and 1066 particulars disagree.


Notes:
Duplicates: 40 acres possibly duplicated in 5,42.


Notes:
Duplicates: 40 acres possibly duplicated in 9,2.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 32,32;44, geld; 2 hides assumed to be additional to 32,44.


Notes:
Satellite: ICC possible plough in lordship, only 3 cottagers, 3 1066 men are Freemen.


Notes:
Ploughteams: 1 in lordship. Satellite: ICC land for 1.5 ploughs and plough not there. Values: ICC, 1066 valuation 26s 4d, not 8d.


Notes:
Satellite: ICC, payments: weir, 500 eels.


Notes:
Payments: 1/2 weir, 500 eels. Satellite: ICC 1.5 lordship hides.


Notes:
Payments: grazing, 16d; marsh, 500 eels.


Notes:
Payments: fishery, 5500 eels. Ploughteams: 1 possible lordship plough (ICC).


Notes:
Satellite: ICC, value £16 instead of £6; payments: 1066, value of 4.5 acres, 12d.


Notes:
Satellite: ICC 1.5 villagers, 6 smallholders.


Notes:
Ploughteams and population: smallholder may be in error for an ox.


Notes:
Satellite: ICC specifies one lords' and one men's.


Notes:
Population: 22 burgesses presumably included in 116 of B1.


Notes:
Geld: Huntingdon answered for 50 hides as a fourth part of Hurstingstone Hundred. But it does not now pay such a tax in that Hundred, since King William placed a tax on the mint in the Borough.


Notes:
Values: from the Borough revenue the King had £20, and the Earl £10, more or less, according to how he could arrange his part. These figures are a breakdown of those in B20.


Notes:
Duplicates: 3 1/2 hides duplicated in 8,4.


Notes:
Payments: 20s from pasture; 70s from meadows.


Notes:
Population: 4 smallholders above 5 in text marked for deletion.


Notes:
Ploughlands: apart from the 6 hides, land for 2 ploughs in lordship, assumed to be new land.


Notes:
Ploughlands: apart from these hides, land for 2 ploughs in lordship, assumed to be new land. Payments: 8s from fisheries.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 4,4-5, valuation recorded here.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 4,4-5, valuation recorded in 4,4.


Notes:
Ploughlands: Land for 2 ploughs in lordship, as well as the said hides, assumed to be new land.


Notes:
Ploughlands: Ploughlands: Land for 3 ploughs in lordship, besides these hides, assumed to be new land.


Notes:
Ploughlands: Land for 3 ploughs in lordship, besides the said hides, assumed to be new land.


Notes:
Ploughlands: Land for 2 ploughs in lordship, besides the said hides, assumed to be new land.


Notes:
Ploughlands: Land for 3 ploughs in lordship, as well as the said hides, assumed to be new land.


Notes:
Ploughlands: land in lordship for 2 ploughs, assumed to be new land.


Notes:
Ploughlands: Land for 4 ploughs in lordship, as well as the said hides, assumed to be new land.


Notes:
Ploughlands: 2 ploughs (car') in lordship, assumed to be new land.


Notes:
Waste: of these 10 hides one is waste, on account of the King's woodland.


Notes:
Population: blank in manuscript after smallholders.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 7,6-7, valuation recorded here.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 7,6-7, valuation recorded in 7,6.


Notes:
Values: recorded only for 1086 but evidently customary dues so attributed to 1066 also.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 8,2-3, valuation recorded here. Land for 2 ploughs in lordship, besides these 5 hides, assumed to be new land. Payments: 1 fishery, 500 eels [and] 5s.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 8,2-3, valuation recorded in 8,2.


Notes:
Duplicates: 3 1/2 hides duplicated in 1,4.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 13,1-2, valuation recorded here.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 13,1-2, valuation recorded in 13,1.


Notes:
Waste: no recorded resources but valued at 2s.


Notes:
Payments: fishery, 1000 eels; 3 presentations a year, value 49d.


Notes:
Ploughlands: Land for 2 ploughs in lordship, apart from the said hides, assumed to be new land.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 20,5-6, valuation of main holding recorded in 20,6.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 20,5-6, valuation recorded here.


Woodland:
0.5 league * 0.5 league 1 furlong & 0.5 league * 3 furlongs


Notes:
Geld: lies in Bedfordshire but pays tax in Huntingdonshire.


Notes:
Geld: he also has 1 hide taxable under the king, presumably acquired from another predecessor.


Notes:
Geld: answered for a Half-Hundred before 1066 and now but never assessed in hides except for 1. Duplicates: 1 church duplicated in 4,9.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 1,1a-1b, valuation recorded here. Geld: 1,1a-c totals 47. Payments: wheat; honey; Queen, 2 gold ounces (assumed to be approximately £8, after Baring); pack-horse; dog dues, 70s; increase, 100s by weight and 40s white silver.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 1,1a-1b, valuation recorded in 1,1a. Geld: 47 hides is the total of 1,1a-1c.


Notes:
Geld: 47 hides is the total of 1,1a-1c. Duplicates: 1 church duplicated in 4,9.


Notes:
Geld: 5 of 30 hides for the church in 1,2b; other 5 in Biscot (1,5). Payments: wheat; honey; Queen, 4 gold ounces (£16, after Baring); pack-horse, etc, 70s; dog dues, £6 10s; increase, £9; sheriff, 1 gold ounce; dues 10s 8d; toll & market, 100s.


Notes:
Geld: the other 3 hides of Houghton in 1086 are recorded in 1,4, for Sewell. Payments: wheat; honey; Queen, 2 gold ounces (£8, after Baring); pack-horse, 65s; dog dues, 65s; increase, 100s by weight; sheriff, 1 gold ounce; 20s white silver.


Notes:
Population: unspecified number of villagers.


Notes:
Ploughlands: manuscript details obscured; 5 ploughlands (recorded here) probably intended.


Notes:
Population and ploughteams: unspecified number of villagers holding ploughs.


Notes:
Duplicates: churches duplicated in B1 and 1,1c.


Notes:
Payments: 1 broken mill which pays nothing.


Notes:
Geld: In lordship 1 carucate of land, as well as the 2 hides and the virgate, assumed to be new land.


Notes:
Ploughlands: 5 implied; not recorded here.


Notes:
Ploughlands: 10 carucates in lordship, assumed to be new land.


Notes:
Landowners: blank in manuscript for 1066 owners.


Notes:
Geld: 15 hides 1066 but answered for 10 post-Conquest; the 5 hides are held by men who keep the king's customary dues.


Notes:
Shared statistics: shared with HRT 40,1. Geld: 3.5 hides duplicated there, not recorded here. Ploughlands: not recorded in Hertfordshire so included here. Duplicates: 3 hides 1 virgate duplicated in HRT 40,1.


Notes:
Population: 47 are left, translated as 47 residences but 47 burgesses assumed.


Notes:
Values: £30 may be error for £300 (see EHR 2002, pp. 259-61). Payments: dogs, £42; Queen, £10.3; hawk, £10; £1 each packhorse, a hunter and alms; £40 for Queen's manor (1,32), £10 for King's Cliffe (1,26), last two recorded in entries.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 1,2a-2g, valuation and population recorded in 1,2g.


Notes:
Values: king ought to have £9 12s from the other income of the borough. Geld: assessment given in carucates.


Notes:
Values: the smiths paid £7 before 1066 (no smiths in 1086). Payments: Freemen, 30s; woodland, £3, when stocked; honey, 4s.


Notes:
Geld: Freeman's 0.6 hide assumed to be additional. Payments: Freeman, 5s.


Notes:
Ploughlands: inland, 2 ploughs; for the men, land for 5 ploughs, assumed to be new land. Payments: meadow, 20s; market, 20s.


Notes:
Geld: 1.7 + 0.875 hides. Inland for 4 ploughs where Land for formulae expected, assumed to be new land; Hart counts as ploughteams.


Notes:
Ploughlands: Land for 4 ploughs besides the inland.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 1,13a-13e, valuation recorded in 1,13e.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 1,13a-13e, valuation recorded here.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 1,15a-15l, valuation of manor, plus teamlands and population of dependencies recorded in 1,15l.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 1,15a-15l, valuation of manor, plus teamlands and population of dependencies recorded here.


Notes:
Payments: woodland which paid £5 now in royal Forest.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 1,20-21;23, valuation possibly recorded here. Duplicates: £13.35 of 1066 valuation possibly duplicated in 1,20..


Notes:
Shared statistics: 1,20-21;23, valuation possibly recorded in 1,20.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 1,20-21;23, valuation possibly recorded in 1,20. Duplicates: £13.35 possibly duplicated in 1,20.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 1,24-25, valuation for 1086 recorded in 1,25.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 1,24-25, valuation for 1086 recorded here.


Notes:
Geld: total 27, but particulars disagree (27. 5; rq by scribe); distributed in 6 Hundreds, for which a breakdown is given. Payments: Freemen, £8 10d.


Notes:
Geld: figure blotted, possibly 2 hides. Waste: no recorded resources.


Notes:
Landowners: no 1066 landholder recorded; King Edward (1,8)?


Notes:
Shared statistics: 4,5-6, valuation recorded here.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 4,5-6, valuation recorded in 4,5.


Notes:
Ploughteams: Farley has 2 (not 11) men's ploughs, followed by VCH and possibly by Darby.


Notes:
Ploughlands: there were 30 ploughs before 1066. Land for 12 ploughs; 12 recorded here.


Notes:
Ploughlands: Land for 16 ploughs. Before 1066 there were 30 there; 16 recorded here.


Notes:
Ploughlands: land for 6 ploughs; before 1066 there were 12; 6 recorded here.


Notes:
Geld: Geoffrey's virgate assumed to be additional (Hart says not). Population: second group of villagers assumed to be additional, not a scribal error.


Notes:
Duplicates: Hart suggests on basis of the Northamptonshire Survey that entry is a duplicate of 2 1/2 virgate holding in 18,4; differences, however, are significant.


Notes:
Duplicates: Hart suggests on basis of the Northamptonshire Survey that the 2 1/2 virgate holding is a duplicate of 18,2; differences, however, are significant.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 18,7-8, valuation possibly recorded here.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 18,7-8, valuation possibly recorded in 18,7. No 1066 landowner recorded.


Notes:
Population and ploughteams: 1 smallholder only interpreted as no other population and no ploughteams.


Notes:
Ploughteams: could be 3 or 3.5; 3 recorded here.


Notes:
Population: 2 villagers, assumed to be additional to 8.


Notes:
Population: 8 smallholders assumed to be additional to other 9.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 30,17;19; all statistics recorded here.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 30,17;19; all statistics recorded in 30,17.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 35,1a-1j, valuation recorded in 35,1j.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 35,3a-3g, valuation recorded in 35,3g.


Notes:
Geld: 1/2 hide less a fifth part [of a hide or 1/2 hide?].


Notes:
Geld: 1 waste virgate pays tax in Arthingworth; included here.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 35,19a-h, valuation recorded in 35,19h.


Notes:
Geld: 1.5 hides and 2 carucates, assumed to be new land; Hart states that 2 carucates equal 1/2 virgate; Darby suggests a scribal error.


Notes:
Duplicates: entry duplicated in LEC 27,4.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 44,1a-1c, valuation recorded in 44,1,c.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 47,1a-c, valuation recorded in 47,1c.


Notes:
Ploughteams: 3 cattle recorded as plough oxen.


Notes:
Other population: some men; recorded as 2.


Notes:
Payments: woodland, 10s when stocked and the King is not hunting in it.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 56,12-14, valuation recorded in 56,14.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 56,15-18;53, valuation for 56,53 recorded in 56,16.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 56,15-18;53, valuation for 56,53 recorded here.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 56,20a-k, valuation recorded in 56,20k.


Notes:
Values: Freeman pays £0.1375, recorded as valuation.


Woodland:
1 furlong & 11 perches * 1 furlong less 7 perches


Notes:
Shared statistics: 56,57a-h, valuation recorded in 56,57h.


Notes:
Values: Leicester paid to the King £30 a year before 1066 at face value, at 20 [pence] to the {ora}, and 15 sesters of honey.


Notes:
Values: a hawk, £10 at face value; a packhorse, 20s.


Notes:
Values: from the moneyers, £20 a year at 20 [pence] to the {ora}; of these £20 Hugh of Grandmesnil has the third penny.


Notes:
Entries: the woodland of the whole sheriffdom, called Hereswode.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 1,1a-c, valuation recorded in 1c.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 1,1a-c, valuation recorded here.


Woodland:
3 * 3 furlongs & 5 acres; 1 * 0.5 league & 4 * 3 furlongs

Notes:
Values: between all of them, they pay £31 8s 1d.


Notes:
Duplicates: 2 carucates duplicated in 15,2; and possibly 1 1/2 carucates in 13,53. Values: they pay 150s 18d.


Notes:
Geld: 1 hide less 1 carucate; 1 hide assumed to equal 18 carucates.


Notes:
Geld: 1 hide assumed to equal 18 carucates.


Notes:
Geld: 2.5 hides and 4 carucates; 1 hide assumed to equal 18 carucates.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 2,1-2, valuation recorded in 2,2. The layout of the manuscript suggests that entry 2,2 is a subset of 2,1 so the 3 carucates are part of the 13, not additional to it.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 2,1-2, valuation recorded here. The layout of the manuscript suggests that entry 2,2 is a subset of 2,1 so the 3 carucates are part of the 13 in 2,1, not additional to it.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 2,3-4, valuation recorded in 2,4. The layout of the manuscript suggests that entry 2,4 is a subset of 2,3 so the 3 carucates are part of the 8 in 2,3, not additional to it.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 2,3-4, valuation recorded here. The layout of the manuscript suggests that entry 2,4 is a subset of 2,3 so the 3 carucates are part of the 8 in 2,3, not additional to it.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 3,1-3, valuation recorded in 3,3.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 3,1-3, valuation recorded in 3,3. Geld: 1 hide assumed to equal 18 carucates.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 3,1-3, valuation recorded here.


Notes:
Geld: 1.25 hides equals 22.5 carucates; carucates not additional to hides.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 6,3-4, valuation recorded here.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 6,3-4, valuation recorded here. Duplicates: 1 carucate probably duplicated in 13,9. Entries, possibly intended as a single entry, the 8 Freemen and 5 ploughs are in Barwell, the resources for Stapleton in 6,3.


Notes:
Geld: 1 hide assumed to equal 18 carucates. Duplicates: 4 carucates probably duplicated in 44,2 as land for four ploughs.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 9,3-4, valuation possibly recorded here.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 9,3-4, valuation possibly recorded in 9,4.


Notes:
Geld: 2 parts of 1 hide; 1 hide assumed to equal 18 carucates.


Notes:
Geld: 1 hide and the third part of 1 hide; 1 hide assumed to equal 18 carucates. Other population: 1 cleric, 2 men-at-arms, 4 Frenchmen have 8 ploughs.


Notes:
Geld: 2 carucates of the jurisdiction are in Bromkinsthorpe, 3 in Desford, 0.5 in Glenfield, 0.5 in Braunstone, totalling 6, not 5.625.


Notes:
Duplicates: 1 carucate probably duplicated in 6,4.


Notes:
Values: was 40s, now 5 ounces of gold (assumed to be approximately £20, after Baring).


Notes:
Geld: 2 carucates probably a mistake for 6 carucates.


Notes:
Other population: 1 man-at-arms, 3 Frenchmen.


Notes:
Duplicates: 1 1/2 carucates possibly duplicated in 1,4.


Notes:
Values: was 10s, now 3 ounces of gold (£12, after Baring).


Notes:
Shared statistics: 14,1;4, valuation recorded here.


Notes:
Ploughteams: blank in manuscript: probably for lordship ploughs or slaves.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 14,1;4, valuation recorded in 14,1.


Notes:
Geld: Edmondthorpe and Wymondham contain 27.5 carucates.


Notes:
Waste: no recorded resources but valued at 8d.


Notes:
Entries: blank in manuscript probably for head of manor.


Notes:
Duplicates: 2 carucates duplicated in 1,4.


Notes:
Other population: 1 man-at arms, 4 Frenchmen.


Notes:
Entries: blank in manuscript for location, possibly Hose.


Notes:
Entries: ploughs and population between them all but some [of them] have nothing.


Notes:
Entries: blank in manuscript in first line for uncertain purpose.


Notes:
Population: Ulf holds with an unspecified number of men.


Notes:
Geld: of the said 8 carucates: these are not recorded anywhere else; total for 17,12-14 is 7.875.


Notes:
Waste: no recorded resources but valued at 4d.


Notes:
Waste: no recorded resources but valued at 12d.


Notes:
Geld: 2 hides and 3 carucates; 1 hide assumed to equal 18 carucates.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 19,6;8-9, geld. Geld: the jurisdiction of 2 carucates of these belongs to the above-written village, interpreted as Shackerstone.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 24,1-2, valuation recorded here.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 24,1-2, valuation recorded in 24,2.


Notes:
Geld: 0.5 hide; 1 hide assumed to equal 18 carucates.


Notes:
Geld: 0.5 hide and 3 bovates; 1 hide assumed to equal 18 carucates.


Notes:
Duplicates: entry duplicated in NTH 37,1.


Notes:
Geld: 1 hide equals 14.5 carucates in this entry. Payments: market, 20s.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 32,1-2, valuation recorded in 32,2; value of these two lands was 8s; now 20s.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 32,1-2, valuation recorded here.


Notes:
Waste: no recorded resources except meadow.


Notes:
Geld: 2 parts of 1 hide 'that is 12 carucates'; 1 hide assumed to equal 18 carucates.


Notes:
Values: 'was' equates to 1066 here. Geld: '3 hides' in manuscript, but in error for carucates. Blank in manuscript end of first line, possibly for Wapentake head.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 40,2-3, valuation recorded in 40,3.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 40,2-3, valuation recorded here.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 42,5-6, valuation recorded in 42,6.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 42,5-6, valuation recorded here. Blank in manuscript.


Notes:
Ploughteams: 6 cattle interpreted as plough oxen. Values: Farley error of 5s for 4s.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 43,1-6; ploughlands and valuation recorded in 43,6.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 43,1-6; ploughlands and valuation recorded in 43,6. Jurisdiction in Hugh's manor at Loughborough 43,2, but head of manor given as Barrow on Soar because of shared statistics. Geld: 1 hide probably an error for carucate.


Notes:
Geld: missing, supllied from 13th century abbreviated version, as is the place-name. Ploughlands: blank in manuscript after 0.5 plough, probably for in lordship.


Notes:
Ploughlands: land for 1 plough assumed to be new land.


Notes:
Duplicates: 4 carucates probably duplicated in 44,2 as land for four ploughs. Payments: water-meadow, 2s.


Notes:
Geld: 0.5 hide and 1.5 carucates; 1 hide assumed to equal 18 carucates.


Notes:
Geld: 0.5 hide and 1 carucate; 1 hide assumed to equal 18 carucates.


Notes:
Geld: 2 parts of 1 hide, that is 12 carucates of land.


Notes:
Geld: manuscript blotted but 2 carucates can be read.


Notes:
Payments: £23 (dogs); £1 (packhorse); £10 (hawk); £5 (queen); 1086 honey recorded in B5; before 1066, £24.4 for all that belonged to the honey.


Notes:
Payments: besides this, it pays 24 sesters of honey, with the larger measure, and from the Borough 6 sesters of honey, that is, a sester at 15 pence. Of these, the Count of Meulan has 6 sesters and 5s.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 1,1-2, valuation possibly recorded here. Payments: 20 packloads of salt. Valuation includes 1,2.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 1,1-2, valuation possibly recorded in 1,2.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 1,3-5;8-9, valuation possibly included in B4.


Notes:
Values: includes the earl's Third Penny. Population: 100 of 106 of smallholders, with gardens, outside Warwick. Payments: from meadow and pasture and smallholders.


Notes:
Payments: woodland, 30s, when exploited.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 1,3-5;8-9, valuation possibly included in B4. Population: '10 villagers and smallholders' counted as 5 of each. Ploughlands: none recorded; perhaps included in Stoneleigh.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 1,3-5;8-9, valuation possibly included in B4. Ploughlands: none recorded; perhaps included in Stoneleigh.


Notes:
Shared statistics: all statistics recorded here; memorandum on the pre-Conquest history of the lordship of the estate in 3,3. Payments: 3 mills, 40s and 1012 sticks of eels; in Warwick 4 houses, 16d.


Notes:
Shared statistics: all statistics recorded in 3,3; memorandum on the pre-Conquest history of the lordship of the estate here.


Notes:
Duplicates: entry duplicated in 44,12 with differences of detail.


Notes:
Payments: mill, 10s and 10 sticks of eels.


Notes:
Values: 10s assumed to be the 1066 valuation. Payments: woodland, 10s, when exploited.


Notes:
Duplicates: amplifies information of claim to church in 14,2.


Notes:
Payments: mill, 20s, 4 packloads of salt and 1000 eels.


Notes:
Payments: mill, 10s and 20 sticks of eels.


Notes:
The entire fief was in the king's hands in 1086, in the 'charge' of Geoffrey of la Guerche, as noted in the final entry on the fief.


Notes:
The entire fief was in the king's hands in 1086, in the 'charge' of Geoffrey of la Guerche, as noted in the final entry on the fief. Duplicates: claim to church, amplified in 6,9.


Notes:
The entire fief was in the king's hands in 1086, in the 'charge' of Geoffrey of la Guerche, as noted in this entry.


Notes:
Waste: no recorded resources but when exploited, value 10s; assumed to be currently without value.


Notes:
Geld: marginal 5 possibly querying the hidage.


Notes:
Payments: woodland, 10s, when exploited.


Notes:
Waste: no significant resources but valued at 5s. Payments: woodland, 10s now and in 1066.


Notes:
Entries: belongs to the manor of Stoneleigh (not recorded). Ploughlands: none recorded, perhaps included with missing manor of Stoneleigh.


Notes:
Entries: resources included in the count's manor of Warmington (16,6); what this man-at-arms has there is enumerated with the stock of the men who are in the Count's manor.


Notes:
Ploughlands: none; perhaps included with Ilmington.


Notes:
Ploughlands: none recorded, perhaps included with Whitchurch.


Notes:
Payments: woodland, 20s, when exploited.


Notes:
Duplicates: entry duplicated in 23,4 and 44,15, with some discrepancies.


Notes:
Ploughteams: Land for 2 ploughs. However, 3 ploughs are there.


Notes:
Waste: no recorded resources other than a small amount of meadow; now it pays nothing.


Notes:
Other population: 5 men-at-arms are English.


Notes:
Other population: 2 Frenchmen. Payments: 2 burgesses in Warwick, 16d.


Notes:
Other population: 1 Frenchmen, 3 thanes.


Notes:
Other population: 1 man-at-arms, 2 thanes.


Notes:
Payments: 2 mills, 11s and 8 sticks of eels.


Notes:
Duplicates: entry duplicated in 17,15 (see also 44,15).


Notes:
Values: 1066 figure unclear in manuscript; probably 3 but could be 4.


Notes:
Ploughteams: In lordship land for 6 ploughs, but the ploughs are not there.


Notes:
Waste possibly implied: woodland is within the King's Enclosure.


Notes:
Duplicates: entry duplicated in STS 12,22, which supplies the name of the Countess. Waste: 1 virgate, apparently of woodland, in Bushbury.


Notes:
Payments: part of a mill, 4 packloads of corn and 8 sticks of eels; from Droitwich 3 packloads of salt. Mills: 1 part of a mill, recorded as 0.5.


Notes:
Geld: marginal 2.5 possibly querying the hidage. Payments: a salt-house which pays 19 packloads of salt.


Notes:
Geld: marginal 5v possibly querying the hidage. Payments: house in Warwick.


Notes:
Geld: marginal 2 1/2 v, possibly querying the hidage. Payments: from house in Warwick.


Notes:
Geld: marginal '1 1/4' probably a contemporary scribal amendment to stated hidage of 1/2 hide and the fourth part of 1 hide.


Notes:
Geld: marginal 7 possibly querying the hidage, suggesting it should be halved.


Notes:
Geld: marginal 4 possibly querying the hidage.


Notes:
Geld: marginal 2 possibly querying the hidage.


Notes:
Geld: marginal 7 possibly querying the hidage.


Notes:
Other population: 9 Flemings. Payments: mill, 8s and 5 sticks of eels.


Notes:
Payments: mill, 2s and 13 sticks of eels.


Notes:
Payments: salt-house, 4s and 2 packloads of salt; 2 Frenchmen and 1 burgess, 7s 5d [each]. Population: 5 slaves, male and female, divided 3:2.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 42,1-2, valuation recorded here. Payments: woodland, 12s, when exploited.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 42,1-2, valuation recorded in 42,1. When exploited, value £3. No recorded ploughlands; perhaps included with 44,1.


Notes:
Values: when the King gave it to Christina it paid £36.


Notes:
Duplicates: entry duplicated in 3,7 with differences of detail.


Notes:
Waste: no recorded resources. 1066 ownership not recorded.


Notes:
Duplicates: entry duplicated in 17,15 (see also 23,4).


Notes:
Values: 'STAFFORD paid £9 of pence from all customary dues; two parts were the King's, the third the Earl's. Now King William has £7, his part and the Earl's together. Robert (of Stafford) has half the King's own part, by the King's gift, as he says'.


Notes:
Ploughlands: none recorded; possibly included with 1,2.


Notes:
Waste possibly implied: before 1066 it paid nothing.


Notes:
Duplicates: valuation duplicated in WOR 1,4.


Notes:
Waste: all this land of the King's is waste; no recorded resources.


Notes:
Waste: all this land of the King's is waste; no recorded resources. Ploughlands: land for 2, or 3, ploughs; 2 recorded here.


Notes:
Waste: all this land of the King's is waste; no recorded resources. Ploughlands: land for 2, or 1, ploughs; 2 recorded here.


Notes:
Waste: all this land of the King's is waste; no recorded resources. Ploughlands: land for 1, or 2, ploughs; 1 recorded here.


Notes:
Waste: all this land of the King's is waste, 1,33 -64.


Notes:
Population: 4 smallholders and their ploughteams assumed to belong to the manor rather than the dependency.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 2,5;9, valuation recorded here.


Notes:
Ploughlands: none recorded; possibly included with 2,5.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 2,5;9, valuation recorded in 2,9.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 2,10;21, various statistics shared.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 2,10;21, various statistics shared. Waste: no recorded resources.


Woodland:
8.5 leagues & 7 furlongs * 6.5 leagues & 8 furlongs

Notes:
Shared statistics: 2,16;22, all statistics shared; holding split between 2,16 and 2,22. Ploughlands: carucates, assumed to be new land.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 2,16;22, all statistics shared; holding split between 2,16 and 2,22.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 7,1-12, total annual valuation recorded in 7,12. Land for 3 ploughs. Ploughlands: before 1066, 8 [demesne] ploughs; now 10; ploughlands recorded as 3.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 7,1-12, total annual valuation recorded in 7,12.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 7,1-12, total annual valuation (if any) recorded in 7,12. Waste: 'because of the King's forest. Half of the woodland in the Forest belonged there'.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 7,1-12, total annual valuation (if any) recorded in 7,12. Waste: no recorded resources.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 7,1-12, total annual valuation recorded here.


Notes:
Other population: 1 man-at-arms, 1 Englishman.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 8,15-16, valuation recorded here.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 8,15-16, valuation recorded in 8,15. No recorded ploughlands, perhaps included in Colton (8,15).


Notes:
Waste: it was and is waste: no recorded resources other than meadow and woodland valued at 20s.


Notes:
Payments: in Stafford, 1 unoccupied messuage.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 8,28-29, valuation possibly recorded in 8,29; but is is possible that the valuation here has been omitted in error.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 8,28-29, valuation possibly recorded here.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 8,30-31, valuation recorded in 8,31.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 8,30-31, valuation recorded here. Ploughlands: none recorded, perhaps included in 8,30.


Notes:
Population: 42 men who live only by their trading have been recorded as burgesses. Values: payment of £4 10s recorded as valuation.


Notes:
Ploughlands: woodland pasture and arable land 2 leagues long and 1 wide.


Notes:
Geld: 1 hide there interpreted as the two half hides in 10,6-7.


Notes:
Payments: In the Borough of Stafford, Robert has 70s from his half of the king's part.


Notes:
Geld: 3 hides; carucate, assumed to be new land.


Notes:
Population: blank in manuscript interpreted as slaves.


Notes:
Landowners: Wulfgeat and Alfward named as pre-Conquest holders, whether in error, or shared ownership, overlordship of one over the other, or a mistaken reference to Wulfgeat as 1086 tenant (although the verb is clearly in the past tense).


Notes:
Geld: 0.75 equals 1 virgate and 1/2 carucate. A half of Stoke [-on-Trent] church, with 1/2 carucate of land.


Notes:
Ploughlands: carucate assumed to be new land.


Notes:
Waste: no recorded resources except woodland.


Notes:
Duplicates: entry duplicated in WAR 27,6.


Notes:
Waste: no recorded resources except for a small wood.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 17,1-4, valuation, recorded in 17,4, allocated here in proportion to their geld.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 17,1-4, valuation, recorded here, allocated in 17,1-3 in proportion to their geld.


Notes:
Geld: 1 carucate of land, assumed to be new land.


Notes:
Ploughlands: carucates, assumed to be new land.


Notes:
Values: in the year preceding this survey it paid £40 to Earl Roger.


Notes:
Geld: the City paid tax on 100 hides before 1066. Duplicates: 2 hides duplicated in 3g,2.


Notes:
Payments: 16 messuages, 10 empty but the remaining 6 paid 4s 7d.


Notes:
Geld: 16 canons of St Chad of Shrewsbury in 1066, exempt from tax, payments to the bishop unknown.


Notes:
Other population: 8 ploughmen, 3 men who plough. Payments: 10s from men who plough.


Notes:
Payments: mills and burgesses, £12. Values: payments recorded as valuation.


Notes:
Values: intermediate valuation assumed to apply to 1086. Payments: 2 fisheries; one pays 16s, the other is for the monks supplies.


Notes:
Geld: 4 hides were exempt from tax in King Knut's time; the others paid tax.


Notes:
Population: 8 men both free (men) and villagers divided equally.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 3d,6-7, ploughlands possibly recorded in 3d,7.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 3d,6-7, ploughlands possibly recorded here.


Notes:
Waste implied: no significant resources. Payments: 1 man, a bundle of box wood on Palm Sunday.


Notes:
Other population: 3 Frenchmen, 4 ploughmen.


Notes:
Other population: 2 riders, 6 ploughmen.


Notes:
Other population: 3 riders, 10 ploughmen.


Notes:
Values: 18s payment included in the valuation.


Notes:
Other population: 5 men-at-arms, 1 rider, 2 Welshmen, 6 ploughmen. Waste: was waste except for 2 hides; waste land there [in woodland] for 31 ploughs. Payments: Welshmen, 16s.


Notes:
Values: under King Aethelred 4,1,10-12 paid half a night's farm. Geld: blank in manuscripts where hidage should be. Other population: 8 ploughmen, 1 reeve.


Notes:
Values: under King Aethelred 4,1,10-12 paid half a night's farm. Other population: 10 Welshmen, 4 ploughmen.


Notes:
Values: under King Aethelred 4,1,10-12 paid half a night's farm. Payments: some Welshmen, 20s.


Notes:
Other population: 6 riders, 1 reeve. Payments: mill, 1 pig.


Notes:
Values: £2 from Wales; Earl Roger has £6 from one district of Wales which belongs to this castlery.


Notes:
Other population: 6 Welshmen, 10 ploughmen. Payments: Welshmen, 20s.


Notes:
Payments: 2 mills, 12 packloads of corn; a fishery, 1502 large eels; 18 ora customary due to the Countess.


Notes:
Other population: 2 Frenchmen, 12 ploughmen.


Notes:
Payments: mill, 5 packloads of corn; 5 salt-houses in Droitwich, 20s.


Notes:
Payments: a new house; a borough called Quatford which pays nothing.


Notes:
Duplicates: entry duplicated in 4,27,14.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 4,1,35-36, geld. Geld: total for both entries 52.5 hides, possibly an error for 50.5 hides. Waste: no recorded resources.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 4,1,35-36, geld. Geld: total for both entries 52.5 hides, possibly an error for 50.5 hides.


Notes:
Geld: 2 hides saves his [Earl Roger's] land, which is inland, from tax.


Notes:
Payments: a fishery on the Severn, nothing; a small wood, 5d.


Notes:
Other population: 1 Frenchman, 6 ploughmen.


Notes:
Other population: 1 smith, 1 Frenchman, 4 ploughmen.


Notes:
Payments: a fishery which pays what it can.


Notes:
Population: 7 slaves, male and female, divided 4:3.


Notes:
Population: 5 slaves, male and female, divided 3:2.


Notes:
Other population: 2 Welshmen, 1 Frenchman, 2 men.


Notes:
Values: Welshman pays 5s, recorded as valuation.


Notes:
Values: Welshmen pay 32d, recorded as valuation.


Notes:
Other population: 4 ploughmen, 4 Welshmen. Payments: Welshmen, 4s.


Notes:
Other population: 8 Welshmen, 2 ploughmen.


Notes:
Values: from one district, 60s in revenue; from the other, 8 cows from the Welshmen.


Notes:
Other population: 1 Frenchman, 1 rider. Payments: 1 mill, 3 measures of wheat.


Notes:
Population: no men there but he has 20s from it.


Notes:
Population: 4 slaves, male and female, divided equally.


Notes:
Geld: 2 hides which do not pay tax. Other population: 1 rider, 1 Frenchman.


Notes:
Other population: 2 Frenchmen, 2 ploughmen.


Notes:
Other population: 1 free ploughman, 1 rider.


Notes:
Payments: mill that only grinds in winter.


Notes:
Waste: no significant resources but pays 12d.


Notes:
Other population: 3 ploughmen, 3 riders. Payments: mills, 3 packloads of wheat.


Notes:
Waste: the land of 4 of the 6 thanes was waste, presumably in 1066 as well as intermediate date. Values: riders pay 20s, recorded as the valuation.


Notes:
Payments: 4 fisheries, 13s 4d. Values: 1086 value £4 and 1000 eels.


Notes:
Other population: 1 rider, 2 ploughmen. Payments: mill, 8 packloads of corn.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 4,8,7-8, valuation for 1086 for both recorded here. Other population: 3 riders, 1 Frenchman.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 4,8,7-8, valuation for 1086 in 4,8,7. Values: 'was' recorded here.


Notes:
Waste: 1 villager and 2 slaves have nothing.


Notes:
Other population: 1 rider, 4 ploughmen. Payments: mill, 400 eels.


Notes:
Payments: 4 packloads of salt from Droitwich.


Notes:
Duplicates: entry duplicated in 4,27,30. Values: Freeman pays 16d, recorded as valuation.


Notes:
Waste: now almost waste; 5 smallholders have nothing.


Notes:
Values: 3 free men paying 7s a year, recorded as valuation.


Notes:
Payments: 5 fisheries in the dues on the villagers.


Notes:
Payments: mill with 2 fisheries, 5s and 64 sticks of eels.


Notes:
Other population: 3 ploughmen, 1 smith, 1 rider.


Notes:
Other population: 6 Welshmen, 2 riders, 2 ploughmen. Payments: 2 riders, 2 cattle in dues.


Notes:
Other population: 1 ploughman, 1 Frenchman.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 4,23,7-8, valuation (if any) possibly recorded in 4,23,8. Waste: intermediate waste recorded in 4,23,8.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 4,23,7-8, valuation possibly recorded here.


Notes:
Values: 1 man who pays 6s, recorded as valuation.


Notes:
Duplicates: entry duplicated in 4,1,34, with additional information here.


Notes:
Duplicates: entry duplicated in 4,12,1. Values: 1 free man pays 16d in revenue, recorded as valuation.


Notes:
Waste possibly implied: no significant resources. Values: blank in manuscript.


Notes:
Duplicates: 1 hide and 3 virgates duplicated in HEF 1,10a.


Notes:
Other population: 7 freedmen, 3 riders. Payments: 12 packloads of corn.


Notes:
Other population: 2 men-at-arms, 1 rider.


Notes:
Duplicates: 1/2 hide possibly duplicated in HEF 24,3.


Notes:
Geld: never paid tax; not hidated. Payments: a measure of corn.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 6,2-4, valuation recorded here. Payments: mills, 2 packloads of corn; woodland for fattening 500 pigs, 40s.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 6,2-4, valuation recorded in 6,2.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 6,2-4, valuation recorded in 6,2. Duplicates: entry duplicated in 7,2.


Notes:
Other population: 1 Frenchman, 2 riders.


Notes:
Other population: 6 ploughmen, 1 reeve, 2 riders, 2 men. Payments: 4s.


Notes:
Values: 1 free man pays 8s, recorded as valuation.


Notes:
Duplicates: entry duplicated in 4,11,1, with additional information here.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 7,1-2, valuation recorded here.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 7,1-2, valuation recorded in 7,1. Duplicates: entry duplicated in 6,4.


Notes:
Population: 28 male and female slaves, divided equally; 3 half-villagers. Other population: 6 Cottagers, 3 riding men, 4 servants, 2 smiths. St Peters of Hereford has 1 villager. Ploughlands: land for 3 ploughs assumed to be new land.


Notes:
Ploughteams: lords' ploughs are 1066 ploughs, and possibly all other statistics are for 1066. Population: 16 male and female slaves, divided equally. Other population: 9 female cottagers, 1 miller, 1 beekeeper. Payments: mill, 9 packloads of wheat.


Notes:
Population: 8 male and female slaves divided equally.


Notes:
Geld: the City paid tax on 50 hides before 1066.


Notes:
Payments: Chester paid £45 of farm and 3 timbers of marten pelts; one third to the earl, two thirds to the king.


Notes:
Payments: £70 and one gold mark (£6) from Chester, and £50 and 1 gold mark from the earl's pleas except in Englefield.


Notes:
Shared statistics: B6-7. Values: 1066 valuation only.


Notes:
Ploughteams: 1 smallholder with 1; ploughteam assumed.


Notes:
Geld: 3 hides in the forest. Payments: there were 7 salt-houses which belonged to this manor; one of them now pays salt to the hall; the others are disused; 1/2 fishery. Waste: whole manor waste when received; 1 virgate waste in 1086.


Notes:
Waste: intermediate waste in the Forest; waste implied: no 1086 value.


Notes:
Payments: 1/2 salt-house in Nantwich that serves the hall; 2 1/2 fisheries.


Notes:
Waste: no recorded resources; now in the Forest.


Notes:
Other population: 7 riders, 2 Frenchmen.


Notes:
Waste: was waste; now a man ploughs it. Ploughteams: none recorded. Values: man pays 2s, recorded as valuation.


Notes:
Waste: no recorded resources; all waste.


Notes:
Population: 1 man-at-arms, the other is counted as a tenant.


Notes:
Other population: 3 Frenchmen, 1 rider. Values: 1066 valuation 12 ora, assumed to be 16d each.


Notes:
Other population: 4 riders, 1 reeve, 1 smith, 1 miller.


Notes:
Values: 1 man pays 12d, 1 smallholder 2s, recorded as 1086 valuation.


Notes:
Waste: 'was' assumed to refer to intermediate date. Values: 'was' assumed to refer to 1066.


Notes:
Ploughteams: 3 smallholders with 1 villager, possibly an error for 1 ploughteam.


Notes:
Other population: 1 Frenchman, 1 servant.


Notes:
Ploughteams: 1 villager and 1 smallholder have another; ploughteam assumed.


Notes:
Payments: 1 exempt house for salt-making in Nantwich.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 8,24-25. Values: 1066 valuation recorded in 8,25.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 8,24-25, 1066 valuation recorded here; 'now valuation assumed to be 10s [each].


Notes:
Ploughteams: 3 villagers have 1; ploughteam assumed.


Notes:
Geld: 1 bovate of land and a third part of a hide.


Notes:
Other population: 2 fishermen, 1 rider. Geld: 5 hides do not pay tax. Payments: 2 fishermen, 5s.


Notes:
Population: figure for smallholders ambiguous; 1 might be intended.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 16,1-2; value given in 16,2.


Notes:
Payments: 1 salt-house, 2s; another 1/2 salt-house, unoccupied.


Notes:
Waste: no recorded resources. Geld: 2 bovates.


Notes:
Waste implied: no significant resources.


Notes:
Waste implied: no recorded resources, no value. Geld: bovates.


Notes:
Waste: the land is waste; 3s from pasture.


Notes:
Duplicates: entry largely duplicated in 27,3; deleted by scribe.


Notes:
Duplicates: partially duplicated in 22,1.


Notes:
Waste: except for ploughs of the riders.


Notes:
Values: paid £21 in farm, including the pleas of the hundred.


Notes:
Payments: 12 burgesses, 9s 4d; 1 salt-house, 12d.


Notes:
Ploughteams: 2 villagers with 1 smallholder have 1/2; ploughteam assumed.


Notes:
Geld: total (20 hides) and particulars of FD1-9 (18.5833) disagree.


Notes:
Shared statistics: FT1,2-10, divided in proportion to ploughlands; waste.


Notes:
Payments: toll of the Borough at farm for 3s.


Notes:
Values: summary totals for data entered elsewhere for Rhuddlan and Englefield: Earl Hugh, £6 10s, Robert, £17 3s.


Notes:
Ploughteams: King Gruffydd had 7 ploughteams; none recorded for 1086 and assumed to be no longer there. Payments: every plough paid 200 loaves, a barrel of beer and a vessel of butter in 1066.


Notes:
Shared statistics: R1,1-45. Woodland in the Forest. Geld: 1 hide equals 6 carucates. Duplicates: Duplicates: 51.5 carucates of Roger's demesne holdings are duplicated among the entries R1,1-38: see note to R1,43.


Notes:
Shared statistics: R1,1-45. Geld: 1 hide equals 6 carucates. Duplicates: 51.5 carucates of Roger's demesne holdings are duplicated among the entries R1,1-38: see note to R1,43.


Notes:
Shared statistics: R1,1-45. Geld: 1 hide equals 6 carucates; 1 virgate and 0.5 carucate. Duplicates: 51.5 carucates of Roger's demesne holdings are duplicated among the entries R1,1-38: see note to R1,43.


Notes:
Shared statistics: R1,1-45. Duplicates: 51.5 carucates of Roger's demesne holdings are duplicated among the entries R1,1-38: see note to R1,43.


Notes:
Shared statistics: R1,1-45. Geld: thanes' carucates assumed to include that of priest. Duplicates: 51.5 carucates of Roger's demesne holdings are duplicated among the entries R1,1-38: see note to R1,43.


Notes:
Shared statistics: R1,1-45. 'This land was exempt apart from tax.' Duplicates: 51.5 carucates of Roger's demesne holdings are duplicated among the entries R1,1-38: see note to R1,43.


Notes:
Shared statistics: R1,1-45. Geld: bovates. Duplicates: 51.5 carucates of Roger's demesne holdings are duplicated among the entries R1,1-38: see note to R1,43.


Notes:
Waste: no recorded resources, 1086 waste implied. Duplicates: 51.5 carucates of Roger's demesne holdings are duplicated among the entries R1,1-38: see note to R1,43.


Notes:
Shared statistics: R1,1-45. Values: the manor of West Derby with the above hides paid £26 2s in 1066, 3 hides which paid £4 14s 8d had their dues remitted.


Woodland:
3.5 leagues * 1.5 leagues and 40 perches

Notes:
Shared statistics: R1,1-45. Geld: 1 hide is 6 carucates. Duplicates: the 1086 holdings duplicate carucates of thanes recorded in previous entries in W. Derby, the remaining 51.5 carucates (117.375 - 65.875) being retained in demesne by Roger.


Notes:
Shared statistics: R1,1-45. 'In each hide there are 6 carucates of land'.


Notes:
Shared statistics: R1,1-45. Value of the lordship for West Derby is £8.


Notes:
Shared statistics: R2,1-2. Geld: 1 hide equals 6 carucates; 2 carucates of church assumed to be included in 30 carucates.


Notes:
Shared statistics: R2,1-2. 5 carucates assumed to be included in the 5 hides of R2,1.


Notes:
Geld: 1 hide equals 6 carucates; ecclesiastical carucate assumed to be included in manorial total.


Notes:
Shared statistics: R4,1-2. Geld: 1 hide equals 6 carucates; 2.25 carucates of ecclesiastical land assumed to be included in manorial total; exemption from dues for 3 years.


Notes:
Shared statistics: R4,1-2. Geld: exemption from dues for 3 years.


Notes:
Shared statistics: R5,1-6. Waste: no recorded resources. Geld: 1 hide equals 6 carucates. Duplicates: 25 carucates of Roger's demesne holdings are duplicated among the entries R5,1-5; see note to R5,6.


Notes:
Shared statistics: R5,1-6. Geld: 1 hide equals 6 carucates. Church carucate assumed to be included in hides. Duplicates: 25 carucates of Roger's demesne holdings are duplicated among the entries R5,1-5; see note to R5,6.


Notes:
Shared statistics: R5,1-6 Geld: 1 hide equals 6 carucates. Duplicates: 25 carucates of Roger's demesne holdings are duplicated among the entries R5,1-5; see note to R5,6.


Notes:
Shared statistics: R5,1-6. Duplicates: 25 carucates of Roger's demesne holdings are duplicated among the entries R5,1-5; see note to R5,6.


Notes:
Shared statistics: R5,1-6. Geld: 1 hide equals 6 carucates. Duplicates: 25 carucates of Roger's demesne holdings are duplicated among the entries R5,1-5 (121.5 - 96.5).


Woodland:
2 * 1 leagues & 6 leagues * 3 leagues and 1 furlong

Notes:
Shared statistics: R6,1-5, valuation for 1066 recorded in R6,3; for 1086 in 6,4-5. Geld: 1 hide is 6 carucates. Duplicates: 17 carucates of Roger's demesne holdings (54-37) are probably duplicated among entries 6,1-5.


Notes:
Shared statistics: R6,1-5, valuation for 1066 recorded in R6,3; for 1086 in 6,4-5.


Notes:
Ploughteams: summary of earlier statistics, not recorded here. Duplicates: 79 hides for all 6 hundreds which is 474 carucates at 6 carucates to the hide, the total for South Lancashire once duplicates have been eliminated.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 1,1-8, valuation recorded here.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 1,1-8, valuation recorded in 1,1.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 1,1-8, valuation (if any) recorded in 1,1. Waste: no recorded resources.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 1,1-8, valuation (if any) recorded in 1,1. Waste possibly implied: no significant resources.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 1,12-15, valuation recorded in 1,15; but separate valuations for 1,11 are recorded here. Payments: 2 sesters of honey paid in 1066 but not apparently in 1086.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 1,12-15, valuation recorded in 1,15. Geld: 2 carucates untaxed.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 1,12-15, valuation recorded in 1,15.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 1,12-15, valuation for 1,12-15 are recorded here: £32 (and 6.5 sesters of honey) TRE and £40 (pure silver) TRW; but separate values are given for 1,11, leaving £30 and £36 (and 4.5 sesters of honey) between 1,12-15.


Notes:
Geld: total for the outliers (8.25) does not match particulars (7.8125); perhaps the scribe meant 8 carucates minus (rather than 'and') 2 bovates. Duplicates: 12.5 bovates probably duplicated in entry 10,26.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 1,20-24;26, valuation recorded here.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 1,20-24;26, valuation recorded in 1,20.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 1,20-24;26, valuation (if any) recorded in 1,20. Waste: no significant resources.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 1,27-29, valuation recorded in 1,29.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 1,27-29, valuation (if any) recorded in 1,29. 1 mill-site may imply some waste; Geld: 1 carucate untaxed.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 1,27-29, valuation recorded here: £30 plus 5.5 sesters of honey and 5 wagons of 50 lead sheets. William Peverel has charge for the king.


Notes:
Waste: all Longendale is waste, unpastured, fit for hunting.


Notes:
Duplicates: 2 carucates possibly duplicated in 7,13.


Notes:
Values: the scribe may have accidentally reversed the 1066 and 1086 values. Payments: 4 tributaries, 16s; a ferry, 13s 4d.


Notes:
Mills: 2 mill-sites may imply some waste.


Notes:
Duplicates: 12 bovates of Rodsley probably duplicated in 6,62.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 6,14-15, valuation possibly recorded here.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 6,14-15, valuation possibly recorded in 6,14.


Notes:
Waste: no significant resources but with some resources and value.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 6,27;48, valuation possibly recorded here. Resources for the jurisdiction of Hatton (6,48) assumed to be included here. Site of a second mill may imply some waste.


Notes:
Waste: no significant resources but valued at 11s.


Notes:
Payments: 5 tributaries, 5s; 2 Freemen, 5s.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 6,40-41, valuation possibly recorded here.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 6,40-41, valuation possibly recorded in 6,40.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 6,27;48, valuation possibly recorded in 6,27.


Notes:
Geld: 1 carucate in Roston assumed to be included in 3 carucates.


Notes:
Duplicates:12 bovates probably duplicated in 3,1.


Notes:
Waste: 3 waste vills, 3 unwasted. Geld: 1/6th carucate interpreted as location, at Herdebi, not as additional to total. Ploughlands: Land for 7 ploughs and the sixth part of 1 plough.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 6,67-68, valuation recorded in 6,68.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 6,67-68, valuation recorded here.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 6,69-70, valuation recorded here.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 6,69-70, valuation recorded in 6,69. Duplicates: 2/3 of a carucate duplicated in 6,100.


Notes:
Waste: no recorded resources; however, value 3s. Duplicates: 1 carucate possibly duplicated in 9,1.


Notes:
Mills: 1 mill-site may imply some waste.


Notes:
Population: 1 villager pays 2s 8d. Third penny: two parts of these pence are the king's, the third Henry's, Osmaston perhaps being regarded as part of the revenue of Derby.


Notes:
Waste possibly implied: no significant resources but value has increased. 2.5 bovates of jurisdiction deleted, perhaps recorded in 1,38.


Notes:
Waste possibly implied: no significant resources. Duplicates: 2/3 of a carucate duplicated in 6,70.


Notes:
Geld: increased assessment may be a scribal error due to part of Edensor remaining in the king's hands (1,32 and perhaps 1,31, totalling 2 carucates). '4 carucates taxable and as many carucates for ploughing' interpreted as ploughland data.


Notes:
Duplicates: 2 carucates possibly duplicated in 1,36.


Notes:
Other population: 1 man-at-arms, 1 smith. Duplicates: 1 carucate possibly duplicated in 6,81.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 9,4-5, valuation recorded here. Payments: 6 tributaries, 14s 4d.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 9,4-5, valuation (if any) recorded in 9,4. Duplicates: jurisdiction of 2 carucates in Breaston probably duplicated in 13,1 though additional details here on Alselin's share which is waste. Payments: 'pays 2 spurs' only.


Woodland:
2 leagues  &  1 furlong * 1 league & 0.5 furlong

Notes:
Shared statistics: 10,1-3, valuation possibly recorded here.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 10,1-3, valuation possibly recorded in 10,1.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 10,1-3, valuation (if any) possibly recorded in 10,1. Waste: no recorded resources.


Notes:
Geld: Lies in Crich but pays tax in Hamston Wapentake.


Notes:
Duplicates: 12 bovates in Barrow duplicated in 1,19 though 12.5 bovates and called an outlier there.


Notes:
Waste: no significant resources; but valued at 8s.


Notes:
Duplicates: 2 carucates of jurisdiction in Breaston probably duplicated in 9,5. Mills: 1 mill-site may imply some waste.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 14,4-5, valuation probably recorded here.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 14,4-5, valuation probably recorded in 14,4.


Notes:
Geld: disputed 1/2 carucate - included here in 3 carucates - probably taken from 13,1.


Notes:
Ploughteams: Land for 1.5 ploughs. However, there are 4 ploughs.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 16,4-5, valuation (if any) possibly recorded in 16,5. Waste possibly implied: no recorded resources.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 16,4-5, valuation possibly recorded here. Waste possibly implied: no recorded resources but worth 64d.


Notes:
Geld: 12.5 bovates of land and 8 acres of land.


Notes:
Geld: 4.5 bovates of land and 4 acres of land.


Notes:
Landowners: no tenant recorded for 1086; assumed to be in the king's hands.


Notes:
Waste: no significant resources but 5s value (perhaps an error for 5d?). No tenant recorded for 1086; assumed to be in the king's hands.


Notes:
Waste: no significant resources. Landowners: no tenant recorded for 1086 so assumed to be in the king's hands.


Notes:
Geld: 1 bovate and 4 acres of land taxable.


Notes:
Waste possibly implied: no recorded resources. Landowners: no tenant recorded for 1086; assumed to be in the king's hands.


Notes:
Waste possibly implied: no significant resources but not stated to be waste.


Notes:
Waste possibly implied: no recorded resources. No tenant recorded for 1086 so assumed to be in the king's hands.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 17,22-23, valuation possibly recorded here. Land for 2 ploughs. However, there are 4.5 ploughs.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 17,22-23, valuation possibly recorded in 17,22. Lies in Stanton, which perhaps includes its resources.


Notes:
Geld: 3.125 carucates of church land is additional to that of the borough total of 12. Ploughteams: recorded for 1066, assumed to be no longer there in 1086.


Notes:
Values: includes Litchurch (not recorded among rural holdings. Waste possibly implied: 103 messuages unoccupied.


Notes:
Geld: unclear whether 12 carucates attached to Borough (B1) include Leofric's carucate.


Notes:
Geld: unclear whether 12 carucates attached to Borough (B1) include Osmer's carucate.


Notes:
Geld: unclear whether 12 carucates attached to Borough (B1) include Godwin's carucate.


Notes:
Population: 173 burgesses and 19 villagers in 1066. Other population: 2 moneyers. Geld: 6 carucates held by 38 burgesses (included in 173?). Payments: 'works' of the burgesses, 75s 7d; moneyers, 40s.


Notes:
Duplicates: 1 carucate possibly duplicated in the 6 of B1.


Notes:
Duplicates: 6 carucates probably duplicate those in B1.


Notes:
Values: Nottingham paid £18; now it pays £30, and £10 from the mint.


Notes:
Payments: 36s. Population: 12 horsemen's houses and 8 smallholders: smallholders or only their houses?


Notes:
Churches: presumably that recorded in B4.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 1,1-8, valuation recorded here. Payments: fishery, 10s 8d. Values: before 1066 it paid £30 and 6 sesters of honey; now £20 with everything that belongs there.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 1,1-8, valuation (if any) recorded in 1,1. Waste possibly implied: no recorded resources.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 1,9-16, valuation recorded here.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 1,9-16, valuation recorded in 1,9.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 1,9-16, valuation recorded in 1,9. Geld: particulars total 1 carucate but text states total to be 7 1/2 bovates (.9375). Duplicates: 1 bovate possibly duplicated in 30,56.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 1,9-16, valuation (if any) recorded in 1,9. Waste possibly implied: no recorded resources.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 1,9-16, valuation (if any) recorded in 1,9. Waste possibly implied: no recorded resources. Duplicates: 2 carucates possibly duplicated in 1,30 (deleted).


Notes:
Duplicates: 4 bovates possibly duplicated in 1,24.


Notes:
Duplicates: 1 1/2 bovates possibly duplicated in 1,24.


Notes:
Waste possibly implied: no significant resources. Duplicates: 1/2 bovate possibly duplicated in 1,24.


Notes:
Waste possibly implied: no significant resources. Duplicates: 1 bovate possibly duplicated in 1,24.


Notes:
Waste possibly implied: no significant resources. Geld stated to total 13.8125 but total of particulars is 15. Duplicates: geld possibly duplicated in 1,17-22.


Notes:
Waste: no recorded resources. Duplicates: possibly duplicated in 1,24.


Notes:
Duplicates: 1 carucate possibly duplicated in 1,24.


Notes:
Duplicates: 2 bovates possibly duplicated in 1,24.


Notes:
Geld: Ranby deleted but not Bothamstall; total corrected to 4 by scribe. Duplicates: 2 carucates possibly duplicated in 1,14.


Notes:
Payments: Freemen paid 20s in customary dues before 1066.


Notes:
Waste possibly implied: no significant resources.


Notes:
Payments: villager holds a garden; he pays salt, for the King's fish.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 1,45-50, valuation recorded here. Values: 1066 valuation £4 and 2 sesters of honey, now £8 and 6 sesters of honey. Payments: 6 sesters of honey.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 1,45-50, valuation (if any) recorded in 1,45. Waste possibly implied: no recorded resources. Duplicates: entry possibly duplicated in 10,37.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 1,45-50, valuation (if any) recorded in 1,45. Waste possibly implied: no recorded resources.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 1,51-57, valuation recorded here. 1066 valuation £30 at face value.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 1,51-57, valuation recorded in 1,51.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 1,51-57, valuation recorded in 1,51. 1 villager ploughs there but no recorded ploughs.


Notes:
Waste: no significant resources; valued 2s.


Notes:
Duplicates: entry probably duplicated in 30,44.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 2,7-8, valuation recorded here. 1/2 church: the other half is not recorded.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 2,7-8, valuation recorded in 2,7. No recorded ploughteams. Stock and value possibly included in 2,7.


Notes:
Entries: Imperfectly divided estate, remainder recorded in 9,130. Duplicates: includes Roger's half duplicated in 9,130.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 4,3-4, valuation recorded here.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 4,3-4, valuation (if any) recorded in 4,3. Waste: no recorded resources: nothing .


Notes:
Shared statistics: 5,1-2, valuation recorded here. 11,15-16. Payments: fishpond and ferry, 6s.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 5,1-2, valuation (if any) recorded in 5,1. Waste possibly implied: no recorded resources.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 5,7-8, valuation recorded here.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 5,7-8, valuation recorded in 5,7.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 5,9-10, valuation possibly recorded in 5,10.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 5,9-10, valuation possibly recorded here.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 5,13-19, valuation recorded here.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 5,13-19, valuation recorded in 5,13.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 5,13-19, valuation (if any) recorded in 5,13. Waste possibly implied: no recorded resources.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 6,1-4, valuation recorded here. All Wapentake dues attached to Newark.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 6,1-4, valuation recorded in 6,1.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 6,13-14, valuation recorded here.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 6,13-14, valuation recorded in 6,13.


Notes:
Payments: 2 mills, 20s; 1 unoccupied may imply some waste.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 9,6-9, valuation recorded in 9,6.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 9,66-68, valuation recorded in 9,66.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 9,12-14;29, valuation recorded , valuation recorded here.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 9,12-14;29, valuation recorded , valuation recorded in 9,12.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 9,20-21;25, valuation recorded here.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 9,20-21;25, valuation (if any) recorded in 9,20. Waste possibly implied: no recorded resources.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 9,22-24;30, valuation recorded here.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 9,22-24;30, valuation (if any) recorded in 9,22. Waste possibly implied: no recorded resources.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 9,22-24;30, valuation (if any) recorded in 9,22. Waste: no recorded resources.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 9,20-21;25, valuation (if any) recorded in 9,20. Waste: no recorded resources.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 9,26-27, valuation recorded here.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 9,26-27, valuation recorded in 9,26.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 9,22-24;30, valuation recorded in 9,22.


Notes:
Waste: no significant resources other than mills; 1066 valuation only.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 9,37-38, valuation recorded here.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 9,37-38, valuation recorded in 9,37.


Notes:
Mills: 1/2 mill-site may imply some waste.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 9,41-42, valuation recorded here. Waste: part of 2 bovates which Fulco holds is waste; in the other part Ulfkil has 1 plough.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 9,41-42, valuation (if any) recorded in 9,41. Waste possibly implied: no recorded resources.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 9,46-49, valuation recorded here.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 9,46-49, valuation (if any) recorded in 9,46. Waste possibly implied: no recorded resources.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 9,46-49, valuation recorded in 9,46.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 9,55-56, valuation recorded here.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 9,55-56, valuation recorded in 9,55.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 9,57-58, valuation recorded here.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 9,57-58, valuation (if any) recorded in 9,57. Waste possibly implied: no recorded resources.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 9,62-63, valuation recorded here.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 9,62-63, valuation (if any) recorded in 9,62. Waste possibly implied: no recorded resources.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 9,66-68, valuation recorded here.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 9,70-71, valuation recorded here.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 9,70-71, valuation recorded in 9,70.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 9,74-75, valuation recorded here. Payments: tolls and a ship which pay 30s 8d; 2 fisheries, 25s; Exactions, 30s.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 9,74-75, valuation recorded in 9,74.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 9,80-81, valuation recorded here.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 9,80-81, valuation recorded in 9,80.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 9,82-83;85-87, valuation recorded here.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 9,82-83;85-87, valuation recorded in 9,82.


Notes:
Waste: 1 carucate of this land is waste.


Notes:
Geld: unclear whether 3 bovates in Newton are additional.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 9,98-99, valuation recorded here.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 9,98-99, valuation recorded in 9,98.


Notes:
Waste: the land is not cultivated; no ploughs or population recorded.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 9,102;109, valuation recorded here.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 9,102;109, valuation recorded in 9,102.


Notes:
Waste: except for 1 smallholder; no 1086 valuation.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 9,116-117, valuation recorded here. Payments: fishery, 200 eels.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 9,116-117, valuation recorded in 9,166.


Notes:
Population: none recorded but value has increased.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 9,122-124, valuation recorded here. Payments: 1000 eels.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 9,122-124, valuation recorded in 9,122.


Notes:
Churches: 1/4 church; half a church at Leverton, nearby.


Woodland:
3 furlongs & 10 perches * 3 furlongs & 10 perches


Notes:
Entries: Imperfectly divided estate (with 2,10). Duplicates: duplicated in 2,10. 1/2 church (perhaps Count Alan's half omitted in 2,10?, though a 1/4 church at Bole, nearby).


Notes:
Shared statistics: 9,131-132, valuation recorded here.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 9,131-132, valuation recorded in 9,131.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 10,5-14, valuation recorded here.


Notes:
Duplicates: entry duplicated in 30,25 (deleted there by scribe).


Notes:
Shared statistics: 10,5-14, valuation recorded in 10,5.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 15,9-10, valuation (if any) recorded in 15,9. Waste possibly implied: no recorded resources. Duplicates: 6 bovates probably duplicated in 10,56.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 10,18-19, valuation recorded here.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 10,18-19, valuation recorded in 10,18.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 10,20-21, valuation recorded here.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 10,20-21, valuation (if any) recorded in 10,20. Waste possibly implied: no recorded resources.


Notes:
Duplicates: entry (deleted by scribe) duplicated in 10,52 and 30,28.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 10-,25-26, valuation recorded here. 1/2 church; neighbouring Chilwell has two halves.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 10-,25-26, valuation (if any) recorded 10,25. Waste possibly implied: no recorded resources. Geld: corrected from 5 to 8 bovates. Duplicates: entry possibly duplicated in 13,5.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 10,35-38, valuation recorded here.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 10,35-38, valuation recorded in 10,35.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 10,35-38, valuation (if any) recorded in 10,35. Waste possibly implied: no recorded resources. Duplicates: entry possibly duplicated in 1,46.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 10,35-38, valuation (if any) recorded in 10,35. Waste possibly implied: no recorded resources. Duplicates: possibly duplicated in 30,55.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 10,40-42, valuation recorded here.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 10,40-42, valuation recorded in 10,40.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 10,40-42, valuation (if any) recorded in 10,40. Waste possibly implied: no significant resources.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 10,43-46, valuation (if any) recorded in 10,46. Waste possibly implied: no recorded resources.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 10,43-46, valuation recorded in 10,46.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 10,43-46, valuation recorded here.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 10,50;66, valuation recorded in 10,66.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 10,51-52, valuation possibly recorded here.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 10,51-52, valuation (if any) possibly recorded 10,51. Waste possibly implied: no recorded resources. Duplicates: entry duplicated in 10,23 and 30,28.


Notes:
Payments: the site of half a fishery and the third part of 1 fishery.


Notes:
Duplicates: 6 bovates probably duplicated in 10,12.


Notes:
Ploughteams: Fredegis holds it assumed to refer to the holding, not a demesne ploughteam.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 10,59-60, valuation recorded here.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 10,59-60, valuation recorded in 10,59.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 10,50;66, valuation recorded here.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 11,2-3, valuation recorded here.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 11,2-3, valuation recorded in 11,2.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 11,4-5, valuation recorded here.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 11,4-5, valuation recorded in 11,4.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 11,6-7, valuation recorded here.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 11,6-7, valuation recorded in 11,6.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 11,12-13, valuation recorded here.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 11,12-13, valuation (if any) recorded in 11,12. Waste possibly implied: no recorded resources.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 5,1-2. 11,15-16, valuation recorded in 5,1.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 11,18-19, valuation recorded here.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 11,18-19, valuation recorded in 18,18.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 11,20-21, valuation recorded here.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 11,20-21, valuation (if any) recorded in 11,20. Waste possibly implied: no recorded resources.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 11,22-23, valuation recorded here.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 11,22-23, valuation recorded in 11,22.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 11,26-32, valuation recorded in 11,28.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 11,26-32, valuation recorded here. The other half of the church is unaccounted for.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 12,1-10, valuation recorded here.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 12,1-10, valuation recorded in 12,1.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 12,1-10, valuation (if any) recorded in 12,1. Waste: no recorded resources.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 12,12-14, valuation recorded here.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 12,12-14, valuation (if any) recorded in 12,12. Waste: no recorded resources.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 12,12-14, valuation (if any) recorded 12,12. Waste: no recorded resources; 2 Freemen who have nothing.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 12,16-17, valuation recorded here.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 12,16-17, valuation recorded in 12,16.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 12,19-20, valuation recorded here.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 12,19-20, valuation recorded 12,19.


Notes:
Waste: no recorded resources; nothing is recorded.


Notes:
Churches: 1/2 church; the other half in 13,1.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 13,2-5, valuation recorded here.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 13,2-5, valuation (if any) recorded in 13,2. Waste possibly implied: no recorded resources.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 13,2-5, valuation recorded in 13,2. 1/2 church, the other half in 13,4. Willow beds, 4 acres.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 13,2-5, valuation (if any) recorded in 13,2. Waste possibly implied: no recorded resources. Duplicates: entry possibly duplicated in 10,26.


Notes:
Waste possibly implied: no recorded resources but has value.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 14,1-4, valuation recorded here.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 14,1-4, valuation (if any) recorded in 14,1. Waste possibly implied: no recorded resources.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 14,1-4, valuation recorded in 14,1.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 14,7-8, valuation recorded in 14,8.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 14,7-8, valuation recorded here. Ploughlands: manuscript unclear but probably 3 rather than 4.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 15,1-2, valuation recorded here.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 15,1-2, valuation recorded in 15,1.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 15,9-10, valuation recorded here.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 16,9-10, valuation recorded here. Waste: no recorded resources but valued at £1.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 16,9-10, valuation (if any) recorded in 16,9. Waste possibly implied: no recorded resources.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 17,4-6, valuation recorded here.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 17,4-6, valuation recorded in 17,4.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 17,4-6, valuation (if any) recorded in 17,4. Waste: no recorded resources.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 17,9-11, valuation recorded here.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 17,9-11, valuation recorded in 17,9.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 17,16-18, valuation recorded here. Payments: millstone quarry where millstones are dug, at 3 silver marks.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 17,16-18, valuation recorded in 17,16.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 18,1-2, valuation recorded here.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 18,1-2, valuation recorded in 18,1.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 20,1-2, valuation recorded here.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 20,1-2, valuation recorded in 20,1.


Notes:
Duplicates: entry probably duplicated in 30,37


Notes:
Waste possibly implied: no recorded resources. 'The land lies with Newark but the villagers' work belongs to Saxilby' (LIN).


Notes:
Shared statistics: 25,1-2, valuation recorded here.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 25,1-2, valuation (if any) recorded in 25,1. Waste possibly implied: no recorded resources.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 27,1-3, valuation recorded here. Granby and dependencies, possibly Colston, misnamed.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 27,1-3, valuation recorded in 27,1. Granby and dependencies; Jurisdiction of Colston [Bassett], perhaps previous entry misnamed.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 27,1-3, valuation (if any) recorded in 27,1. Granby and dependencies; Jurisdiction of Colston [Bassett], perhaps previous entry misnamed. Waste.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 28,1-2, valuation (if any) recorded here; but 1066 valuation only. 1 mill-site may imply some waste.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 28,1-2, valuation recorded in 28,1; but 1066 valuation only.


Notes:
Geld: Freeman's bovate assumed to be included in manorial total.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 30,20-21, valuation recorded here. Geld: ambiguous formulae assumed to mean fourth part of a bovate.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 30,20-21, valuation recorded in 30,20.


Notes:
Duplicates: entry duplicated in 10,6 (but marked there for deletion).


Notes:
Waste possibly implied: no recorded resources. Duplicates: Duplicates: entry duplicated in 10,23 and 10,52.


Notes:
Waste possibly implied: no recorded resources but modest value.


Notes:
Waste possibly implied: no recorded resources other than 5 smallholders.


Notes:
Duplicates: entry probably duplicated in 20,6


Notes:
Duplicates: entry probably duplicated in 1,65.


Notes:
Geld: 1 bovate lies there: assumed to be an additional bovate.


Notes:
Waste possibly implied: no recorded resources. Duplicates: entry probably duplicated in 1,25.


Notes:
Waste possibly implied: no recorded resources. Duplicates: possibly duplicated in 10,38.


Notes:
Waste possibly implied: no recorded resources. Duplicates: 1 bovate possibly duplicated in 1,12.


Notes:
Geld: in ALSTOE Wapentake there are 2 Hundreds; in each 12 carucates taxable, and in each 24 ploughs possible.


Notes:
Geld:' in `MARTINSLEY' Wapentake there is one Hundred, in which [are] 12 carucates of land taxable, and 48 ploughs possible, apart from the King's three lordship manors, in which 14 ploughs can plough'.


Notes:
Geld: these two Wapentakes are attached to the sheriffdom of Nottingham for the King's tax.


Notes:
Duplicates: entry duplicated in LIN 56,2;11.


Notes:
Duplicates: entry duplicated in LIN 56,12.


Notes:
Duplicates: entry duplicated in LIN 27,48.


Notes:
Duplicates: entry duplicated in LIN 56,13.


Notes:
Duplicates: entry duplicated in LIN 56,17.


Woodland:
6 furlongs 6 perches * 3 furlongs 13 perches

Notes:
Duplicates: entry duplicated in LIN 56,18. Values: 1066 valuation has been corrected from 20s in Phillimore to 40s where scribe has overwritten xx with xl in manuscript.


Notes:
Duplicates: entry duplicated in LIN 24,80.


Notes:
Duplicates: entry duplicated in LIN 13,38.


Notes:
Entries: gap in manuscript of uncertain purpose.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 3 churches of 1,20 detailed here: Church of Oakham, Hambleton and St Peter's of Stamford. Ploughteams: '8 ploughs possible; however 16 ploughs plough there.' The 16 have been interpreted as additional, following Darby.


Notes:
Waste: the king's pool destroyed 2 new mills, 1 carucate of arable, meadows and gardens. Geld: 6 carucates assumed to belong to archbishop at both dates.


Notes:
Waste: no recorded resources. Duplicates: 3 carucates duplicated in 6W4.


Notes:
Duplicates: 3 carucates duplicated in 24N36.


Notes:
Duplicates: 9 1/2 carucates duplicated in 6W6. Ploughlands: the Count's 5 ploughlands assumed to be included in total of 9, (duplicated in any case). Waste: Canons holding is waste and without resources.


Notes:
Waste: no significant resources. Values: undated; assumed to be 1066. Ploughlands: for whole manor. Duplicates: 1 carucate duplicated in 1W1.


Notes:
Shared statistics: C32-33 and 6W2. Duplicates: entry (together with C33) duplicated in 6W2.


Notes:
Shared statistics: C32-33 and 6W2. Duplicates: entry (together with C33) duplicated in 6W2. Geld: total and particulars disagree. Waste: Canons' holding is waste and without resources. Values: undated; assumed to be 1066.


Notes:
Waste: no recorded resources. Values: undated; assumed to be 1066.


Notes:
Waste: no significant resource; 'only 2 villagers and 4 smallholders' with 1.5 ploughs on land for 20 ploughs.


Notes:
Waste: no significant resources or valuation but 116 Freemen, 66 villagers and 35 ploughs before 1066. Geld: the Summary gives 42 and 75 carucates respectively.


Notes:
Waste: no significant resource; there were 108 Freemen with 46 ploughs in jurisdictions; now 7 Freemen, 15 villagers and 14 smallholders with 7.5 ploughs; the rest waste. Geld: breakdown from the Summary.


Notes:
Waste: no significant resources only 10 villagers with 2 ploughs; the rest waste.


Notes:
Waste possibly implied: no significant resources for jurisdictions. Duplicates: 4 1/2 carucates duplicated in 11E7.


Notes:
Waste: jurisdictions have no significant resources. Geld: for Warter from the Summary.


Notes:
Waste: no recorded resources. Geld: total and particulars (-1 c.) disagree.


Notes:
Waste: no recorded resources; there were 8 mills and 2 churches, assumed to be no longer there.


Notes:
Waste possibly implied: no significant resources for Kilnwick. Geld: total and particulars (-0.25 c.) disagree. Payments: tributaries, 30s.


Notes:
Waste: no significant resources except for 4 burgesses and 3 villagers and a Freeman with 1.5 ploughs.


Notes:
Waste: no significant resources except for 1 tributary paying 10s. Geld: breakdown for manor and outliers from the Summary.


Notes:
Duplicates: 2 carucates duplicated in 1W26. Geld: total and particulars (+0.375 c.) disagree. Waste: jurisdictions have a population of 15 with 6 ploughs on land for 20 ploughs.


Notes:
Geld: breakdown for manor and outliers from the Summary. Waste: jurisdictions have no significant resources.


Notes:
Waste: no significant resources though it pays £1. Geld: total and particulars (-2.875 c.) disagree. Farley omits 1 bovate.


Notes:
Waste possibly implied: no recorded resources. Marginal M only regularly recorded from here.


Notes:
Waste possibly implied: no recorded resources. Geld: 2 carucates within this boundary.


Notes:
Waste possibly implied: no recorded resources. Values: undated; assumed to be 1066.


Notes:
Waste possibly implied: no significant resources. Farley has 4.5 carucates.


Notes:
Geld: breakdown from the Summary. Waste possibly implied: no significant resources.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 1N55-56, valuation for 1066 (if any) possibly included with 1N56. Waste possibly implied: no recorded resources.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 1N55-56, valuation (undated) assumed to be 1066; possibly includes 1N55. Waste possibly implied: no significant resources.


Notes:
Waste possibly implied: no recorded resources. Values: undated; assumed to be 1066. Farley has 3s.


Notes:
Waste possibly implied: no significant resources. Values: undated; assumed to be 1066.


Notes:
Values: 8s could refer to this or next entry; assigned to this holding with resources.


Notes:
Waste possibly implied: no recorded resources. Values: 8s assigned to previous holding with resources.


Notes:
Waste possibly implied: no recorded resources. Duplicates: entry probably duplicated in 29N11.


Notes:
Geld: in the same manor as 1N106, but rubricated M. Duplicates: entry duplicated in 28W34.


Notes:
Waste possibly implied: no recorded resources. Duplicates: 6 carucates duplicated in 28W35.


Notes:
Waste possibly implied: no recorded resources. Values: undated; assumed to be 1066. Marginal inquire.


Notes:
Waste possibly implied: no recorded resources. Values: undated; assumed to be 1066. Geld: 6 bovates marked for deletion by Farley in error.


Notes:
Waste possibly implied: no recorded resources. Values: undated; assumed to be 1066. Geld: breakdown from the Summary.


Notes:
Waste possibly implied: no recorded resources. Values: undated; assumed to be 1066. Farley has 4.25 carucates.


Notes:
Waste possibly implied: no recorded resources. Values: undated; assumed to be 1066. Landowners: Ketilbert deleted by the scribe.


Notes:
Waste possibly implied: no recorded resources. Values: undated; assumed to be 1066. Duplicates: 1 carucate duplicated in C31.


Notes:
Waste possibly implied: no recorded resources. Values: undated; assumed to be 1066. Duplicates: entry duplicated in 9W71.


Notes:
Waste possibly implied: no recorded resources. Values: undated; assumed to be 1066. Duplicates: entry duplicated in 9W73.


Notes:
Waste possibly implied: no recorded resources. Duplicates: 2 carucates duplicated in 1Y15.


Notes:
Waste possibly implied: no significant resources but valued at 5s.


Notes:
Waste possibly implied: no recorded resources. Values: undated; assumed to be 1066. Marginal inquire. Duplicates: 3 carucates duplicated in 28W19.


Notes:
Waste possibly implied: no significant resources. Values: 1066 valuation unreadable. Marginal inquire.


Notes:
Waste possibly implied: no recorded resources. Values: undated; assumed to be 1066. Marginal inquire. Duplicates: 6 carucates duplicated in 28W22.


Notes:
Waste possibly implied: no recorded resources. Geld: defect in manuscript; some bovates missing.


Notes:
Waste: no recorded resources; 16 vills inhabited by a few people, number unknown; the rest waste. Farley has 3 carucates for Barton.


Notes:
Waste possibly implied: no recorded resources. Geld: Farley has 3 carucates for Cantsfield.


Notes:
Values: blank in manuscript for 1066 valuation.


Notes:
Values: include the whole of what he has in the city.


Notes:
Waste: no significant resources except for 1 tributary who pays 10s 8d.


Notes:
Geld: breakdown from the Summary where particulars (+ 0.5 c.) disagree with total.


Notes:
Geld: breakdown from the Summary where particulars (+ 2.5 c.) disagree with total. Waste: jurisdictions have no significant resources.


Notes:
Waste: no significant resources except for 1 man-at-arms, 2 Freemen, 3 smallholders and 1 plough.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 2N7-14, valuation for 1066 possibly recorded in 2N14. Waste: no recorded resources except for 4 villagers with 2 ploughs.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 2N7-14, valuation for 1066 recorded here. Geld: particulars of 2N7-14 match stated total (2N14). Waste: no significant resources except for 4 villagers with 2 ploughs (2N7-14); meadow and woodland recorded for Ampleforth and Baxby.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 2N15-19, valuation possibly recorded in 2N19. Waste: no recorded resources except for 8 villagers with 5 ploughs; the rest waste (2N15?-19).


Notes:
Shared statistics: 2N15-19, valuation possibly recorded in 2N19. Waste: no recorded resources except for 8 villagers with 5 ploughs; the rest waste 2N15?-19).


Notes:
Shared statistics: 2N15-19, valuation possibly recorded here. Waste: no significant resources except for 8 villagers with 5 ploughs; the rest waste (2N15?-19). Geld: particulars of 2N15-19 or 2N16-19 (confirmed by the Summary) do not match total.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 2N23-24, valuation recorded in 2N24.


Notes:
Shared statistics: 2N23-24, valuation recorded here. Waste: no recorded resources.


Notes:
Waste: no significant resources except for man paying 6s and some woodland pasture. Geld: breakdown of jurisdictions from the Summary.


